Quantcast

Jump to content

» «
Photo

GTA V Map = Oahu + Los Angeles dumped in the south

9 replies to this topic
theguitarist
  • theguitarist

    Square Civilian

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 08 Oct 2013

#1

Posted 10 October 2013 - 02:27 PM

Does anyone seriously disagree? Its nowhere near what was in GTA San Andreas, where we had Los Angeles, San Francisco, Las Vegas plus a countryside AND desert.


TehTacoGuy
  • TehTacoGuy

    Half taco, half human.

  • Members
  • Joined: 02 Nov 2011
  • Australia

#2

Posted 10 October 2013 - 04:49 PM

Does anyone seriously disagree? Its nowhere near what was in GTA San Andreas, where we had Los Angeles, San Francisco, Las Vegas plus a countryside AND desert.

San Andreas was tiny, and much less detailed. 

  • TrustedInstaller likes this

RoadRunner71
  • RoadRunner71

    Left to rust

  • Members
  • Joined: 11 Mar 2012
  • None

#3

Posted 10 October 2013 - 04:50 PM

There we go with this sh*t again...


GR0VE4LIF3
  • GR0VE4LIF3

    Peon

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 07 Oct 2013

#4

Posted 10 October 2013 - 04:52 PM

the desert looks smaller than your penis

  • ten-a-penny likes this

TakinThyBacon
  • TakinThyBacon

    Foot Soldier

  • Members
  • Joined: 01 Mar 2013

#5

Posted 10 October 2013 - 05:44 PM

God man, use the search function, this topic has been beat to death on these forums


ten-a-penny
  • ten-a-penny

    كساااد

  • Members
  • Joined: 20 Jun 2013
  • Libya

#6

Posted 14 October 2013 - 05:30 PM

GTA V is based on California :monocle:

GTA SA didn't.

end of story :^:


RockstarFanboy
  • RockstarFanboy

    GTA #2 FANBOY / Loyal R* Soldier

  • Members
  • Joined: 12 Oct 2013

#7

Posted 14 October 2013 - 05:37 PM

this has been discussed before thousands of times... san andreas only seemed big because of the sh*t draw distance but in reality V's map is 2(or more) times bigger than SA's map


Ferocious Banger
  • Ferocious Banger

    Big Homie

  • Members
  • Joined: 17 May 2012
  • India

#8

Posted 14 October 2013 - 05:49 PM Edited by Ferocious Banger, 14 October 2013 - 05:51 PM.

 

Does anyone seriously disagree? Its nowhere near what was in GTA San Andreas, where we had Los Angeles, San Francisco, Las Vegas plus a countryside AND desert.

San Andreas was tiny, and much less detailed. 

 

Meh, the countryside ( at least the hills ) in GTA V is no better than the ones in San Andreas. In fact, I'd say that SA had more detailed hills/forests. At least we saw grasses aplenty in SA, unlike in V where there is always a "green sea" covering the hills - unnecessarily excessive amount of hills.

 

 

 

"this has been discussed before thousands of times... san andreas only seemed big because of the sh*t draw distance but in reality V's map is 2(or more) times bigger than SA's map"

At least it felt big.


Neox
  • Neox

    Player Hater

  • Members
  • Joined: 04 Jun 2013

#9

Posted 14 October 2013 - 05:53 PM

Well GTA:SA isn't that smaller.

But yeah the graphics are much better and you can't simply make a huge world like SA with the graphics of current/next Gen.


killahmatic
  • killahmatic

    JB

  • Members
  • Joined: 13 Apr 2008
  • None

#10

Posted 14 October 2013 - 06:02 PM

Does anyone seriously disagree? Its nowhere near what was in GTA San Andreas, where we had Los Angeles, San Francisco, Las Vegas plus a countryside AND desert.

 

it wouldn't have been realistically possible for them to have 3 cities in this game, and you know that..





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users