Quantcast

Jump to content

» «
Photo

GTA V VS GTA SA

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
142 replies to this topic
Fuzzknuckles
  • Fuzzknuckles

    Chronic Ape

  • The Connection
  • Joined: 10 Apr 2004
  • None

#121

Posted 4 days ago

:lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

 

No wonder this forum is a joke, right?

You should probably just log out now mate, you're not really contributing anything of worth. 

 

Fuzz, haven't you noticed that most people without avatars tend to post nonsense?

Well... yeah. 


gta3masta5000
  • gta3masta5000

    'Sup?

  • Members
  • Joined: 28 Apr 2012
  • United-States

#122

Posted 4 days ago

I'm gonna go shower. When I come back, maybe everyone will have realized that SA wins.

  • SAVILLAIN and Militia like this

Vercetti42
  • Vercetti42

    Generic GTA Username™

  • Members
  • Joined: 13 May 2013
  • India

#123

Posted 4 days ago

Look, i enjoyed Sa just like u but it isn't the messiah. There are better games than sa.

also i said most people, not all. And yes i am typing on my phone.
  • ten-a-penny likes this

Militia
  • Militia

    Proof Vehicle Collector

  • Members
  • Joined: 15 Nov 2013
  • United-States

#124

Posted 4 days ago

 

:lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

 

No wonder this forum is a joke, right?

You should probably just log out now mate, you're not really contributing anything of worth.

 

And what are you contributing exactly?  Movie references?  And nah, I won't log out, I just go back to PM and talk to people who share the same interests

 

Oh, and SA is king.

I'm gonna go shower. When I come back, maybe everyone will have realized that SA wins.

 

LOL, or maybe the topic will be locked by the all mighty modmasterrace

  • SAVILLAIN likes this

Fuzzknuckles
  • Fuzzknuckles

    Chronic Ape

  • The Connection
  • Joined: 10 Apr 2004
  • None

#125

Posted 4 days ago

 

 

:lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

 

No wonder this forum is a joke, right?

You should probably just log out now mate, you're not really contributing anything of worth.

 

And what are you contributing exactly?  Movie references?  And nah, I won't log out, I just go back to PM and talk to people who share the same interests

 

Oh, and SA is king.

I'm gonna go shower. When I come back, maybe everyone will have realized that SA wins.

 

LOL, or maybe the topic will be locked by the all mighty modmasterrace

 

SA is YOUR king. Don't assume that it's everyone else's as well. Your opinion is no more valid than anyone elses, so please stop making it out like your opinion is some sort of globally accepted fact. It's not. 

  • SonOfLiberty and ten-a-penny like this

Vercetti42
  • Vercetti42

    Generic GTA Username™

  • Members
  • Joined: 13 May 2013
  • India

#126

Posted 4 days ago Edited by Vercetti42, 4 days ago.

SA is king? If that's the case IV and VC should be at a higher position since they r better than sa...
  • ten-a-penny likes this

FEAR THE SATURN
  • FEAR THE SATURN

    Mark Chump

  • Members
  • Joined: 12 Sep 2013

#127

Posted 4 days ago

SA is king? If that's the case IV and VC should be at w higher position since they r better than sa...

gta 1 is better than gta vice city and gta 4.

 

gta sa>gta 3>gta 2>gta 1>gta v>gta 4>gta vice city.this is the fact.


Vercetti42
  • Vercetti42

    Generic GTA Username™

  • Members
  • Joined: 13 May 2013
  • India

#128

Posted 4 days ago

You need to get some help, seriously.

Fuzzknuckles
  • Fuzzknuckles

    Chronic Ape

  • The Connection
  • Joined: 10 Apr 2004
  • None

#129

Posted 4 days ago

fact
/fakt/
noun
noun: fact; plural noun: facts
a thing that is known or proved to be true.
"the most commonly known fact about hedgehogs is that they have fleas"

 

 

--

 

 

opinion
/əˈpɪnjən/
noun
noun: opinion; plural noun: opinions
1.
a view or judgement formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge.
"that, in my opinion, is right"

 

 

---

 

I suggest everyone here spend the next 45 minutes reading this post over and over and over again until it starts to make sense. 

  • SonOfLiberty, TJtheS2000fan, ten-a-penny and 1 other like this

FEAR THE SATURN
  • FEAR THE SATURN

    Mark Chump

  • Members
  • Joined: 12 Sep 2013

#130

Posted 4 days ago

You need to get some help, seriously.

Tell me how vice city is better than gta sa.you will say that you dont like gangwars thats the reason vicecity is better than gta sa.but most people loved the gangwars and sa was better than vice city in many other ways.


iam2fresh
  • iam2fresh

    Rat

  • Members
  • Joined: 07 Apr 2014
  • United-States

#131

Posted 4 days ago

 

 

I think you are a 9 yr old who dont know whats living in real world is as you completely rely upon your parents.you propably didnt played gta san andreas because it was released begore you were born.

1st get a dictionary 2nd.please explain to me how san andreas is the most realistic game ever

 

gta san andreas had more enterable building,more jobs like you do in real life police,ambulance,firefighting,quarry,truck,courier,taxi and so many jobs.you can purchase many houses all over the map and you can build your body by going to gym and impress girls and have sex wit them.the map is so diverse you can get lost in the desert,forests and mountains of gta san andreas but in gta v you cant get that feeling.there are always roads with traffic near by wherever you go.gta sa had 3 cities and travelling between cities make it feel like travelling for hours.san andreas had jetpack,drivable trains,realistic physics,casinos and so many other features which make it great game of all time.

 

you said so many reasons why this game isn't realistic.

1. a functional jetpack in 1994

2. car physics running over boxes slow down you car and if the car gets shot 10 times it explodes.

3. you can't enter a police vehicle and then become a cop or fire fighter.

4. you can purchase many houses but you don't have to pay a bill.

im not trying to start a quote train so ill say this: gta san andreas is not realstic at all. i respect the game for what it is. yea it was amazing in 2004 but it has aged a lot. also just because the game is full of things to do doesn't make it amazing

  • Fuzzknuckles, Vercetti42 and ten-a-penny like this

CasualSergiu
  • CasualSergiu

    Cliché

  • Members
  • Joined: 08 Mar 2014
  • European-Union

#132

Posted 4 days ago

 

You need to get some help, seriously.

Tell me how vice city is better than gta sa.you will say that you dont like gangwars thats the reason vicecity is better than gta sa.but most people loved the gangwars and sa was better than vice city in many other ways.

 

As I've said before, you're fanboy-ing too much. Every goddamn time, 'itz a fact dat sa iz betta dan everitin in de univerz'. Seriously, start accepting other opinions too, your opinion is not fact, nor is it made for everyone else to go by.

  • Fuzzknuckles, SonOfLiberty and ten-a-penny like this

FEAR THE SATURN
  • FEAR THE SATURN

    Mark Chump

  • Members
  • Joined: 12 Sep 2013

#133

Posted 4 days ago

 

 

 

I think you are a 9 yr old who dont know whats living in real world is as you completely rely upon your parents.you propably didnt played gta san andreas because it was released begore you were born.

1st get a dictionary 2nd.please explain to me how san andreas is the most realistic game ever

 

gta san andreas had more enterable building,more jobs like you do in real life police,ambulance,firefighting,quarry,truck,courier,taxi and so many jobs.you can purchase many houses all over the map and you can build your body by going to gym and impress girls and have sex wit them.the map is so diverse you can get lost in the desert,forests and mountains of gta san andreas but in gta v you cant get that feeling.there are always roads with traffic near by wherever you go.gta sa had 3 cities and travelling between cities make it feel like travelling for hours.san andreas had jetpack,drivable trains,realistic physics,casinos and so many other features which make it great game of all time.

 

you said so many reasons why this game isn't realistic.

1. a functional jetpack in 1994

2. car physics running over boxes slow down you car and if the car gets shot 10 times it explodes.

3. you can't enter a police vehicle and then become a cop or fire fighter.

4. you can purchase many houses but you don't have to pay a bill.

im not trying to start a quote train so ill say this: gta san andreas is not realstic at all. i respect the game for what it is. yea it was amazing in 2004 but it has aged a lot. also just because the game is full of things to do doesn't make it amazing

 

You can enter police vehicle and then become a cop.gta san andreas had many purchasable houses with realistic interiors but even not to pay bills thats realistic enough.the us army has many secret machines,equipments and vehicles in area 51 much advanced than the jetpack even in 1994.cars running over boxes damages wheels so it slows down which is realistic.


gta3masta5000
  • gta3masta5000

    'Sup?

  • Members
  • Joined: 28 Apr 2012
  • United-States

#134

Posted 4 days ago

 

 

 

I think you are a 9 yr old who dont know whats living in real world is as you completely rely upon your parents.you propably didnt played gta san andreas because it was released begore you were born.

1st get a dictionary 2nd.please explain to me how san andreas is the most realistic game ever

 

gta san andreas had more enterable building,more jobs like you do in real life police,ambulance,firefighting,quarry,truck,courier,taxi and so many jobs.you can purchase many houses all over the map and you can build your body by going to gym and impress girls and have sex wit them.the map is so diverse you can get lost in the desert,forests and mountains of gta san andreas but in gta v you cant get that feeling.there are always roads with traffic near by wherever you go.gta sa had 3 cities and travelling between cities make it feel like travelling for hours.san andreas had jetpack,drivable trains,realistic physics,casinos and so many other features which make it great game of all time.

 

you said so many reasons why this game isn't realistic.

1. a functional jetpack in 1994

 

*1992


CasualSergiu
  • CasualSergiu

    Cliché

  • Members
  • Joined: 08 Mar 2014
  • European-Union

#135

Posted 4 days ago Edited by CasualSergiu, 4 days ago.

 

 

 

 

I think you are a 9 yr old who dont know whats living in real world is as you completely rely upon your parents.you propably didnt played gta san andreas because it was released begore you were born.

1st get a dictionary 2nd.please explain to me how san andreas is the most realistic game ever

 

gta san andreas had more enterable building,more jobs like you do in real life police,ambulance,firefighting,quarry,truck,courier,taxi and so many jobs.you can purchase many houses all over the map and you can build your body by going to gym and impress girls and have sex wit them.the map is so diverse you can get lost in the desert,forests and mountains of gta san andreas but in gta v you cant get that feeling.there are always roads with traffic near by wherever you go.gta sa had 3 cities and travelling between cities make it feel like travelling for hours.san andreas had jetpack,drivable trains,realistic physics,casinos and so many other features which make it great game of all time.

 

you said so many reasons why this game isn't realistic.

1. a functional jetpack in 1994

2. car physics running over boxes slow down you car and if the car gets shot 10 times it explodes.

3. you can't enter a police vehicle and then become a cop or fire fighter.

4. you can purchase many houses but you don't have to pay a bill.

im not trying to start a quote train so ill say this: gta san andreas is not realstic at all. i respect the game for what it is. yea it was amazing in 2004 but it has aged a lot. also just because the game is full of things to do doesn't make it amazing

 

You can enter police vehicle and then become a cop.gta san andreas had many purchasable houses with realistic interiors but even not to pay bills thats realistic enough.the us army has many secret machines,equipments and vehicles in area 51 much advanced than the jetpack even in 1994.cars running over boxes damages wheels so it slows down which is realistic.

 

One question, why the hell are you always backing up SA with futile 'facts' that aren't even real? Seriously, stop seeing it all through FanboyVision.

  • Fuzzknuckles, SonOfLiberty and ten-a-penny like this

Vercetti42
  • Vercetti42

    Generic GTA Username™

  • Members
  • Joined: 13 May 2013
  • India

#136

Posted 4 days ago

 

You need to get some help, seriously.

Tell me how vice city is better than gta sa.you will say that you dont like gangwars thats the reason vicecity is better than gta sa.but most people loved the gangwars and sa was better than vice city in many other ways.

 

 

Oh yes I can.

 

Firstly Vice City's story albeit a bit simple was much better than San Andreas'. Same goes for the characters. And Tommy was a much more real and developed protagonist than CJ could have ever been. The story is consistent even if it isn't as long as SA.

 

Vice City also had an enterable airport and mall. Something that no other GTA (excluding VCS of course) or even SA has had. So I guess that counts too.

 

While SA's missions were indeed more varied, Vice City's missions definitely weren't as annoying as SA (perhaps with the exception of Demolition man) and were written in a much better fashion.

 

Also VC's side missions are about as good if not better than SA's. While SA had the content, VC had the quality. Nearly every single side mission in the game was well developed and rehearsed unlike in SA. Also GTA VC's asset system rocks.

 

VC also had the better atmosphere in my opinion. Although I did really like SA's ghetto vibe, San Fierro was just so poorly done. I'd say VC's soundtrack is just as good as SA's too.

 

And then there's Malibu Club, the first night club in the series.

 

So, yes. There is good enough reason for a person to say that VC is better than SA even if VC is the much smaller game.

  • SonOfLiberty, The Odyssey and ten-a-penny like this

CasualSergiu
  • CasualSergiu

    Cliché

  • Members
  • Joined: 08 Mar 2014
  • European-Union

#137

Posted 4 days ago Edited by CasualSergiu, 4 days ago.

 

 

You need to get some help, seriously.

Tell me how vice city is better than gta sa.you will say that you dont like gangwars thats the reason vicecity is better than gta sa.but most people loved the gangwars and sa was better than vice city in many other ways.

 

 

Oh yes I can.

 

Firstly Vice City's story albeit a bit simple was much better than San Andreas'. Same goes for the characters. And Tommy was a much more real and developed protagonist than CJ could have ever been. The story is consistent even if it isn't as long as SA.

 

Vice City also had an enterable airport and mall. Something that no other GTA (excluding VCS of course) or even SA has had. So I guess that counts too.

 

While SA's missions were indeed more varied, Vice City's missions definitely weren't as annoying as SA (perhaps with the exception of Demolition man) and were written in a much better fashion.

 

Also VC's side missions are about as good if not better than SA's. While SA had the content, VC had the quality. Nearly every single side mission in the game was well developed and rehearsed unlike in SA. Also GTA VC's asset system rocks.

 

VC also had the better atmosphere in my opinion. Although I did really like SA's ghetto vibe, San Fierro was just so poorly done. I'd say VC's soundtrack is just as good as SA's too.

 

And then there's Malibu Club, the first night club in the series.

 

So, yes. There is good enough reason for a person to say that VC is better than SA even if VC is the much smaller game.

 

Then again, don't forget to mention the fact that it's all a matter of perspective.

  • Militia likes this

iam2fresh
  • iam2fresh

    Rat

  • Members
  • Joined: 07 Apr 2014
  • United-States

#138

Posted 4 days ago

 

 

You need to get some help, seriously.

Tell me how vice city is better than gta sa.you will say that you dont like gangwars thats the reason vicecity is better than gta sa.but most people loved the gangwars and sa was better than vice city in many other ways.

 

 

Oh yes I can.

 

Firstly Vice City's story albeit a bit simple was much better than San Andreas'. Same goes for the characters. And Tommy was a much more real and developed protagonist than CJ could have ever been. The story is consistent even if it isn't as long as SA.

 

Vice City also had an enterable airport and mall. Something that no other GTA (excluding VCS of course) or even SA has had. So I guess that counts too.

 

While SA's missions were indeed more varied, Vice City's missions definitely weren't as annoying as SA (perhaps with the exception of Demolition man) and were written in a much better fashion.

 

Also VC's side missions are about as good if not better than SA's. While SA had the content, VC had the quality. Nearly every single side mission in the game was well developed and rehearsed unlike in SA. Also GTA VC's asset system rocks.

 

VC also had the better atmosphere in my opinion. Although I did really like SA's ghetto vibe, San Fierro was just so poorly done. I'd say VC's soundtrack is just as good as SA's too.

 

And then there's Malibu Club, the first night club in the series.

 

So, yes. There is good enough reason for a person to say that VC is better than SA even if VC is the much smaller game.

 

just don't reply to him he's just going to suck san andreas dick until it can't cum no more.


The Odyssey
  • The Odyssey

    Save it for a rainy day

  • Members
  • Joined: 26 Aug 2012
  • Australia

#139

Posted 4 days ago

gta san andreas is the most realistic open world game to date.


  • TheMasterfocker and stjimmy3 like this

gta3masta5000
  • gta3masta5000

    'Sup?

  • Members
  • Joined: 28 Apr 2012
  • United-States

#140

Posted 4 days ago

 

 

 

You need to get some help, seriously.

Tell me how vice city is better than gta sa.you will say that you dont like gangwars thats the reason vicecity is better than gta sa.but most people loved the gangwars and sa was better than vice city in many other ways.

 

 

Oh yes I can.

 

Firstly Vice City's story albeit a bit simple was much better than San Andreas'. Same goes for the characters. And Tommy was a much more real and developed protagonist than CJ could have ever been. The story is consistent even if it isn't as long as SA.

 

Vice City also had an enterable airport and mall. Something that no other GTA (excluding VCS of course) or even SA has had. So I guess that counts too.

 

While SA's missions were indeed more varied, Vice City's missions definitely weren't as annoying as SA (perhaps with the exception of Demolition man) and were written in a much better fashion.

 

Also VC's side missions are about as good if not better than SA's. While SA had the content, VC had the quality. Nearly every single side mission in the game was well developed and rehearsed unlike in SA. Also GTA VC's asset system rocks.

 

VC also had the better atmosphere in my opinion. Although I did really like SA's ghetto vibe, San Fierro was just so poorly done. I'd say VC's soundtrack is just as good as SA's too.

 

And then there's Malibu Club, the first night club in the series.

 

So, yes. There is good enough reason for a person to say that VC is better than SA even if VC is the much smaller game.

 

just don't reply to him he's just going to suck san andreas dick until it can't cum no more.

 

Dude. No.


Kalerney
  • Kalerney

    Ibanez Player

  • Members
  • Joined: 29 Aug 2011
  • France

#141

Posted 4 days ago

This thread is going insane.


gta3masta5000
  • gta3masta5000

    'Sup?

  • Members
  • Joined: 28 Apr 2012
  • United-States

#142

Posted 4 days ago

This thread is going insane.

Indeed.


Andreas
  • Andreas

    GTAV Forum Leader

  • Leone Family Mafia
  • Joined: 27 May 2012
  • Austria

#143

Posted 4 days ago Edited by Andreas, 4 days ago.

Okay, I think I have seen enough. First of all, learn to accept other people's opinion for god's sake. Stop attacking other members just because they have a different opinion than you - and stop stating your own opinion as fact. You all know who you are.

 

This topic is beyond a joke, and I don't think there is anything that speaks for keeping it open any longer. Just another comparison thread that bites the dust.

  • SonOfLiberty, Kalerney, xXGst0395Xx and 3 others like this




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users