Quantcast

Jump to content

» «
Photo

Dear r* (regarding overall female clothing choices)

2,804 replies to this topic
Miss-RI95
  • Miss-RI95

  • Members
  • Joined: 10 Jun 2015
  • United-Kingdom

#511

Posted 03 April 2016 - 11:12 PM

I think a push up bra would be good at the moment to lift them up a bit and because it is ideal when running around in heels and any footwear, rolling around on the floor to avoid bullets, getting in multiple car crashes, shooting with an automatic weapon, repeatedly changing position when taking cover to shoot then protect and shoot and protect. It just seems sensible somehow.  :lol:

 

Then I guess having a topless character would be fun at times - within limits. Imagine taking off the push up bra and hearing your character sigh in relief.  :panic:

  • tenpennyisplainevil, TovarishTony, PhillBellic and 3 others like this

Audi
  • Audi

    Don't Pray For Me, Homie Pray For The Weak

  • $outh $ide Hoodz
  • Joined: 24 Dec 2014
  • Slovenia
  • Best Turbo Quattro 2017

#512

Posted 04 April 2016 - 02:13 AM

I think a push up bra would be good at the moment to lift them up a bit and because it is ideal when running around in heels and any footwear, rolling around on the floor to avoid bullets, getting in multiple car crashes, shooting with an automatic weapon, repeatedly changing position when taking cover to shoot then protect and shoot and protect. It just seems sensible somehow.  :lol:

 

Then I guess having a topless character would be fun at times - within limits. Imagine taking off the push up bra and hearing your character sigh in relief.  :panic:

That would be a really realistic game  :lol:

  • PhillBellic, robban, Miss-RI95 and 1 other like this

Hunter
  • Hunter

    Hunter civil rights activist

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 26 Jul 2015
  • None

#513

Posted 04 April 2016 - 03:32 AM

I was going to say some of you should put a link to this thread in your signatures so it can maybe get more visibility, but looking around, most people on here have some pretty nice sigs.

 

I'd actually consider putting it on my own, but I don't know if I can make enough room to fit it alongside my own obsession. It might look kind of weird even if I could lol. Still, this thread is great and deserves as much attention as it can get.


camo_boy67
  • camo_boy67

    Mark Chump

  • Members
  • Joined: 15 Aug 2013
  • United-States

#514

Posted 04 April 2016 - 04:46 AM

I was going to say some of you should put a link to this thread in your signatures so it can maybe get more visibility, but looking around, most people on here have some pretty nice sigs.
 
I'd actually consider putting it on my own, but I don't know if I can make enough room to fit it alongside my own obsession. It might look kind of weird even if I could lol. Still, this thread is great and deserves as much attention as it can get.


I'm with you, this thread needs more attention. Most of the clothing ideas are really great on this thread. Keep it up y'all. Hopefully it catches on soon.
  • Hunter likes this

PhillBellic
  • PhillBellic

  • Members
  • Joined: 03 Jul 2012
  • Australia
  • Ban Roulette Winner 2016

#515

Posted 04 April 2016 - 06:56 AM

I was going to say some of you should put a link to this thread in your signatures so it can maybe get more visibility, but looking around, most people on here have some pretty nice sigs.

 

I'd actually consider putting it on my own, but I don't know if I can make enough room to fit it alongside my own obsession. It might look kind of weird even if I could lol. Still, this thread is great and deserves as much attention as it can get.

How about Hyper-Linking to your Hunter Thread using this text in your Signature;

 

 

Over 389 days without an attack helicopter ...

We could do with a new one.

And then create a link to This Topic using the section currently linking to the Hunter Thread.

  • Hunter likes this

jollythecat
  • jollythecat

    Mack Pimp

  • Members
  • Joined: 07 Jul 2015
  • Sweden

#516

Posted 04 April 2016 - 11:54 AM Edited by jollythecat, 04 April 2016 - 12:01 PM.

About the topless option.

 

I'm all for that BUT only in your house or yacht, showering and bathing topless in your hot tub and walking around in your own space.

Topless should not be available outside your house/yacht, people walking around topless in the street just don't seem very realistic, even in a den of sin like Los Santos.

 

I mean it is an adult game after all, and you can see boobs in the strip club so it's a bit weird actually that you can't see your own.

 

They could make it like the hot tub, when you exit your house clothes will be automatically put on, like a bikini top at least.

Walking around in a bikini top seems a bit weird too imo, but it's Los Santos it got a lot of sun and palm trees and a massive beach. So you would probably see girls in bikini tops in the streets there irl.

  • Miss-RI95 likes this

Hunter
  • Hunter

    Hunter civil rights activist

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 26 Jul 2015
  • None

#517

Posted 04 April 2016 - 03:07 PM

And then create a link to This Topic using the section currently linking to the Hunter Thread.

 

 

 

Thanks, I've done something similar now.

 

I know it's not much, but it's something. Having the other thread in my signature got it a little attention, since nearly 400 people voted on it - I'm hoping having this thread should bring some attention to it too.

  • PhillBellic likes this

Retroview1955
  • Retroview1955

    Homie

  • Members
  • Joined: 21 Jul 2015
  • United-States

#518

Posted 04 April 2016 - 07:34 PM

The whole knee high boots and jeans thing has me pissed. Why can't the female characters have that? NPCs females can have the knee high boots and jeans/leggings.
  • Cameron Star and Hunter like this

Cameron Star
  • Cameron Star

    Rock my socks.

  • Members
  • Joined: 25 Jul 2014
  • United-Kingdom
  • Helpfulness Award
    Doggo-Chop Winner 2016

#519

Posted 04 April 2016 - 07:50 PM

The whole knee high boots and jeans thing has me pissed. Why can't the female characters have that? NPCs females can have the knee high boots and jeans/leggings.

You could do that for a few days with the save VIP outfits glitch. There were two unique leggings, black and blue, that you could wear knee high boots over. But then R* decided that we might have seizures from experiencing such high levels of fun and customization and so removed them for our health and safety.

  • Voit Turyv, CrayCray, Suzuki Azure Vulpine and 2 others like this

Hunter
  • Hunter

    Hunter civil rights activist

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 26 Jul 2015
  • None

#520

Posted 04 April 2016 - 07:55 PM

The whole knee high boots and jeans thing has me pissed. Why can't the female characters have that? NPCs females can have the knee high boots and jeans/leggings.

NPCs often have special abilities that we don't.

 

Buzzards that can pivot their minguns and aim, Lazers that can lock onto you while you're on foot, cops rappelling off helicopters, Savages that take multiple missiles, etc.

 

It's like they love to rub these things in people's faces. I'm not surprised they like to do the same with clothes. Why?

 

But then R* decided that we might have seizures from experiencing such high levels of fun and customization and so removed them for our health and safety.

This is why.

  • Suzuki Azure Vulpine and Amy Vinewood like this

Commander S
  • Commander S

    Preston, Esq.

  • Members
  • Joined: 01 Apr 2014
  • European-Union

#521

Posted 04 April 2016 - 08:00 PM

Right, so here are the pics (mostly under spoiler tags, to save space! ;) ) of the various things hanging up in apartment wardrobes. As far as I can tell, most of the menswear has a wearable equivalent in the game (jackets, hooded tops, sports vests), and same for the jeans and cargo pants. But the dresses and boots? Nope.

First up, a dress that you can sorta approximate using a bustier and skirt - but still, this is an actual dress (and note the asymetric shoulder straps - interesting detail):

Spoiler

 

 

The most interesting things are the two styles of backless halter-neck dress - one with a plunge neck (black/white), and another type with a strappy back, which shows up in a variety of colours in the different interiors:

Zf8vye6.jpg

 

 

Alternative views, showing the different details and colour variants:

Spoiler

 

There's also some nice trainers in different colours - these are almost like the new style introduced with Lowriders, but those only come in combinations of black, white and yellow (because Vagos outfits), and it'd be good to get some other colour variations (for ladies - because, again, I'm pretty sure male characters have those kinds of options already... :rol: ):

Spoiler

 

Also, some new styles of high-heeled boot - the sort of thing that, if added, should logically be made wearable over skinny jeans and leggings, at the very least:

y3mW0vL.jpg

 

 

To contrast, all these items are currently available in the game - in fact, I'm pretty sure that they've been purchasable/wearable since launch (the hooded top for men only, while the jeans and cargo pants are very much like the versions available for all characters):

Spoiler

 

 

None of those items would be any harder to implement than anything existing in the game. The only slight difference I can think of would be making the dresses wearable with a jacket - but that's easily done: since dresses function like tops that extend to cover both top and bottom slots, just make them 'extended tops' in the same clothing layer as a camisole or bustier, and thus a jacket would fit over them in the same way.

And the absolute kicker? Most of those pics were taken in the standard high-end apartment wardrobe - the one that's been in the game since launch back in 2013:turn:

  • REXX, CrayCray, mahey31 and 7 others like this

ALFWER2015
  • ALFWER2015

    Player Hater

  • New Members
  • Joined: 11 Jul 2015
  • China

#522

Posted 04 April 2016 - 08:09 PM

the only explanation for knee high boots issue is that r* devs love bare legs as hell...


- Ballistics -
  • - Ballistics -

  • Members
  • Joined: 23 Oct 2014
  • None

#523

Posted 05 April 2016 - 01:41 AM

This is my first post contributing to this thread that is not where this thread should be in my opinion.

This is making me cringe because, well, I've always wanted to be a Masculine dude, yet recently, I've created a Female character that I have levelled up quickly, within a day I'm already level 40, but anyways, I don't want more appealing clothing, I want more badass stuff. Currently I wear jean pants, a bomber jacket and some converse canvas sneakers, which make me happy. It looks cool, but most of the female wardrobe is really slutty and just horrible, to be frank. And I don't want dresses and sh*t, I want armor and a Knights Shield.

I want to be a f*ckin female knight, one of the Knights of the round table. I want a f*ckin sword too and a f*ckin horse. Riding on my MOTHERf*ckIN horse, killing motherf*ckers with my f*ckin sword made of steel, while wearing steel plated armor that screams "I'm a badass mofo that slays dragons, come at me".

My female character always gets humped by horny desperate dudes and I want something that says "you motherf*cker, I will slay you if you do that stupid sh*t again near me! I'm Buffy the MOTHERf*ckIN vampire slayer in f*ckin Knight armor, and I'll behead you if you come near me again!"

And I also want this for my male too, so me and my female and my male can be Alexander the f*ckin great.

Message to C*: YOU MAY TAKE MY CLOTHING GLITCHES, BUT YOU WILL NEVER TAKE MY KNIGHTHOOD.

LeAuxChord
  • LeAuxChord

    Tracks are finally open!

  • Members
  • Joined: 02 Mar 2014
  • United-States

#524

Posted 05 April 2016 - 01:46 AM

This is my first post contributing to this thread that is not where this thread should be in my opinion.

This is making me cringe because, well, I've always wanted to be a Masculine dude, yet recently, I've created a Female character that I have levelled up quickly, within a day I'm already level 40, but anyways, I don't want more appealing clothing, I want more badass stuff. Currently I wear jean pants, a bomber jacket and some converse canvas sneakers, which make me happy. It looks cool, but most of the female wardrobe is really slutty and just horrible, to be frank. And I don't want dresses and sh*t, I want armor and a Knights Shield.

I want to be a f*ckin female knight, one of the Knights of the round table. I want a f*ckin sword too and a f*ckin horse. Riding on my MOTHERf*ckIN horse, killing motherf*ckers with my f*ckin sword made of steel, while wearing steel plated armor that screams "I'm a badass mofo that slays dragons, come at me".

My female character always gets humped by horny desperate dudes and I want something that says "you motherf*cker, I will slay you if you do that stupid sh*t again near me! I'm Buffy the MOTHERf*ckIN vampire slayer in f*ckin Knight armor, and I'll behead you if you come near me again!"

And I also want this for my male too, so me and my female and my male can be Alexander the f*ckin great.

Message to C*: YOU MAY TAKE MY CLOTHING GLITCHES, BUT YOU WILL NEVER TAKE MY KNIGHTHOOD.

Jesus christ dude.

+1 to what he said.....up until the armor stuff. Just made a female character myself last week, and have also noticed the amount of bogus clothes on there. And to the person with the concept dress drawings, good work. Hopefully someone of importance see's it, and implements it in some sort of future update.

  • - Ballistics - and Audi like this

Diana McFarland
  • Diana McFarland

    Cam Newton's Baby Mama "Yes I'm a tattletale"

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 24 May 2015
  • United-States
  • Best Diana 2016

#525

Posted 05 April 2016 - 02:59 AM

+1

 

support

  • Hunter likes this

TovarishTony
  • TovarishTony

    [РККА] Krasnaya Army

  • Members
  • Joined: 31 May 2012

#526

Posted 05 April 2016 - 06:14 AM

This is my first post contributing to this thread that is not where this thread should be in my opinion.

This is making me cringe because, well, I've always wanted to be a Masculine dude, yet recently, I've created a Female character that I have levelled up quickly, within a day I'm already level 40, but anyways, I don't want more appealing clothing, I want more badass stuff. Currently I wear jean pants, a bomber jacket and some converse canvas sneakers, which make me happy. It looks cool, but most of the female wardrobe is really slutty and just horrible, to be frank. And I don't want dresses and sh*t, I want armor and a Knights Shield.

I want to be a f*ckin female knight, one of the Knights of the round table. I want a f*ckin sword too and a f*ckin horse. Riding on my MOTHERf*ckIN horse, killing motherf*ckers with my f*ckin sword made of steel, while wearing steel plated armor that screams "I'm a badass mofo that slays dragons, come at me".

My female character always gets humped by horny desperate dudes and I want something that says "you motherf*cker, I will slay you if you do that stupid sh*t again near me! I'm Buffy the MOTHERf*ckIN vampire slayer in f*ckin Knight armor, and I'll behead you if you come near me again!"

And I also want this for my male too, so me and my female and my male can be Alexander the f*ckin great.

Message to C*: YOU MAY TAKE MY CLOTHING GLITCHES, BUT YOU WILL NEVER TAKE MY KNIGHTHOOD.

I really hope they wont take my turtleneck and the cop uniform unless they improve the clothes along with the ability to improve the figures of our characters


REXX
  • REXX

    REXX | ALEXA - Content Creator & GTA Photographer

  • Members
  • Joined: 04 Dec 2013
  • Spain

#527

Posted 05 April 2016 - 06:06 PM

So, Frost's creations inspired me to quickly make my own. Went for a catsuit :p

25984012330_e3e6750b12_o.jpg
  • Suzuki Azure Vulpine, Coleco, idonknowhow and 1 other like this

RustyShackleford
  • RustyShackleford

    You can look (but you can't touch)

  • Members
  • Joined: 28 Oct 2013
  • None

#528

Posted 05 April 2016 - 07:10 PM Edited by RustyShackleford, 05 April 2016 - 07:15 PM.

Let me respond with BOLD inside of the quote.

 

 

It's 2016 and you have yet add knee high boots with real black leggings not that crap u gave us.

 

I'm still waiting for an update that adds more contact missions (the main point of GTA), as well as reintroduce the removed contact missions (assuming the bugs in those missions are fixed).

Went to log on today and saw my knee high outfit was patched.....smh. Like seriously maybe now based on how many females used this glitch just to get knee high on leggings and boots you would add this with out glitching which should of been at launch!

 

A bunch of other clothing items were patched as well.  For BOTH, male AND female.

I mean do u have a female working on the art design of the clothing for online? If not you need to go to a fashion show because clearly u do not know fashion.

 

GTA Online is NOT a fashion simulator.  Try Sims for that.

Why do I have to use a mod menu or glitch to make a outfit that I see the npc's wearing already!

 

Because it seems you are concerned primarily with fashion.

God your so incompetent I mean what was wrong with wearing knee high leggings? Seriously if it has clipping issues then get off your butts and fix it. While we are add it add proper black leggings call them dark black leggings idk the vip ones were perfect and made my outfit look cute.

 

It had the clipping issues because it was glitched by another party.  R* did NOT intend for it to happen.  You can't blame R$ for the problems of unofficial mods.  Things like that happen if you try to do things the developers didn't intend.  CLEARLY by removing the glitched clothes, R$ doesn't want people using mods.

Seriously the clothing that's been coming out as for late isn't really for females it's more geared for guys making their toon look like dude.

 

Maybe its because the stereotypical "lowrider demographic" female population in those areas dress like that.  Also, the DLC as of late is basically Lowriders Part 2, 3, 4...

Besides, even with the "male" clothing, FEMALE CLOTHING STILL DOMINATES compared to men.

 

Ask any female gamer and they will tell what needs to be improved on our side...

 

A saying goes like this, "You canNOT please everyone."  So knowing that, in business, we try to market towards the primary consumer (NOT everyone).  Most of the consumers are NOT highly concerned with clothing.  At the end of the day, the main audience PAYS the R$ employees their money.  The consumer is NOT making wishlist about a R$'$ $ecret fashion show in GTA.

Idk this is bitch and moan but many of us have been waiting for proper layering and actual female clothing that some of us uses.

 

What about the male side?  GTA's clothing STILL FAVOR'S WOMEN.

Why can't I wear leather straps with a necklace unless it's the gold cuffs. Why can't I wear boots with jeans? Why no long hair or nail polish r*. Stop making the game geared more to males seriously. There are a lot of gamers who are female and you need to stop ignoring us.

 

Its geared towards the males because they mainly purcha$e the game and will give R$ the $$$.  Besides, the MALES GET LESS CLOTHING OPTIONS.  This game is NOT shop at the Target, F21, Abercrombie, American Eagle, or whatever clothing shops are in.  Ain't nobody got time to focus on fashion when the BULK of the gamer$ play for reasons other than clothing.  Besides, our systems can only hold so much space.

 

Besides, there is a list like that for men.  Why can't I have my character do a hip swivel while in a unicorn suit and eat a box of Booty-O's?

 

Valentine's Day update yay underwear and stockings ok that's fine now next update is more clothes that look like its for guys. -_-

 

Maybe its because the stereotypical "lowrider demographic" female population in those areas dress like that.  Its basically a repeat of one of your statements.  And like a repeat of your last statement, R$ is repeating Lowriders by introducing Lowriders Part 45,79, 93... (which include "manly" clothes that females in the "lowrider" group stereotypically wear.)  And most of the clohting in lowriders are repaints.  I'm still waiting on my Booty-O's clothes.

 

 


born2fart
  • born2fart

    i'll fight your dad, kid

  • Members
  • Joined: 17 Mar 2016
  • Japan

#529

Posted 05 April 2016 - 07:22 PM

Part of the reason we don't have cocktail dresses or similar pieces of clothing, as far as I can tell, is it because it accentuates our massive man-sized shoulders. This is exemplified in the OP image.

  • robban likes this

Hunter
  • Hunter

    Hunter civil rights activist

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 26 Jul 2015
  • None

#530

Posted 05 April 2016 - 07:38 PM Edited by Icantthinkofonew, 05 April 2016 - 07:40 PM.

 

 

1. "I'm still waiting for an update that adds more contact missions (the main point of GTA), as well as reintroduce the removed contact missions (assuming the bugs in those missions are fixed)."

 

So what? I'm still waiting for a new attack helicopter, and missions too - you don't see me sh*tting over what someone else wants. Irrelevant.

 

2. "A bunch of other clothing items were patched as well.  For BOTH, male AND female."

 

You're only strengthening her point with this.

 

3. "GTA Online is NOT a fashion simulator.  Try Sims for that."

 

It's not a driving simulator. Yet there are cars. It's not a flight simulator, yet I can re enact the Soviet - Afghan war with my Savage. It doesn't have to be a simulator to have content specialized towards particular people.

 

4. "It had the clipping issues because it was glitched by another party.  R* did NOT intend for it to happen.  You can't blame R$ for the problems of unofficial mods.  Things like that happen if you try to do things the developers didn't intend.  CLEARLY by removing the glitched clothes, R$ doesn't want people using mods."

 

Then Rockstar should've put it in the game in the first place. That she had to glitch for something as basic as that is ridiculous.

 

5. "Maybe its because the stereotypical "lowrider demographic" female population in those areas dress like that.  Also, the DLC as of late is basically Lowriders Part 2, 3, 4...

Besides, even with the "male" clothing, FEMALE CLOTHING STILL DOMINATES compared to men."
 
People are sick to death of low riders. F**k low riders.
 
6. "A saying goes like this, "You canNOT please everyone."  So knowing that, in business, we try to market towards the primary consumer (NOT everyone).  Most of the consumers are NOT highly concerned with clothing.  At the end of the day, the main audience PAYS the R$ employees their money.  The consumer is NOT making wishlist about a R$'$ $ecret fashion show in GTA."
 
They're not pleasing anyone. If they can release umpteen low riders in a row, they can release some half decent clothes for female characters.
 
7. "What about the male side?  GTA's clothing STILL FAVOR'S WOMEN."
 
Women need more clothes. Don't you have a girlfriend, or wife, or mother, or any sisters? How have you not learned that by now? I have a male character - I don't care about the clothes.
 
8. "Its geared towards the males because they mainly purcha$e the game and will give R$ the $$$.  Besides, the MALES GET LESS CLOTHING OPTIONS.  This game is NOT shop at the Target, F21, Abercrombie, American Eagle, or whatever clothing shops are in.  Ain't nobody got time to focus on fashion when the BULK of the gamer$ play for reasons other than clothing.  Besides, our systems can only hold so much space.
 
Besides, there is a list like that for men.  Why can't I have my character do a hip swivel while in a unicorn suit and eat a box of Booty-O's?"
 
Have you got some figures to back this up? No? Well there are plenty of women on here; I'm sure there's a sizable audience.
 
9. "Maybe its because the stereotypical "lowrider demographic" female population in those areas dress like that.  Its basically a repeat of one of your statements.  And like a repeat of your last statement, R$ is repeating Lowriders by introducing Lowriders Part 45,79, 93... (which include "manly" clothes that females in the "lowrider" group stereotypically wear.)  And most of the clohting in lowriders are repaints.  I'm still waiting on my Booty-O's clothes."
 
This isn't a low riders simulator. We're sick of them.
  • PhillBellic, Audi, Anna Deadly and 2 others like this

RustyShackleford
  • RustyShackleford

    You can look (but you can't touch)

  • Members
  • Joined: 28 Oct 2013
  • None

#531

Posted 05 April 2016 - 08:25 PM

 

 

 

1. "I'm still waiting for an update that adds more contact missions (the main point of GTA), as well as reintroduce the removed contact missions (assuming the bugs in those missions are fixed)."

 

So what? I'm still waiting for a new attack helicopter, and missions too - you don't see me sh*tting over what someone else wants. Irrelevant.

 

It IS relevant because people have their wants, and their new clothes will probably be introduced as a "side" to support the next DLC, but as a SIDE.  Besides, you only mentioned helicopters and missions.  Show me where I shat all over her argument.  I am just saying that we all want things, but (like you) missions take priority.

 

2. "A bunch of other clothing items were patched as well.  For BOTH, male AND female."

 

You're only strengthening her point with this.

 

She is focused on FEMALE clothing as the priority.  I am just saying FEMALE CLOTHING is NOT a priority.

 

3. "GTA Online is NOT a fashion simulator.  Try Sims for that."

 

It's not a driving simulator. Yet there are cars. It's not a flight simulator, yet I can re enact the Soviet - Afghan war with my Savage. It doesn't have to be a simulator to have content specialized towards particular people.

 

There is a HUGE market for racing in GTA and people, and even some GTA Youtubers are becoming big names by focusing primarily on racing.  If racing wasn't popular in GTA, certain channels wouldn't have grown so much.

 

4. "It had the clipping issues because it was glitched by another party.  R* did NOT intend for it to happen.  You can't blame R$ for the problems of unofficial mods.  Things like that happen if you try to do things the developers didn't intend.  CLEARLY by removing the glitched clothes, R$ doesn't want people using mods."

 

Then Rockstar should've put it in the game in the first place. That she had to glitch for something as basic as that is ridiculous.

 

R* did NOT place the option to add the clothing to be worn together.  It was supposed to be WORN SEPARATE.  What she did was glitch the boots and leggings together.  The only way that it made its way into the game was by glitching.  Because R$ removed the glitched clothes (or tried to), they showed that it wasn't supposed to be in the game in the first place.  R* intended their clothing to NOT be layered with boots and leggings.  R* did NOT place the option to layer boots and leggings in the game.  If the modders wanted to go against R$, at least they should fix the clipping.  

 

5. "Maybe its because the stereotypical "lowrider demographic" female population in those areas dress like that.  Also, the DLC as of late is basically Lowriders Part 2, 3, 4...

Besides, even with the "male" clothing, FEMALE CLOTHING STILL DOMINATES compared to men."
 
People are sick to death of low riders. F**k low riders.
 
Lowriders suck too, but R$ playing into the "stereotypes" is why females get "manly" clothes that update.
 
6. "A saying goes like this, "You canNOT please everyone."  So knowing that, in business, we try to market towards the primary consumer (NOT everyone).  Most of the consumers are NOT highly concerned with clothing.  At the end of the day, the main audience PAYS the R$ employees their money.  The consumer is NOT making wishlist about a R$'$ $ecret fashion show in GTA."
 
They're not pleasing anyone. If they can release umpteen low riders in a row, they can release some half decent clothes for female characters.
 
Lowriders are just repaints of cars and clothing and a reason to get people to come back to GTA when they could be playing The Division.  Besides, its easier to add in repaints of existing models rather than to add new ones.  So no wonder they release Lowriders part 34, 46, 67 every few weeks.  R* just allows the already included lowrider paints and whatnot to be added to the already included cars.  They don't need to code in much of any new layers.  At most, they probably have to fix the way a certain paint livery appears on a Tornado (vs the Voodoo).
 
7. "What about the male side?  GTA's clothing STILL FAVOR'S WOMEN."
 
Women need more clothes. Don't you have a girlfriend, or wife, or mother, or any sisters? How have you not learned that by now? I have a male character - I don't care about the clothes.
 
And they will get new clothing as the updates roll out.  Besides, clothing is a "want."  Just because people "want" things doesn't mean that they are entitled to them.  I want millions of dollars and billions of dollars.  I want to be the supreme ruler of the world.  I want to eat all sorts of junk food and NOT get fat.  I want to have the next Star Wars episode come out next month.  I wanted Villanova to LOSE.  I wanted to see Holms vs. Rousey part 2 for the title.  Wants are just wants.  We all want a lot of things, but we ain't getting it all.  Sometimes, when clothes shopping, the wife, GF, or mother wants this and that, but this and that is TOO EXPENSIVE.  You have to get this OR that, but not both, not this AND that.  Besides, my family growing up didn't have a lot of money, so the wifes, GF's and other female may have wanted clothing, the reality of wants vs. needs sat in.
 
8. "Its geared towards the males because they mainly purcha$e the game and will give R$ the $$$.  Besides, the MALES GET LESS CLOTHING OPTIONS.  This game is NOT shop at the Target, F21, Abercrombie, American Eagle, or whatever clothing shops are in.  Ain't nobody got time to focus on fashion when the BULK of the gamer$ play for reasons other than clothing.  Besides, our systems can only hold so much space.
 
Besides, there is a list like that for men.  Why can't I have my character do a hip swivel while in a unicorn suit and eat a box of Booty-O's?"
 
Have you got some figures to back this up? No? Well there are plenty of women on here; I'm sure there's a sizable audience. 
 
The original author failed to provide statistics of the amount of women in GTA as well.  The author is arguing about the lack of female clothing, so the BURDEN OF PROOF LIES ON HER, NOT ME.  Although there are some female gamers out there, the bulk of hardcore gamers are male.  Males also spend more time gaming than females.  The males also spend more money on gaming as well.
 
Here are some statistics I found. 
 
 
 
9. "Maybe its because the stereotypical "lowrider demographic" female population in those areas dress like that.  Its basically a repeat of one of your statements.  And like a repeat of your last statement, R$ is repeating Lowriders by introducing Lowriders Part 45,79, 93... (which include "manly" clothes that females in the "lowrider" group stereotypically wear.)  And most of the clohting in lowriders are repaints.  I'm still waiting on my Booty-O's clothes."
 
This isn't a low riders simulator. We're sick of them.
 
Maybe the next major update will introduce some new clothing for BOTH males and females, but the R$ formula shows that the MAIN COURSE will be the update's primary content (hopefully missions or races), but clothing will probably support the main update.  If R* adds in clothes, it will be in a minor form (like X-mas).  If that happens, you won't get this AND that clothing options, you will only get this OR that, but not both (or everything that was listed).

 


Hunter
  • Hunter

    Hunter civil rights activist

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 26 Jul 2015
  • None

#532

Posted 05 April 2016 - 08:37 PM Edited by Icantthinkofonew, 05 April 2016 - 08:38 PM.

 

 

 

 

 

(Sighs)

 

1. "It IS relevant because people have their wants, and their new clothes will probably be introduced as a "side" to support the next DLC, but as a SIDE.  Besides, you only mentioned helicopters and missions.  Show me where I shat all over her argument.  I am just saying that we all want things, but (like you) missions take priority."

 

You're not allowing her to have her wants. And no, I didn't say that missions should take priority.

 

2. "She is focused on FEMALE clothing as the priority.  I am just saying FEMALE CLOTHING is NOT a priority."

 

Female clothing should be a priority. It has been neglected.

 

3. "There is a HUGE market for racing in GTA and people, and even some GTA Youtubers are becoming big names by focusing primarily on racing.  If racing wasn't popular in GTA, certain channels wouldn't have grown so much."

 

And GTA isn't a racing simulator, yet it has this? Can't have it all ways can you?

 

4. "R* did NOT place the option to add the clothing to be worn together.  It was supposed to be WORN SEPARATE.  What she did was glitch the boots and leggings together.  The only way that it made its way into the game was by glitching.  Because R$ removed the glitched clothes (or tried to), they showed that it wasn't supposed to be in the game in the first place.  R* intended their clothing to NOT be layered with boots and leggings.  R* did NOT place the option to layer boots and leggings in the game.  If the modders wanted to go against R$, at least they should fix the clipping. "

 

Once again, Rockstar should have added this in the first place. She should not have had to glitch to obtain it.

 

5.  "Lowriders suck too, but R$ playing into the "stereotypes" is why females get "manly" clothes that update."

 

The point being? She can complain about that if she wants.

 

6. "Lowriders are just repaints of cars and clothing and a reason to get people to come back to GTA when they could be playing The Division.  Besides, its easier to add in repaints of existing models rather than to add new ones.  So no wonder they release Lowriders part 34, 46, 67 every few weeks.  R* just allows the already included lowrider paints and whatnot to be added to the already included cars.  They don't need to code in much of any new layers.  At most, they probably have to fix the way a certain paint livery appears on a Tornado (vs the Voodoo)."

 

That doesn't mean it's not BS that hardly anyone wants.

 
7. "And they will get new clothing as the updates roll out.  Besides, clothing is a "want."  Just because people "want" things doesn't mean that they are entitled to them.  I want millions of dollars and billions of dollars.  I want to be the supreme ruler of the world.  I want to eat all sorts of junk food and NOT get fat.  I want to have the next Star Wars episode come out next month.  I wanted Villanova to LOSE.  I wanted to see Holms vs. Rousey part 2 for the title.  Wants are just wants.  We all want a lot of things, but we ain't getting it all.  Sometimes, when clothes shopping, the wife, GF, or mother wants this and that, but this and that is TOO EXPENSIVE.  You have to get this OR that, but not both, not this AND that.  Besides, my family growing up didn't have a lot of money, so the wifes, GF's and other female may have wanted clothing, the reality of wants vs. needs sat in."

 

This isn't reality. This is where dreams are meant to come true. That's why it's full of kids with guns, and I get to fly a Hind. Why are you trying to deny them their dream?

 

8. "The original author failed to provide statistics of the amount of women in GTA as well.  The author is arguing about the lack of female clothing, so the BURDEN OF PROOF LIES ON HER, NOT ME.  Although there are some female gamers out there, the bulk of hardcore gamers are male.  Males also spend more time gaming than females.  The males also spend more money on gaming as well."

 

I've seen plenty of women who like games. I think they should get what they want.

 

9. "Maybe the next major update will introduce some new clothing for BOTH males and females, but the R$ formula shows that the MAIN COURSE will be the update's primary content (hopefully missions or races), but clothing will probably support the main update.  If R* adds in clothes, it will be in a minor form (like X-mas).  If that happens, you won't get this AND that clothing options, you will only get this OR that, but not both (or everything that was listed)."

 

So what? Maybe that's what they'll do; doesn't mean people can't complain about it though.

 

Why are you trying to derail her thread? Bad vibes, bad vibes.

  • Miss-RI95 likes this

Audi
  • Audi

    Don't Pray For Me, Homie Pray For The Weak

  • $outh $ide Hoodz
  • Joined: 24 Dec 2014
  • Slovenia
  • Best Turbo Quattro 2017

#533

Posted 05 April 2016 - 08:43 PM

Ignore him, that's what has kept this thread civil so far, ignoring the trolls.
  • Hunter likes this

Miss-RI95
  • Miss-RI95

  • Members
  • Joined: 10 Jun 2015
  • United-Kingdom

#534

Posted 05 April 2016 - 08:47 PM

 

Let me respond with BOLD inside of the quote.

What about the male side?  GTA's clothing STILL FAVOR'S WOMEN.

 

 

Besides, even with the "male" clothing, FEMALE CLOTHING STILL DOMINATES compared to men.

 

Its geared towards the males because they mainly purcha$e the game and will give R$ the $$$.  Besides, the MALES GET LESS CLOTHING OPTIONS.  This game is NOT shop at the Target, F21, Abercrombie, American Eagle, or whatever clothing shops are in.  Ain't nobody got time to focus on fashion when the BULK of the gamer$ play for reasons other than clothing.  Besides, our systems can only hold so much space.

 

GTA Online is NOT a fashion simulator.  Try Sims for that.

 

First three quotes contradict themselves. You can't say Rockstar favour women in clothes then later on claim that they are geared to males.

 

Where is the logic in that?

 

In your 3rd quote which I'll insert here: "Ain't nobody got time to focus on fashion when the BULK of the gamer$ play for reasons other than clothing.  Besides, our systems can only hold so much space."

 

  Yeah, this is invalid hun'. Yes they do have different areas of the game such as missions, deathmatches, cars and many more. But that is why Rockstar can afford to hire a lot of people to work on these different areas, therefore making time for them to create items including clothes.  

 

Now finally for a big rant. Yes, we all acknowledge that this isn't a fashion simulator, so using the "Go play Sims" is irrelevant because 1. it takes effort to find a nice outfit then which is why people turn to custom content. Gosh people. 2. The loading times kill to change outfits everyday. 3. Sims includes other skills of interior design which are hugely part of Sims. This means...SIMS ISN'T JUST FASHION PEOPLE. STOP USING SIMS AS AN ARGUMENT POINT BECAUSE IT IS IRRELEVANT. 

 

Clothing actually plays a big part in GTA V Online seeing as you wear them all the time. So it will forever continue to be produced in GTA V Online. So this thread is just advice with a side of bitching of what we want to see in GTA V Online ~ In the fashion side.

 

Why is it there is different concept ideas with threads and ideas, yet when we have one just solely for female clothing with ideas, concepts and input from many forum members of all genders but some people just want to shift us of the apparent game we should play for fashion (Sims). 

 

I want to slay people while looking good not looking like I dressed in the dark.

  • Hunter and Amy Vinewood like this

RustyShackleford
  • RustyShackleford

    You can look (but you can't touch)

  • Members
  • Joined: 28 Oct 2013
  • None

#535

Posted 05 April 2016 - 09:43 PM Edited by RustyShackleford, 05 April 2016 - 09:53 PM.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Sighs)

 

1. "It IS relevant because people have their wants, and their new clothes will probably be introduced as a "side" to support the next DLC, but as a SIDE.  Besides, you only mentioned helicopters and missions.  Show me where I shat all over her argument.  I am just saying that we all want things, but (like you) missions take priority."

 

You're not allowing her to have her wants. And no, I didn't say that missions should take priority.

 

She will get her some (NOT ALL) of her wants (clothing) in the next update IF it is not some repaint or rehash of current DLC.  Besides, not everyone can have what they want, especially in the large GTA community.  If the don't get what they want, DEAL WITH IT AND GET OVER IT.  You can't alway get what you want in life.  Its not me who is NOT allowing her to get what she wants, its R$ (they make the updates).  I have NO SAY.  Besides R$ DOES introduce some new female clothing as we go.  Its not like they are completely ignoring female clothing.  Maybe R$ will introduce nail polish in one update, the next, they will introduce long hair, then the update after, they will introduce boots over leggings.  THEY DON'T WANT TO USE RESOURCES AND DO IT ALL AT ONCE.

 

2. "She is focused on FEMALE clothing as the priority.  I am just saying FEMALE CLOTHING is NOT a priority."

 

Female clothing should be a priority. It has been neglected.

 

As with male clothing, and pretty much anything other than lowriders.  Its just that the other things that are neglected takes priority.  Female clothing IS a priority in updates.  It just not THE priority.

 

3. "There is a HUGE market for racing in GTA and people, and even some GTA Youtubers are becoming big names by focusing primarily on racing.  If racing wasn't popular in GTA, certain channels wouldn't have grown so much."

 

And GTA isn't a racing simulator, yet it has this? Can't have it all ways can you?

 

If racing generates enough $$$ for R$, they will have it.  Besides, GTA has featured illegal street racing for a LONG TIME as a part of GTA (a bigger part than clothes).  GTA is also a sh*tty racing simulator compared to Gran Turismo.

 

4. "R* did NOT place the option to add the clothing to be worn together.  It was supposed to be WORN SEPARATE.  What she did was glitch the boots and leggings together.  The only way that it made its way into the game was by glitching.  Because R$ removed the glitched clothes (or tried to), they showed that it wasn't supposed to be in the game in the first place.  R* intended their clothing to NOT be layered with boots and leggings.  R* did NOT place the option to layer boots and leggings in the game.  If the modders wanted to go against R$, at least they should fix the clipping. "

 

Once again, Rockstar should have added this in the first place. She should not have had to glitch to obtain it.

 

This goes back to the community wants vs. R$'s resources, which will be explained later.

 

5.  "Lowriders suck too, but R$ playing into the "stereotypes" is why females get "manly" clothes that update."

 

The point being? She can complain about that if she wants.

 

We ALL are complaining about lowriders.  Most of us sold most of our lowriders already.

 

6. "Lowriders are just repaints of cars and clothing and a reason to get people to come back to GTA when they could be playing The Division.  Besides, its easier to add in repaints of existing models rather than to add new ones.  So no wonder they release Lowriders part 34, 46, 67 every few weeks.  R* just allows the already included lowrider paints and whatnot to be added to the already included cars.  They don't need to code in much of any new layers.  At most, they probably have to fix the way a certain paint livery appears on a Tornado (vs the Voodoo)."

 

That doesn't mean it's not BS that hardly anyone wants.

 

We know no one wants lowriders.  The problem is what R$ should focus their time and resources on for the next DLC.

 
7. "And they will get new clothing as the updates roll out.  Besides, clothing is a "want."  Just because people "want" things doesn't mean that they are entitled to them.  I want millions of dollars and billions of dollars.  I want to be the supreme ruler of the world.  I want to eat all sorts of junk food and NOT get fat.  I want to have the next Star Wars episode come out next month.  I wanted Villanova to LOSE.  I wanted to see Holms vs. Rousey part 2 for the title.  Wants are just wants.  We all want a lot of things, but we ain't getting it all.  Sometimes, when clothes shopping, the wife, GF, or mother wants this and that, but this and that is TOO EXPENSIVE.  You have to get this OR that, but not both, not this AND that.  Besides, my family growing up didn't have a lot of money, so the wifes, GF's and other female may have wanted clothing, the reality of wants vs. needs sat in."

 

This isn't reality. This is where dreams are meant to come true. That's why it's full of kids with guns, and I get to fly a Hind. Why are you trying to deny them their dream?

 

In "reality," it takes MONEY, TIME, AND RESOURCES to make what the community wants in the virtual world.  With the amount of people in the GTA community vs. the amount of developers in the R$'s offices making what we want, we all can't get what we want because there are many different wants in our large community and focusing on FEMALE clothing as a major update is at the bottom of the list.  Obviously R$ gave us some female clothing, but it still is not enough to satisfy the posters here.  A lot of the community however wants missions (and some races), so in future updates we will get missions, and some races.  The amount of people wanting female clothing R$ views as minor, so their clothing will be a "minor" part of updates.

 

8. "The original author failed to provide statistics of the amount of women in GTA as well.  The author is arguing about the lack of female clothing, so the BURDEN OF PROOF LIES ON HER, NOT ME.  Although there are some female gamers out there, the bulk of hardcore gamers are male.  Males also spend more time gaming than females.  The males also spend more money on gaming as well."

 

I've seen plenty of women who like games. I think they should get what they want.

 

Probably because (I assume) you are a woman, you socialize primarily with women (other than your [possible] boyfriend).  Of course you will see plenty of women who play games.  I am a man and I see mainly men play games.  Besides I cited the statistic about how men outnumber women in gaming.  Personal anecdotes can't represent all women.  Statistics > One or two personal instances of X (unless there are statistics to back it up).  Besides even if plenty of women play games, it is unfair to leave out the men.  Also, if plenty of women play games, the statistics show that it is still not enough compared to the men.  I'll relink the statistic.

 

http://www.pewintern...ies-as-a-gamer/

 

9. "Maybe the next major update will introduce some new clothing for BOTH males and females, but the R$ formula shows that the MAIN COURSE will be the update's primary content (hopefully missions or races), but clothing will probably support the main update.  If R* adds in clothes, it will be in a minor form (like X-mas).  If that happens, you won't get this AND that clothing options, you will only get this OR that, but not both (or everything that was listed)."

 

So what? Maybe that's what they'll do; doesn't mean people can't complain about it though.

 

People can complain, but others can complain and respond to complaints.

 

Why are you trying to derail her thread? Bad vibes, bad vibes.

 

I'm not against clothing in general.  I am against the topic wanting R$ to focus their limited resources PRIMARILY on FEMALE CLOTHING in a MAJOR UPDATE.  A major update is the only way the OP will get ALL of what she wants.  A minor "holiday" pack isn't enough  Besides give the males some clothing in the name of equality (in a MINOR update of course).

 

 

 

 

Let me respond with BOLD inside of the quote.

What about the male side?  GTA's clothing STILL FAVOR'S WOMEN.

 

 

Besides, even with the "male" clothing, FEMALE CLOTHING STILL DOMINATES compared to men.

 

Its geared towards the males because they mainly purcha$e the game and will give R$ the $$$.  Besides, the MALES GET LESS CLOTHING OPTIONS.  This game is NOT shop at the Target, F21, Abercrombie, American Eagle, or whatever clothing shops are in.  Ain't nobody got time to focus on fashion when the BULK of the gamer$ play for reasons other than clothing.  Besides, our systems can only hold so much space.

 

GTA Online is NOT a fashion simulator.  Try Sims for that.

 

First three quotes contradict themselves. You can't say Rockstar favour women in clothes then later on claim that they are geared to males.

 

No they don't contradict themselves.  The first quote was stating that FEMALE CLOTHES DOMINATE, the second quote says that even if you add male clothing, FEMALE CLOTHES DOMINATE, and the third quote says that FEMALE CLOTHES DOMINATE.  Seems pretty consistent to me.  Female clothes in current GTA > Male clothing in GTA (even with support).  GTA IS geared towards males, but R$ can still have a 60-40% ratio of female to male clothes.  The GAME is marketed primarily for men, HOWEVER the clothing still favors females.  We can still market a game for men, but have the GTAO clothing favor females.

 

Where is the logic in that?

 

In your 3rd quote which I'll insert here: "Ain't nobody got time to focus on fashion when the BULK of the gamer$ play for reasons other than clothing.  Besides, our systems can only hold so much space."

 

  Yeah, this is invalid hun'. Yes they do have different areas of the game such as missions, deathmatches, cars and many more. But that is why Rockstar can afford to hire a lot of people to work on these different areas, therefore making time for them to create items including clothes.  

 

No, its NOT invalid.  It costs money to make updates and we have to proportionate what the people want.  A small number want clothes, so we divvy up a small percent of a DLC with clothing.  Besides if R$ doesn't see $$$, they won't waste the $$$ on new hires.  Businesses want $$$ and if they don't see $$$, they won't waste $$$.  It will p*ss off the shareholders and upper management.  Saving $$$ makes you look good in front of upper management.

 

Now finally for a big rant. Yes, we all acknowledge that this isn't a fashion simulator, so using the "Go play Sims" is irrelevant because 1. it takes effort to find a nice outfit then which is why people turn to custom content. Gosh people. 2. The loading times kill to change outfits everyday. 3. Sims includes other skills of interior design which are hugely part of Sims. This means...SIMS ISN'T JUST FASHION PEOPLE. STOP USING SIMS AS AN ARGUMENT POINT BECAUSE IT IS IRRELEVANT. 

 

Clothing actually plays a big part in GTA V Online seeing as you wear them all the time. So it will forever continue to be produced in GTA V Online. So this thread is just advice with a side of bitching of what we want to see in GTA V Online ~ In the fashion side.

 

No one is denying clothing is a part of GTA online.  What I am saying is that clothing, when compared to the rest of GTA is MINOR.  If clothing is "big", the bulk of what makes GTA, GTA (shooting, violence, cars, money, missions, etc), is WAY BIGGER.  Besides, you will still get some female clothing and/or accessories in future DLC's.

 

Why is it there is different concept ideas with threads and ideas, yet when we have one just solely for female clothing with ideas, concepts and input from many forum members of all genders but some people just want to shift us of the apparent game we should play for fashion (Sims). 

 

Because the GTA world doesn't soley revolve around you.  Its not like R$ won't give you ANY clothes, R$ shouldn't focus most of their resources primarily on clothing.

 

I want to slay people while looking good not looking like I dressed in the dark.

 

I want my character to wear a box of Booty-O's cereal while hip swiveling over his victims.

 

I'm not some asshat who hates X, I just don't like the idea of PRIMARILY FOCUSING on female clothing in GTAO.  I'm not against SOME clothing, I am against an update PRIMARILY on clothing for PRIMARILY FEMALES.  Besides, we don't get frequent updates because it takes a LONG time to make content and R* won't hire new people for updates.  R* is on limited resources.  They aren't making as much money as when GTA came out.  R$ (hopefully) got their $$$ from the launch day sales.  Now they live off of $hark card$ because GTA is now either on clearance or sold in the secondary market.

 

 

Ignore him, that's what has kept this thread civil so far, ignoring the trolls.

 

Whats wrong with diversity of opinions?  It is HARMFUL to ignore other opinions (assuming they are taking about the discussion). 

 

A thread can be civil as long as we stick to the discussion of the topic.  My arguments were mostly responses to statements and arguments with some new arguments being brought up CONCERNING THE TOPIC OF FEMALE CLOTHING IN GTA ONLINE.

 

Besides I am NOT a "troll."  That is ad-hominem. I want to focus my attacks on the arguments, rather resort to name calling.  You don't see me name calling.  You don't see me posting pictures trying to get an emotion.  Lets NOT name call.  If I DO post a picture, it will be related to the topic at hand in some way (like a graph from a study).


Vro
  • Vro

    Goon

  • Members
  • Joined: 09 Mar 2014
  • United-States

#536

Posted 05 April 2016 - 09:53 PM Edited by hotrider567, 05 April 2016 - 09:54 PM.

Spoiler

 

pls rockster

 

mabe ill play the gaim again if some ogs get in


RustyShackleford
  • RustyShackleford

    You can look (but you can't touch)

  • Members
  • Joined: 28 Oct 2013
  • None

#537

Posted 05 April 2016 - 09:57 PM

Spoiler

 

pls rockster

 

mabe ill play the gaim again if some ogs get in

 

Hopefully R$ makes a sports update and adds that in.  I want to see how they parody the Jordans.  If they can add Ferrari and Lambo parodys in the game without being sued (successfully to stop them), I don't see why they can't add in some J's.


Hunter
  • Hunter

    Hunter civil rights activist

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 26 Jul 2015
  • None

#538

Posted 05 April 2016 - 10:04 PM Edited by Icantthinkofonew, 05 April 2016 - 10:11 PM.

 

 

 

You can rephrase your BS as much as you want; it's still BS.

 

Just a thinly veiled attack on the thread mixed with the usual "go play the sims" rubbish.

 

And for your information, I'm actually not a woman. I just don't allow this to make me biased. Plus I just happen to like women, and I hope they get what they want.

 

If you're not a troll, and you really want to debate this in a logical way, then go back to the drawing board and stop posting toxic walls of text. Also turn the caps lock off.

 

Part of why I support this topic is because the people here are civil. You're upsetting that civility.

  • Suzuki Azure Vulpine, big_papa_goose, idonknowhow and 4 others like this

CUTS3R
  • CUTS3R

    PVE and Coop advocate

  • Members
  • Joined: 27 Dec 2015
  • France
  • Next DLC Thread Page 3000 Winner

#539

Posted 05 April 2016 - 10:35 PM Edited by CUTS3R, 05 April 2016 - 10:46 PM.

People still use the "its not X its GTA" argument ? You should know by now it has no weight whatsoever no matter the subject.

 

The thing we spend the most of our time watching is our characters, so wanting them to look the way we want is extremely important. Asking in a constructive manner for more options is a legitimate request.

 

Some love to look like half naked clowns, others like being COD wannabes, theres is nothing wrong with that.

But i play a female and i want her to look like a woman i could meet in the street, with a variety of clothing i like to see on IRL women and are not currently in the game.

Whatever the haters can say about it, this thread must carry on until it gets adressed.

Because it goes way beyond asking for for more customizition. Its about aknowledging what ( for the most part ) the females players community wants and treating them as equal from the males players community.  You can't give a gender a better treatment than the other, and this goes inside and outside the game.

  • A Maned Wolf, Suzuki Azure Vulpine and Hunter like this

xDatxJunkyx
  • xDatxJunkyx

    Mack Pimp

  • Members
  • Joined: 11 Jul 2015
  • Canada

#540

Posted 05 April 2016 - 10:37 PM Edited by xDatxJunkyx, 05 April 2016 - 10:38 PM.

 

 

 

 

You can rephrase your BS as much as you want; it's still BS.

 

Just a thinly veiled attack on the thread mixed with the usual "go play the sims" rubbish.

 

And for your information, I'm actually not a woman. I just don't allow this to make me biased. Plus I just happen to like women, and I hope they get what they want.

 

If you're not a troll, and you really want to debate this in a logical way, then go back to the drawing board and stop posting toxic walls of text. Also turn the caps lock off.

 

Part of why I support this topic is because the people here are civil. You're upsetting that civility.

 

 

 

sI2fbQ.gif

 

 

d76.gif

  • TheIceWarrior, Miss-RI95, Hunter and 3 others like this




5 user(s) are reading this topic

1 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users