I never said you were lying. It all comes back to what I said earlier; people had unrealistic expectations and expected features that hadn't been confirmed. If you still wanna argue that, fine, but most people with common sense would understand what I mean.
Could you share the articles where you feel they decieved us? I'd really like to read them, because I don't remember that even being hinted at.
You use your brain and Google the earlier previews of GTA V, this was all quite a good while ago man, I've no reason to lie to you and make it up. All Rockstar needed to say was that the property feature was back in the game, which they definitely said in previews. Yeah sure, they were very clever with their use of words, but they never specified whether this property feature did or did not include safehouse properties, but it is understandable to see why many people would have been led to believe that it did. Dan Houser beaming with excitement stated, "properties are back in". Okay congratulations you and others were so clever not to fall for it, but many people did and with good reason. If you still wanna argue that, fine, but most people with common sense would understand what I mean.
Oh so you know what is and what is not important to me in GTA know do you? I never realized you were the one makes me decide my preferences and tastes in GTA. Exploring the map is the major fun and interest in GTA to me, I spent a great deal of my free roam time doing that stuff in GTA IV and EFLC. But I'm not going into this any further man, I've explained this to you already.
If you still don't know or understand why there's no need for endless amounts of side activites in a GTA environment by now, then it is my conclusion your gameplay experience of GTA is very unimaginative, boring and lacking in creativity.
Well if you still don't understand why interiors are so important to the gameplay, then I cannot help you, I'm sorry but it ends there.
You may not have been very specific but you knew what you were playing at. You just wanted to keep the insults moving at full speed by manipulating your words. I had good reason to take it as such based on your deception. If you still wanna argue that, fine, but most people with common sense would understand what I mean.
And please do refrain from insulting me for no reason, it's not like I insulted you. I don't take kindly to being called thick or stupid.
I never directly said that about you, it was subject to certain conditions. I stated if you did not understand what I meant, then you must be incredibly thick or stupid. But if you felt you understood what I had meant, then the insult does not apply to you does it ? Exactly. But if that still upsets you and gets you all emotional, I will refrain from doing so.