Oh god, the stupidity in this thread...
"The people with brains know the game isn't that good while the fanboys are trying to believe the game is good while its the same formula we've seen for years. "
This statement right here is the stupidest in the thread. Congratulations redx.
Coming from someone who thought the 360 version would still look better with all the proof I shown makes whatever you post stupid.
The PS3 has better ground textures, congratulations. The Xbox has the better framerate, which, if I remember from our PM's, that "Right there alone makes it the better version."
Remember when you said that? You said that when early reports (forum members) said the PS3 had better framerate, but those reports were wrong. When I sent you better proof (The same article you have in your sig, actually) that showed the Xbox version had better framerate, you automatically went back on that.
But anyway, enough of that bullsh*t. No one cares.
You're still stupid, your post proves it. Anything else you want?
Did you even read the link?
360: Has better frame rates but will slow down faster in time while the PS3 beats it ONCE in a while in frame rates in which it matters. Like where they shown a video of Trevor blowing up the truck at the trailer park. The 360 went down to 18 while the PS3 was still in the 20's. The PS3 frame rate is more consistent then the 360 which makes it better then 360.
Once again TRY AGAIN. Read my link and stop being a fanboy. The proof is all in there by non bias people.
@Street My link is providing proof that the PS3 version is better from NON bias people that do this for every game.
"Has better frame rates but will slow down faster in time while the PS3 beats it ONCE in a while in frame rates in which it matters."
"The PS3 frame rate is more consistent then the 360 which makes it better then 360. "
That's contradictory. You said 2 opposite things. Nice try though.
And how am I a fanboy? By agreeing that the PS3 looks better? No, I'm a fanboy because anyone that argues with you is a fanboy, because you're so close-minded it's ridiculous.
Anyway, like I said, no one cares. Are you gonna argue against you being stupid from your first post, or not?
The PS3 is more consistent in gun fights then the 360.
"The 360 does command a minor advantage in frame-rate during synchronised play, but for shoot-outs and high-speed hurtles down the city streets, the PS3 can sometimes pull ahead in these metrics"
This was proven in the video and is even stated by DF.
You didn't say that though. You said the PS3 gets better frames sometimes, but then you said it was more consistent. What you say now to cover your ass doesn't matter.
Anyway, you're not gonna defend against me saying you're stupid, so I'm done. I'm not getting into a console war when I barely even play on consoles.
What do you think Sometime means? In gun fights, explosives and high speed racing that's where the PS3 shines. Hint Sometimes because we are not always in one of them. While the 360 shines in just walking, driving, and etc...
In those sometimes its more consistent. How does that not make any sense? I swear you M$ fanboys always love to twist words around.
You got me to come back. Congratulations. Now, let's prove you wrong again.
"360: Has better frame rates but will slow down faster in time while the PS3 beats it ONCE in a while in frame rates in which it matters. Like where they shown a video of Trevor blowing up the truck at the trailer park. The 360 went down to 18 while the PS3 was still in the 20's. The PS3 frame rate is more consistent then the 360 which makes it better then 360. "
This is your whole post. You put "while the PS3 beats it ONCE in a while in frame rates"
You even f*cking capped the part that proved your post was contradictory. You said the PS3 beat it once in a while. Once in a while. Let me say it again. Once. In. A. While.
And then, somehow, you get to "The PS3 frame rate is more consistent that then 360"
That goes against what you just said in your last sentence. How can it be more consistent if it's only better once in a while, like you so lovingly put in caps in your own post? It can't. You can't even get your own arguments right.
And oh yeah, I'm such a big Microsoft fanboy! I mean, I play on my Xbox all day, not on my awesome gaming PC! I have everything Xbox offers, because I'm such a big fanboy!
Seriously, get a clue.
"For example planning hest. They told us that we will be able to plan heists, and that heists will be amazing like heist mission in GTA IV. But no. We are able to choose 1 from 2 scripted scenarios. And that's all."
You did plan the heists. Also, I doubt they said "The heisst will be amazing like heist mission in GTA 4".
You were only able to choose between 2 scenarios, but you could pick who did everything. Who did you want as a hacker, who did you want as a driver, who did you want as a gunman, etc.
"Or map. Underwater is completely waste of space and time, it's extremaly boring, and submarine is too slow. And we even can't dive to ocean floor. Instead of this they should create more terrain behind Chilliad, or make chilliad bigger, and create snowy terrain on the top."
Underwater being a waste of space is your opinion, and it's fine for you to think that. Just like it's fine for me to think that underwater is awesome. Cruising under the ocean, exploring what it has to offer in the sub is fun to me. May not be fun to everyone. Completely understandable. And yes, you can dive to the ocean floor. You even do it during a mission.
"Also gun customization is big fail. Why we can't unmount silencer? Or turn off flashlight?"
I'm pretty sure you can unmount silencers at the gun shop (Not 100% though). And you can turn off the flashlight.
"Why the hell there's no nitro in Los Santos Customs?"
The lack of nitro was pretty saddening.
"Why the f*ck they created inventory in multiplayer, but no in singleplayer?"
Probably because multiplayer was a more appropriate place for it. I dunno, I haven't played much of multiplayer, so I don't really know what the inventory consists of. Can't comment much on that.
"Why we can't drive train?"
I'm pretty sure we could never drive trains. And they never promised that.
"Why they blocked almost every interior available in missions?"
Same reason they did the same thing in GTA 4.
"Why there are sh*tload of bugs, when they delayed it for fixing bugs?"
Because a closed, internal test isn't as good as millions of people playing it. Why are Bethesda games always buggy? This is pretty common sense.
"Why the hell they talked about V like about revolution in gaming while it's not even evolution?!
They said it was there biggest and most ambitious game to date. They talked about it like a revolution for them, not gaming.
"It's just GTA IV with better graphics, new story, map, weapons and cars."
...Everything a sequel usually is to the game before it. Lol what are you trying to say here?