(I know the Wishlist thread and the B&M one... it's a mod decision where this belongs, not yours, so please if you can do me the favor, don't post that links, there's no necessary. Thanks)
It might be a mod's decision, but each person who creates a thread should take it upon themselves to post it in the right section and if you're idea is already covered or is suited by another thread, you should post it there. What's the point it making your own? "ooh, look people like MY idea, they want to talk to ME.
Guess what? In these threads you never get views or opinions... which sucks because you come to a forum to share points of view, not to let your words in the air. I suggested a sub-forum section for these threads instead of all in one, but that's another matter. Never said that you can't post something or what are you limited to say, just asked it for a favor.
The actual system sucks... and I mean, it really sucks.
How can a full armored car can keep it's speed? Along with the armor upgrades, you can make engine upgrades too, right?
Yeah, so? Still no logic.
How can even a super sports car can get full armored? What do you mean by a "super sports" car? and any car can be reinforced regardless of what kinda of car it is
I'm not totally sure. Super sports car... super car (e.g. Adder). But tell me, why a racing car needs that? You agree about the extra weight. You can armor a sports car, but you loose speed. More fair.
How can sports rims get better performance in a mountain? I'm not even sure by what mean by this. If you're referring to sports tires, they don't get better performance, there's no performance difference in any of the tires, let alone rims.
I apologize about that, typing mistake. The correct sentence was "How can a sports car get better performance in a mountain?".
I consider that the main reason of why free roam is full of Adders and Zentornos, there's no reason to choice my Phoenix in closed streets if they're going to rape me in performance (and I still see people turning like crap in free roam). Let's be honest... the game would be fun if the envoirment make you use a proper vehicle for every situation. The reason there's more supers around is mainly based on the player base, not the map. The reason you should choose one car over another is because that's what you want to drive, you wouldn't base it on what everyone else is driving.
People prefers super cars because they're better over all. I've seen a lot of people tired of their Zentorno but they use it because is the best option in missions/free roam.
No where does it say you have to drive the same car as other people do. And you're worried about performance in free-mode, why? My opinion a good driver can drive anything.
Of course, I said it. I'm not worried either.
Are you in the desert? Well, call for a Rebel or a Sanchez...
Are you in the closed streets? Well, call for a Sentinel or a Sabre Turbo...
Are you in the road and want to get fast to Paleto? Well, call for a Entity or a Massacro...
Taking a trip to the airport? Well, a bike will do the job...
What exaclty is stopping you from doing that now? If I'm going off-roading, then yeah I choose one of my off-road vehicle.
Did you read the part when I said that I do that already?
But no... a Zentorno is perfect for every situation, made pointless in have muscles or sedans, they're only in our garages for racing, not in my case, I drive my Phoenix often and take the Sanchez if I'm going to the desert because I want to think the supers aren't the answer for everything.
That is one part, upgrading vehicles is the compliment for this mess.
Almost every single upgrade boost the hell out of the acceleration, and the best brakes only upgrade like 1/8 of one of the five bits in the bar, almost nothing. Engines, Turbo, Transmission... three parts that upgrade acceleration, and we can agree that rarely a full modded car hasn't full Acceleration. Would be better if:
I'm confused as to why you dont want the most acceleration you're car can get.
Because you can't upgrade your brakes (and the ones that already exist are crap), top speed or something else beside acceleration.
The sh*ttier your car is, better the upgrades can be made.
That simply doesnt make sense, even in RL that's not how it is.And how do you use the Dominator as your example of a "sh*tty car"
Of course... I used the Dominator as a muscle example. And I wasn't using sh*tty that literal.
Brakes: Street brakes
Engine: EMS Upgrade, Level 2
Brakes: Race brakes
Engine: EMS Upgrade, Level 4
Transmission: Race Transmission
And the more armor you put in your car, the slower it comes. Also, bulletproof tires in a super car is stupid... I can't imagine the material of that tires, it's enough advantage if you're after one with a bounty then shooting the tires would make things more fair. Do you want Turbo? Then say goodbye to brakes. This way would let people create proper racing vehicles or proper combat/getaway vehicles.
Armor should increase weight I agree with that, but that can be accounted for and balanced out to where armor doesn't effect speed. Bullet proof tires can go on any car, just because you can "imagine" doesn't make it false. And so now it's about you having an easier time with bountys? Is that what all of this about? And why would getting a turbo installed get rid of your brakes, that just doesn't make sense. People can already create a racing vehicle or a "combat/getaway" vehicle. No one forces you to buy every upgrade.
1. Yeah, the whole thread is because I can't get a single bounty... is so hard that I don't chase them anymore. You got me.
2. That was an example, but if your car is faster, maybe the brakes won't work that well... I don't know.
3. "No one forces..." Jeez, learn another line.
Also... rims should make a difference, but no, they're only for nice looking, not function at all.
Without statistics on the rims and wheels, there's no way to account for that. You would need size, weight, diameter, etc/
And it's not making the game boring, it could bring more variety and people would find fun in choosing the right vehicle for every purpose.
That's simply your opinion, so I wont bother debating that.
Yet you did it...
And I don't want more content, just change the actual system... but I thinks it's impossible because Rockstar aims to kids instead of mature players. Just hope that GTA VI isn't a PG-13.
It's impossible because the would need to revamp the entire game, starting with the physics engine. It has nothing to do with the R* demographic. It sounds like to me, you want Grand Turismo with guns, which I cant even begin to understand.
Eh no... they don't need to re-do the game... just adjust it, but like I said, that won't happen.
My thoughts are you want a system that benefits you and one that you're accustomed to, for that I suggest you go play a facing sim such as Forza or Grand Turismo. That's where you'll find realism when it comes to cars. You're whole post is contradictory, you somehow want more and less vehicle customization at the same time, you want more and less restrictions. It seems you just want those bountys to be easier, when it comes down to it.
Yes, I want my own videogame, you got me again. And I want all the bounties that I don't give a sh*t, it's obvious. I forget I'm debating with Dr. House, you forgot to say what's my K/D ratio based in my post, it's obvious I want a more fair system in the car customization because I can kill someone driving an Adder. No, I don't want more customizations, just limit the existing ones according the car you use, a sports armored car with turbo is pretty dumb.
You started doing it fine, but ended like a smart ass. That's why I don't like examples, there's always one idiot who take it so seriously.