Wow, you totally debunked by arguments and refuted all of them in legitimate mature ways. No cowardice here. Hahahahah. /s
Seriously though, I'm not remotely surprised you'd turn to using Straw Man tactics. Through reading your posts, I didn't think you'd be someone capable of rational thought.
The intra-species hunting example was used as an analogy to demonstrate how the world of dating/romance/relationships works. But like I said I'm not surprised at how it went right over your head.
This illustration shows the origins of inter-species mating. Notice how two men had to compete with one another for the female of their choice. This, in large, still applies today. The competition does not stay with brute violence, but has moved onto who has the silkier hair or the nicer car or the better career and whatnot.
To eliminate the competition, the challenge, or any sort of prowess/skill needed from obtaining sexual contact inevitably lowers a female's appeal.
Men have to work hard for sex. Women do not. This is why men are commended for lots of sex whereas women are not. Men like working hard for sex when it matters, and like quick-effortless-sex when it doesn't. The former is facilitated by real women whereas the latter is facilitated by sluts.
As I mentioned in my "non-sensical pseudo-intellectual PM"....
If you want to say "don't publically call a girl a slut and make her feel bad" that is your opinion and that in itself is not wrong. But to deny the concept of sluts altogether, or to condemn any man that acknowledges it IS wrong...whether you accept it or not.
You cannot take away a man's right to choose. Sexual chastity and other such things are just as valid a criteria to approve/reject interactions with a woman as anything else.
If John's friend, Steve, tries hooking him up with a woman...he is in full justice to say "nah dude, she's too slutty for me" the same way he could say "nah man, I don't date fat girls" or "I don't want to date a blonde"
Feminist groups and women like you may make it so that it becomes socially unacceptable to insult sluts in a public setting. However, you will never rewrite the biological composition of the male species. Any man with at least an ounce of class and self-respect will still prefer a classy chaste woman, and never see a slut as a worthy woman to form a sincere relationship with. She will simply be a f*ck-buddy in his life, if she is in his life at all. She will be a quick vagina to have sex with whenever he feels the need to, but will never take a place at his side in marriage or some sort of long-term serious romantic relationship.
Because of this, the anti-slut-shaming army has lost before the battle began and never holds the possibility of winning. Ever.
That's it. I'm not going to say anymore as it's abundantly clear you're just another one of those femtards who is blind to any sort of logic and reason and vehemently stand behind your "womyn's liberashun hurr durr" crap and just fling the word "troll" around as opposed to a legitimate counter-argument. Lol. Clearly not someone worth debating with, or even attempting to debate with. Just another delusional feminist who has yet to wake up to the sights and sounds of the real world. It's truly a pity.
Now let's get back to our star-of-the-show, CJ Killed Ryder.
OP: Have there been any updates on your situation?