Seriously, how can some people say that VC or III are better games than V? I mean it can be proven with facts that GTA SA has some content over GTA V but saying III or VC have more content or replay-ability or that are better is like claiming a 400 lbs fat-ass can outrun an athletic dude at a triathlon.
I literally got this reply on YouTube from a guy who was screaming bloody murder and trying to convince me of the following:
"For one GTA V had more variety to VC and 3 but VC and 3 had more quantity of the missions....Let's say V has 10 different missions and 3 has 5. V has about 3-5 different versions of that mission where 3 would have 15 versions. Hence it having more content"
And I'm pretty sure he believed it himself. I understand the nostalgia but let's not start sounding like moronic fanboys who talk nonsenses