Quantcast

Jump to content

» «
Photo

best specs to run gta 5 smoothly at high setting?

10 replies to this topic
Jack Lupino
  • Jack Lupino

    Meth Enthusiast

  • Victim of The Pit™
  • Joined: 16 Dec 2017
  • None

#1

Posted 31 December 2017 - 06:07 AM

Hi friends I am building my gaming pc within next few months to play GTA 5.I wanted to know that what is the spec required to run this game at ultra high graphics without lagging.
And please tell me if the following specs are enough to run this game:

CPU - Intel Pentium G4560
Motherboard - GIGABYTE GA-B250M-D2V
RAM - 8GB DDR4 2400MHz RAM
PSU - Antec VP550P
HDD - WD Blue 1TB
GPU - Zotac GTX 1050Ti Mini 4GB
My total budget is INR 35000 (around 550$)

yojc
  • yojc

    2A03

  • Members
  • Joined: 06 Dec 2008
  • Poland
  • Best Poster [Tech] 2014
    Most Knowledgeable [Tech] 2013
    Helpfulness Award

#2

Posted 31 December 2017 - 07:00 AM

You might experience some stuttering due to a dual core CPU. A quad core would be preferable. Other than that you should be fine.
  • Jack Lupino likes this

Andreaz1
  • Andreaz1

    ♪ ♫

  • Members
  • Joined: 26 Dec 2010
  • Sweden
  • Helpfulness Award
    Draw Contest Winner 2016

#3

Posted 31 December 2017 - 10:36 AM

I also don't trust a 1050 Ti to deliver absolutely smooth gameplay if you max out the game. It only manages ~50fps and that's with a much better CPU.

yojc
  • yojc

    2A03

  • Members
  • Joined: 06 Dec 2008
  • Poland
  • Best Poster [Tech] 2014
    Most Knowledgeable [Tech] 2013
    Helpfulness Award

#4

Posted 31 December 2017 - 11:39 AM

It probably won't be enough for the ultra settings, but the question was if it was "enough to run the game", and the answer is yes. Even on my GTX660 2GB the performance was satisfactory (@ 2560x1080 on medium details).

Jimmy
  • Jimmy

  • Best Jimmys
  • Joined: 26 Oct 2016
  • India
  • Best Newsletter 2017 [GTAF Weekly]
    Best Poster in Movies / TV 2017
    Best Jimmy
    Contribution Award [GTAF Weekly]
    Helpfulness Award [WD&P Mega Topic]

#5

Posted 31 December 2017 - 11:52 AM Edited by Arrow, 31 December 2017 - 11:53 AM.

I've a 1050Ti Mini 4GB variant and it's not enough to run the game at max settings. I would also suggest getting a Quad Core CPU as G4560 being a dual core won't be efficient. It's good enough for getting somewhat 35 to 40FPS though.

Andreaz1
  • Andreaz1

    ♪ ♫

  • Members
  • Joined: 26 Dec 2010
  • Sweden
  • Helpfulness Award
    Draw Contest Winner 2016

#6

Posted 31 December 2017 - 12:53 PM

It probably won't be enough for the ultra settings, but the question was if it was "enough to run the game", and the answer is yes. Even on my GTX660 2GB the performance was satisfactory (@ 2560x1080 on medium details).

No, the question was regarding "ultra high graphics".

You can run the game at 2560x1080 with a 2GB 660? I wanna make sure you haven't made a typo somewhere as that sounds too good to be true.
  • HalfOfAKebab likes this

sivispacem
  • sivispacem

    Ännu en dag, ännu ett slag, i betongens krävande skugga

  • Moderator
  • Joined: 14 Feb 2011
  • European-Union
  • Best Poster in Debates 2017
    Contribution Award [D&D, General Chat]
    Most Knowledgeable [Vehicles] 2013
    Best Debater 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011

#7

Posted 31 December 2017 - 04:54 PM

It probably won't be enough for the ultra settings, but the question was if it was "enough to run the game", and the answer is yes. Even on my GTX660 2GB the performance was satisfactory (@ 2560x1080 on medium details).

No, the question was regarding "ultra high graphics".

You can run the game at 2560x1080 with a 2GB 660? I wanna make sure you haven't made a typo somewhere as that sounds too good to be true.

I suspect his idea of "satisfactory" might differ from that of other people, but it's such a subjective term.
Capped, stutter-free 30fps at 2560x1080 medium settings and no AA might well be achievable on a GTX660 and some people would doubtless see that as satisfactory. I don't think I'd be one of them though.

yojc
  • yojc

    2A03

  • Members
  • Joined: 06 Dec 2008
  • Poland
  • Best Poster [Tech] 2014
    Most Knowledgeable [Tech] 2013
    Helpfulness Award

#8

Posted 02 January 2018 - 04:21 AM Edited by yojc, 02 January 2018 - 04:23 AM.

Yeah, haven't played this game in a while, but the FPS varied in the 30-60 range on medium settings with AA off, IIRC (at least in singleplayer, I haven't played GTA:O). I don't mind that, honestly it's much better than I expected, GTA4 ran far worse and looked far worse.

Dealux
  • Dealux

    Goddess Of Light

  • $outh $ide Hoodz
  • Joined: 26 Nov 2011
  • European-Union

#9

Posted 02 January 2018 - 01:53 PM

GTA IV PC port is a steaming pile of crap. I think they might have f*cked it up even more with the impromptu patch they made last year.

HaRdSTyLe_83
  • HaRdSTyLe_83

    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • Members
  • Joined: 06 Mar 2014
  • None

#10

Posted 02 January 2018 - 02:21 PM Edited by HaRdSTyLe_83, 02 January 2018 - 02:22 PM.

OP didn't specified the resolution nor the FPS that he wants to run the game at, and while he did say Ultra in the first post, on the title he only mentioned High settings. since he comes from consoles it can be a bit confusing thinking about settings.

i wouldn't go with a dual core or a 2GB GPU in these days, but with that budget i guess it's kind of hard to do any better anyway


jpm1
  • jpm1

    Vice city citizen

  • Members
  • Joined: 26 Sep 2005
  • European-Union

#11

Posted 12 January 2018 - 02:10 PM

from personal experience i know that in GTAV CPU is at least as important as GPU. if you have medium CPU and GPU, and you're asking yourself which one you should go for. i'd definitely say CPU





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users