Quantcast

Jump to content

» «
Photo

What Cities Do You Dislike The Most In The Series?

106 replies to this topic
jaljax
  • jaljax

    Vice Squad

  • Members
  • Joined: 16 Aug 2016
  • Canada

#1

Posted 3 weeks ago

What cities/states do you dislike the most in the whole series? 

 

I dislike San Andreas (Gta 5) simply because i find that it's just a boring map and it seems small & to be honest i liked the San Andreas map from Gta San Andreas because it felt like it was a lot bigger & better.

 

Post your opinions on any cities/states you dislike , i'm interested in your opinions.

 

 

  • Jeansowaty and Stoopid Stuff like this

Queen Elizabeth II
  • Queen Elizabeth II

    ______________________

  • Members
  • Joined: 11 Jul 2014
  • Poland

#2

Posted 3 weeks ago Edited by Queen Elizabeth II, 3 weeks ago.

Worst city in the series (IMO):

Vice City (Terrible layout and it is very ugly).

 

2646.jpg

 

Meh!

  • B Dawg, universetwisters, Tao Cheng and 2 others like this

Jeansowaty
  • Jeansowaty

    Gognitti bailed. I made like Chow Yun-Fat...

  • Members
  • Joined: 31 Mar 2013
  • Poland

#3

Posted 3 weeks ago

Los Santos, mostly in GTA5, the SA version is quite OK. Terribly overrated and well I ain't a fan of Los Angeles in real life either. Vice City is also pretty bad but at least it had its charm.

  • B Dawg, SilentSeas, The American Army 1775 and 1 other like this

Achlys
  • Achlys

    I Can Tell You're Curious, It's Written On Your Lips

  • Members
  • Joined: 22 Jul 2014
  • Mexico

#4

Posted 3 weeks ago

I think San Fierro is kinda forgettable, there's nothing that would make you want to go back. At least Las Venturas has casinos.
  • EarthGaia, LincolnClay and jaljax like this

Jabalous
  • Jabalous

    Villager

  • Members
  • Joined: 19 Nov 2007
  • None

#5

Posted 3 weeks ago

GTA V's Los Santos. I always say that the obnoxious writing is a main reason why I dislike this city the most. 

  • Jeansowaty, Payne Killer, Stoopid Stuff and 2 others like this

Queen Elizabeth II
  • Queen Elizabeth II

    ______________________

  • Members
  • Joined: 11 Jul 2014
  • Poland

#6

Posted 3 weeks ago

Los Santos (GTA SA / GTA V) is overall pretty bad. I don't like to walk around them and I don't feel any immersion to them. Same goes with Vice City. I don't know why but Liberty City and San Fierro (Las Venturas too) are much better in my opinion.

  • Jeansowaty and jaljax like this

will.
  • will.

    Dance hall days love!

  • Members
  • Joined: 21 Feb 2005
  • Canada

#7

Posted 3 weeks ago Edited by will., 2 weeks ago.

I have to say the whole of V's setting (Los Santos and the rest of San An to the north) doesn't really do it for me. While I like Los Santos in the original, I just... don't like it in V, and I agree with Jabalous about the writing being one of the reasons. And I don't like Blaine County at all.

  • jaljax likes this

Tao Cheng
  • Tao Cheng

    Man I'm fuuuucked up!

  • Members
  • Joined: 13 May 2014
  • China

#8

Posted 3 weeks ago

GTAV. I go to Los Angeles a lot and the city does not feel like Southern California at all. Even the Blaine County freeways don't feel like any interstate I've been to!

  • jaljax likes this

DOUGL4S1
  • DOUGL4S1

    Li'l G Loc

  • Members
  • Joined: 06 Dec 2016
  • Brazil

#9

Posted 3 weeks ago

The GTA V map has a really weird layout, the main freeway goes into nowhere and comes back into the city, and the Grand Senora desert doesn't feel like a desert for the most part. If anything it feels like a big beach because of the Alamo Sea. There are also tons of places that are useless in the game.

  • Saganist, LincolnClay and jaljax like this

Steezy.
  • Steezy.

    Dimension Shifter

  • Members
  • Joined: 07 Feb 2017
  • None

#10

Posted 3 weeks ago Edited by Steezy., 3 weeks ago.

I honestly like all of the cities, but if I had to choose I'd say Liberty City (3D era) for being used way too much (featured in 4 games) and Vice City for being way too small for such a beautiful city.
  • DimitriFaustin and jaljax like this

universetwisters
  • universetwisters

    THAT'S NOT THE PROBLEM, WILLY!

  • Members
  • Joined: 26 Feb 2011
  • United-States
  • Best Conversion 2016 [GTA: Underground] [Contribution]
    Best Workshop 2014
    Most Improved 2014
    Funniest Member 2014
    April Fools Winner 2015

#11

Posted 3 weeks ago

Vice City. As much as I love the game, it's just a sh*tty city. Very poorly laid out and small compared to Liberty City in III.
  • Meekail, Payne Killer, The Deadite and 4 others like this

DOUGL4S1
  • DOUGL4S1

    Li'l G Loc

  • Members
  • Joined: 06 Dec 2016
  • Brazil

#12

Posted 3 weeks ago

Vice City. As much as I love the game, it's just a sh*tty city. Very poorly laid out and small compared to Liberty City in III.

It seems small because of the tons of water in between the islands, but I agree with you. Navigating Vice City seems like navigating a maze while gang members shoot at you because you're Tommy.

  • LincolnClay and Steezy. like this

universetwisters
  • universetwisters

    THAT'S NOT THE PROBLEM, WILLY!

  • Members
  • Joined: 26 Feb 2011
  • United-States
  • Best Conversion 2016 [GTA: Underground] [Contribution]
    Best Workshop 2014
    Most Improved 2014
    Funniest Member 2014
    April Fools Winner 2015

#13

Posted 3 weeks ago

 

Vice City. As much as I love the game, it's just a sh*tty city. Very poorly laid out and small compared to Liberty City in III.

It seems small because of the tons of water in between the islands, but I agree with you. Navigating Vice City seems like navigating a maze while gang members shoot at you because you're Tommy.

 


It's not even that. Just look at how much space is just wasted on the beach and tarmac at the airport.

 

GTAVC_Map_Robbery.png

  • DimitriFaustin, jaljax, DOUGL4S1 and 1 other like this

ten-a-penny
  • ten-a-penny

    Hardass Tomboy(tm)

  • Members
  • Joined: 20 Jun 2013
  • Morocco

#14

Posted 3 weeks ago

I think San Fierro is kinda forgettable, there's nothing that would make you want to go back. At least Las Venturas has casinos.

Not the California Street-grade streets all over the everywhere that allows you to bypass roadblocks like they're nothing? What about the dead-ass brain-dead SFPD AKA Sandbox-Fun PD? How's stunting there, tho? ;)

 

OT: f*ck Las Venturas. Boring, little to no places to bike-stunt (unlike San Fierro and GTAV's Los Santos), and overall ugly. Just because casinos (which are just as boring) are in the dead city, doesn't make it any decent. San Fierro > Everything else.

  • Meekail, Achlys and jaljax like this

Achlys
  • Achlys

    I Can Tell You're Curious, It's Written On Your Lips

  • Members
  • Joined: 22 Jul 2014
  • Mexico

#15

Posted 3 weeks ago

 

I think San Fierro is kinda forgettable, there's nothing that would make you want to go back. At least Las Venturas has casinos.

Not the California Street-grade streets all over the everywhere that allows you to bypass roadblocks like they're nothing? What about the dead-ass brain-dead SFPD AKA Sandbox-Fun PD? How's stunting there, tho? ;)

Oh yeah, I forgot about all of that, nvm. I guess my least favorite city is VC because of it's kinda small. But it's still charming. :)

  • ten-a-penny, jaljax and Steezy. like this

DimitriFaustin
  • DimitriFaustin

    Megalopolis Megalomaniac

  • Members
  • Joined: 25 Mar 2016
  • United-States

#16

Posted 3 weeks ago

I've always liked every setting, but for some strange reason, III/LCS's Liberty City and Vice City in VC/VCS are both to me "awesome" and "meh" at the same time.

Rockstar did a great job with the settings then, but still it seems like they could have done a lot better. 

  • jaljax and Steezy. like this

jaljax
  • jaljax

    Vice Squad

  • Members
  • Joined: 16 Aug 2016
  • Canada

#17

Posted 3 weeks ago

I agree with all your opinions about Vice City , ya it's small & could've got more area's

 

Ugh casino's & Las Venturas lol, ya i know casino's are a great way of making money , but they were kind of boring at the same time .


I've always liked every setting, but for some strange reason, III/LCS's Liberty City and Vice City in VC/VCS are both to me "awesome" and "meh" at the same time.

Rockstar did a great job with the settings then, but still it seems like they could have done a lot better. 

I agree .

  • DimitriFaustin and Steezy. like this

Queen Elizabeth II
  • Queen Elizabeth II

    ______________________

  • Members
  • Joined: 11 Jul 2014
  • Poland

#18

Posted 3 weeks ago

 

 

Vice City. As much as I love the game, it's just a sh*tty city. Very poorly laid out and small compared to Liberty City in III.

It seems small because of the tons of water in between the islands, but I agree with you. Navigating Vice City seems like navigating a maze while gang members shoot at you because you're Tommy.

 


It's not even that. Just look at how much space is just wasted on the beach and tarmac at the airport.

 

GTAVC_Map_Robbery.png

 

 

Rockstar has always made airports too big. Except GTA IV because FIA is just the right size.

  • Roger Cheeto, jaljax and Steezy. like this

MiamiViceCity
  • MiamiViceCity

    The Unforgiven

  • Moderator
  • Joined: 14 Oct 2007
  • Australia
  • Most Obsessive Name Changer 2016 (My unofficial GTAF annual award)
    Biggest Fanboy 2013, 2014, 2015
    Best Poster [GTA] 2014
    Best Member in the OGA 2012

#19

Posted 3 weeks ago

Don't care for Los Santos in its 3D or HD renditions. San Fierro also. Las Venturas is the only West Coast city I like.

 

East Coast > West Coast.

  • Payne Killer, LincolnClay, DimitriFaustin and 2 others like this

DimitriFaustin
  • DimitriFaustin

    Megalopolis Megalomaniac

  • Members
  • Joined: 25 Mar 2016
  • United-States

#20

Posted 3 weeks ago Edited by DimitriFaustin, 3 weeks ago.

Don't care for Los Santos in its 3D or HD renditions. San Fierro also. Las Venturas is the only West Coast city I like.

 

East Coast > West Coast.

Not to ignite a battle between "East Coast vs. West Coast" or derail this thread, but I'd just like to throw in my thoughts on this.

I've always felt both the East Coast and the West Coast were portrayed sufficiently enough in the Grand Theft Auto series (not to mention countless movies,

music, TV shows and other video games) that the lesson learned from all this is that deep down in both coasts, society is extremely superficial with a almost complete

lack of humanity and genuine people are hard to find. Even if it's an ice cold killer like Niko Bellic or a maniac like Trevor Philips, in some ways they're a better example

to society even if their actions are completely amoral, illegal, and just plain reckless. Even people like Tommy Vercetti, CJ and Vic Vance are more relatable than the

celebrities a lot of people sheepishly idolize instead of taking responsibility for their own lives.

Again, not wanting to derail the thread, I just wanted to weigh in on this.

  • MiamiViceCity, Meekail, Deminu and 4 others like this

Giantsgiants
  • Giantsgiants

    Boss

  • Members
  • Joined: 17 Nov 2013
  • Mauritius

#21

Posted 3 weeks ago

Los Santos. Not much of a Los Angeles person in real life, and the atmosphere of Los Santos in the HD era is kinda bland. By comparison, HD era Liberty City had quite the diverse atmosphere with all the various gangs and unique gang vehicles driving around the streets.

  • MiamiViceCity, LincolnClay and jaljax like this

Johnny Spaz
  • Johnny Spaz

    Rat

  • Members
  • Joined: 28 Nov 2013
  • None

#22

Posted 3 weeks ago

The upper part of GTA V's map was god awful, Paleto Bay & Mount Chiliad were okay but that's it. Los Santos was pretty good though. Could've used more hood/lower income areas but besides that it's good.
  • Meekail, Roger Cheeto, ten-a-penny and 1 other like this

LaBombaRomba
  • LaBombaRomba

    Straya. "Fear denies faith", ⌐■_■

  • Members
  • Joined: 31 Oct 2014
  • Australia

#23

Posted 3 weeks ago

III's LC and V's LS. And whilst I agree with what people have said about VC being really badly laid out, I don't think that's enough to outweigh the things I liked about it.

  • MiamiViceCity, LincolnClay and jaljax like this

Roger Cheeto
  • Roger Cheeto

    Gangsta

  • Members
  • Joined: 19 Feb 2013
  • None

#24

Posted 3 weeks ago Edited by Rodger Cheeto, 3 weeks ago.

Anywhere city, I hate GTA2s feel for some reason. I don't really like that post-industrial thing plus it makes me feel like I'm in a flea market for some reason lmao.

Next would be V's LS but I like the sunny theme and feel and some areas are ok, it's just that I think some areas are way too small in comparison to thier real life counterpart and it f*cks with immersion.

Vice City is pretty small but I never really gave that any thought.
  • MiamiViceCity, ten-a-penny, Payne Killer and 3 others like this

TheSadisticOwl
  • TheSadisticOwl

    Unprofessional sniper.

  • Members
  • Joined: 19 Apr 2015
  • None

#25

Posted 3 weeks ago

GTA 3's Liberty City, specially after you leave Portland. While Portland is a small, poor district compared to Staunton, it's very detailed and it has a great atmosphere to it, specially at the Red Light District. Anything beyond that island however, is dissapointingly bad; Staunton Island might be big and richer, but much lesser detailed and has a very confusing layout to get used to, which isn't helped by the amount of timed missions it has and those stupid don't damage the car ones. 

 

And Shoreside Vale is simply boring. It's also hard to get used to, it has nothing to it that makes you want to go back and explore it more and even for a mostly industrial area, it's really lacking. 

  • Bare and jaljax like this

Queen Elizabeth II
  • Queen Elizabeth II

    ______________________

  • Members
  • Joined: 11 Jul 2014
  • Poland

#26

Posted 3 weeks ago Edited by Queen Elizabeth II, 3 weeks ago.

Anywhere city, I hate GTA2s feel for some reason. I don't really like that post-industrial thing plus it makes me feel like I'm in a flea market for some reason lmao.
 

 

Oh yes. I hope Rockstar will never try this "Futuristic" setting again. It was awful!

 

(Even though I played GTA 2 on PSX like crazy back in the day)

  • jaljax likes this

jaljax
  • jaljax

    Vice Squad

  • Members
  • Joined: 16 Aug 2016
  • Canada

#27

Posted 3 weeks ago

Ya Anywhere City was awful lol, they should of made the setting for GTA 2 a lot better like they did with GTA 1 where you had the option to go to Liberty City, Vice City , & San Andreas

The American Army 1775
  • The American Army 1775

    The Protectors

  • Members
  • Joined: 12 May 2016
  • United-States

#28

Posted 3 weeks ago Edited by DIze, 3 weeks ago.

Liberty City of III/LCS (I played GTA III after completing GTA IV)
San Fierro (It's not even a bit like the SFO I've visited)
Las Venturas (Something is missing in there I feel)

(Ambient)
  • (Ambient)

    Wrath.

  • Facade Corporation
  • Joined: 11 Jul 2012
  • Poland

#29

Posted 3 weeks ago

It's hard to say which city I dislike the most as it's a fight between 3D era Los Santos and Las Venturas, but I will go with LV, because there's more stuff that interests me here in LS.

  • ten-a-penny and jaljax like this

SmokesWithCigs
  • SmokesWithCigs

    recovering addict

  • Members
  • Joined: 23 Nov 2014
  • United-States

#30

Posted 3 weeks ago

alderney and broker blechh !!!!! yuck!!!!!
  • jaljax likes this




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users