DC Cinematic Universe (Batman, Supes, Aquaman, and more)
Posted 08 August 2013 - 10:04 PM
But who cares! A Brolin-Bat would be rad.
Posted 08 August 2013 - 10:57 PM
Posted 08 August 2013 - 11:43 PM
|QUOTE (Sup3rman @ Thursday, Aug 8 2013, 14:57)|
|Well they want to make a JLA movie next, so can't be a ye olde batman. Ill just say again, Brolin would be awesome in both roles(Bruce/Bats). But guys, try to post some more interesting actors who would be good playing Lex, cause i can't think of any.|
Posted 09 August 2013 - 12:13 AM
Taylor Kitch. Anson Mount. Armie Hammer. Antony Starr. Karl Urban.
Older lookin' dudes: (quite the age gamut here)
Matt Dillon. Hugh Laurie. Mickey Rourke. (Imagine Rourke in the Dark Knight Rises!!!!) Kurt Russel. Gerard Butler. And you know what? f*ck it. Bryan Cranston as Batman hisgoddamedself.
Posted 09 August 2013 - 12:45 AM
|QUOTE (Otter @ Thursday, Aug 8 2013, 20:13)|
|And you know what? f*ck it. Bryan Cranston as Batman hisgoddamedself.|
As old Bruce, hell yeah.
If they ever do the Batman Beyond thing, Cranston as the grizzled Bat would be rad. But it'll never happen...
Posted 09 August 2013 - 10:06 AM
|QUOTE (darthYENIK @ Friday, Aug 9 2013, 05:13)|
Oh wow, that's what I had in mind too. Mark Strong would be awesome as Lex Luthor. He has the talent required to get under the skin of the character. Good voice as well.
A thumbs up to Josh Brolin as Batman. Can't go wrong with that.
As for Cranston, majority of the fans want to see him as Commissioner Gordon and I don't disagree. He definitely has the looks.
Posted 09 August 2013 - 05:16 PM
Posted 09 August 2013 - 05:29 PM
|QUOTE (Sup3rman @ Friday, Aug 9 2013, 13:16)|
|Indeed, i agree with Girish completely here. But Otter, you can't really have Mickey Rourke in a DC universe film, can you? He was already in Marvels Iron Man 2.|
Also, Chris Evans has played two different characters in different Marvel franchises (if you can fall Fantastic Four a franchise).
Posted 09 August 2013 - 07:19 PM
Posted 10 August 2013 - 03:35 AM
Rourke is still too ugly. Although realistically, Bruce Wayne would have that boxer's face.
Posted 10 August 2013 - 04:27 PM
As for Reynolds, he read the script, did he not? In both cases, royally sh*tting the bed.
Posted 11 August 2013 - 06:46 AM
Edit: Here's an article on it - http://www.digitaljo.../article/356085
Posted 11 August 2013 - 07:04 AM
Uhm. I want to see to Batmans - old and young versions. I dunno. I just want to.
Posted 23 August 2013 - 03:05 AM
Posted 23 August 2013 - 03:10 AM
Posted 23 August 2013 - 05:31 AM
Posted 23 August 2013 - 05:58 AM
|QUOTE (darthYENIK @ Friday, Aug 23 2013, 08:40)|
|I was really hoping to see Broman (what I was gonna call Josh Brolin as Batman).|
heh, that was a cool nick. Hell, I would have taken Ryan Gosling over Ben Affleck.
Posted 23 August 2013 - 06:07 AM
Wow.. I prefer Brolin, Liev Shreiber or Micheal Fassbender as possible candidates.. but Brolin is probably the best one. All I'm going to see is a DareDevil instead of Batman.
Posted 23 August 2013 - 06:12 AM
Posted 23 August 2013 - 06:19 AM
Affleck isn't a bad actor by any means but he's had his ups and downs like some actors. I just don't think Affleck can sell Batman though man, that's some big shoes to fill.
Posted 23 August 2013 - 09:54 AM
Posted 23 August 2013 - 12:08 PM
I'm reluctant to watch the new Superman but I might watch this new one when it comes out.
Posted 23 August 2013 - 03:36 PM
Silly nitpick, I'm sure, but f*ck you guys - that's what internet forums are for.
Posted 23 August 2013 - 05:37 PM
Posted 23 August 2013 - 05:46 PM
To Superman, all he sees is a bully beating up these diseased, vulnerable people. Batman, at the beginning, will probably seem very much like The Punisher to Clark - an evil, monstrous lunatic without a shred of empathy.
Likewise, I think Batman will have a tamer version of Lex Luthor's xenophobia - seeing Superman as an alien threat.
Luthor can really bring the two together when Superman sees how empathetic Batman is compared to Luthor, and Batman reevaluates his opinion on Superman when he sees that Lex is basically a collossal racist f*cknugget judging Clark not on his actions, but the accident of his birth.
I think they need Lex as the main villain and another foe as a secondary villain to show the differing approach to their methods - ideally, any secondary villain would be one of the aforementioned loons who Superman would view as needing protection from Batman.
Posted 23 August 2013 - 05:56 PM Edited by darthYENIK, 23 August 2013 - 06:55 PM.
But If they go the Dark Knight Returns route, then Superman is going to be asked by the US government to take Batman down.
Posted 23 August 2013 - 07:50 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users