Let's put aside the Daily Wail source and re-read what I actually said instead of descending into moronic straw men. You'll note I was referring to Islamic extremism, not general impact on society. But since you don't actually appear able to read, you've clearly missed this.
The massive influx of mostly economic migrants from a backwards culture had no impact on society
Actually, you've just proven my point. Muslim converts make up 25% of Jihadis, but converts only make up about 2-4% of Muslims in Western countries. Therefore, the statement that converts display a far higher propendity towards violent extremism is demonstrably true, not false.
In countries such as Belgium and Germany they (converts) constitute 20 to 25 percent of the 'jihadi scene,' says Lorenzo Vidino, a senior researcher at Zurichs Center for Security Studies...
And you're an incompetent debater whose blind to nuance and entirely reliant on straw men. Stating that certain countries don't experience the same issues with violent extremism as others does not equate to stating that violent extremism is nonexistent.
And yet again you've demonstrated your complete inability to debate properly. First you cite a country I don't even mention, then then you cite a report on fundamentalism in response to a commentary on extremism, apparently totally ignorance to the distinction between the two.
It's becoming obvious you live in some kind of phantasy world
Good thing I never actually asserted that violent extremism was solely confined to socially impoverished groups then isn't it? I don't know if it's a case of your reading comprehension being that bad, or whetger you're creating these farcical straw men because you can't actually respond to the points im putting forward, but it's kind of hilarious.
...pretty much repudiate the theory that only the poor and uneducated are vulnerable to radicalization.
I'm not sure how you could reasonably consider that an extension of my argument. Pretty silly if you ask me.
Sure, why not go further with your reasoning and openly blame the victim?