I don't believe this for a single second, seems like blatant propaganda if you ask me. I mean if these accusations were true, then why was Goncola Amaral even allowed to lead the of Madeline McCann investigation in Portugal in the first place, since apparently these accusations date all the way to 1996? I find it all very coincidental that it wasn't until after Goncola Amaral wrote that book, that these accusations were raised?
Pulling out news articles out of your arse is not evidence, as you don't truly understand the journalists motive for writing them? For all you know they could have been personally hired for strategic domination for the McCann's, ensuring that people looked down on people who accused them and look up to them. You're going to have try better than this. I hope you know that most journalists earn their living by writing mostly false reports. It's how they earn money.
Edited by ROCKGTASTAR, 28 October 2013 - 11:41 AM.