I'd like to see the Northern San Andreas (LV and SF) after Vice City.
I want that before another game set in Vice City tbh, the latter is just too similiar to Los Santos. LV and SF together would provide a refreshing change after Los Santos.
Here's the problem LV is nowhere near SF in real life if you looked at a map. R* seems to be going for realism this time around and putting two cities that are nowhere near each other in real life sounds pretty unrealistic. While it's a nice idea I just don't see it happening.
I'd rather see a standalone SF with Oakland across the bridge and maybe include some more of Northern California by adding a version of Sacramento.
My thoughts exactly.
If I see SF paired with LV I'm gonna f*cking flip.
Personally I dont care in this case. Its not like they are that far apart in real life. I dont think either city can carry its own game so pairing them together makes sense.
SF and LV paired up wouldn't make sense.
Rockstar already said it was nearly impossible to pair LS with SF
That said SF's time has passed and doesn't need an excusive game.
Just finish the remaining locations (LV&VC) as the main focus and SF as a prologue.
Like users said, its unrealistic, a bygone and will flip.
Give us the locked islands with LV & VC again and not another dumbed down paired SF n LS w/ LV.