Quantcast

Jump to content

» «
Photo

Yoga this, Yoga that, Yoga replaced Gang Wars, Yoga etc etc..

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
220 replies to this topic
TheMasterfocker
  • TheMasterfocker

    Public Enemy #1

  • Members
  • Joined: 11 Jul 2012
  • United-States

#181

Posted 18 December 2013 - 06:42 PM

 

 

 

 

 

yoga is the only excuse whiners have to say that gta is bad... yoga is sh*tty though not gonna lie

Said the R* fanboy. GTA V is a sh*tty game all round, the tennis is horrible, I appreciate the effort by R* but it's too clunky and slow paced, darts needs no explanation, the golf mini game was well done I would have nothing against it being in future GTA's even though I hate golf and don't consider it a real sport, the triathlon isn't for me I made it to the beach and quit the game for over a month out of anger, I didn't buy GTA V to take part in a f*cking button mashing contest, I have an actual life, then there's car racing which is meh whatever, Trevor has a watered down version of hunting from RDR where he shoots an animal and takes a picture of it.....I repeat he shoots an animal then takes a picture of it for no f*cking reason that's supposed to be one of the mini games, the arms trafficking and drug trafficking is the EXACT same thing as Smugglers Run, same dune buggy, same everything it's a 13 year old game made by...dun, dun, dun ROCKSTAR GAMES, as for all the underwater sh*t they went on about who gives a f*ck, the game is so sh*t I haven't even bothered with it.
The talk of someone who never played the game... don't worry whiny kid you'll always have sh*t row 3 by your side :)

GTAF logic. Criticises the game= Never played it before.

 

What do you expect. He has a friend/another account with the words Rockstar's #1 and 2 solider. This is why this forum is going downhill. Fanboys defend this game way too much for the credit it doesn't deserve. 

 

Yoga has to be the WORST activity I ever seen in my life. Tennis is alright but I feel its way too easy. Golf in this game is a well done sport and I wouldn't mind seeing it again in another GTA game. Movie theater and TV shows are just taking up useless space that can be use to add to gameplay. Internet is a bit better cause the only way to make REAL money is the stock market. 

 

Rob a store: $500

Rob a money truck: $3,000 - $5,000

Use stocks: Billions of dollars ( Then makes the game's money useless which it already was. The only time you got a decent amount of money as at the end and what are you going to do with 30 Million? Golf course isn't worth buying trust me I brought EVERY PLACE. Make a little over $200,000 a week while it cost 150 million. You know how long in real time it would take to make that money back? A long time)

 

I gave GTA IV a lot of hate but the City felt way more complete and the story was good. V has a decent city with a useless countryside filled up with 2/3 of mountains and you can't even stay up there that long cause a cougar will spawn up there and attack you. Underwater is useless and could of been taken out to improve the city and even country life more if they just dropped it. 

 

Are you seriously still believing that starvisitor is my other account? After a moderator confirmed to you that it wasn't? jeez...

 

 

 

 

yoga is the only excuse whiners have to say that gta is bad... yoga is sh*tty though not gonna lie

Said the R* fanboy. GTA V is a sh*tty game all round, the tennis is horrible, I appreciate the effort by R* but it's too clunky and slow paced, darts needs no explanation, the golf mini game was well done I would have nothing against it being in future GTA's even though I hate golf and don't consider it a real sport, the triathlon isn't for me I made it to the beach and quit the game for over a month out of anger, I didn't buy GTA V to take part in a f*cking button mashing contest, I have an actual life, then there's car racing which is meh whatever, Trevor has a watered down version of hunting from RDR where he shoots an animal and takes a picture of it.....I repeat he shoots an animal then takes a picture of it for no f*cking reason that's supposed to be one of the mini games, the arms trafficking and drug trafficking is the EXACT same thing as Smugglers Run, same dune buggy, same everything it's a 13 year old game made by...dun, dun, dun ROCKSTAR GAMES, as for all the underwater sh*t they went on about who gives a f*ck, the game is so sh*t I haven't even bothered with it.
The talk of someone who never played the game... don't worry whiny kid you'll always have sh*t row 3 by your side :)

GTAF logic. Criticises the game= Never played it before.

 

that's shoudn't even be called criticizing, he's just bashing down the game like he has a grudge on it... pretty easy to guess why honestly...

 

You should know by now that redx only believes what he wants to believe and that nothing will ever change his mind.

  • RockstarFanboy likes this

redx165
  • redx165

    Making the GTA fanboys dance

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 05 Jul 2012
  • None

#182

Posted 19 December 2013 - 12:52 AM Edited by redx165, 19 December 2013 - 12:53 AM.

 

 

 

 

 

 

yoga is the only excuse whiners have to say that gta is bad... yoga is sh*tty though not gonna lie

Said the R* fanboy. GTA V is a sh*tty game all round, the tennis is horrible, I appreciate the effort by R* but it's too clunky and slow paced, darts needs no explanation, the golf mini game was well done I would have nothing against it being in future GTA's even though I hate golf and don't consider it a real sport, the triathlon isn't for me I made it to the beach and quit the game for over a month out of anger, I didn't buy GTA V to take part in a f*cking button mashing contest, I have an actual life, then there's car racing which is meh whatever, Trevor has a watered down version of hunting from RDR where he shoots an animal and takes a picture of it.....I repeat he shoots an animal then takes a picture of it for no f*cking reason that's supposed to be one of the mini games, the arms trafficking and drug trafficking is the EXACT same thing as Smugglers Run, same dune buggy, same everything it's a 13 year old game made by...dun, dun, dun ROCKSTAR GAMES, as for all the underwater sh*t they went on about who gives a f*ck, the game is so sh*t I haven't even bothered with it.
The talk of someone who never played the game... don't worry whiny kid you'll always have sh*t row 3 by your side :)

GTAF logic. Criticises the game= Never played it before.

 

What do you expect. He has a friend/another account with the words Rockstar's #1 and 2 solider. This is why this forum is going downhill. Fanboys defend this game way too much for the credit it doesn't deserve. 

 

Yoga has to be the WORST activity I ever seen in my life. Tennis is alright but I feel its way too easy. Golf in this game is a well done sport and I wouldn't mind seeing it again in another GTA game. Movie theater and TV shows are just taking up useless space that can be use to add to gameplay. Internet is a bit better cause the only way to make REAL money is the stock market. 

 

Rob a store: $500

Rob a money truck: $3,000 - $5,000

Use stocks: Billions of dollars ( Then makes the game's money useless which it already was. The only time you got a decent amount of money as at the end and what are you going to do with 30 Million? Golf course isn't worth buying trust me I brought EVERY PLACE. Make a little over $200,000 a week while it cost 150 million. You know how long in real time it would take to make that money back? A long time)

 

I gave GTA IV a lot of hate but the City felt way more complete and the story was good. V has a decent city with a useless countryside filled up with 2/3 of mountains and you can't even stay up there that long cause a cougar will spawn up there and attack you. Underwater is useless and could of been taken out to improve the city and even country life more if they just dropped it. 

 

Are you seriously still believing that starvisitor is my other account? After a moderator confirmed to you that it wasn't? jeez...

 

 

 

 

You should know by now that redx only believes what he wants to believe and that nothing will ever change his mind.

 

The fact that they both got female avatars that look the same and have Rockstar #1/2 fanboy really makes them look like the same person. You never seen them post together. He is either using a different server to change one of his IP address or using another computer with another IP address.

Instead of being a clueless idiot why not use your head and put two things together.  


TheMasterfocker
  • TheMasterfocker

    Public Enemy #1

  • Members
  • Joined: 11 Jul 2012
  • United-States

#183

Posted 19 December 2013 - 01:41 AM Edited by TheMasterfocker, 19 December 2013 - 01:42 AM.

A clueless idiot? Me? When you have no idea how IT works? Oooook redx, okay.

 

A different server? Guess what? The ISP's control which server you use, not the user. The ONLY thing a user can do is change his IP address. And when you do that the easy way, it's random every time. I guarantee you that both of them have unique IP addresses that don't even have the same subnet ISP range, and I guarantee you again that the IP addresses don't change every time they decide to log in.

 

And why are they #1 and #2? Maybe because #2 saw the #1 guy, and then decided to be #2? I mean, there's no way that's a possibility, right!?

 

And this, redx, is why you're infamous on this forum.


woggleman
  • woggleman

    Ghetto Star

  • Members
  • Joined: 19 Jan 2012

#184

Posted 19 December 2013 - 01:47 AM

I can't say I am a fan of it but you have that one mission and it can be completely ignored like dancing in SA. If people didn't let dancing ruin SA why let yoga ruin V?


redx165
  • redx165

    Making the GTA fanboys dance

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 05 Jul 2012
  • None

#185

Posted 19 December 2013 - 01:48 AM

A clueless idiot? Me? When you have no idea how IT works? Oooook redx, okay.

 

A different server? Guess what? The ISP's control which server you use, not the user. The ONLY thing a user can do is change his IP address. And when you do that the easy way, it's random every time. I guarantee you that both of them have unique IP addresses that don't even have the same subnet ISP range, and I guarantee you again that the IP addresses don't change every time they decide to log in.

 

And why are they #1 and #2? Maybe because #2 saw the #1 guy, and then decided to be #2? I mean, there's no way that's a possibility, right!?

 

And this, redx, is why you're infamous on this forum.

Do you not read what's under their name? They even say Rockstar solider #1 and # 2. It is possible if they want to keep it a secret. They both have the same sayings and same avatar. 


ColdHearted
  • ColdHearted

    Nascar isn't a sport

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 06 Sep 2013

#186

Posted 19 December 2013 - 01:50 AM

I can't say I am a fan of it but you have that one mission and it can be completely ignored like dancing in SA. If people didn't let dancing ruin SA why let yoga ruin V?

It can't be ignored because San Andreas had so much stuff to do most people dont even remember dancing was in the game.


bish0p2004
  • bish0p2004

    Mack Pimp

  • Members
  • Joined: 25 Jul 2013

#187

Posted 19 December 2013 - 01:52 AM

Somebody take over because I feel like they're about to triple-team the sh*t out of me...


You're doing fine. You're just up against fanboys...in other words, you cant win.

You'll write out a decent argument, they will ignore the bulk of it, and only focus on the least important part of your post (such as calling them a moron) in an attempt to sidetrack you. Then you get nowhere and the cycle continues.

woggleman
  • woggleman

    Ghetto Star

  • Members
  • Joined: 19 Jan 2012

#188

Posted 19 December 2013 - 01:56 AM

 

I can't say I am a fan of it but you have that one mission and it can be completely ignored like dancing in SA. If people didn't let dancing ruin SA why let yoga ruin V?

It can't be ignored because San Andreas had so much stuff to do most people dont even remember dancing was in the game.

 

If SA were released today we would here endless complaints.


TheMasterfocker
  • TheMasterfocker

    Public Enemy #1

  • Members
  • Joined: 11 Jul 2012
  • United-States

#189

Posted 19 December 2013 - 01:57 AM Edited by TheMasterfocker, 19 December 2013 - 01:59 AM.

 

A clueless idiot? Me? When you have no idea how IT works? Oooook redx, okay.

 

A different server? Guess what? The ISP's control which server you use, not the user. The ONLY thing a user can do is change his IP address. And when you do that the easy way, it's random every time. I guarantee you that both of them have unique IP addresses that don't even have the same subnet ISP range, and I guarantee you again that the IP addresses don't change every time they decide to log in.

 

And why are they #1 and #2? Maybe because #2 saw the #1 guy, and then decided to be #2? I mean, there's no way that's a possibility, right!?

 

And this, redx, is why you're infamous on this forum.

Do you not read what's under their name? They even say Rockstar solider #1 and # 2. It is possible if they want to keep it a secret. They both have the same sayings and same avatar. 

 

Did you not read what I wrote? Do you know how much effort they'd have to put in to make it seem like they're 2 different people when they go and look?

 

Like I said, I guarantee that they're in a different subnet range.

 

Also, do you really think a dude's gonna have 2 profiles? What's the point? Like, literally. Give me one good point as to why it's feasible to put forth ANY kind of effort to do that?

 

Your beliefs on this are beyond outrageous. 

 

I mean, they joined almost a month apart. If a dude's gonna make 2 profiles, he's more than likely going to do it at the same time for convenience.


gtaxpert
  • gtaxpert

    that's how I dooz it

  • Members
  • Joined: 07 Aug 2005
  • Netherlands

#190

Posted 19 December 2013 - 02:03 AM

Why care that there is some minigame that you don't like? If you don't like it don't play it.

 

R* probably didn't think gangwars fitted in the rest of this game well. I agree most of the minigames suck, and that's why I don't play them.. Easy as that. The core of this game is great. The combat is great, the map is great, the missions are great. That's what it's about. If you want gangwars, turf wars or drug wars, go play TLaD, SA or TBoGT.


ColdHearted
  • ColdHearted

    Nascar isn't a sport

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 06 Sep 2013

#191

Posted 19 December 2013 - 02:13 AM

 

 

I can't say I am a fan of it but you have that one mission and it can be completely ignored like dancing in SA. If people didn't let dancing ruin SA why let yoga ruin V?

It can't be ignored because San Andreas had so much stuff to do most people dont even remember dancing was in the game.

 

If SA were released today we would here endless complaints.

 

Complaints about what?


Official General
  • Official General

    You gotta always carry heat in these Vice City streets

  • Members
  • Joined: 13 Apr 2010

#192

Posted 19 December 2013 - 02:22 AM Edited by Official General, 19 December 2013 - 03:11 AM.

I can't say I am a fan of it but you have that one mission and it can be completely ignored like dancing in SA. If people didn't let dancing ruin SA why let yoga ruin V?

 

Errm, lets see, why did dancing not ruin SA ? Because SA also had :

 

* Gang Wars

* Gang recruitment and armed back up to act as bodyguards

* Random shootouts in the streets between rival gangs

* Buying your own safehouse properties.

* Burglaries.

* Car theft import/export

* Casinos and gambling

* Intercepting and hijacking drug shipments

* Pimping

* Multiple cities

* Lost of interiors

* Much longer story

* Boxing

* Gym and bodybuilding

* Expensive jewelry to buy

* Many other side missions relating to crime. 

 

With a whole ton of gameplay features that would undoubtedly appeal to most typical GTA fans, why on earth would some silly minor feature like dancing even be noticed enough to 'ruin' SA ?? There is a big difference between the situation with SA and the one with GTA V my friend. 

 

@ gtaxpert

 

 

 If you want gangwars, turf wars or drug wars, go play TLaD, SA or TBoGT.

 

Well Franklin's trailer gave many people the idea that this was gonna be here and fans of it got excited. Anyway I've long come to the harsh realization I won't get that with V, so believe me I will be doing just what you have said. Once I finish Max Payne 3 and a few other games. 


gtaxpert
  • gtaxpert

    that's how I dooz it

  • Members
  • Joined: 07 Aug 2005
  • Netherlands

#193

Posted 19 December 2013 - 03:08 AM Edited by gtaxpert, 19 December 2013 - 03:13 AM.

 

I can't say I am a fan of it but you have that one mission and it can be completely ignored like dancing in SA. If people didn't let dancing ruin SA why let yoga ruin V?

 

Errm, lets see, why did dancing not ruin SA ? Because SA also had :

 

* Gang Wars

* Gang recruitment and armed back up to act as bodyguards

* Random shootouts in the streets between rival gangs

* Buying your own safehouse properties.

* Burglaries.

* Car theft import/export

* Casinos and gambling

* Intercepting and hijacking drug shipments

* Pimping

* Multiple cities

* Lost of interiors

* Much longer story

* Boxing

* Gym and bodybuilding

* Expensive jewelry to buy

* Many other side missions relating to crime. 

 

With a whole ton of gameplay features that would undoubtedly appeal to most typical GTA fans, why on earth would some silly minor feature like dancing even be noticed enough to 'ruin' SA ?? There is a big difference between the situation with SA and that one with GTA V my friend. 

 

 

Well, these are the reasons why SA was a better game than V. But considering the memory limits of current gen, R* just can't live up to these expectations in the HD era (multiple cities etc..). And they probably feared redoing the gang theme would've turned it into too much of a SA rehash.

I agree that the criminal underworld/mafia/gang theme is more appealing than the making photos of celebrities in Hollywood and Yoga bullsh*t we're getting this time, but it was a new interpretation of Los Santos this time, and that was the most original thing they could come up with... Maybe they should've gone for a Latino character and change all the gang names to set it apart from SA, and made it focused on drug trade/ drug wars. Maybe that would've been a better game.

 

I guess R* is too obsessed with making a parody of popular culture, and it made them lose the focus on crime. And that's a bad development if you ask me.

I also think the countryside is near to useless considering there is no other city on the other side. GTA is about cities, and rural area should just be filler and not a main area. I think they should've just made one giant city again..

So, alternative idea for V: we keep Michael, we change the gang names. We change Franklin into a hispanic guy. We remove North Yankton and instead make a small part of Mexico where his backstory plays out... uuhm, we change Trevor into a psychopath stripclub owner and pimp, who is totally insane and says crazy sh*t like Trevor does, to keep the element of comic relief. With Trevor we throw out the countryside and make one giant city. We keep the heist theme, and somehow mend the three characters together with that.. And we bring back pimping, gangwars, chainsaws, flamethrowers, fight club, gambling, gang recruitment and basketball and other stuff that's cool. Damn, I should be working at R*, lmao.


Lucchese
  • Lucchese

    Cynical Prick

  • Andolini Mafia Family
  • Joined: 06 Jun 2012

#194

Posted 19 December 2013 - 03:19 AM

I can't say I am a fan of it but you have that one mission and it can be completely ignored like dancing in SA. If people didn't let dancing ruin SA why let yoga ruin V?

 

Mate, I wouldn't bother wasting my time with these idiots anymore. The SA kids are the f*cking plague of the series. This same display of entitlement happened when IV released, and it's happening here once more. They will continually use yoga as their main scapegoat to hate on V, while completely ignoring everything else this game has to offer. They obviously have nothing better to do with their lives than come on this forum to remind everyone of their hate with the same recycled drivel.

 

On a side note: I always laugh when they bring up house robberies. I don't know about anybody else, but if I had to choose between tediously creeping around somebody's house trying not to wake the owner up, or getting into an exciting chase with a depository van before getting into a shootout and robbing it, I know what one I'd pick, and it definitely isn't the former.


Official General
  • Official General

    You gotta always carry heat in these Vice City streets

  • Members
  • Joined: 13 Apr 2010

#195

Posted 19 December 2013 - 03:28 AM Edited by Official General, 19 December 2013 - 03:36 AM.

 

 

I can't say I am a fan of it but you have that one mission and it can be completely ignored like dancing in SA. If people didn't let dancing ruin SA why let yoga ruin V?

 

Errm, lets see, why did dancing not ruin SA ? Because SA also had :

 

* Gang Wars

* Gang recruitment and armed back up to act as bodyguards

* Random shootouts in the streets between rival gangs

* Buying your own safehouse properties.

* Burglaries.

* Car theft import/export

* Casinos and gambling

* Intercepting and hijacking drug shipments

* Pimping

* Multiple cities

* Lost of interiors

* Much longer story

* Boxing

* Gym and bodybuilding

* Expensive jewelry to buy

* Many other side missions relating to crime. 

 

With a whole ton of gameplay features that would undoubtedly appeal to most typical GTA fans, why on earth would some silly minor feature like dancing even be noticed enough to 'ruin' SA ?? There is a big difference between the situation with SA and that one with GTA V my friend. 

 

 

Well, these are the reasons why SA was a better game than V. But considering the memory limits of current gen, R* just can't live up to these expectations in the HD era (multiple cities etc..). And they probably feared redoing the gang theme would've turned it into too much of a SA rehash.

I agree that the criminal underworld/mafia/gang theme is more appealing than the making photos of celebrities in Hollywood and Yoga bullsh*t we're getting this time, but it was a new interpretation of Los Santos this time, and that was the most original thing they could come up with... Maybe they should've gone for a Latino character and change all the gang names to set it apart from SA, and made it focused on drug trade/ drug wars. Maybe that would've been a better game.

 

I guess R* is too obsessed with making a parody of popular culture, and it made them lose the focus on crime. And that's a bad development if you ask me.

I also think the countryside is near to useless considering there is no other city on the other side. GTA is about cities, and rural area should just be filler and not a main area. I think they should've just made one giant city again..

So, alternative idea for V: we keep Michael, we change the gang names. We change Franklin into a hispanic guy. We remove North Yankton and instead make a small part of Mexico where his backstory plays out... uuhm, we change Trevor into a psychopath stripclub owner and pimp, who is totally insane and says crazy sh*t like Trevor does, to keep the element of comic relief. With Trevor we throw out the countryside and make one giant city. We keep the heist theme, and somehow mend the three characters together with that.. And we bring back chainsaws, flamethrowers, fight club, gambling, gang recruitment and basketball and other stuff that's cool. Damn, I should be working at R*, lmao.

 

 

More or less everything you stated there was spot on  :^:

 

The Hollywood celebrity and Yoga bullsh*t would have been fine IF Rockstar had just f**king stuck to essential elements of crime-focused gameplay within the game. You are so right when you talk of Rockstar's obsession with parodying popular culture making them lose focus on crime within the game. I kinda thought this myself. Seriously, Rockstar need to go back to the drawing board and remember what it was that made the series so great in the first place. 

 

They most definitely should have had a Latino protagonist in GTA V and made one of the main themes of the game about the drug trade, Hispanic gangs and Mexican drug cartels - I have always said this, before and after V came out. So many recent movies and shows that cover crime in LA have always got Mexican drug cartels featuring in their material, it should have really been a no-brainer for Rockstar really. The Hispanic gangs in V made just one mission appearance throughout the whole game - how shocking was that ?? The Hispanic/Mexican drug cartel angle would have definitely made V a much better game in my opinion - even better, this stuff could have been a major part of the game ALONG with the main theme of heists. No, instead we got some bullsh*t cop and feds story and a bit of Hollywood glittery nonsense. 

 

Again you are right, this time about the countryside. As beautiful and stunning as it looked, it was such a great waste. The wildlife was weak, and there was almost nothing really significant do or see out there, apart from admire the views and save a few random encounters and Trevor's small handful of side missions. I'm with you on that, GTA is more about cities and the countryside and wilderness should have been filler like in San Andreas. I too believe Los Santos should have been much bigger and more detailed with interiors, or they should have made multiple detailed cities if they could. 

 

The only thing I have against what you said, is Rockstar not including too much gang stuff because they feared another SA re-hash - look at how they depicted Franklin's trailer. By looking at that, you would have thought that Franklin's story was gonna contain some of the most explosive gang action ever seen in GTA yet. On that part, I just think they simply f**ked up. Seriously, Rockstar would greatly benefit from my creative input, and yours too lool. 

  • gtaxpert likes this

Lucchese
  • Lucchese

    Cynical Prick

  • Andolini Mafia Family
  • Joined: 06 Jun 2012

#196

Posted 19 December 2013 - 03:36 AM

@Official General

 

They didn't f*ck up. They simply made the game they wanted to make, not what you wanted to make. Just because the game didn't include an aspect you wanted to see, doesn't somehow discredit or belittle what R* themselves wanted to do with this game.

 

The sooner you stop speaking with that factual, voice-of-the-people tone, the better.


Official General
  • Official General

    You gotta always carry heat in these Vice City streets

  • Members
  • Joined: 13 Apr 2010

#197

Posted 19 December 2013 - 03:40 AM

@Official General

 

They didn't f*ck up. They simply made the game they wanted to make, not what you wanted to make. Just because the game didn't include an aspect you wanted to see, doesn't somehow discredit or belittle what R* themselves wanted to do with this game.

 

The sooner you stop speaking with that factual, voice-of-the-people tone, the better.

 

Okay, let me put it properly just especially for you if it makes you happy. I personally think Rockstar f**ked up on certain vital aspects of V, as so do many others on here, and elsewhere who have similar views on this subject as myself.

 

There you go, is that better ?


Lucchese
  • Lucchese

    Cynical Prick

  • Andolini Mafia Family
  • Joined: 06 Jun 2012

#198

Posted 19 December 2013 - 03:52 AM

 

@Official General

 

They didn't f*ck up. They simply made the game they wanted to make, not what you wanted to make. Just because the game didn't include an aspect you wanted to see, doesn't somehow discredit or belittle what R* themselves wanted to do with this game.

 

The sooner you stop speaking with that factual, voice-of-the-people tone, the better.

 

Okay, let me put it properly just especially for you if it makes you happy. I personally think Rockstar f**ked up on certain vital aspects of V, as so do many others on here, and elsewhere who have similar views on this subject as myself.

 

There you go, is that better ?

 

 

There you go, that wasn't so hard now was it?

 

I just find it to be your loss that you can't appreciate what this game has to offer simply because your hung up that you didn't get your cherished elements from previous GTA's. Like I've said a hundred times, I love the whole mob/mafia sh*t, and thought we'd be getting loads of it in IV with it being set in LC. I was pretty disappointed by the minor role it played in the game, but f*ck me, I didn't go nitpicking every little fault with game to try and justify any hate. I absolutely adored IV, and got huge enjoyment out of it.

 

It's just a shame you're too stubborn to do the same here.


Official General
  • Official General

    You gotta always carry heat in these Vice City streets

  • Members
  • Joined: 13 Apr 2010

#199

Posted 19 December 2013 - 04:10 AM

 

 

@Official General

 

They didn't f*ck up. They simply made the game they wanted to make, not what you wanted to make. Just because the game didn't include an aspect you wanted to see, doesn't somehow discredit or belittle what R* themselves wanted to do with this game.

 

The sooner you stop speaking with that factual, voice-of-the-people tone, the better.

 

Okay, let me put it properly just especially for you if it makes you happy. I personally think Rockstar f**ked up on certain vital aspects of V, as so do many others on here, and elsewhere who have similar views on this subject as myself.

 

There you go, is that better ?

 

 

There you go, that wasn't so hard now was it?

 

I just find it to be your loss that you can't appreciate what this game has to offer simply because your hung up that you didn't get your cherished elements from previous GTA's. Like I've said a hundred times, I love the whole mob/mafia sh*t, and thought we'd be getting loads of it in IV with it being set in LC. I was pretty disappointed by the minor role it played in the game, but f*ck me, I didn't go nitpicking every little fault with game to try and justify any hate. I absolutely adored IV, and got huge enjoyment out of it.

 

It's just a shame you're too stubborn to do the same here.

 

 

How many times do I have to tell you that from day one, I wished that V had a Latino protagonist and that the game was centered around Mexican drug cartels and Hispanic gangs ? That was what I wanted to see in V. Not the Black gangsta stuff. The only reason I'm venting anger about the Black gangsta stuff done poorly in V is because if Rockstar chose to include it again, I was hoping they were gonna do it properly and up to date, and made sure it was gonna provide a better gameplay experience than IV did. And it was nowhere near it. 

 

I'm being honest here, there is nothing about V that makes me really enjoy it on such a great scale, it just missed the mark on too many things, even lesser stuff like interiors. I liked playing it, it's still good,  but I cannot force myself to say it;s so great when I just don't think it is.

 

And I disagree, GTA IV had plenty of Mafia and mob action. Most of the game was about all of that man, what are you talking about. Half of the game was about internal rivalry between Mafia crime families in LC and Alderney, thrown in with a mix of Irish Mob and Albanian Mafia. 


Lucchese
  • Lucchese

    Cynical Prick

  • Andolini Mafia Family
  • Joined: 06 Jun 2012

#200

Posted 19 December 2013 - 04:32 AM Edited by niko bellic half brother, 19 December 2013 - 04:32 AM.

@General

 

Regardless if you wanted a "black gangsta" or a "Hispanic cartel" theme; V had neither. Why can't you just accept it and get over it? I'm not trying to force you to like the game; if you don't like it, then you don't like it. But it just irks me when people refuse to appreciate that this game has a great deal to offer gameplay-wise, simply because they didn't get every single goddam thing their own way. 

 

There's much I would've loved to have seen in the game myself that wasn't included, but I'm old enough to appreciate the game was not made solely to cater to my requirements. It was made for the whole GTA fanbase, and they tried their best to please everybody by bringing back stuff from San Andreas as well as being innovative by introducing new things. (Exactly how much content do you think these 8 year old machines can handle?...)

 

But no. The entitled fanboys still have to piss and moan because, like I keep saying, they didn't get every single thing their own way.


Zodape
  • Zodape

    Brilliant Gentleman

  • Members
  • Joined: 20 Jun 2013
  • Argentina

#201

Posted 19 December 2013 - 04:34 AM

I can't say I am a fan of it but you have that one mission and it can be completely ignored like dancing in SA. If people didn't let dancing ruin SA why let yoga ruin V?

I would have loved better customization in SA if they completely dumped the whole GF idea....


Official General
  • Official General

    You gotta always carry heat in these Vice City streets

  • Members
  • Joined: 13 Apr 2010

#202

Posted 19 December 2013 - 04:51 AM Edited by Official General, 19 December 2013 - 04:51 AM.

@General

 

Regardless if you wanted a "black gangsta" or a "Hispanic cartel" theme; V had neither. Why can't you just accept it and get over it? I'm not trying to force you to like the game; if you don't like it, then you don't like it. But it just irks me when people refuse to appreciate that this game has a great deal to offer gameplay-wise, simply because they didn't get every single goddam thing their own way. 

 

There's much I would've loved to have seen in the game myself that wasn't included, but I'm old enough to appreciate the game was not made solely to cater to my requirements. It was made for the whole GTA fanbase, and they tried their best to please everybody by bringing back stuff from San Andreas as well as being innovative by introducing new things. (Exactly how much content do you think these 8 year old machines can handle?...)

 

But no. The entitled fanboys still have to piss and moan because, like I keep saying, they didn't get every single thing their own way.

 

I've accepted that long time ago. But I'm gonna continue to discuss my disappointments with like-minded people who feel the same way about the game as I do. Like I've said already, if no one likes those kind of views, they don't have to engage in discussion. 


GamerShotgun
  • GamerShotgun

    The main protagonist.

  • Members
  • Joined: 03 Oct 2005

#203

Posted 19 December 2013 - 04:56 AM Edited by GamerShotgun, 19 December 2013 - 04:56 AM.

A clueless idiot? Me? When you have no idea how IT works? Oooook redx, okay.

 

A different server? Guess what? The ISP's control which server you use, not the user. The ONLY thing a user can do is change his IP address. And when you do that the easy way, it's random every time. I guarantee you that both of them have unique IP addresses that don't even have the same subnet ISP range, and I guarantee you again that the IP addresses don't change every time they decide to log in.

 

And why are they #1 and #2? Maybe because #2 saw the #1 guy, and then decided to be #2? I mean, there's no way that's a possibility, right!?

 

And this, redx, is why you're infamous on this forum.

Proxy servers mate. Never heard of them? It takes literally just 2 minutes to install a firefox next to my chrome, set up a proxy and use two browsers at the same time, one with another IP.


EntretainMeOrDie
  • EntretainMeOrDie

    Shut up, sit down, relax.

  • Members
  • Joined: 15 Aug 2013

#204

Posted 19 December 2013 - 04:58 AM Edited by EntretainMeOrDie, 19 December 2013 - 04:58 AM.

DID ANYBODY SAY YOGA?

 

IS ANYBODY CALMER THEN A BOYSCOUT?

 

Billyboyscout.png


Lucchese
  • Lucchese

    Cynical Prick

  • Andolini Mafia Family
  • Joined: 06 Jun 2012

#205

Posted 19 December 2013 - 05:02 AM

 

@General

 

Regardless if you wanted a "black gangsta" or a "Hispanic cartel" theme; V had neither. Why can't you just accept it and get over it? I'm not trying to force you to like the game; if you don't like it, then you don't like it. But it just irks me when people refuse to appreciate that this game has a great deal to offer gameplay-wise, simply because they didn't get every single goddam thing their own way. 

 

There's much I would've loved to have seen in the game myself that wasn't included, but I'm old enough to appreciate the game was not made solely to cater to my requirements. It was made for the whole GTA fanbase, and they tried their best to please everybody by bringing back stuff from San Andreas as well as being innovative by introducing new things. (Exactly how much content do you think these 8 year old machines can handle?...)

 

But no. The entitled fanboys still have to piss and moan because, like I keep saying, they didn't get every single thing their own way.

 

I've accepted that long time ago. But I'm gonna continue to discuss my disappointments with like-minded people who feel the same way about the game as I do. Like I've said already, if no one likes those kind of views, they don't have to engage in discussion. 

 

 

Well in that case...

 

Whenever we have a nice possitive thread around here, could you kindly refrain yourself from ruining it by reminding people - who are not as like-minded as yourself - how much you dislike the game.


gtaxpert
  • gtaxpert

    that's how I dooz it

  • Members
  • Joined: 07 Aug 2005
  • Netherlands

#206

Posted 19 December 2013 - 05:28 AM

Well in that case...

 

Whenever we have a nice possitive thread around here, could you kindly refrain yourself from ruining it by reminding people - who are not as like-minded as yourself - how much you dislike the game.

 

 

And could you keep yourself from ruining a thread by avoiding talking about anything that has meaning, but only attacking people? You haven't said anything meaningful throughout this whole thread, 100% of your posts were personal attacks, and now you keep asking attention from Official General. Next time give it a try to not formulate your comment as a personal attack. Maybe meaningful discussion will follow some day.. Just a tip.

  • latigreblue and matajuegos01 like this

redx165
  • redx165

    Making the GTA fanboys dance

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 05 Jul 2012
  • None

#207

Posted 19 December 2013 - 05:55 AM Edited by redx165, 19 December 2013 - 05:58 AM.

 

 

A clueless idiot? Me? When you have no idea how IT works? Oooook redx, okay.

 

A different server? Guess what? The ISP's control which server you use, not the user. The ONLY thing a user can do is change his IP address. And when you do that the easy way, it's random every time. I guarantee you that both of them have unique IP addresses that don't even have the same subnet ISP range, and I guarantee you again that the IP addresses don't change every time they decide to log in.

 

And why are they #1 and #2? Maybe because #2 saw the #1 guy, and then decided to be #2? I mean, there's no way that's a possibility, right!?

 

And this, redx, is why you're infamous on this forum.

Do you not read what's under their name? They even say Rockstar solider #1 and # 2. It is possible if they want to keep it a secret. They both have the same sayings and same avatar. 

 

Did you not read what I wrote? Do you know how much effort they'd have to put in to make it seem like they're 2 different people when they go and look?

 

Like I said, I guarantee that they're in a different subnet range.

 

Also, do you really think a dude's gonna have 2 profiles? What's the point? Like, literally. Give me one good point as to why it's feasible to put forth ANY kind of effort to do that?

 

Your beliefs on this are beyond outrageous. 

 

I mean, they joined almost a month apart. If a dude's gonna make 2 profiles, he's more than likely going to do it at the same time for convenience.

 

Joining a month apart is a good way to make it look like your not the same. Download a proxy server and you will have 2 different IP addresses. They clearly act the same. How is it not hard to realize they are the same person. 

 

Same avatar

Same Rockstar solider

Joining the forum to defend GTA V ( Due to all the hate it got from forum members. )

 

Notice one of them quit coming around as often? Why cause we caught him in his own act. 


Miamivicecity
  • Miamivicecity

    Get Love Fisted

  • Moderator
  • Joined: 14 Oct 2007
  • Australia
  • Best Member In An Official Group 2012

#208

Posted 19 December 2013 - 07:37 AM

Jesus. They're not the same person. They have two different registration IPs for one thing and two we're quick to pick up duplicate accounts.

Just because two people share the same avatar and a similar posting style doesn't mean it's the same person every single time.

Coming to think about it I'm sure I debunked this a while ago so I have no idea why it's been brought up again.
  • TheMasterfocker likes this

B Dawg
  • B Dawg

    Looks like the diversion worked!

  • Members
  • Joined: 15 Dec 2008
  • Bosnia-and-Herzegovina

#209

Posted 19 December 2013 - 09:51 AM

Ooooh yeah them 4 bail bonds missions were such an improvement on non-stop vigilante missions!

 

I think peoples johnnies are getting wrangled because there was a huge lack of criminal side missions and people feel like yoga has taken the place of where the criminal side missions should be.

 

I don't understand why R* didn't include both yoga AND criminal side missions. Bail bonds AND vigilante. Most ambitious GTA yet, but it lacks the some of the core things that make a GTA game.


Mister Pink
  • Mister Pink

    Boards Of Canada

  • The Connection
  • Joined: 03 Nov 2004
  • None
  • Most Knowledgeable [Music] 2013
    Best Contributor [Music] 2012

#210

Posted 19 December 2013 - 09:55 AM

Yeah Rockstar really lost the ball with their demographic when it came to including Yoga. It's a sort of a sell out. I mean did they include it because some lads will be playing and their partner might be in to Yoga and the lad can say "look, it's got something you like in the game." That's the only reason I could see it work. Sure Yoga is all in and big around the world esp LA but f*cking hell, spare us the in-game spam. 





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users