Read my latest post before this one, it explains. It's not necessarily any given single feature, but instead, it's that they took 6 years gutting and replacing GTA with something else, when it could have been 2 or 3 years for a game "on its way" to here. It's too much change, too quickly for the series, and took way, way too long to get released.
We could have 2 or 3 GTA games by now if they would have not "fixed what wasn't broken in the first place".
All this time spent on sh*t that, very obviously judging by the reactions on these forums, half of the fans don't even like. You mean to tell me, we waited 6 years for more GTA, and we're getting something different? You mean to tell me you changed ALL of this, and that's the excuse for why LV and SF are deleted from the state of san andreas?
No man, they f*cked up big time on GTA V. Even if it's a hit, even if it does well and we all enjoy it, we will miss GTA, because this ain't GTA anymore. It's a GTA reboot if it is GTA anything at all. So it shouldn't even be called "V" because as far as the experience goes: Everything is completely different, it's not a sequel, it's a reboot. It's not GTA V, it's "Grand Theft Auto 2013" in my book.
And some people like reboots, and some don't. Some like one reboot, but not the other. This will be the case with GTA V. Some will like it, but most true GTA fans will probably enjoy it, but dislike how long it took just to give us something completely different.
IF they spent less time gutting everything, imagine how much sooner and better and bigger GTA V could have been. I'm pissed, but I will give the benefit of the doubt.
| Thier kill markers you idiot. |
No, they aren't. Because the first two guys michael shoots put up a gray then a red x, why would a kill marker have 2 states? And the guy he HEADSHOTS after those two dies, the screen blurs, and it's a HEADSHOT, yet there is NO marker for him! So it's not a kill marker, and that was all explained in your own quoting post, so I am wondering who is the idiot here. Because I think only an idiot would call someone an idiot while they spout of incorrect information themselves.