I'm not getting into this argument. Both you and the other guy are basing your entire argument on a sentence stating that they dont need a title update to IP ban.
How can you ban ip when you lease it on a 1-7 day lease?
And you discerned that based on my post? Explain how my post allowed you to draw those conclusions...
Clearly you have no working knowledge of how IP's actually work and live in some fake dream world where people still "IP" ban hahahah.
You do realize that they don't need a title update to ban IPs and accounts on servers they have total control over, right? So your post is illogical.
And yes, people do still IP ban, because in certain environments... the IP is the only identifier that exists.
And again, at what point of my post clearly illustrates how I dont know how IPs work? They are not hard to understand.
So what you are saying, that they do need a title update to IP ban? And my post that they dont shows I dont understand how they work.
Please, I would love for you to educate me... I need a good laugh today.
You do know how dynamic public IPing works?
Or for a retard Your ip changes all the time so no IP banning does not exist.
Cant ban a IP unless it static as it changes constantly.
Start a CMD prompt in windows and type ipconfig /all and notice the lease optained and lease expired times.
And somehow that shows that I dont understand hiw IPs can be dynamic and static?
Or that mutiple people can all hide behind one IP?
I suppose you are going to try and say that I dont know that even multiple websites can share one IP?
All based on a sentence that somehow made you conjure up all these ideas of what you think I know and completely goes astray from what I said to begin with.
Your reeling faster than a congress man caught with his pants down.
Maybe because I am still waiting for you to tell me how you can know what knowledge I have based on, "they don't need a title update to IP ban"
And instead, you proceed to ramble on and on of how IPs work.
So again, explain to me how my sentences shows I dont understand how they work.
Did you ever stop to think that I didnt feel like writing book here on how they would actually do it and instead, opted to put it in such a way that most people would have some sort of ckue of the point I was making....
Maybe I should have just left it at this..... "They dont need a title update to ban dumbasses"
Would that get my f*cking point across? Or do you need a god damn book to see the point? Cause for f*cks sake, I damn near wrote one already trying to tell you what I was getting at.
And once again, one sentence doesnt tell you a f*cking thing about what I know. All you did was come up with a fantasy about what I do and dont know because I said "IP"
f*ck sakes, didnt realize saying one word opened brain to my entire knowledge....