Posted 14 June 2014 - 08:05 AM
Edited by Lazyboy., 14 June 2014 - 08:05 AM.
For gameplay and story, Rockstar. For graphics, Ubisoft.
Rockstar North did epic driving mechanics in GTA IV
San Diego and North did fun shooting mechanics in RDR and GTAV. Still need to add recoil and smoother animations though, this is where Ubisoft are better.
I think overall, San Diego are better than North and Ubisoft. They made MCLA, the graphics were nice, it was one of those "perfect" games. Amazing customisation, way more depth than other games had in pretty much everything. Interior views, storyline with in-game cutscenes, different race types, one of the best games ever.
Then there's RDR, fun shooting mechanics, different minigames, great story.
Rockstar as a whole, would completely demolish Ubisoft if they worked together properly.
Rockstar North would do map design and details and driving mechanics (based on IV's)
Rockstar San Diego would do the story, minigames, customisation and add details to the map that affect gameplay, such as ramps. MCLA mixed jumps into the world really well, while still keeping it believeable.
Rockstar Vancouever, or whoever did MP3's shooting mechanics, would do the shooting.
That would literaslly be the best game EVER. Nothing could beat it.
matajuegos01 and BLOOD like this