Search the Community

Any new leaks? Ideas? Anything? Man, these fellas are making it so damn hard for us.

There is no need to start a fanboy war. Any leak is a good leak, provided they're from a reliable source and not some 15 year old fat ass who spends his day pulling it to Rebecca Black and making up fake GTA V leaks. I dont wanna start a War. Its my opinion. Like the guy said at gamekult. Sony is showing more for the NGP this year, could be a little bit boring. Maybe at Microsoft, GTA5 gets an announcement. I cant freaking wait for E3 2011 haha and will MS not do what they did in 2010 and just show off kinect? MS will be showing of causal games, SONY will be doing something different to that. I believe that AGENT will come out before GTAV though. Also it depends, if R* started development right after gta iv( for GTA V) then it could come out before or in 2011.

Like I said hundreds of times, it will most likely be announced at E3 2012 for a late 2012 release (Oct or Xmas) My reasons to think this are because this is going to be A HUGE project and it'll be impossible to keep leaks from this, especially with such a large fanbase they'll NEVER be able to keep this quiet so I believe the project is in it's early stages such as storyline and etc. Just my opinions.

Hmmm interesting, supposed leaked details of Sony's plans at E3 2011. http://www.hookedgamers.com/blogs/chrispri...011_lineup.html "2 PS3 exclusives won't be presented at E3 but will be available before the end of the year in Europe" "A Rockstar game, probably GTA V, could be released before Agent was planned to be" More speculation, without any facts but still pretty interesting...

Nah, I'm just a troll. Damn you. If you really believe he was faked the leaked file, then yes, he trolled you.

The attention was given to him because of the 'leaks' and the mods deleting his posts and regular people's posts. I think it was quite elaborate for a hoax and it was not just for 'people like me' when he sent threatening tweets and such to R* - fake or not he sent them and I'm sure they looked into it.

If you're a troll and you admit all the information is fake, why pretend to contribute by linking to that fan video? (which coincidently is the same idea as your 'leak') and have an avatar that shows a city which you originally told us would be the next location of GTA?

Oke, so the Rockstarleaks guy's topic just got deleted... I refreshed the page and poof, it wasn't there anymore.. Could someone of the mods or a admin please give us a explanation about this crap? and with this crap i mean: Rockstarleaks: -what do you guys know about him? -Why do you guys keep deleting his posts? -maybe even a opinion about his actions? -and if you know, was it real or fake? The numbers beneath the leak topic: -what the hell does it mean? -and generally, what the f*ck is going on? please, enlighten us... or just me..

The leak topic description changed to a series of numbers earlier, similar to what RockstarLeaks was posting. I'm sure only mods/admins can edit that though. It translated to: NOT_OVER Then the numbers changed again to what they are now and they translate to: [PART_1]36*2= Where is the blue all over again?

The leak topic description changed to a series of numbers earlier, similar to what RockstarLeaks was posting. I'm sure only mods/admins can edit that though. It translated to: NOT_OVER Then the numbers changed again to what they are now and they translate to: [PART_1]36*2=

There is no need to start a fanboy war. Any leak is a good leak, provided they're from a reliable source and not some 15 year old fat ass who spends his day pulling it to Rebecca Black and making up fake GTA V leaks. I dont wanna start a War. Its my opinion. Like the guy said at gamekult. Sony is showing more for the NGP this year, could be a little bit boring. Maybe at Microsoft, GTA5 gets an announcement. I cant freaking wait for E3 2011

the numbers under the leak topic description done changed again!!!

There is no need to start a fanboy war. Any leak is a good leak, provided they're from a reliable source and not some 15 year old fat ass who spends his day pulling it to Rebecca Black and making up fake GTA V leaks.

lol the original poster is at Gamekult and his name there is: "O_O_O" And he is maybe working for Sony. So but i dont care about Sony I want some Microsoft Leaks

Is it only Mods that can edit topics? Weird numbers under the Leak Topic

Leaked documents and the PinkSwan Photo are pretty much the only things we've been discussing for the past 20 pages. How has it gone off-topic at all besides your post and this post answering your post?

Someone should make a new leak topic. This topic has gone so off topic, its now a wishlist. I fing myself trawling through them as I try to find some actual relevant news .

So PinkSwan guy wants us to believe its in San Andreas. Leak and Grope guy want us to believe its in Vice City.

If the documents were fake explain: A) Why this site would take them down when every other fake leak stays up. B) Why Mediafile and File Factory would say it violated their Use of Terms if it were documents available to the public already or completely faked? C) Why he would spend weeks, even months on a hoax, only to apologize 24 hours later and say they were fake. D) Why he would create MP3 documents and not GTAV to hoax us.

You've already been informed of the "truth"..... But hey incase you want to sound n feel better, there is only an official statement of development being in progress, not an official announcement of information regarding said information... Funnily enough the real world doesn't live by official announcements, didn't you know? Or should we pretend every gaming franchise doesn't exist until a press release says so... Flawed logic = Epic fail = Enjoy your flames. As for city & scipt chat... Wouldn't it be right in thinking any story can be adapted to any location? After all, scripts being rewritten & vocals being later in the dev cycle is what happens. Back on topic... No GTA V ever = Severe devastating reasons as to why that would be or most likely it's daft to consider that as a possibility. Actually I have never seen anything being released without an announcement of it coming before it. And 'a script of 1000 pages' do not mean anything, first of all reporters love to change words said so they sound mroe interresting, second is that Dan Houser never said what game, only a script of 1000 pages, third of all, and what is even more interresting, is that people arent even allowed to leak such information befor ethe official announcement. I find it funny that people are firm that a new GTA is coming without any proof of doing so. Have you read any announcement, seen any screens or whatsoever? I havent, you might have in your imagination. Dont get me wrong, I would love to see a new GTA, but until it is officially announced it isnt coming, simple as that. Or are there coming out new games tomorrow, new cars tomorrow and other stuff that has never been announced? I dont think so. There isnt any proof of a new GTA being in development, that is just the blurred view of 99% of the forum members. That the previous GTA's where a succes doesnt mean anything, that doenst mean they just continue it. The franchise has been under fire regularely and GTA 4 was plagued, and is still plagued by alot of problems putting alot of fire under their feet. They cannot risk a fallow up like Vice City, no they have to add alot more stuff, stuff anyone missed in IV, and is that doable? I doubt so as IV was barely doable. You are looking at a new game, a game that needs the functions of SA and the graphics of IV, IV ran as sh*t on most pc's, so an SA with IV graphics wouldnt even be possible, and then i havent even talked about the disk problem. So unless anyone can come with real proof of the franchise continuing I stand my point. Dude Your On A GTAV Forum. Enuff Said. LMAO! And You R* Is Owned by TAKE 2. Do You Really Think TAKE 2 Will Not Let Their Be Another GTA? If You Do. Urself

oh yeah?? well why dont you make something better!!! I'm playing yeah pink swan could be real but at this point i dont believe anything they keep f'ing with us we start thinking its vice city then noooo now we start thinking its san andreas. I bet rockstar doing this on purpose but im not belive anything anymore If pinkswan is real you would have to wonder why rockstar games choose to leak info this way..why not do it officially? cause they want to see u kill for info

oh yeah?? well why dont you make something better!!! I'm playing yeah pink swan could be real but at this point i dont believe anything they keep f'ing with us we start thinking its vice city then noooo now we start thinking its san andreas. I bet rockstar doing this on purpose but im not belive anything anymore If pinkswan is real you would have to wonder why rockstar games choose to leak info this way..why not do it officially?

oh yeah?? well why dont you make something better!!! I'm playing yeah pink swan could be real but at this point i dont believe anything they keep f'ing with us we start thinking its vice city then noooo now we start thinking its san andreas. I bet rockstar doing this on purpose but im not belive anything anymore nothins really pointed at vice city tho. most of the leaks lead towards san andreas cept for the rstarleaks dood which was pretty fake

Looks like something we'd find in Las Venturas... Maybe the very first GTA Next image??? But I highly doubt it... That's from SA isnt it Doesn't look SA graphics to me...It's either real or IV era... It aint in SA, thats for sure. This PinkSwanLV person either has no life making GTA photoshoped pictures or they actually work for R* (ie leaking). I'm watching closely...

He was probably either paid off or got threaten with Legal action. Have you not been reading this thread? Have you not understanded. He leaked documents of the next gta game on the web, and you think he comes off with just a threat to take legal action? Anyone with a bit of knowledge(or anyone who is not that GTA horny and can actually still think normal when on the forums) can understand that if these where real he wouldnt have come off with just a threat to sue him, this is sensitive bussiness information, and stealing such information or even having property of this outside R* knowledge or approval is prohibited. And there is another simple thing you have forgot, why the hell wouldnt r* sue him for it? He actually broke the law in multiple ways, and apart from that made a lot of work useless they executed. Overall that would be a few milion dollars of damage. Excuse me but only a retard would no-life for this. And grope you dont need to trust only we do?