His post did imply that it doesnt matter. Its totally wrong i cant get kills with an ak at all, im ok with the special carbine unsilenced but with a silencer again I cant kill anyone. Regular carbine silenced im good aa or free. Advanced im pretty good with. Obviously in aa you can just use a combag mg and own any gun.
But to say auto aim negates gun selection is stupid. If you agree with him your stupid too. Theres a reason why everyone isnt running around with combat mgs in aa lobbies. Its because there is a difference.
This is all letting go of the fact that the post I quoted was oozing of a free aim superiority complex.
No it didn't, he said Rifles specifically (also seeing as its a thread discussing Assault Rifles), not guns in general. He wasn't hinting to Shotguns, Pistols, SMG's etc, he said Rifles. If you can't get kills with an AK, then clearly your 'lock on' skills aren't up to par, it only takes a slight nudge of the analog stick upwards to get a headshot, which can be achieved with pretty much any Assault Rifle in the game; things like higher damage, fire rate, magazine capacity are factors that don't come into the lock on distance (which is the same for all weapons in the same class e.g. Assault Rifles).
Also; If I agree with someone I have the same level of intellect as they do? Do you have any idea how childish you sound? Gta4thewin may have some beef with Auto Aim, but it's well placed in my opinion; instead of applying a counter argument like an adult in defence of AA you made yourself look like a colossal asshat by calling him a moron right off the bat, not to mention tarnishing all Free Aim players with the same brush; I'm a Free Aim player, and have no problem with those that use Auto-Aim, it's an aiming PREFERENCE, nothing more. So stop acting like an immature muppet and offer something constructive rather than spewing the same old recycled verbal diarrhoea.