Now THAT'S creepy. It looks tiny!
Yep it is tiny, but SA nostalgia kiddies will scream that it was the biggest map Rockstar made to date.
Oh how powerful draw distance can affect the mind. Especially when the mind is a pubescent teenager's.
Can you only think black and white? Not everyone who prefers GTA SA's map over V's is a "SA nostalgia kiddie" or a "pubescent teenager", and not everyone believes that SA's map IS bigger. Of course it is NOT. It's tiny compared to V.
But it matters to me how you FEEL while playing. And I love R*'s tricks they used to make us think that SA is freakin massive. Those places like Shady Creeks made ... no, they still make me feel lost when I'm playing. R* did a good job on that, and it is not only the poor draw distance. It is the whole style of the countryside. V's is way too recognizable, in SA I still find things I've never seen, because the countryside was way more... complex and it had more variety + hidden things. That doesn't mean I hate V's map. It's still beautiful and well done, but.. I expected something different. Not something bigger, but something with more variety and places to get lost.
But that's just my opinion, do you call me a SA fanboy now?
I know you weren't specifically talking to me, but: Did you even read my first post when I made this topic? No? I wasn't talking about SA being huge or so. I was talking about the PLACES I miss. Like Shady Creeks, Flint County and Back O' Beyond. I never said that I get lost in SA because it IS bigger. It is NOT.