
you think the map will be the same as SA?
Started by Dario47, Aug 30 2013 07:57 AM
21 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 30 August 2013 - 07:57 AM
the map looks pretty similar to san andreas, from what i've seen. which would suck alot if it looked exactly the same. the san andreas map was too boring, and had no life in it. too small IMO
#4
Posted 30 August 2013 - 08:02 AM
QUOTE (Drive_ByShooting @ Friday, Aug 30 2013, 08:00) |
Why is this in the news section? |
oh sorry i didn't realise i was posting in the news section. sorry for the mix up, fella's
#5
Posted 30 August 2013 - 09:48 AM
yes it is exactly the same map.
I heard they added a few trees. But the rest stays as we know it.
I heard they added a few trees. But the rest stays as we know it.
#6
Posted 30 August 2013 - 09:49 AM
it will be different map
a lot of locations and buildings has changed its place.. for example the griffiths observatory


#7
Posted 30 August 2013 - 10:01 AM
Map will be very different. First, the time difference of developing is 9 years between those games and GTA V takes place in present day while San Andreas is set in 1992, so cities will have many differences in comparison to each other. About countryside, as everyone says ''V has small map, only one city'' and all. If San Andreas was big enough for players to go around with plane, in GTA V, it will be much more than enough.
#10
Posted 30 August 2013 - 10:21 AM
QUOTE (Drive_ByShooting @ Friday, Aug 30 2013, 08:00) |
Why is this in the news section? |
Why is this in any section.
#12
Posted 30 August 2013 - 10:27 AM
The geography will be similar minus SF and LV much in the same way GTA IV is to GTA III.
#14
Posted 30 August 2013 - 10:33 AM
The name may be San Andreas but it is a new map entirely. Think.
#15
Posted 30 August 2013 - 10:34 AM
QUOTE (Dario47 @ Friday, Aug 30 2013, 08:57) |
the map looks pretty similar to san andreas, from what i've seen. which would suck alot if it looked exactly the same. the san andreas map was too boring, and had no life in it. too small IMO |
Well I'm hoping that, given the fact that they've built all new models and applied all new textures, and made the whole thing MUCH BIGGER, it won't feel like SA. Because it's basically an entirely new city.
You HAVE been reading the previews, rather than just making assumptions on something you've not actually played and seen a few screenshots and trailers for, right?
RIGHT?
Kids today. It boggles the mind.
#16
Posted 30 August 2013 - 11:01 AM
QUOTE (Dario47 @ Friday, Aug 30 2013, 07:57) |
the map looks pretty similar to san andreas, from what i've seen. which would suck alot if it looked exactly the same. the san andreas map was too boring, and had no life in it. too small IMO |
I hope not aswell as SA map was too stupid
#18
Posted 30 August 2013 - 11:20 AM
Yeh ItZ gOna b Cj n Swzet n Gan Bazngers m Lv m San Fiezro azn JetpuC cAnt waYt too go SHoot dOgs an Gezt Arira 51 hYdRa CheAtz
#19
Posted 30 August 2013 - 11:57 AM
QUOTE (AuSsIeThUnDeR36 @ Friday, Aug 30 2013, 11:20) |
Yeh ItZ gOna b Cj n Swzet n Gan Bazngers m Lv m San Fiezro azn JetpuC cAnt waYt too go SHoot dOgs an Gezt Arira 51 hYdRa CheAtz |
Yeah what he said......
OP go look at the mapping thread. Other than containing the city of LS and it's basic geographical layout, GTA V and SA won't share a similar map in the slightest.
#22
Posted 30 August 2013 - 12:02 PM
WTF dude, theres a big thread of map and mapping....go and check it!
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users