Quantcast

Jump to content

» «
Photo

San Fierro? Las Venturas?

44 replies to this topic
kmb1979
  • kmb1979

    Player Hater

  • Members
  • Joined: 17 Sep 2013

#1

Posted 17 September 2013 - 06:45 AM

If GTA V is set in the state of San Andreas why are we only able to visit the city of Los Santos and not the other two cities like we could in the original game? It feels like we are getting sort changed with an incomplete game. Will there be DLC?


JumpingKentFlash
  • JumpingKentFlash

    Hustler

  • Members
  • Joined: 30 Jan 2004

#2

Posted 17 September 2013 - 06:48 AM

God

Mzeppelin
  • Mzeppelin

    The Don

  • Members
  • Joined: 16 Aug 2005

#3

Posted 17 September 2013 - 06:48 AM

I agree and am also angry and confused at this. I'd really love to visit a current-day San Fierro.

  • Young Killah and kmb1979 like this

Gedmundo
  • Gedmundo

    Rat

  • Members
  • Joined: 10 May 2007

#4

Posted 17 September 2013 - 06:49 AM

It was done purposefully to annoy you.


ZRose
  • ZRose

    THE ONE

  • Members
  • Joined: 01 May 2013

#5

Posted 17 September 2013 - 06:51 AM

All i see is complainers on this forum today.


Boxman108
  • Boxman108

    Thug

  • Members
  • Joined: 13 Sep 2013

#6

Posted 17 September 2013 - 06:52 AM

I heard something about Rockstar possibly adding onto the map in GTA online so maybe we could see renditions of them someday.


poklane
  • poklane

    So now what?

  • Members
  • Joined: 06 Jun 2012
  • Netherlands

#7

Posted 17 September 2013 - 06:53 AM

We might see them in GTAO via DLC. Also, isn't LC set in a state?


Munx
  • Munx

    Homie

  • Members
  • Joined: 16 Sep 2013

#8

Posted 17 September 2013 - 07:14 AM

They've made some pretty strong hints about other cities being added in the online version, Id say those two are prob the first we'll see added.

 

While I havnt played the game yet, It dosnt sound like the sp is in any way lacking because these towns arnt there.


almostrodney
  • almostrodney

    Trick

  • Members
  • Joined: 26 May 2011

#9

Posted 17 September 2013 - 07:41 AM

My favourite bit was were he said what everyone has been saying for the last year.


saintsrow
  • saintsrow

    I thought I would only need this meme for a few weeks...or so

  • Members
  • Joined: 21 Sep 2006
  • None

#10

Posted 17 September 2013 - 07:45 AM

Well, let's see, at 5 years per HD city, I guess we will get San Fierro and Las Venturas by about 2023.... :whuh:


Dodgers2013Champs
  • Dodgers2013Champs

    Trick

  • Members
  • Joined: 05 Sep 2013

#11

Posted 17 September 2013 - 07:46 AM

Please log off and think about what you just typed.
  • GTA_VI likes this

Fuzzknuckles
  • Fuzzknuckles

    Chronic Ape

  • The Connection
  • Joined: 10 Apr 2004
  • None

#12

Posted 17 September 2013 - 07:47 AM

I haven't read the other replies yet, but hopefully they're all telling you to shut the hell up. 

 

But if you're NOT trolling, the answer is simple:

 

THIS ISN'T THE SAME SAN ANDREAS. THIS IS SAN ANDREAS IN AN ALTERNATE UNIVERSE, WHERE CJ NEVER EXISTED, WHERE THERE IS NO SAN FIERRO OR LAS VENTURAS JUST AROUND THE CORNER.

 

That's not to say we won't see them in future, if the Online speculation is correct, though. I have a feeling we'll see Venturas next. 

  • Tonkse likes this

kmb1979
  • kmb1979

    Player Hater

  • Members
  • Joined: 17 Sep 2013

#13

Posted 17 September 2013 - 07:48 AM

Oh I'm sorry almostrodney! I was unaware that you were not allowed to post a question because somebody else somewhere in the world has already asked it? 


Munx
  • Munx

    Homie

  • Members
  • Joined: 16 Sep 2013

#14

Posted 17 September 2013 - 07:49 AM Edited by Munx, 17 September 2013 - 07:51 AM.

Well, let's see, at 5 years per HD city, I guess we will get San Fierro and Las Venturas by about 2023.... :whuh:

 

Yeah, because making the city of los santos is what took them 5 years, the other features they just copy pasted! *trollface*

 

They already got alot of the resources they'd need, they could likely push in another city within a few months if they wanted to.

 

Hell, based on some of the stuff they are saying about the online part, it sounds like they got some pretty strong creation tools at theyr disposal.


kmb1979
  • kmb1979

    Player Hater

  • Members
  • Joined: 17 Sep 2013

#15

Posted 17 September 2013 - 07:52 AM

Oh and I'm not a troll. I have just joined this site and asked a question! wtf! What is with the abuse? But thank you for your explanation regarding the alternate reality information.


almostrodney
  • almostrodney

    Trick

  • Members
  • Joined: 26 May 2011

#16

Posted 17 September 2013 - 08:12 AM

Oh I'm sorry almostrodney! I was unaware that you were not allowed to post a question because somebody else somewhere in the world has already asked it? 

 

You see I wouldn't mind but you should use the search function. But il let you off since your new :)

  • kmb1979 likes this

TheTruthOnly
  • TheTruthOnly

    Street Cat

  • Members
  • Joined: 11 Jul 2013
  • Unknown

#17

Posted 17 September 2013 - 08:46 AM

San Fierro was boring as f*ck in SA. Las Venturas too. Only Los Santos and countryside were great, i'm glad they focus on one city. BTW Now Los Santos alone is bigger than all SA cites combined.


RandomNoun
  • RandomNoun

    Li'l G Loc

  • Members
  • Joined: 04 Jan 2012

#18

Posted 17 September 2013 - 08:49 AM

And if they were to add those cities in later DLC, it'll be like what they do with Liberty City: They'll be separate islands that you can travel to via the airport.


Distrom
  • Distrom

    Sodom

  • Members
  • Joined: 12 Feb 2013
  • Venezuela

#19

Posted 17 September 2013 - 08:52 AM

Oh I'm sorry almostrodney! I was unaware that you were not allowed to post a question because somebody else somewhere in the world has already asked it? 

It was confirmed almost 2 years ago (yes, 2 years) there is no SF and LV.


LondonTipton91
  • LondonTipton91

    Player Hater

  • Members
  • Joined: 17 Sep 2013

#20

Posted 17 September 2013 - 02:07 PM Edited by LondonTipton91, 17 September 2013 - 02:09 PM.

Trust me, don't waste your time. Personally, I LOVE Las Vegas, and I live in San Francisco, so I understand this things.. But let's change our subject to the real question. Why not San Fierro and Las Venturas?
Let's start with Las Venturas.. Why, you aksed?
Las Venturas is surely a lot bigger than Los Santos. It comes with huge desert and beautiful buildings. So, we all saw Los Santos in GTA V.. Yeah, only Los Santos is bigger than whole Gta San Andreas map. And now.. IMAGINE LAS VENTURAS! Ha! You can't. Only desert would take 10 years to be finished, not to mention all the casinos and hotels in HD graphics.. It's simply... INSANE! I KNOW there won't be any DLC on GTA V about this one, cause' I don't want to wait a whole decade for one more city. They will probably make 'GTA V: Las Venturas Stories' with the main protagonist being Wu zi mu, perhaps. Moving on to the SAN FRANCISCO!
San Fierro took an itsy-bitsy part in GTA San Andreas. We have no protagonists here.. I don't like the person who told San Fierro was boring. I simply LOVED the whole bridges, houses downhill, big pointy building and a lot more things. Now, why GTA V won't include San Fierro? Well, San Fierro in-game is.. well.. expensive! Let's start with BIGGEST problems:
First: Golden Gate Bridge (Gant Bridge)
Okay, this one is the major problem. You saw that little bridges all around the Los Santos,right? Well, yeah, now in GTA V they are up to TEN times bigger than original San Andreas version, right? Yeah,yeah,yeah.. dum,dum.. BOOM! BUT GOLDEN GATE? Oh please, it will be a 20 mins long ride with Inferno on full speed to just pass through it! I get goosebumps when I just think about it!
Second: Bay Area (Bay Area)
Well, this one isn't major but can ruin up the gameplay. It would probably be the size of whole San Fierro (San Andreas) if it comes to life! It's just, not important.. AT ALL! It's like rubish on a street to Las Venturas.. Nothing else.. 
Third: Mount Chiliad-not gonna be related 
GTA V release map told us that Mount Chiliad is a heart of GTA V. It resides a little above the center, and it kinda ruins the original gameplay aswell. Well, Mount Chiliad and San Fierro are a duo that no one dares to  seperate. AND THEY DID! How can you possibly connect Mount Chiliad to San Fierro in GTA V? Obviously, only by the plane. 
I think I can go on by hours.. It's simply not possible. San Fierro will probably come in a new game maybe 'GTA V:San Fierro Stories'? 
Also..
I DON'T WANT THEM IN THERE! It's not like this one is small, YET I need 2 more cities! I mean, COME ON! 
________
Read whole, I appreciate it!


ArcherTheGreat
  • ArcherTheGreat

    Master Chief's Backseat Driver

  • Members
  • Joined: 26 Jan 2013

#21

Posted 28 September 2013 - 06:47 PM

With the heaps of money they are making at the moment I could see San Fierro and Las Venturas making an appearance by 2015. With all that money they could make a gi-normous team at Rockstar.

 

Vice City will probably be saved for last, most likely GTA 6. Might even be the finale.


calearne
  • calearne

    GTAO is a complete abomination compared to GTA IV multiplayer.

  • Members
  • Joined: 23 Aug 2013
  • United-States

#22

Posted 28 September 2013 - 06:56 PM

R* added lots of extra map on MCLA south central DLC.

  • Unseen_Bull likes this

biggtafan88
  • biggtafan88

    Square Civilian

  • Members
  • Joined: 30 Aug 2013

#23

Posted 28 September 2013 - 07:26 PM

man i think that you have to wait ten years and then MAYBE you will get an world with Ls,Sf e LV


Josh410
  • Josh410

    Li'l G Loc

  • Members
  • Joined: 31 Dec 2012
  • None

#24

Posted 28 September 2013 - 07:28 PM Edited by Josh410, 28 September 2013 - 07:29 PM.

I agree and am also angry and confused at this. I'd really love to visit a current-day San Fierro.

Yea, i think it would be neat. Plus, Las Venturas could add more heists into robbing casinos and so on. I bet 75% that we will see San Fierro and Las Venturas in DLC/ later GTA. it is almost confirmed that we will get LC because it was set in the latest gen so it would be almost a simple copy and paste job (not THAT easy but still easier than LV or SF.) I bet VC will be set for last. Also, about LC, we keep seeing it in the in-game TV and it could be a hint that it will be for GTAO


alfonsogomezmontoya
  • alfonsogomezmontoya

    The Hunter

  • Members
  • Joined: 20 Oct 2011

#25

Posted 28 September 2013 - 07:29 PM

where the hell is located san fierro and las venturas in hd era?


poklane
  • poklane

    So now what?

  • Members
  • Joined: 06 Jun 2012
  • Netherlands

#26

Posted 28 September 2013 - 07:32 PM Edited by poklane, 28 September 2013 - 07:34 PM.

With the heaps of money they are making at the moment I could see San Fierro and Las Venturas making an appearance by 2015. With all that money they could make a gi-normous team at Rockstar.

 

Vice City will probably be saved for last, most likely GTA 6. Might even be the finale.

I think VI will be set in Vice City. 1 simple reason: Vice City and it's area haven't had a HD game yet. Then you could also go with San Fierro and/or Las Venturas, but that's the same state as V. That's also why I believe Vice City, San Fierro and Las Venturas wont be in GTA Online (until they have their own HD game): Rockstar wants them to give them the same respect as LS and LC and give them their own game.


bish0p2004
  • bish0p2004

    Mack Pimp

  • Members
  • Joined: 25 Jul 2013

#27

Posted 28 September 2013 - 07:32 PM Edited by bish0p2004, 28 September 2013 - 07:33 PM.

This is one of the few complaints that I don't care for. I mean, the map is already pretty detailed and big, so it would be impossible to fit the other 3 cities with all of the content in the game.

Khaos89
  • Khaos89

    Has a small willy

  • Members
  • Joined: 06 Sep 2013
  • Antarctica

#28

Posted 28 September 2013 - 07:34 PM


 
Might even be the finale.

That would be a great idea. End the greatest selling game franchise ever. GTA will never end.

DoubleOGJohnson
  • DoubleOGJohnson

    Playa

  • Members
  • Joined: 17 Feb 2007

#29

Posted 28 September 2013 - 09:01 PM Edited by DoubleOGJohnson, 28 September 2013 - 09:02 PM.

San Fierro was boring as f*ck in SA. Las Venturas too. Only Los Santos and countryside were great, i'm glad they focus on one city. BTW Now Los Santos alone is bigger than all SA cites combined.

 

Shut your uncreative fanboy ass up, had Rockstar included SF and LV in GTA V you'd be raving about how great those places are. You fanboys always praise every feature that is included in GTA, but every feature that the fans want which is not included you fanboys call it boring or useless. Bunch of uncreative ass kissers who cant think outside the box of what Rockstar has created.

  • latigreblue likes this

Niko Vercetti 112
  • Niko Vercetti 112

    That's, just, like, your opinion man

  • Members
  • Joined: 10 Feb 2012

#30

Posted 28 September 2013 - 11:52 PM

I stopped listening when he referred to San Andreas as "the original game"





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users