Southern SA isnt in Los Santos screw u
You're absolutely right! Southern SA is not in LS, it's the other way around.
It's definitely a peculiar choice of words, though. Previous information and marketing has always called the entire V island 'San Andreas', so they are either calling it Southern San Andreas because they want to clarify that it's not San Fierro and Las Venturas, or that they're focussing on a Los Santos only DLC. Probably the latter. Perhaps a South Los Santos DLC, a.k.a the much requested ghetto/hood missions with Franklin? Curious how they are gonna make it a prequel (since the characters don't know eachother yet) or a sequel (dealing with the multiple endings).
I'm saying Los Santos isn't part of Southern San Andreas. San Fierro could be in Southern San Andreas. We can use the airport to start the DLC campaign.
Or maybe, both LS and SF is part of Southern San Andreas and LV being at north. wtv
If they use the real life logic (and therefore the locations used in GTA: San Andreas), LS is south, SF is north-west and LV is north(-east). I just don't think there is any possibility of them adding another well-thought city in a year. The amount of research they did on Los Angeles is insane. I'm not saying they are never adding other cities, but I'm pretty sure those will be locations for Online, not for the offline single player part.
To me, it's sounds as if they are focussing on South Los Santos, perhaps giving a bit more dept to the Franklin Story. I wouldn't mind some hood action, and although I'm not trying to recreate GTA: San Andreas, I think the rare Franklin-Ballas missions were pretty great. I'm still very uncertain how they are gonna add it, time-wise. Prequel, Sequel, spinoff? There are quite a few complaints about that already..
Oh well, I'm just glad they are adding single player Story DLC (although it's not yet an official announcement).