
R.I.P GTA DAMAGE and HANDLING
#5
Posted 16 September 2013 - 06:33 PM
Oh for f*cks sake, give it a rest.
Some people like the handling and the damage.
#6
Posted 16 September 2013 - 06:36 PM
That is very painful to watch. R* really do need to bring out and optional patch/DLC for those who want it to correct these godawful physics. I'd definitely pay extra for that, to have the fun back in driving. It just looks so cheap and nasty now.
- birakira likes this
#7
Posted 16 September 2013 - 07:20 PM
That is very painful to watch. R* really do need to bring out and optional patch/DLC for those who want it to correct these godawful physics. I'd definitely pay extra for that, to have the fun back in driving. It just looks so cheap and nasty now.
allow me to retrieve a hanky for your tears
#9
Posted 16 September 2013 - 07:55 PM
That is very painful to watch. R* really do need to bring out and optional patch/DLC for those who want it to correct these godawful physics. I'd definitely pay extra for that, to have the fun back in driving. It just looks so cheap and nasty now.
#10
Posted 16 September 2013 - 07:58 PM
Who Cares? This is just the one of a million threads with a bunch of people whining over something as little as handling/damage.
#14
Posted 16 September 2013 - 08:39 PM
Who Cares? This is just the one of a million threads with a bunch of people whining over something as little as handling/damage.
Who cares? Obviously the million people who posted those million threads. Not such a minor matter then, is it?
#15
Posted 16 September 2013 - 08:41 PM
It's better than IV moron.
You can't argue with logic like this, can you? As Mark Twain once put it:
"Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience".
#16
Posted 16 September 2013 - 08:41 PM
Who Cares? This is just the one of a million threads with a bunch of people whining over something as little as handling/damage.
Who cares? Obviously the million people who posted those million threads. Not such a minor matter then, is it?
more like the same ten people over and over
- GTAIVman likes this
#17
Posted 16 September 2013 - 08:41 PM Edited by SausageInACan, 16 September 2013 - 08:42 PM.
You're an idiot. People dont understand that the handleing in V is better than iv.You're an idiot.
It's better than IV moron.
#19
Posted 16 September 2013 - 08:50 PM Edited by russianpolice, 16 September 2013 - 08:50 PM.
You're an idiot. People dont understand that the handleing in V is better than iv.
You're an idiot.It's better than IV moron.
I got called an idiot by a person who can't spell.
- namor likes this
#20
Posted 16 September 2013 - 09:16 PM
Show the motorcycle on the incline. That's the worse violation of physics ever. Childs game. f*ck you all.
- namor likes this
#22
Posted 16 September 2013 - 09:51 PM
Ok, I'll be the only one man enough to admit it, I was wrong about hating on GTA V car handling, it's actually awesome.
#23
Posted 16 September 2013 - 09:56 PM
No, really. Waaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
is it fixed yet? No?
WAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
#24
Posted 16 September 2013 - 10:02 PM
Why can't people just admit that after a half a decade of supposed "improvement" the physics got worse? Watching the fanboys defend V's "better than IV physics" in every other thread is like watching a bunch of drunk girls defending their boyfriends in a bar argument. You can stop lying to yourselves now. The .gifs are right there ffs.
However, it's not worth bitching over because R* already f*cked it up. In fact, if it wasn't for folks bitching about IV's physics, then we would probably still have them. They're both mediocre tbh but I guess it's just one of those things R* will have to learn how to do with time.
#25
Posted 16 September 2013 - 10:04 PM
The handling of cars is better than IV. The damage is not, but there are stuff that have been improved. There's just a lack of dents and the car getting deformed!
Also, I'm pretty sure that jet is only taking off like that cause it's some military grade sh*t. Jumbo jet/private jets/stunt planes etc. will NOT be able to do that.
#26
Posted 16 September 2013 - 10:08 PM Edited by Slim-Joe2911, 16 September 2013 - 10:09 PM.
Everyone who is here is complaining about the handling.
Everyone who likes the handling isn't here because they are too busy playing and enjoying the game.
For those of you who are upset, I shall now play a sad tune on the worlds smallest violin.
*begins to play*
#27
Posted 16 September 2013 - 10:08 PM
It's better than IV moron.
You're an idiot.
Nope. It's fact. Play the game then report back to me, chief.
#28
Posted 16 September 2013 - 10:16 PM
yo. long time stalker. first post ever.
all i have to say is that it would be neat if there was at least a choice to select between the box-like handling and the "toned down" gta IV handling. after all you can't take away the auto from the grand theft.....
#29
Posted 16 September 2013 - 10:24 PM Edited by Gigabomber, 16 September 2013 - 10:24 PM.
The damage issue is quickly beginning to eclipse the handling issue, although that plane's take off is pretty ridiculous.
#30
Posted 16 September 2013 - 10:33 PM Edited by mawerick_mc, 16 September 2013 - 10:35 PM.
The damage issue is quickly beginning to eclipse the handling issue, although that plane's take off is pretty ridiculous.
have to agree, from many streams i watched, handling... can get over it (although when driving on off-road and in situations where common sense tells you the car will roll upside down , it does not, it's frustrating). But the damage is so... burnout-ish, damn, and you can't say they didn't had already a well made driving and damage physics engine before... sigh (still it is the best GTA so far, just not Perfect yet)
P.S. vote here so we get a better understanding of what people really think about it.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users