Jump to content

» «

Lindsay Lohan vs Rockstar Games

4 replies to this topic

Poll: Lindsay Lohan VS Rockstar Games (20 member(s) have cast votes)

Does Lindsay Lohan have a case against Rockstar Games that will hold up in court

  1. Yes. (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  2. No. (20 votes [100.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 100.00%

  3. There is not enough evidence to state my opinion. (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote
  • Sir_Martin_Esq

    Player Hater

  • Members
  • Joined: 31 Jul 2014
  • England


Posted 03 August 2014 - 06:42 PM Edited by N3RD4L1F3, 03 August 2014 - 06:43 PM.

As most of you know Lindsay Lohan has filed a suit against Rockstar Games for Allegedly using her likeness in Grand theft Auto: V (This is used for the lacy Jonas character).



 This thread is for people to discuss whether she has a case or not. I am going to give some evidence for both sides of this case so that you can make up your opinion. (These are not my options, Just facts)


For the case:

The clothing that Lacy Jonas is wearing during the mission "Lacy Jonas" Is smiler to Lindsay Lohans Clothing brand 6126.

Her likeness was used (Issues with paparazzi, Sextape ).


Against the case:

The character model that is used for lacy Jonas is also used for another character (Kerry McIntosh)a+(3).jpg.


Rockstar Games has paid Shelby Welinder for modelling for the this pictureactual_1352056603.jpg

Anyway what do you think vote on the poll and explain your reasons why.

  • universetwisters

    brb sitting in my 85 Skylark as it idles in the garage

  • Members
  • Joined: 26 Feb 2011
  • United-States
  • Best Total Overhaul 2017 [GTA: Underground]
    Best Map 2017 Contribution [Liberty City Countryside]
    Best Conversion 2016 [GTA: Underground] [Contribution]
    Best Workshop 2014
    Most Improved 2014
    Funniest Member 2014
    April Fools Winner 2015


Posted 03 August 2014 - 06:57 PM

It's obvious the case won't hold up in court, seeing as parodies are protected under fair use. I'm interested in following the case, though. Even if they don't televise it, it should still be interesting what the arguments are.

  • BLOOD likes this

  • wiizardii


  • Members
  • Joined: 07 Oct 2013
  • None


Posted 03 August 2014 - 07:19 PM Edited by Phoenix_Shit, 03 August 2014 - 10:33 PM.

I don't even know why this is a thread.... Lindsey Methheadan can go and sniff up more cocaine than ever. She needs money, that's why she sued R*. It's kind of funny if you think about it, lol. But to answer the topics title: 





This, whatever it is supposed to be, VS R*..



I don't know? Wich one will win? Lets see.... Rockstargames, a multi millionaire gaming company that created one of the greatest gaming franchises of all time, against a meth-head dumb blonde.... I don't know, who will win? 

  • BLOOD likes this


    Formerly: Blood-Is-in-Diamond or BiiD

  • Members
  • Joined: 21 Dec 2013
  • None
  • Take-Two Analyst of the Year


Posted 03 August 2014 - 10:15 PM Edited by Blood-Is-in-Diamond, 03 August 2014 - 10:15 PM.

NO!...btw is this still News? :lol:

  • ObsydianRaven

    Formerly Sethpenguin

  • Members
  • Joined: 07 Jul 2008
  • None
  • Contribution Award [Concepts]


Posted 04 August 2014 - 01:40 AM

This, whatever it is supposed to be, VS R*..

The term is: Embarrassment to Gingers everywhere.
  • BLOOD likes this

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users