Quantcast

Jump to content

» «
Photo

Multiple Cities in Single Player DLC? (speculation)

152 replies to this topic
.Smaher.
  • .Smaher.

    Mr. Triangle Man

  • Members
  • Joined: 02 Sep 2015
  • United-States

#1

Posted 24 January 2016 - 11:38 PM Edited by .Smaher., 23 November 2016 - 09:59 PM.

I'm expecting a new city(s) for the upcoming Single Player DLC if it comes. Each for the protagonists's stories/episodes. Possibly Las Venturas, North Yankton, and Liberty City.

Franklin = LC

Trevor = LV and/or SF

Michael = NY


For one, the source codes for Trevor's DLC have a heavy emphasis on Casinos and Casino heists and to me, it would be a dumb move by Rockstar to have a focus on Casinos and not include Las Venturas in some way. I'm speculating that they'll add San Fierro and/or Las Venturas to Trevor's DLC IF LV is in it, because let's be honest. How stupid would it be to go back to San Andreas for the next GTA title? It only makes sense for V's DLC to be in SA. And there's already an airline in GTA V called "San Fierro Air", so that's near convenient.

Also, here's the description for the Vestra.
 

"Low wing, very light jet aircraft for the business traveller. Perfect for ferrying your favorite hookers out to meet you in Las Venturas, picking up uncut blow south of the border, or doing the school run. Doesn't come cheap, but be honest, you're getting this so people know how rich you are." ―ElitasTravel.com description.


North Yankton. Well, they've already got the map done, and it's already pretty detailed. And acording to Fun's source, Michael's DLC is set in North Yankton. And Ned Luke also made a Facebook post with names of actual places and cities in the world, and among those was North Yankton. Possibly hinting at something?

I think if LC was implemented in a DLC, it would make sense for it to feature Franklin. For one, he has a cousin (Tavell Clinton) there. And on LifeInvader, Franklin's Aunt Denise suggested that Franklin go move in with his cousin. Foreshadowing?

Spoiler


I think Fun even stated that this DLC was in production since 2012. It's been nearly 5 years, so that's more than enough time.

______________________
On a related note, was anybody here during the Genesis Age? 
 
If so, on the very last page, there's a post about a dude named Ross Wallace, who worked at Rockstar and posted about his post to California.
 
During the Pre-Release of V, there were a lot of people speculating about there being multiple cities, and a good source of proof for multiple cities was a Flickr album by sir Rossatron.
 
His Trip in 2008:

 
 USA Roadtrip 2008:After 2 years working weekends and evenings Rockstar gave us 5 weeks paid time off work. We decided on a road trip from New York to San Francisco.

Las Vegas
San Francisco 
Los Angeles
 
His Trip in 2010: (No link for this one,boys)

 
 USA 2010 Trip:Lee, Stu, DJ and I hit Las Vegas, visit the Rockstars in San Diego, continue to Los Angeles and add the full stop in San Francisco.

Las Vegas
San Francisco 
Los Angeles
 
Now, what I'm speculating is that the trip in 2008 was to get a scope of California, so they'd implement it into GTA V. But we didn't get San Fierro, or Las Venturas in V. But what if we do, eventually? I mean, if we get North Yankton and Liberty City-which are fairly big-we could get either SF or LV or BOTH at the same capacity. It would make sense because Fun said the DLC was in the works since 2012. And it's been THREE years, nearly FOUR since V came out, and still no DLC. Maybe they've been developing the DLC since then. 
 
LC is already done. We know what North Yankton looks like. San Fierro or Las Venturas could take the same amount of time to make as LS did. Rockstar did say this DLC would be monumental. (source:)

Spoiler

 
I know I most likely seem like a nutcase and all but I was speculating that V would get multiple cities until I ended up being disappointed.
 
How much of a stretch is it to assume that we'd be getting either Las Venturas or San Fierro in a DLC. I mean, if Trevor's DLC has such a heavy emphasis on Casinos and Casino heists, then it wouldn't be illogical to include Las Venturas in the expansion.


Now, I know there are people already suggesting that RStar could save SF and LV for a future GTA Title, but the thing is, I never found sense in saving SF and LV for a brand new GTA when they can correlate it with GTA V, seeing as it's set in San Andreas. I've always thought that the map extending to other parts of SA was somewhere in the pipeline. A little bit like gifbrah's fanmap.
 
It'd be a good idea since it was The Benz's vision, afterall. 

_____________________
Lastly, Liberty City, does anybody still wonder where that Liberty City pic from Funmw2? I've thorough analyzed it and I still can't see any resemble to IV. IMO, this picture looks way too smooth to be from IV. And I highly doubt it's from an EnB. The trees look as smooth as Next Gen trees in GTA V. Not to mention, the trees in the foreground in the same exact place in IV aren't dark green but they sure are in the leaked pic.

7U2JXK7.png
TWvStf8.jpg?1

Now, before anyone barges in to tell me how unreasonable I am. I think we all thought that a FPS mode pretty "unreasonable". Even with a working speedometer in the first Next Gen trailer. In comparison to that, this map expansion's not to far down the line. Rockstar even said they'd like to expand the map.


TL;DR: There is no TL; DR.

  • UltraGizmo64, assCRACK_98, ClaudeSpeed74 and 2 others like this

Original Light
  • Original Light

    You Float Like a Feather

  • The Connection
  • Joined: 08 Jun 2011
  • United-States

#2

Posted 24 January 2016 - 11:45 PM Edited by Original Light, 24 January 2016 - 11:46 PM.

Personally, I'm not going to hold my breath. Though, I am curious about the so called "leaked pic".  If someone could enlighten me, it'd be appreciated. To me, it looks like GTA IV. The picture quality is poor and there's a filter (from what I can see), which is why it looks different.

  • DIEXEL and Android like this

Maibatsu545
  • Maibatsu545

    veritas vos liberabit

  • Members
  • Joined: 19 Feb 2014
  • United-States

#3

Posted 24 January 2016 - 11:49 PM Edited by Maibatsu545, 24 January 2016 - 11:58 PM.

You are insane if you expect Las Venturas/San Fierro to be added to this game. Absolutely insane. We really don't need another thread about this, keep the hoaxes where they belong in the DLC thread.

Personally, I'm not going to hold my breath. Though, I am curious about the so called "leaked pic".  If someone could enlighten me, it'd be appreciated. To me, it looks like GTA IV. The picture quality is poor and there's a filter (from what I can see), which is why it looks different.

It was made by fun to trick gullible people into believing more of his BS.
  • LeeH1989, Official General, Original Light and 14 others like this

Zello
  • Zello

    Hired gun

  • Members
  • Joined: 20 Oct 2013
  • United-States

#4

Posted 24 January 2016 - 11:51 PM Edited by Zello, 25 January 2016 - 12:22 AM.

If they ever add new cities which they won't no such thing as map expansions in games like this

They could add versions of San Diego and Anaheim they said Southern San Andreas so if anything we go to the southern part of the state.

Both Anaheim and San Diego are in Southern California and not too far from LA

 

If they decide to do something different from that and go north I can see them add in versions of Sacramento, Oakland, and the return of San Fierro

But like I said earlier there is no such thing as map expansions


.Smaher.
  • .Smaher.

    Mr. Triangle Man

  • Members
  • Joined: 02 Sep 2015
  • United-States

#5

Posted 24 January 2016 - 11:59 PM Edited by .Smaher., 25 January 2016 - 12:00 AM.

You are insane if you expect Las Venturas/San Fierro to be added to this game. Absolutely insane. We really don't need another thread about this, keep the hoaxes where they belong in the DLC thread.

No, thanks. Seeing as how I'm not even aloud to discuss it in that thread because of your superiority complex. I'd also appreciate if this thread didn't start with a rough start, because like most things, participating in this thread is a choice.

Also, I already said it, but it would be a dumb move by Rockstar to not use the perfect opportunity to have other parts of San Andreas added to V, but for a future installment.
  • GtaoJackbroker likes this

Original Light
  • Original Light

    You Float Like a Feather

  • The Connection
  • Joined: 08 Jun 2011
  • United-States

#6

Posted 25 January 2016 - 12:01 AM Edited by Original Light, 25 January 2016 - 12:02 AM.

You have to consider how much it actually costs for R* to create these immensely detailed game worlds. Of course they made a large profit from GTA V, but if they were to invest money in making two entirely new cities as DLC, they wouldn't profit as nearly as much since it's not being sold as a separate game. It would obviously be priced less than a full game (most DLC is anywhere from $20 to $40). Not nearly as many people are going to purchase the DLC as the amount of people that bought the main game.

 

Therefore, it wouldn't make sense financially. That's why it wont happen, ever. Now, even if they were to recycle Liberty City, it would still cost money to update it both visually and bring it up to 2016 standards. They couldn't just do a copy and paste, it would look lazy. Consumers want new and exciting content to explore. 

  • Huffin-Puffin likes this

.Smaher.
  • .Smaher.

    Mr. Triangle Man

  • Members
  • Joined: 02 Sep 2015
  • United-States

#7

Posted 25 January 2016 - 12:03 AM

Personally, I'm not going to hold my breath. Though, I am curious about the so called "leaked pic".  If someone could enlighten me, it'd be appreciated. To me, it looks like GTA IV. The picture quality is poor and there's a filter (from what I can see), which is why it looks different.

The original picture is black and white but it's the enhanced version of it. I think the only thing similar about the pic to IV I the location. The picture looks too smooth, and so do the trees. It's hard to make out, but I can sorta see the light details on the trees like they would do in Next Gen GTA V.

.Smaher.
  • .Smaher.

    Mr. Triangle Man

  • Members
  • Joined: 02 Sep 2015
  • United-States

#8

Posted 25 January 2016 - 12:09 AM Edited by .Smaher., 25 January 2016 - 12:11 AM.

You have to consider how much it actually costs for R* to create these immensely detailed game worlds. Of course they made a large profit from GTA V, but if they were to invest money in making two entirely new cities as DLC, they wouldn't profit as nearly as much since it's not being sold as a separate game. It would obviously be priced less than a full game (most DLC is anywhere from $20 to $40). Not nearly as many people are going to purchase the DLC as the amount of people that bought the main game.
 
Therefore, it wouldn't make sense financially. That's why it wont happen, ever. Now, even if they were to recycle Liberty City, it would still cost money to update it both visually and bring it up to 2016 standards. They couldn't just do a copy and paste, it would look lazy. Consumers want new and exciting content to explore. 

What makes you think that a lot of people wouldn't fill their pockets and Rockstar's pockets with cash? It's already evident from this forum alone that despite the three year gap, a lot of people would still have no problem getting their hands on a DLC. Would it sale as much as V when it first came out? Surely not. But you can't tell me it won't sell good, especially not with something as major as a map expansion.

Now, about that map expansion. The only ones not modeled are San Fierro and Las Venturas. But like I said, according to Fun, this DLC's been in the works since 2012. It doesn't take nearly five years to design a city. And it's not like the cities have to be the same scale as Los Santos, either.
  • GtaoJackbroker likes this

XenoxX
  • XenoxX

    *stubborn minded*

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 28 Nov 2014
  • Germany

#9

Posted 25 January 2016 - 12:12 AM Edited by XenoxX, 25 January 2016 - 12:15 AM.

From a business perspective, releasing this amount of content in the frame of a DLC or an expansion is absolutely insane...R* could EASILY make a whole new game out of it, and sell it with bigger marketing for a 60$ release(IMO 3 hugely detailed worlds along with a Story are easily worth 60$), and set yet another record breaking sales record.

Also Ross Wallace is still working at Rockstar North according to LinkedIn...

I don't understand how ANYTHING of a road trip has to do with GTA V SP DLC, especially since that was in 2010.

Believe it or not but after a hard crunch you migh just want to have an actualy road trip which is NOT games related...

 

Also you do not link any of funmw2, you mostly MISSQUOTE him, he never even said that  MIchaels SP DLC is based in North Yankton, and if he did, please link it.

Also fun said about the Liberty City DLC that : "next week will tell if it is true or NOT true", it turned out NOT TRUE, fun never lied about anything.

  • LeeH1989, Original Light, Android and 1 other like this

.Smaher.
  • .Smaher.

    Mr. Triangle Man

  • Members
  • Joined: 02 Sep 2015
  • United-States

#10

Posted 25 January 2016 - 12:23 AM Edited by .Smaher., 25 January 2016 - 12:26 AM.

From a business perspective, releasing this amount of content in the frame of a DLC or an expansion is absolutely insane...R* could EASILY make a whole new game out of it, and sell it with bigger marketing for a 60$ release(IMO 3 hugely detailed worlds along with a Story are easily worth 60$), and set yet another record breaking sales record.
Also Ross Wallace is still working at Rockstar North according to LinkedIn...
I don't understand how ANYTHING of a road trip has to do with GTA V SP DLC, especially since that was in 2010.
Believe it or not but after a hard crunch you migh just want to have an actualy road trip which is NOT games related...
 
Also you do not link any of funmw2, you mostly MISSQUOTE him, he never even said that  MIchaels SP DLC is based in North Yankton, and if he did, please link it.
Also fun said about the Liberty City DLC that : "next week will tell if it is true or NOT true", it turned out NOT TRUE, fun never lied about anything.

Rockstar is known for being unpredictable. If they wanna add map expansion to the game (which they SAID was a possibility) then they sure as hell can. They might've been talking about Online when they said that, but Rockstar's not stupid enough to include something so major just for their online title.

I never guaranteed that Ross traveling to California meant SP DLC. But it was always speculated pre-release that it had to do with GTA V especially since Los abeles was included. There's a lot of thins strange with Ross traveling to the same place in both 2008 and 2011. Sure, it could be vacation, but Rockstar always gets people to feel of the setting in which their game is portraying.

Also, Fun never said that? Are you 100% sure about that? Because he DEFINITELY said that according to his source, Michaels DLC is set in North Yankton. I'll get a quote once I find it.

XenoxX
  • XenoxX

    *stubborn minded*

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 28 Nov 2014
  • Germany

#11

Posted 25 January 2016 - 12:27 AM

 

From a business perspective, releasing this amount of content in the frame of a DLC or an expansion is absolutely insane...R* could EASILY make a whole new game out of it, and sell it with bigger marketing for a 60$ release(IMO 3 hugely detailed worlds along with a Story are easily worth 60$), and set yet another record breaking sales record.
Also Ross Wallace is still working at Rockstar North according to LinkedIn...
I don't understand how ANYTHING of a road trip has to do with GTA V SP DLC, especially since that was in 2010.
Believe it or not but after a hard crunch you migh just want to have an actualy road trip which is NOT games related...
 
Also you do not link any of funmw2, you mostly MISSQUOTE him, he never even said that  MIchaels SP DLC is based in North Yankton, and if he did, please link it.
Also fun said about the Liberty City DLC that : "next week will tell if it is true or NOT true", it turned out NOT TRUE, fun never lied about anything.

I never guaranteed that Ross traveling to California meant SP DLC. But it was always speculated pre-release that it had to do with GTA V especially since Los abeles was included. There's a lot of thins strange with Ross traveling to the same place in both 2008 and 2011. Sure, it could be vacation, but Rockstar always gets people to feel of the setting in which their game is portraying.

Also, Fun never said that? Are you 100% sure about that? Because he DEFINITELY said that according to his source, Michaels DLC is set in North Yankton. I'll get a quote once I find it.

 

Ross is a mission designer, in fact a LEAD mission designer at Rockstar North, it does not realy make sense for him to make the road trip in order to "get a feel" of the world, since he will be working on something entirely different from the world, the missions.

 

Regarding fun, I never read it at least, i follow his Twitter and he never posted about such thing.


Maibatsu545
  • Maibatsu545

    veritas vos liberabit

  • Members
  • Joined: 19 Feb 2014
  • United-States

#12

Posted 25 January 2016 - 12:43 AM

You are insane if you expect Las Venturas/San Fierro to be added to this game. Absolutely insane. We really don't need another thread about this, keep the hoaxes where they belong in the DLC thread.

No, thanks. Seeing as how I'm not even aloud to discuss it in that thread because of your superiority complex. I'd also appreciate if this thread didn't start with a rough start, because like most things, participating in this thread is a choice.
Also, I already said it, but it would be a dumb move by Rockstar to not use the perfect opportunity to have other parts of San Andreas added to V, but for a future installment.
You're "aloud" to do anything you want, but people are also "aloud" to say you're completely idiotically wrong as well.
  • Official General, Nick Testbranch, Osho and 4 others like this

.Smaher.
  • .Smaher.

    Mr. Triangle Man

  • Members
  • Joined: 02 Sep 2015
  • United-States

#13

Posted 25 January 2016 - 12:44 AM

From a business perspective, releasing this amount of content in the frame of a DLC or an expansion is absolutely insane...R* could EASILY make a whole new game out of it, and sell it with bigger marketing for a 60$ release(IMO 3 hugely detailed worlds along with a Story are easily worth 60$), and set yet another record breaking sales record.
Also Ross Wallace is still working at Rockstar North according to LinkedIn...
I don't understand how ANYTHING of a road trip has to do with GTA V SP DLC, especially since that was in 2010.
Believe it or not but after a hard crunch you migh just want to have an actualy road trip which is NOT games related...
 
Also you do not link any of funmw2, you mostly MISSQUOTE him, he never even said that  MIchaels SP DLC is based in North Yankton, and if he did, please link it.
Also fun said about the Liberty City DLC that : "next week will tell if it is true or NOT true", it turned out NOT TRUE, fun never lied about anything.

I never guaranteed that Ross traveling to California meant SP DLC. But it was always speculated pre-release that it had to do with GTA V especially since Los abeles was included. There's a lot of thins strange with Ross traveling to the same place in both 2008 and 2011. Sure, it could be vacation, but Rockstar always gets people to feel of the setting in which their game is portraying.
Also, Fun never said that? Are you 100% sure about that? Because he DEFINITELY said that according to his source, Michaels DLC is set in North Yankton. I'll get a quote once I find it.
Ross is a mission designer, in fact a LEAD mission designer at Rockstar North, it does not realy make sense for him to make the road trip in order to "get a feel" of the world, since he will be working on something entirely different from the world, the missions.
 
Regarding fun, I never read it at least, i follow his Twitter and he never posted about such thing.
He posted it somewhere in the Story Mode DLC thread.

Cheatz_N_Trickz
  • Cheatz_N_Trickz

    Foot Soldier

  • Members
  • Joined: 18 Mar 2013

#14

Posted 25 January 2016 - 03:03 AM Edited by Cheatz_N_Trickz, 25 January 2016 - 03:04 AM.

The best you can expect is North Yankton, that has potential, it is partially modelled and would be a nice fit for DLC. Liberty City would need a pretty big makeover to bring it in line with V graphically, but this is reaching, just for DLC. And San Fierro or Las Venturas? You're dreaming.

I don't know if we'll ever see recreations of SF and LV, Los Santos was always the main city in San Andreas and now they've done that... Vice City, has to be.

Then they'll just hit reset and do it all over again!
  • Official General, Original Light, Journey_95 and 2 others like this

Official General
  • Official General

    I'm from Broker, LC, we always carry heat around here.

  • Members
  • Joined: 13 Apr 2010
  • None

#15

Posted 25 January 2016 - 03:57 AM Edited by Official General, 25 January 2016 - 05:33 AM.

@ Smaher

Multiple cities he speculates, and Rockstar haven't even confirmed the SP DLC itself, lool :D

I really wish I had your glowing, and relentless sense of optimism for this SP DLC, I really do. If there is one thing I give you credit for, is your immensely stubborn refusal let your hopes die, and your zeal in seeing light at the end of the tunnel.

Since we're in wishful thinking mode, I'd love to see SF and LV added to the map in V, if Rockstar ever did that, I'd probably never lose interest in V. I love the way the they did it in SA, I'd be in paradise if they could it using PS4 HD visuals. If Rockstar were ever gonna do SF or LV again, this would the best time to do it, as an add on SP expansion, no point in making a separate game for it. But sadly, I just don't see it happening, not a chance in Hades.
  • Osho, UltraGizmo64, josephene123 and 2 others like this

Maibatsu545
  • Maibatsu545

    veritas vos liberabit

  • Members
  • Joined: 19 Feb 2014
  • United-States

#16

Posted 25 January 2016 - 04:10 AM

While we're at the wishful thinking: I predict Rockstar is going to add a Moonbase and time travel DLC. It just makes perfect sense considering what funmw2 source (who I also know) has said. A spaceship DLC with Hypersace travel and alien sidekicks is also going to be released soon.
  • Official General, PhillBellic, Osho and 4 others like this

.Smaher.
  • .Smaher.

    Mr. Triangle Man

  • Members
  • Joined: 02 Sep 2015
  • United-States

#17

Posted 25 January 2016 - 04:34 AM Edited by .Smaher., 25 January 2016 - 04:37 AM.

The best you can expect is North Yankton, that has potential, it is partially modelled and would be a nice fit for DLC. Liberty City would need a pretty big makeover to bring it in line with V graphically, but this is reaching, just for DLC. And San Fierro or Las Venturas? You're dreaming.
I don't know if we'll ever see recreations of SF and LV, Los Santos was always the main city in San Andreas and now they've done that... Vice City, has to be.
Then they'll just hit reset and do it all over again!

If Rockstar were ever planning on adding SF and LV, then now would be a good time as any. Like I said before, it's downright stupid to decide to go back to SA in a future installment. You might as well include it in the current GTA thats set in SA. Otherwise, they might as well brush that idea off completely.

@ Smatter
Multiple cities he speculates, and Rockstar haven't even confirmed the SP DLC itself, lool :D

Really? This again? You don't even wanna try and take that back?

And later this year, look for even more additions to both Grand Theft Auto Online and Grand Theft Auto V, including more holiday-themed updates, some very exciting Story Mode DLC and much more.


http://www.rockstarg...-Spring-Updates

You still sure about that, haha? I think you might wanna check yourself before you accuse someone of "stubbornly refusing".

If there's one thing I give you credit for, it's your complete lack of observation skills. That argument's been left in the dirt countless times. It shouldn't even be labelled as an argument lol. :D

Zello
  • Zello

    Hired gun

  • Members
  • Joined: 20 Oct 2013
  • United-States

#18

Posted 25 January 2016 - 04:36 AM Edited by Zello, 25 January 2016 - 04:37 AM.

While we're at the wishful thinking: I predict Rockstar is going to add a Moonbase and time travel DLC. It just makes perfect sense considering what funmw2 source (who I also know) has said. A spaceship DLC with Hypersace travel and alien sidekicks is also going to be released soon.

You're way off they clearly said a prehistoric caveman DLC

That's right GTA V 10,000 BC

 

Here's the trailer

  • Nick Testbranch, UltraGizmo64, Maibatsu545 and 1 other like this

Osho
  • Osho

    High Roller

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 03 Nov 2012
  • None

#19

Posted 25 January 2016 - 04:44 AM

There's a difference between fantasy and reality and this clearly sounds like one of those numerous fairy tales floating around without understanding the practical side of the situation for it to happen in real.

At least, SP DLC speculation is based on some engaging hints that saves it from being merely wishful thinking, including the history of EFLC to back it up as a reason to voice your expectation for the same, again.

The only thing I expect now is another title update.
  • Official General likes this

.Smaher.
  • .Smaher.

    Mr. Triangle Man

  • Members
  • Joined: 02 Sep 2015
  • United-States

#20

Posted 25 January 2016 - 04:49 AM

There's a difference between fantasy and reality and this clearly sounds like one of those numerous fairy tales floating around without understanding the practical side of the situation for it to happen in real.
At least, SP DLC speculation is based on some engaging hints that saves it from being merely wishful thinking, including the history of EFLC to back it up as a reason to voice your expectation for the same, again.
The only thing I expect now is another title update.

Fairy tales? This isn't a wishlist thread. This is pure speculation.

GtaoJackbroker
  • GtaoJackbroker

    DLC Enthusiast

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 14 Jan 2016
  • United-States

#21

Posted 25 January 2016 - 05:01 AM

There's a difference between fantasy and reality and this clearly sounds like one of those numerous fairy tales floating around without understanding the practical side of the situation for it to happen in real.
At least, SP DLC speculation is based on some engaging hints that saves it from being merely wishful thinking, including the history of EFLC to back it up as a reason to voice your expectation for the same, again.
The only thing I expect now is another title update.

Fairy tales? This isn't a wishlist thread. This is pure speculation.
@smaher dont worry, I can't wait to see the faces 😂😂😨

Cheatz_N_Trickz
  • Cheatz_N_Trickz

    Foot Soldier

  • Members
  • Joined: 18 Mar 2013

#22

Posted 25 January 2016 - 05:10 AM

If Rockstar were ever planning on adding SF and LV, then now would be a good time as any. Like I said before, it's downright stupid to decide to go back to SA in a future installment. You might as well include it in the current GTA thats set in SA. Otherwise, they might as well brush that idea off completely.


The rules of the HD San Andreas aren't quite the same as the old one. This version was specifed as "southern", meaning the state is a lot bigger than the game world of V, and not the compact mini-state of old.

They could still return to San Andreas in a furure game but another part of it (with LV and SF maybe), perhaps by that time the tech will be good enough to include an updated Los Santos as well, and between them have the different counties, with towns similar to North Yankton.

VenomsnakeVII
  • VenomsnakeVII

    RDR2 Drought Fighter

  • Members
  • Joined: 22 Aug 2013
  • United-States

#23

Posted 25 January 2016 - 05:10 AM

 

There's a difference between fantasy and reality and this clearly sounds like one of those numerous fairy tales floating around without understanding the practical side of the situation for it to happen in real.
At least, SP DLC speculation is based on some engaging hints that saves it from being merely wishful thinking, including the history of EFLC to back it up as a reason to voice your expectation for the same, again.
The only thing I expect now is another title update.

Fairy tales? This isn't a wishlist thread. This is pure speculation.

 

Which sadly failed like the countless other threads over the same subject due to petty arguments. Maybe it's time to look at the facts man.

  • Official General likes this

.Smaher.
  • .Smaher.

    Mr. Triangle Man

  • Members
  • Joined: 02 Sep 2015
  • United-States

#24

Posted 25 January 2016 - 05:13 AM

There's a difference between fantasy and reality and this clearly sounds like one of those numerous fairy tales floating around without understanding the practical side of the situation for it to happen in real.
At least, SP DLC speculation is based on some engaging hints that saves it from being merely wishful thinking, including the history of EFLC to back it up as a reason to voice your expectation for the same, again.
The only thing I expect now is another title update.

Fairy tales? This isn't a wishlist thread. This is pure speculation.
Which sadly failed like the countless other threads over the same subject due to petty arguments. Maybe it's time to look at the facts man.
I would if there were "facts". Let me guess, you've got insider source that a SP DLC isn't coming?

VenomsnakeVII
  • VenomsnakeVII

    RDR2 Drought Fighter

  • Members
  • Joined: 22 Aug 2013
  • United-States

#25

Posted 25 January 2016 - 05:18 AM

 

 

 

There's a difference between fantasy and reality and this clearly sounds like one of those numerous fairy tales floating around without understanding the practical side of the situation for it to happen in real.
At least, SP DLC speculation is based on some engaging hints that saves it from being merely wishful thinking, including the history of EFLC to back it up as a reason to voice your expectation for the same, again.
The only thing I expect now is another title update.

Fairy tales? This isn't a wishlist thread. This is pure speculation.
Which sadly failed like the countless other threads over the same subject due to petty arguments. Maybe it's time to look at the facts man.
I would if there were "facts". Let me guess, you've got insider source that a SP DLC isn't coming?

 

Nope, just being real. what about your source that says it is coming?

  • Official General likes this

.Smaher.
  • .Smaher.

    Mr. Triangle Man

  • Members
  • Joined: 02 Sep 2015
  • United-States

#26

Posted 25 January 2016 - 05:34 AM

There's a difference between fantasy and reality and this clearly sounds like one of those numerous fairy tales floating around without understanding the practical side of the situation for it to happen in real.
At least, SP DLC speculation is based on some engaging hints that saves it from being merely wishful thinking, including the history of EFLC to back it up as a reason to voice your expectation for the same, again.
The only thing I expect now is another title update.

Fairy tales? This isn't a wishlist thread. This is pure speculation.
Which sadly failed like the countless other threads over the same subject due to petty arguments. Maybe it's time to look at the facts man.
I would if there were "facts". Let me guess, you've got insider source that a SP DLC isn't coming?
Nope, just being real. what about your source that says it is coming?
I'd tell you if I only I ever claimed it was.

ClaudeSpeed74
  • ClaudeSpeed74

    Violent Demise

  • Members
  • Joined: 17 Jul 2015
  • United-States

#27

Posted 25 January 2016 - 05:47 AM

I still believe Liberty City will be added in entirety to both Single player and Online, And they will make GTA 6 Vice City and it will also will be able to transverse between the other two cities. If we are lucky, We might get North Yankton also.


Edward Nashton
  • Edward Nashton

    A Traveler of Both Time and Space.

  • Members
  • Joined: 11 Mar 2015
  • United-States

#28

Posted 25 January 2016 - 05:47 AM Edited by Edward Nashton, 25 January 2016 - 05:50 AM.

7U2JXK7.png

Why does this image keep showing up? It's piss easy to achieve this look on the PC; ICEnhancer + one of the many tree mods + maximum draw distance = SP DLC confirmed?

 

And your theory is indeed insane, I'm open to the fact that maybe, maaaybe some form of single player DLC could come out, but this... is a complete fantasy, it's starting to resemble something I would've doodled in my notebook back in third grade - "Yeah, three new cities *scrtch-scrtch* and, and laser guns *scrtch-scrtch* then a T-Rex bites Trevor's head off *scrtch-scrtch* a final boss fight against Darth Vader and Megatron..."

  • Official General, Original Light, Osho and 3 others like this

Osho
  • Osho

    High Roller

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 03 Nov 2012
  • None

#29

Posted 25 January 2016 - 05:51 AM

Fairy tales? This isn't a wishlist thread. This is pure speculation.

It is a wishlist type thread.
On what basis, hints, or strong evidences, do you expect me to speculate about this multiple cities?
Like Official General said, Rockstar have yet to even 'formally confirm' the release of the SP DLC first, and you have started dreaming about something that has zero engaging hints or clues, unlike SP DLC, that at least, has some merit in it that not only allows us, the fans, but even several gaming sites, the analyst who raised the question during earnings call to T2 CEO Zelnick, to speculate because that's what the majority seeks to believe, nowhere I have seen that this multiple cities DLC has got any credibility nor any support as a voice of the majority.

First let theSP DLC happen, and then we shall think about this.
  • Official General and UltraGizmo64 like this

the buckit
  • the buckit

    The Dude

  • Members
  • Joined: 08 Sep 2013

#30

Posted 25 January 2016 - 05:53 AM

Why a new thread smasher?




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users