Quantcast

Jump to content

» «
Photo

Gameplay Graphics comparison

576 replies to this topic
realtom
  • realtom

    Rat

  • Members
  • Joined: 15 Jul 2012
  • None

#1

Posted 10 July 2013 - 03:40 AM Edited by realtom, 14 July 2013 - 04:04 PM.

Thanks to Carl CJ Johnsons Brother Brian for providing us high quality screenshots.
user posted image
user posted image

user posted image
user posted image

user posted image
user posted image

user posted image
user posted image

user posted image
user posted image

user posted image
user posted image

Thanks to VATG for showing another difference
user posted image
user posted image

From the screenshots i can only say that
1. Texture has been lowered drastically especially in plane screenshot.
2. Some trees are also cut in plane screenshot.
(it can also be texture popup and trees popup, taking time to render texture, trees at high speed as it is moving plane)
3. There is a lack of foliage in gameplay trailer found in trailer 2.

Same case is with gta iv. Either those screenshots are from next gen GTA V or from pc version.
GTA IV Consoles vs PC
user posted image

note: you can see the screenshots in full resolution if you click on them.

djdiond
  • djdiond

    I need dis more than you I think!

  • Members
  • Joined: 23 Aug 2012

#2

Posted 10 July 2013 - 03:42 AM

looks the same to me lol

TheFoxRiverFugitive
  • TheFoxRiverFugitive

    Sly Fox

  • Facade Corporation
  • Joined: 08 Feb 2012
  • United-States

#3

Posted 10 July 2013 - 03:48 AM

You're taking stills from Youtube footage and then comparing them to screens that have been tweaked to have appropriate quality for their resolution. Hardly worthwhile.

I will say that I was surprised when you posted the first 2 screens because I hadn't realized they re-shot that angle from Trailer 1.

realtom
  • realtom

    Rat

  • Members
  • Joined: 15 Jul 2012
  • None

#4

Posted 11 July 2013 - 03:28 PM

i think ps3 graphics is somewhat downgraded.

jperkovic
  • jperkovic

    Street Cat

  • Members
  • Joined: 05 May 2013

#5

Posted 11 July 2013 - 03:32 PM

game looks awesome in gameplay, so I don't care.

Trund
  • Trund

    I'm all of ach fo her

  • Members
  • Joined: 19 Oct 2004

#6

Posted 11 July 2013 - 03:38 PM

The screenshots from the gameplay video you took aren't the highest quality, so a comparison is technically not feasible.
I don't know why so many people see graphics as such a big deal though, whether the game will look as good as the screenshots or not, you and everyone else will still buy it, in the end no one will give a damn anymore how the screenshots looked before release.

I'd only be mad if R* pulls off a GTA4 move again, but I don't think that'll happen.

r34ld34l
  • r34ld34l

    PC Gamer

  • Members
  • Joined: 08 Apr 2012
  • Slovenia

#7

Posted 11 July 2013 - 03:40 PM

Enhanced screenshots =! in-game gameplay


I Luke
  • I Luke

    UGHH..

  • Members
  • Joined: 13 Mar 2012

#8

Posted 11 July 2013 - 03:41 PM

The last one is the most dissapointing.. Are they too far away for everything to load or something?

Showstopper 26
  • Showstopper 26

    Big Homie

  • Members
  • Joined: 13 Nov 2012

#9

Posted 11 July 2013 - 03:43 PM

Some of the gameplay screens look way better, like the Bugstar one.

elephant punch
  • elephant punch

    Player Hater

  • Members
  • Joined: 04 May 2013

#10

Posted 11 July 2013 - 03:46 PM

It's going to be awesome.

NYC PATROL
  • NYC PATROL

    "Patrolling and Observing Forums Since 2005"

  • Leone Family Mafia
  • Joined: 07 Jan 2008
  • United-States

#11

Posted 11 July 2013 - 03:46 PM

QUOTE (I Luke @ Thursday, Jul 11 2013, 11:41)
The last one is the most dissapointing.. Are they too far away for everything to load or something?

It's just what happens during development unfortunately. Unforseen circumstances. They put so much detail in that
apparently it was bogging down the systems(Framerate etc.). At least that's how see the situation.

It's still amazing what they were able to do with so little RAM on the consoles.

UnderWeb
  • UnderWeb

    Playa

  • Members
  • Joined: 04 Jun 2012

#12

Posted 11 July 2013 - 03:46 PM

Wow...just...wow. no threes!!!

user posted image


Tommy_Vercetti_Mob
  • Tommy_Vercetti_Mob

    Snitch

  • Members
  • Joined: 30 Sep 2012

#13

Posted 11 July 2013 - 03:50 PM

QUOTE (UnderWeb @ Thursday, Jul 11 2013, 15:46)
Wow...just...wow. no threes!!!

user posted image

Does seem kinda odd, different location perhaps?

littleBIGman
  • littleBIGman

    Rat

  • Members
  • Joined: 04 May 2013

#14

Posted 11 July 2013 - 03:50 PM

Who cares?

It looks 10x better than GTA 4 and for saying its on the Xbox 360 i am extremely impressed.

If you want even better graphics, then simply wait until the next gen versions come out next year.

Personally i will get them both as even the 360 version looks utterly fantastic.

UnderWeb
  • UnderWeb

    Playa

  • Members
  • Joined: 04 Jun 2012

#15

Posted 11 July 2013 - 03:55 PM

QUOTE (Tommy_Vercetti_Mob @ Thursday, Jul 11 2013, 15:50)
QUOTE (UnderWeb @ Thursday, Jul 11 2013, 15:46)
Wow...just...wow. no threes!!!

user posted image

Does seem kinda odd, different location perhaps?

It's the same. Watch the gameplay video again. I think it's around 2:00

Showstopper 26
  • Showstopper 26

    Big Homie

  • Members
  • Joined: 13 Nov 2012

#16

Posted 11 July 2013 - 04:00 PM

QUOTE (UnderWeb @ Thursday, Jul 11 2013, 11:55)
QUOTE (Tommy_Vercetti_Mob @ Thursday, Jul 11 2013, 15:50)
QUOTE (UnderWeb @ Thursday, Jul 11 2013, 15:46)
Wow...just...wow. no threes!!!

user posted image

Does seem kinda odd, different location perhaps?

It's the same. Watch the gameplay video again. I think it's around 2:00

Is that the blimp in the second screen in the background?

Chekoloco
  • Chekoloco

    Ghetto Star

  • Members
  • Joined: 04 Nov 2011

#17

Posted 11 July 2013 - 04:06 PM

I donīt f**cking care graphics! The game will be the best game ever! cool.gif

Stoic Intrusion
  • Stoic Intrusion

    Nietzschean

  • Members
  • Joined: 06 Nov 2011

#18

Posted 11 July 2013 - 04:10 PM

what is it with the big ass pictures all the time? why not just use clickable thumbnails for god's sake.

DaRkL3AD3R
  • DaRkL3AD3R

    Big Homie

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 02 May 2013

#19

Posted 11 July 2013 - 04:11 PM

QUOTE (UnderWeb @ Thursday, Jul 11 2013, 15:46)
Wow...just...wow. no threes!!!

user posted image

Yep. This right here hurts me, big time. Very disappointed that they had to strip a lot of the forests. Look how barren things look in the gameplay trailer sad.gif

Where's our forests R*????

Sezii
  • Sezii

    P.I.M.P

  • Members
  • Joined: 26 Dec 2012

#20

Posted 11 July 2013 - 04:16 PM

Playing games for the graphic is like watching porn for the story.


It looks amazing to me!

DaRkL3AD3R
  • DaRkL3AD3R

    Big Homie

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 02 May 2013

#21

Posted 11 July 2013 - 04:21 PM

QUOTE (Sezii @ Thursday, Jul 11 2013, 16:16)
Playing games for the graphic is like watching porn for the story.


It looks amazing to me!

The part about the trees being missing from what looks like the foresty region, is NOT a graphics problem. It's a gameplay problem. The whole point to GTA 5 was that you're in a geographical part of the world with VARIANCE. If they take away all the trees and make it just as barren as the desert regions well gee nice. That ruined my gameplay. Because I intended to go into the forest to hunt animals and go hiking.

Now it looks boring and dull de-forested. That's a major disappointment.

ChocoFrosty
  • ChocoFrosty

    Trolley Surfing

  • Members
  • Joined: 06 Nov 2006

#22

Posted 11 July 2013 - 04:21 PM

QUOTE (realtom @ Thursday, Jul 11 2013, 15:28)
i think ps3 graphics is somewhat downgraded.

Do you mean in comparison to Xbox 360?

GTA V was developed on both consoles at the same time. So they should look identical.

Showstopper 26
  • Showstopper 26

    Big Homie

  • Members
  • Joined: 13 Nov 2012

#23

Posted 11 July 2013 - 04:27 PM

QUOTE (DaRkL3AD3R @ Thursday, Jul 11 2013, 12:21)
QUOTE (Sezii @ Thursday, Jul 11 2013, 16:16)
Playing games for the graphic is like watching porn for the story.


It looks amazing to me!

The part about the trees being missing from what looks like the foresty region, is NOT a graphics problem. It's a gameplay problem. The whole point to GTA 5 was that you're in a geographical part of the world with VARIANCE. If they take away all the trees and make it just as barren as the desert regions well gee nice. That ruined my gameplay. Because I intended to go into the forest to hunt animals and go hiking.

Now it looks boring and dull de-forested. That's a major disappointment.

That's a mountain range with some trees. Not a forest. You can see the forest while sniping the deer. That's also while flying a plane, not walking on land. There's load in obviously, these are consoles. This also isn't the final version of the game.

dxbrandon
  • dxbrandon

    Homeboy

  • Members
  • Joined: 27 Oct 2011

#24

Posted 11 July 2013 - 04:50 PM

Looks almost the same to me.

MrSpooge
  • MrSpooge

    Soldier

  • Members
  • Joined: 03 May 2013

#25

Posted 11 July 2013 - 04:54 PM

Rockstar was always straight with us. Ever since the first trailer and pictures posted.. It was all the same. Never lied, love you Rockstar. Massive respect.

DaRkL3AD3R
  • DaRkL3AD3R

    Big Homie

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 02 May 2013

#26

Posted 11 July 2013 - 04:59 PM

QUOTE (Showstopper 26 @ Thursday, Jul 11 2013, 16:27)
QUOTE (DaRkL3AD3R @ Thursday, Jul 11 2013, 12:21)
QUOTE (Sezii @ Thursday, Jul 11 2013, 16:16)
Playing games for the graphic is like watching porn for the story.


It looks amazing to me!

The part about the trees being missing from what looks like the foresty region, is NOT a graphics problem. It's a gameplay problem. The whole point to GTA 5 was that you're in a geographical part of the world with VARIANCE. If they take away all the trees and make it just as barren as the desert regions well gee nice. That ruined my gameplay. Because I intended to go into the forest to hunt animals and go hiking.

Now it looks boring and dull de-forested. That's a major disappointment.

That's a mountain range with some trees. Not a forest. You can see the forest while sniping the deer. That's also while flying a plane, not walking on land. There's load in obviously, these are consoles. This also isn't the final version of the game.

dozingoff.gif

Did you not look at the screenshots? It's the same place and obviously they neutered it. It went from looking like a beautiful valley to a barren desert river going between two empty mountains.

I am aware of the deer hunting section where they showed some woodlands, but why butcher this particular area? It looked so much better before and yes this is the final build. There's not enough time to go in and make serious changes the vegetation layer before the game has to be shipped.

Dbns_Finest
  • Dbns_Finest

    "Did I ever tell you the definition of insanity?"

  • Members
  • Joined: 23 Nov 2012
  • South-Africa

#27

Posted 11 July 2013 - 05:05 PM

Don't know why people are still complaining, this game looks almost perfect yet people are still not satisfied suicidal.gif

MosquitoSmasher
  • MosquitoSmasher

    Moonwalker like MJ

  • Members
  • Joined: 16 Jun 2012

#28

Posted 11 July 2013 - 05:14 PM

QUOTE (ChocoFrosty @ Thursday, Jul 11 2013, 16:21)
QUOTE (realtom @ Thursday, Jul 11 2013, 15:28)
i think ps3 graphics is somewhat downgraded.

Do you mean in comparison to Xbox 360?

GTA V was developed on both consoles at the same time. So they should look identical.

No not compared to 360, cause we haven't seen that version so far. My guess is that those old screenshots are from the devkit? And correct me if i'm wrong, but devkit versions are better most of the time, aren't they? Its a bit of a shame though. However we all should not forget something......

In the old screenshot we see the bridge from very close, in the video screenshot we don't. It's possible that the trees haven't been rendered yet and that they pop in when the plane gets closer ? I have to watch the video again for that. I do hope that we'll have forests in this one though.

NYC PATROL
  • NYC PATROL

    "Patrolling and Observing Forums Since 2005"

  • Leone Family Mafia
  • Joined: 07 Jan 2008
  • United-States

#29

Posted 11 July 2013 - 05:15 PM

QUOTE (MosquitoSmasher @ Thursday, Jul 11 2013, 13:14)
QUOTE (ChocoFrosty @ Thursday, Jul 11 2013, 16:21)
QUOTE (realtom @ Thursday, Jul 11 2013, 15:28)
i think ps3 graphics is somewhat downgraded.

Do you mean in comparison to Xbox 360?

GTA V was developed on both consoles at the same time. So they should look identical.

No not compared to 360, cause we haven't seen that version so far. My guess is that those old screenshots are from the devkit? And correct me if i'm wrong, but devkit versions are better most of the time, aren't they? Its a bit of a shame though. However we all should not forget something......

In the old screenshot we see the bridge from very close, in the video screenshot we don't. It's possible that the trees haven't been rendered yet and that they pop in when the plane gets closer ? I have to watch the video again for that. I do hope that we'll have forests in this one though.

There is trees loaded all the way in the back in the gameplay shot. They just took them out for one reason or another unfortunately.

TheKrigeron
  • TheKrigeron

    Prankster

  • Members
  • Joined: 03 May 2013

#30

Posted 11 July 2013 - 05:16 PM

The only Real difference is that Screens are at sunny days, while the gameplay is at noon




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users