that's what it takes to be number 1 on GTA5stats
Posted 17 January 2014 - 04:55 AM Edited by uhlinyaface, 17 January 2014 - 04:59 AM.
They must have done a lot of grinding to amass that fortune. Totally legit.
Posted 17 January 2014 - 04:56 AM
its warren buffet
The richest people in the world wouldnt be able to cash card that lol, it'd be like 180 billion quid approx worth of cash cards... if I did it right in my head...
Posted 17 January 2014 - 04:57 AM
to put it into perspective... @ $50 per $3.5M worth of cash cards, that = $1,317,624,576,693 or roughly 1/12 of the US national debt
if i calculated it right.
Posted 17 January 2014 - 04:57 AM
its warren buffet
The richest people in the world wouldnt be able to cash card that lol, it'd be like 180 billion quid approx worth of cash cards... if I did it right in my head...
It would be approx 10x the amount he has, considering you get around $1.25m for £13.
Posted 17 January 2014 - 04:57 AM
its warren buffet
The richest people in the world wouldnt be able to cash card that lol, it'd be like 180 billion quid approx worth of cash cards... if I did it right in my head...
The Rothschild family. Dad alone is worth 500 trillion.
Posted 17 January 2014 - 04:59 AM
its warren buffet
The richest people in the world wouldnt be able to cash card that lol, it'd be like 180 billion quid approx worth of cash cards... if I did it right in my head...
The Rothschild family. Dad alone is worth 500 trillion.
While that family certainly have considerably more money than the typical forbes top 10 richest people, they do not have wealth of that magnitude
Posted 17 January 2014 - 05:02 AM Edited by UnicornAssassin, 17 January 2014 - 05:03 AM.
its warren buffet
The richest people in the world wouldnt be able to cash card that lol, it'd be like 180 billion quid approx worth of cash cards... if I did it right in my head...
The Rothschild family. Dad alone is worth 500 trillion.
Surely not.
Posted 17 January 2014 - 11:34 AM
Isn't that JohnMcLaneNYPD?
lol, no I posted that profile earlier. Definitely not mine.
Interesting enough, 9223372036854775808 is probably the biggest number you can have in the money column.
If you google: 9223372036854775808, you get some interesting results.
Posted 17 January 2014 - 12:00 PM Edited by Jolly SWAGman, 17 January 2014 - 12:11 PM.
Absolute lies.If Gina Rinehart had the amount she would still spend it all on meat pies.
Posted 17 January 2014 - 12:13 PM
If Gina Rinehart had the amount she would still spend it all on meat pies.
The other day I was listening to a podcast, and someone tried to explain wealth disparity by using time as a reference to put it in perspective. I'll paraphrase, but what he said as that a million seconds equals to about 11 days of time, while a billion seconds is roughly 32 YEARS. Think about that perspective.
Posted 17 January 2014 - 12:16 PM
Posted 17 January 2014 - 12:20 PM
no, that value was the most you could obtain from an activity in one shot. And that number is precisely 2,147,463,847.Didn't they say that since the console is 32-bit or x86(whatever), It can only go up to a huge number that starts with 2, and if your GTA Money went over that, it would become negative?
Posted 17 January 2014 - 12:25 PM Edited by Furry_Monkey, 17 January 2014 - 12:27 PM.
Didn't they say that since the console is 32-bit or x86(whatever), It can only go up to a huge number that starts with 2, and if your GTA Money went over that, it would become negative?
If they're unsigned integers then they can be (roughly) twice the size of a signed integer, since the first bit is not used to indicate whether it's -ive or +ive.
Signed integers can go from -2,147,483,648 to 2,147,483,647. If you try to store 2,147,483,647 + 1 it will become -2,147,483,648.
Unsigned integers can go up to 4,294,967,295. If you try to add 1 to that it will either cause an overflow or go back to 0 (or 1) - that all depends on the environment.
Saying that though, just because a processor is 32-bit, that doesn't mean that you can only go up to numbers that size. Software will handle numbers far greater than that size. It's all to do with what variable type was used to store the number when it was coded (both app and database - the smallest limit being the actual limit).
Posted 17 January 2014 - 01:04 PM
Saying that though, just because a processor is 32-bit, that doesn't mean that you can only go up to numbers that size. Software will handle numbers far greater than that size. It's all to do with what variable type was used to store the number when it was coded (both app and database - the smallest limit being the actual limit).
And hardware will also handle it. 32-bit CPUs typically have some 64-bit registers that can be used for basic 64-bit maths as well (even though the internal calculations are 32-bits at a time)
I think (from memory) the Intel MMX extensions had these since the late 90s so it's pretty common these days.
Posted 17 January 2014 - 01:11 PM
Saying that though, just because a processor is 32-bit, that doesn't mean that you can only go up to numbers that size. Software will handle numbers far greater than that size. It's all to do with what variable type was used to store the number when it was coded (both app and database - the smallest limit being the actual limit).
And hardware will also handle it. 32-bit CPUs typically have some 64-bit registers that can be used for basic 64-bit maths as well (even though the internal calculations are 32-bits at a time)
I think (from memory) the Intel MMX extensions had these since the late 90s so it's pretty common these days.
Yeah, handling a 64-bit address and handling a number in software are 2 very different things, aren't they. But either way, that number's strange because it's either the wrong sign, or it's 1 too many. 64-bit integers don't go that high.
Posted 17 January 2014 - 01:13 PM
Didn't they say that since the console is 32-bit or x86(whatever), It can only go up to a huge number that starts with 2, and if your GTA Money went over that, it would become negative?
If they're unsigned integers then they can be (roughly) twice the size of a signed integer, since the first bit is not used to indicate whether it's -ive or +ive.
Signed integers can go from -2,147,483,648 to 2,147,483,647. If you try to store 2,147,483,647 + 1 it will become -2,147,483,648.
Unsigned integers can go up to 4,294,967,295. If you try to add 1 to that it will either cause an overflow or go back to 0 (or 1) - that all depends on the environment.
Saying that though, just because a processor is 32-bit, that doesn't mean that you can only go up to numbers that size. Software will handle numbers far greater than that size. It's all to do with what variable type was used to store the number when it was coded (both app and database - the smallest limit being the actual limit).
Posted 17 January 2014 - 01:17 PM
she made my months salary in the time it took me to read the image.If Gina Rinehart had the amount she would still spend it all on meat pies.
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users