Quantcast

Jump to content

» «
Photo

Driving Physics: Remember YOU asked for it

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
959 replies to this topic
TrevorPhillipsEnterprise
  • TrevorPhillipsEnterprise

    Rat

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 12 Jul 2013

#871

Posted 15 July 2013 - 12:16 AM

QUOTE (IDredMan @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:12)
QUOTE (TrevorPhillipsEnterprise @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:06)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:35)
QUOTE (UtricularEwe001 @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:07)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 19:59)
Screw it, the amount of hate here is getting me down below.
I'm just gonna leave this here.
I hated the driving in IV.
If you disagree, go die in an unimaginable car crash at 1MPH.

I loved the driving in IV especially in Cavalcade.



umad?

Yes.

Also, TPE, you're not really saying IV was better than San Andreas, are you?

Of course it was better than SA, ten million times better confused.gif

Yes, IV had flaws, all I'm saying is there shouldn't be too much difference, just improvements in the correct places.

Okay ..Screw it.
What the f*ck is wrong with you?
Have you even played SA? I doubt you have.
With a statement that false and stoopid I pretty much KNOW that you have never played San Andreas in your entire life.

Are you f*cking high? Are you f*cking high dude!?

If you are telling me SA's driving was fun and realistic, then NO. You sir haven't played it. I've played SA for 6 f*cking years so I know what I'm talking about. It's ten times worse than Saint's Row's driving physics, that's because it was on the PS2, which was ACCEPTABLE.

tenpennyisplainevil
  • tenpennyisplainevil

    Ghetto Star

  • Members
  • Joined: 16 Dec 2011

#872

Posted 15 July 2013 - 12:17 AM

QUOTE (IDredMan @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 01:15)
I just made an offensive post that makes me terrible, even tho I said so.

Because YOLO.

Double post and use of the word YOLO... requesting ban

suicidehummer
  • suicidehummer

    This post will self destruct in 3... 2... 1...

  • Members
  • Joined: 08 Jul 2011
  • None

#873

Posted 15 July 2013 - 12:19 AM

QUOTE (IDredMan @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:12)
QUOTE (TrevorPhillipsEnterprise @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:06)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:35)
QUOTE (UtricularEwe001 @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:07)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 19:59)
Screw it, the amount of hate here is getting me down below.
I'm just gonna leave this here.
I hated the driving in IV.
If you disagree, go die in an unimaginable car crash at 1MPH.

I loved the driving in IV especially in Cavalcade.



umad?

Yes.

Also, TPE, you're not really saying IV was better than San Andreas, are you?

Of course it was better than SA, ten million times better confused.gif

Yes, IV had flaws, all I'm saying is there shouldn't be too much difference, just improvements in the correct places.

Okay ..Screw it.
What the f*ck is wrong with you?
Have you even played SA? I doubt you have.
With a statement that false and stoopid I pretty much KNOW that you have never played San Andreas in your entire life.

Are you f*cking high? Are you f*cking high dude!?

SA fanboy or troll?

I'm gonna say both.

IDredMan
  • IDredMan

    Dred

  • Members
  • Joined: 04 May 2013

#874

Posted 15 July 2013 - 12:19 AM

QUOTE (TrevorPhillipsEnterprise @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:16)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:12)
QUOTE (TrevorPhillipsEnterprise @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:06)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:35)
QUOTE (UtricularEwe001 @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:07)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 19:59)
Screw it, the amount of hate here is getting me down below.
I'm just gonna leave this here.
I hated the driving in IV.
If you disagree, go die in an unimaginable car crash at 1MPH.

I loved the driving in IV especially in Cavalcade.



umad?

Yes.

Also, TPE, you're not really saying IV was better than San Andreas, are you?

Of course it was better than SA, ten million times better confused.gif

Yes, IV had flaws, all I'm saying is there shouldn't be too much difference, just improvements in the correct places.

Okay ..Screw it.
What the f*ck is wrong with you?
Have you even played SA? I doubt you have.
With a statement that false and stoopid I pretty much KNOW that you have never played San Andreas in your entire life.

Are you f*cking high? Are you f*cking high dude!?

If you are telling me SA's driving was fun and realistic, then NO. You sir haven't played it. I've played SA for 6 f*cking years so I know what I'm talking about. It's ten times worse than Saint's Row's driving physics, that's because it was on the PS2, which was ACCEPTABLE.

I was talking about San Andreas itself.
San Andreas is better than anything IV could ever become.
While I did enjoy the driving more and enjoyed the fast that EVERY CAR DROVE DIFFERENTLY. I can't say it's realistic.


Also.
Tenpennyisplainever is plain evil.

IDredMan
  • IDredMan

    Dred

  • Members
  • Joined: 04 May 2013

#875

Posted 15 July 2013 - 12:23 AM

QUOTE (suicidehummer @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:19)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:12)
QUOTE (TrevorPhillipsEnterprise @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:06)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:35)
QUOTE (UtricularEwe001 @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:07)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 19:59)
Screw it, the amount of hate here is getting me down below.
I'm just gonna leave this here.
I hated the driving in IV.
If you disagree, go die in an unimaginable car crash at 1MPH.

I loved the driving in IV especially in Cavalcade.



umad?

Yes.

Also, TPE, you're not really saying IV was better than San Andreas, are you?

Of course it was better than SA, ten million times better confused.gif

Yes, IV had flaws, all I'm saying is there shouldn't be too much difference, just improvements in the correct places.

Okay ..Screw it.
What the f*ck is wrong with you?
Have you even played SA? I doubt you have.
With a statement that false and stoopid I pretty much KNOW that you have never played San Andreas in your entire life.

Are you f*cking high? Are you f*cking high dude!?

SA fanboy or troll?

I'm gonna say both.

I'm sorry dude, I didn't know people who preferred IV over SA existed outside of movies and trolling accounts.

TrevorPhillipsEnterprise
  • TrevorPhillipsEnterprise

    Rat

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 12 Jul 2013

#876

Posted 15 July 2013 - 12:24 AM

QUOTE (IDredMan @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:19)
QUOTE (TrevorPhillipsEnterprise @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:16)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:12)
QUOTE (TrevorPhillipsEnterprise @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:06)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:35)
QUOTE (UtricularEwe001 @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:07)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 19:59)
Screw it, the amount of hate here is getting me down below.
I'm just gonna leave this here.
I hated the driving in IV.
If you disagree, go die in an unimaginable car crash at 1MPH.

I loved the driving in IV especially in Cavalcade.



umad?

Yes.

Also, TPE, you're not really saying IV was better than San Andreas, are you?

Of course it was better than SA, ten million times better confused.gif

Yes, IV had flaws, all I'm saying is there shouldn't be too much difference, just improvements in the correct places.

Okay ..Screw it.
What the f*ck is wrong with you?
Have you even played SA? I doubt you have.
With a statement that false and stoopid I pretty much KNOW that you have never played San Andreas in your entire life.

Are you f*cking high? Are you f*cking high dude!?

If you are telling me SA's driving was fun and realistic, then NO. You sir haven't played it. I've played SA for 6 f*cking years so I know what I'm talking about. It's ten times worse than Saint's Row's driving physics, that's because it was on the PS2, which was ACCEPTABLE.

I was talking about San Andreas itself.
San Andreas is better than anything IV could ever become.
While I did enjoy the driving more and enjoyed the fast that EVERY CAR DROVE DIFFERENTLY. I can't say it's realistic.


Also.
Tenpennyisplainever is plain evil.

Oh. Yes, I did prefer SA entertainment wise, but that is the pattern they take. It actually HELPS them develop each game better and more improved. Look when GTA 3 came out, it was revolutionary for an open world game back then and when VC came it, it made 3 looked like utter sh*t, and when SA came out, it made the latter a bit sh*t too. IV is like 3 this gen, and V is like SA in terms of improvement and development and entertainment. But the driving in the PS2 era was UTTER sh*t, and that's a fact.

Massyl
  • Massyl

    ★★★★★★

  • Members
  • Joined: 07 Oct 2009

#877

Posted 15 July 2013 - 12:25 AM Edited by Massyl, 15 July 2013 - 12:28 AM.

QUOTE (IDredMan @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:12)
QUOTE (TrevorPhillipsEnterprise @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:06)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:35)
QUOTE (UtricularEwe001 @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:07)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 19:59)
Screw it, the amount of hate here is getting me down below.
I'm just gonna leave this here.
I hated the driving in IV.
If you disagree, go die in an unimaginable car crash at 1MPH.

I loved the driving in IV especially in Cavalcade.



umad?

Yes.

Also, TPE, you're not really saying IV was better than San Andreas, are you?

Of course it was better than SA, ten million times better confused.gif

Yes, IV had flaws, all I'm saying is there shouldn't be too much difference, just improvements in the correct places.

Okay ..Screw it.
What the f*ck is wrong with you?
Have you even played SA? I doubt you have.
With a statement that false and stoopid I pretty much KNOW that you have never played San Andreas in your entire life.

Are you f*cking high? Are you f*cking high dude!?

IV was 10x better than SA, why? simply because it uses the RAGE Engine, which has bigger limits than does RenderWare.
Geez, when I play IV I just wave around in that town, the same sh*t i would do if i was playing SA. SA's minigames are not that fun anyway.

Can you please calm yourself and stop this non sense, you are born with a brain, you must understand that you are not the only one expecting V but millions of other people and you should also understand that not everyone is the same, that's why there are different opinions, it ain't everyone that agrees with you, i must say you are desperately trying to prove that LA Noire's driving is the best, it's like you're alone trying to argue with the rest with only one argument(which isn't but you think is one); you enjoy it. USE RATIONAL THINKING NEXT TIME, THE WORLD HAS A POPULATION OF 7 BILLION, NOT 1000 12 YRS OLD THAT WANT SR PHYSICS IN V.

IDredMan
  • IDredMan

    Dred

  • Members
  • Joined: 04 May 2013

#878

Posted 15 July 2013 - 12:31 AM

QUOTE (Massyl @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:25)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:12)
QUOTE (TrevorPhillipsEnterprise @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:06)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:35)
QUOTE (UtricularEwe001 @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:07)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 19:59)
Screw it, the amount of hate here is getting me down below.
I'm just gonna leave this here.
I hated the driving in IV.
If you disagree, go die in an unimaginable car crash at 1MPH.

I loved the driving in IV especially in Cavalcade.



umad?

Yes.

Also, TPE, you're not really saying IV was better than San Andreas, are you?

Of course it was better than SA, ten million times better confused.gif

Yes, IV had flaws, all I'm saying is there shouldn't be too much difference, just improvements in the correct places.

Okay ..Screw it.
What the f*ck is wrong with you?
Have you even played SA? I doubt you have.
With a statement that false and stoopid I pretty much KNOW that you have never played San Andreas in your entire life.

Are you f*cking high? Are you f*cking high dude!?

IV was 10x better than SA, why? simply because it uses the RAGE Engine, which has bigger limits than does RenderWare.
Geez, when I play IV I just wave around in that town, the same sh*t i would do if i was playing SA. SA's minigames are not that fun anyway.

Can you please calm yourself and stop this non sense, you are born with a brain, you must understand that you are not the only one expecting V but millions of other people and you should also understand that not everyone is the same, that's why there are different opinions, it ain't everyone that agrees with you, i must say you are desperately trying to prove that LA Noire's driving is the best, it's like you're alone trying to argue with the rest with only one argument(which isn't but you think is one); you enjoy it.

So what you're saying is...
IV is better than SA because it COULD BE so much more, but it just isn't...
SA beats IV in every aspect except pedestrians and graf1cks.

I'm not saying L.A. Noire had the best driving ever, but I AM saying it was better than IV.


Didn't see that part you edited in.
You actually seemed like a reasonable person before that.
Now you just seem like an immature asshole that acts like a f*cking king yelling at people because they don't wanna crash for going more than 2 MPH.

shanbhu
  • shanbhu

    Rat

  • Members
  • Joined: 10 Nov 2006

#879

Posted 15 July 2013 - 12:32 AM

Driving was fun in IV and it will be even better in V.

TrevorPhillipsEnterprise
  • TrevorPhillipsEnterprise

    Rat

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 12 Jul 2013

#880

Posted 15 July 2013 - 12:33 AM

QUOTE (IDredMan @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:31)
QUOTE (Massyl @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:25)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:12)
QUOTE (TrevorPhillipsEnterprise @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:06)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:35)
QUOTE (UtricularEwe001 @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:07)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 19:59)
Screw it, the amount of hate here is getting me down below.
I'm just gonna leave this here.
I hated the driving in IV.
If you disagree, go die in an unimaginable car crash at 1MPH.

I loved the driving in IV especially in Cavalcade.



umad?

Yes.

Also, TPE, you're not really saying IV was better than San Andreas, are you?

Of course it was better than SA, ten million times better confused.gif

Yes, IV had flaws, all I'm saying is there shouldn't be too much difference, just improvements in the correct places.

Okay ..Screw it.
What the f*ck is wrong with you?
Have you even played SA? I doubt you have.
With a statement that false and stoopid I pretty much KNOW that you have never played San Andreas in your entire life.

Are you f*cking high? Are you f*cking high dude!?

IV was 10x better than SA, why? simply because it uses the RAGE Engine, which has bigger limits than does RenderWare.
Geez, when I play IV I just wave around in that town, the same sh*t i would do if i was playing SA. SA's minigames are not that fun anyway.

Can you please calm yourself and stop this non sense, you are born with a brain, you must understand that you are not the only one expecting V but millions of other people and you should also understand that not everyone is the same, that's why there are different opinions, it ain't everyone that agrees with you, i must say you are desperately trying to prove that LA Noire's driving is the best, it's like you're alone trying to argue with the rest with only one argument(which isn't but you think is one); you enjoy it.

So what you're saying is...
IV is better than SA because it COULD BE so much more, but it just isn't...
SA beats IV in every aspect except pedestrians and graf1cks.

I'm not saying L.A. Noire had the best driving ever, but I AM saying it was better than IV.


Didn't see that part you edited in.
You actually seemed like a reasonable person before that.
Now you just seem like an immature asshole that acts like a f*cking king yelling at people because they don't wanna crash for going more than 2 MPH.

What? LA Noire's driving was worse than IV's driving physics, what are you smoking? It's almost too similar to MAFIA 2.

Massyl
  • Massyl

    ★★★★★★

  • Members
  • Joined: 07 Oct 2009

#881

Posted 15 July 2013 - 12:36 AM

QUOTE (IDredMan @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:31)
QUOTE (Massyl @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:25)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:12)
QUOTE (TrevorPhillipsEnterprise @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:06)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:35)
QUOTE (UtricularEwe001 @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:07)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 19:59)
Screw it, the amount of hate here is getting me down below.
I'm just gonna leave this here.
I hated the driving in IV.
If you disagree, go die in an unimaginable car crash at 1MPH.

I loved the driving in IV especially in Cavalcade.



umad?

Yes.

Also, TPE, you're not really saying IV was better than San Andreas, are you?

Of course it was better than SA, ten million times better confused.gif

Yes, IV had flaws, all I'm saying is there shouldn't be too much difference, just improvements in the correct places.

Okay ..Screw it.
What the f*ck is wrong with you?
Have you even played SA? I doubt you have.
With a statement that false and stoopid I pretty much KNOW that you have never played San Andreas in your entire life.

Are you f*cking high? Are you f*cking high dude!?

IV was 10x better than SA, why? simply because it uses the RAGE Engine, which has bigger limits than does RenderWare.
Geez, when I play IV I just wave around in that town, the same sh*t i would do if i was playing SA. SA's minigames are not that fun anyway.

Can you please calm yourself and stop this non sense, you are born with a brain, you must understand that you are not the only one expecting V but millions of other people and you should also understand that not everyone is the same, that's why there are different opinions, it ain't everyone that agrees with you, i must say you are desperately trying to prove that LA Noire's driving is the best, it's like you're alone trying to argue with the rest with only one argument(which isn't but you think is one); you enjoy it.

So what you're saying is...
IV is better than SA because it COULD BE so much more, but it just isn't...
SA beats IV in every aspect except pedestrians and graf1cks.

I'm not saying L.A. Noire had the best driving ever, but I AM saying it was better than IV.


Didn't see that part you edited in.
You actually seemed like a reasonable person before that.
Now you just seem like an immature asshole that acts like a f*cking king yelling at people because they don't wanna crash for going more than 2 MPH.

Maybe, but i don't think SA nor LA NOIRE beats IV at driving.
I can't see how driving a Caravan-like car that feels like a go kart fun.
I can't see how driving a 1940 car that feels like a go kart fun. HELLO!

IDredMan
  • IDredMan

    Dred

  • Members
  • Joined: 04 May 2013

#882

Posted 15 July 2013 - 12:36 AM

QUOTE (TrevorPhillipsEnterprise @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:33)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:31)
QUOTE (Massyl @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:25)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:12)
QUOTE (TrevorPhillipsEnterprise @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:06)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:35)
QUOTE (UtricularEwe001 @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:07)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 19:59)
Screw it, the amount of hate here is getting me down below.
I'm just gonna leave this here.
I hated the driving in IV.
If you disagree, go die in an unimaginable car crash at 1MPH.

I loved the driving in IV especially in Cavalcade.



umad?

Yes.

Also, TPE, you're not really saying IV was better than San Andreas, are you?

Of course it was better than SA, ten million times better confused.gif

Yes, IV had flaws, all I'm saying is there shouldn't be too much difference, just improvements in the correct places.

Okay ..Screw it.
What the f*ck is wrong with you?
Have you even played SA? I doubt you have.
With a statement that false and stoopid I pretty much KNOW that you have never played San Andreas in your entire life.

Are you f*cking high? Are you f*cking high dude!?

IV was 10x better than SA, why? simply because it uses the RAGE Engine, which has bigger limits than does RenderWare.
Geez, when I play IV I just wave around in that town, the same sh*t i would do if i was playing SA. SA's minigames are not that fun anyway.

Can you please calm yourself and stop this non sense, you are born with a brain, you must understand that you are not the only one expecting V but millions of other people and you should also understand that not everyone is the same, that's why there are different opinions, it ain't everyone that agrees with you, i must say you are desperately trying to prove that LA Noire's driving is the best, it's like you're alone trying to argue with the rest with only one argument(which isn't but you think is one); you enjoy it.

So what you're saying is...
IV is better than SA because it COULD BE so much more, but it just isn't...
SA beats IV in every aspect except pedestrians and graf1cks.

I'm not saying L.A. Noire had the best driving ever, but I AM saying it was better than IV.


Didn't see that part you edited in.
You actually seemed like a reasonable person before that.
Now you just seem like an immature asshole that acts like a f*cking king yelling at people because they don't wanna crash for going more than 2 MPH.

What? LA Noire's driving was worse than IV's driving physics, what are you smoking? It's almost too similar to MAFIA 2.

I'm just gonna say this and leave ...
People say it's vastly different from IV because he was driving a pimped out sports car and didn't crash.

That says enough about the driving in IV.

GTAVTheHeat
  • GTAVTheHeat

    I can't picture life without a point of view..

  • Members
  • Joined: 06 Jul 2013

#883

Posted 15 July 2013 - 12:40 AM Edited by GTAVTheHeat, 15 July 2013 - 12:43 AM.

QUOTE (TrevorPhillipsEnterprise @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:16)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:12)
QUOTE (TrevorPhillipsEnterprise @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:06)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:35)
QUOTE (UtricularEwe001 @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:07)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 19:59)
Screw it, the amount of hate here is getting me down below.
I'm just gonna leave this here.
I hated the driving in IV.
If you disagree, go die in an unimaginable car crash at 1MPH.

I loved the driving in IV especially in Cavalcade.



umad?

Yes.

Also, TPE, you're not really saying IV was better than San Andreas, are you?

Of course it was better than SA, ten million times better confused.gif

Yes, IV had flaws, all I'm saying is there shouldn't be too much difference, just improvements in the correct places.

Okay ..Screw it.
What the f*ck is wrong with you?
Have you even played SA? I doubt you have.
With a statement that false and stoopid I pretty much KNOW that you have never played San Andreas in your entire life.

Are you f*cking high? Are you f*cking high dude!?

If you are telling me SA's driving was fun and realistic, then NO. You sir haven't played it. I've played SA for 6 f*cking years so I know what I'm talking about. It's ten times worse than Saint's Row's driving physics, that's because it was on the PS2, which was ACCEPTABLE.

Just thought I would refresh your memory on how San Andreas' driving is "10 times worse" than Saints Row.

Saints Row 3: Release: 11/2011


San Andreas: Release: 10/2004


10 times worse.. Are you sure? Doesn't look any better than San Andreas in the slightest other than graphically, and thats not saying much at all, its a complete console generation after and yet its driving doesn't seem to have had much of an improvement to be honest..

EDIT- So comparing these two is kinda... Trivial.

Audiophile
  • Audiophile

    Soothe us with sweet lies...

  • Zaibatsu
  • Joined: 26 Jul 2012
  • Canada

#884

Posted 15 July 2013 - 12:48 AM

QUOTE (IDredMan @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:12)
QUOTE (TrevorPhillipsEnterprise @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:06)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:35)
QUOTE (UtricularEwe001 @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:07)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 19:59)
Screw it, the amount of hate here is getting me down below.
I'm just gonna leave this here.
I hated the driving in IV.
If you disagree, go die in an unimaginable car crash at 1MPH.

I loved the driving in IV especially in Cavalcade.



umad?

Yes.

Also, TPE, you're not really saying IV was better than San Andreas, are you?

Of course it was better than SA, ten million times better confused.gif

Yes, IV had flaws, all I'm saying is there shouldn't be too much difference, just improvements in the correct places.

Okay ..Screw it.
What the f*ck is wrong with you?
Have you even played SA? I doubt you have.
With a statement that false and stoopid I pretty much KNOW that you have never played San Andreas in your entire life.

Are you f*cking high? Are you f*cking high dude!?

Are you high?

The driving in SA was arcade-like. IV was a major improvement from the driving in SA. Whether or not you like it you have to admit that is true.

IDredMan, stop flaming people that don't have the same opinion as you. The reason they flame you back is because you get all hostile and try to get them to change their opinion to suit yours. You cried pages ago how you would leave this thread, yet here you are still.

STFU already and go back to discussing the car handling in V. Not what your thoughts are on IV and SA.

TrevorPhillipsEnterprise
  • TrevorPhillipsEnterprise

    Rat

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 12 Jul 2013

#885

Posted 15 July 2013 - 12:57 AM

QUOTE (GTAVTheHeat @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:40)
QUOTE (TrevorPhillipsEnterprise @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:16)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:12)
QUOTE (TrevorPhillipsEnterprise @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:06)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:35)
QUOTE (UtricularEwe001 @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:07)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 19:59)
Screw it, the amount of hate here is getting me down below.
I'm just gonna leave this here.
I hated the driving in IV.
If you disagree, go die in an unimaginable car crash at 1MPH.

I loved the driving in IV especially in Cavalcade.



umad?

Yes.

Also, TPE, you're not really saying IV was better than San Andreas, are you?

Of course it was better than SA, ten million times better confused.gif

Yes, IV had flaws, all I'm saying is there shouldn't be too much difference, just improvements in the correct places.

Okay ..Screw it.
What the f*ck is wrong with you?
Have you even played SA? I doubt you have.
With a statement that false and stoopid I pretty much KNOW that you have never played San Andreas in your entire life.

Are you f*cking high? Are you f*cking high dude!?

If you are telling me SA's driving was fun and realistic, then NO. You sir haven't played it. I've played SA for 6 f*cking years so I know what I'm talking about. It's ten times worse than Saint's Row's driving physics, that's because it was on the PS2, which was ACCEPTABLE.

Just thought I would refresh your memory on how San Andreas' driving is "10 times worse" than Saints Row.

Saints Row 3: Release: 11/2011


San Andreas: Release: 10/2004


10 times worse.. Are you sure? Doesn't look any better than San Andreas in the slightest other than graphically, and thats not saying much at all, its a complete console generation after and yet its driving doesn't seem to have had much of an improvement to be honest..

EDIT- So comparing these two is kinda... Trivial.

I'm not talking about graphically. And the ten times worse is just an exaggeration, either way it had a full on arcadey driving physics. IV just flawlessly improved from that and made it look like sh*t.

_Kindled_
  • _Kindled_

    ‘Be Yourself’ is about the worst advice you can give to people.

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 09 Jul 2013
  • United-States

#886

Posted 15 July 2013 - 02:06 AM

QUOTE (GTAVTheHeat @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:40)

Just thought I would refresh your memory on how San Andreas' driving is "10 times worse" than Saints Row.

Saints Row 3: Release: 11/2011


San Andreas: Release: 10/2004


10 times worse.. Are you sure? Doesn't look any better than San Andreas in the slightest other than graphically, and thats not saying much at all, its a complete console generation after and yet its driving doesn't seem to have had much of an improvement to be honest..

EDIT- So comparing these two is kinda... Trivial.

That's not true, GTA SA's driving wasn't worst than SR3"s driving, if that's what you're trying to say. If anything, the thing Saint's Row's driving has is too much speed, when you try to start up your car or back up slowly, your car speeds too fast. I enjoy San Andreas' driving, by the way.

BMW1M
  • BMW1M

    The Driver

  • Members
  • Joined: 15 Jul 2013

#887

Posted 15 July 2013 - 05:50 AM

People please consider this.

We dont know how all cars are going to handle. We have only seen two high end sports cars weaving in and out of traffic. What you have to consider is...

The Audi and Aston Martin are super cars and should have great handling.

These cars could have been upgraded to have better handling.

It could have been Franklin driving with an extremely high driving skill level.

It could have been Franklin using his special ability.

Those chases could have been sped up to make them look more intense then they actually were.


MrSpooge
  • MrSpooge

    Soldier

  • Members
  • Joined: 03 May 2013

#888

Posted 15 July 2013 - 06:14 AM

QUOTE (BMW1M @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 05:50)
People please consider this.

We dont know how all cars are going to handle. We have only seen two high end sports cars weaving in and out of traffic. What you have to consider is...

The Audi and Aston Martin are super cars and should have great handling.

These cars could have been upgraded to have better handling.

It could have been Franklin driving with an extremely high driving skill level.

It could have been Franklin using his special ability.

Those chases could have been sped up to make them look more intense then they actually were.

Thank you, and along side we only sore the Driving was done at a really high speed so for it to be "Realistic" as everybody is hating that fake it aint, that is the way it should handle.. With that speed cars will move like that left to right for it to be realistic, so everybody bitching.. You are a idiot.

MoWGLi
  • MoWGLi

    Square Civilian

  • Members
  • Joined: 24 Apr 2003

#889

Posted 15 July 2013 - 06:20 AM

Biggest issue with IV's physics was the ridiculous body roll.

MrSpooge
  • MrSpooge

    Soldier

  • Members
  • Joined: 03 May 2013

#890

Posted 15 July 2013 - 06:24 AM

QUOTE (MoWGLi @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 06:20)
Biggest issue with IV's physics was the ridiculous body roll.

I never body rolled, played through it 3 Times. You need to learn the physics, I did straight away.. If you don't.. I guess you'll do that.

PoliceFarm
  • PoliceFarm

    Punk-ass Bitch

  • Members
  • Joined: 12 Nov 2012

#891

Posted 15 July 2013 - 06:35 AM

Why do people dislike SA's driving so much? I think it's really fun with the main drawback being that most cars reach top speeds way to fast, driving around in slower cars like the mower is especially enjoyable. I really like IV's as well but I've always felt like there's an invisible wire lifting up all the vehicles slightly, so their weight doesn't have the right feeling of pressure towards the road.

user posted image

It seems like what they've done with GTA V means they have more of that weighted feel, so most things will have better traction and suspension a little like in SA, but will still mainly be like IV, with the better acceleration.

Ferocious Banger
  • Ferocious Banger

    Big Homie

  • Members
  • Joined: 17 May 2012
  • India

#892

Posted 15 July 2013 - 07:11 AM

QUOTE (TrevorPhillipsEnterprise @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 05:46)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:12)
QUOTE (TrevorPhillipsEnterprise @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 00:06)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:35)
QUOTE (UtricularEwe001 @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 20:07)
QUOTE (IDredMan @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 19:59)
Screw it, the amount of hate here is getting me down below.
I'm just gonna leave this here.
I hated the driving in IV.
If you disagree, go die in an unimaginable car crash at 1MPH.

I loved the driving in IV especially in Cavalcade.



umad?

Yes.

Also, TPE, you're not really saying IV was better than San Andreas, are you?

Of course it was better than SA, ten million times better confused.gif

Yes, IV had flaws, all I'm saying is there shouldn't be too much difference, just improvements in the correct places.

Okay ..Screw it.
What the f*ck is wrong with you?
Have you even played SA? I doubt you have.
With a statement that false and stoopid I pretty much KNOW that you have never played San Andreas in your entire life.

Are you f*cking high? Are you f*cking high dude!?

If you are telling me SA's driving was fun and realistic, then NO. You sir haven't played it. I've played SA for 6 f*cking years so I know what I'm talking about. It's ten times worse than Saint's Row's driving physics, that's because it was on the PS2, which was ACCEPTABLE.

Oh, hell no! GTA SA's driving physics is far better than the physics of the Saints Rows and SD.

LCstuntman
  • LCstuntman

    It's a wonderful horrible life.

  • Members
  • Joined: 25 Oct 2009

#893

Posted 15 July 2013 - 07:24 AM

QUOTE (MrSpooge @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 22:24)
QUOTE (MoWGLi @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 06:20)
Biggest issue with IV's physics was the ridiculous body roll.

I never body rolled, played through it 3 Times. You need to learn the physics, I did straight away.. If you don't.. I guess you'll do that.

He doesn't mean rolling the car, like a barrel roll on the ground during a crash. He means how the body "rolls" to lean to one side during a turn.

GTAaLEX117
  • GTAaLEX117

    Cynical Optimist

  • Members
  • Joined: 03 Apr 2013

#894

Posted 15 July 2013 - 07:25 AM

QUOTE (Ferocious Banger @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 07:11)
Oh, hell no! GTA SA's driving physics is far better than the physics of the Saints Rows and SD.

That's true. I don't know why people bash SA's driving so much, the only thing it really lacked was the exaggerated suspension from IV. You would loose control of the car at high speed, you could not take corners at high speed, driving into an obstacle wouldn't launch you up, cars had good acceleration and much higher top speeds, etc.

MrSpooge
  • MrSpooge

    Soldier

  • Members
  • Joined: 03 May 2013

#895

Posted 15 July 2013 - 07:46 AM

QUOTE (LCstuntman @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 07:24)
QUOTE (MrSpooge @ Sunday, Jul 14 2013, 22:24)
QUOTE (MoWGLi @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 06:20)
Biggest issue with IV's physics was the ridiculous body roll.

I never body rolled, played through it 3 Times. You need to learn the physics, I did straight away.. If you don't.. I guess you'll do that.

He doesn't mean rolling the car, like a barrel roll on the ground during a crash. He means how the body "rolls" to lean to one side during a turn.

I drive, the car would lean to a side when turning. I don't get it.. The actually character rolling? What am I missing.. I'm sure if it was a problem for me I would had realized what was being spoken of by now.

J Hater
  • J Hater

    Crows

  • Members
  • Joined: 06 Nov 2002

#896

Posted 15 July 2013 - 08:39 AM

It's funny we've only seen a couple of seconds and you guys complain for 40+ pages. smile.gif

K20
  • K20

    Woooo-rah

  • Members
  • Joined: 08 Nov 2012

#897

Posted 15 July 2013 - 09:00 AM

i never rolled in IV. and i think IV handling was great. different for each car. it was realistic.

problem is people complain to rockstar about iv handling and they make the change [even though there was nothing wrong in the first place]... and the people who think IV had good handling obviously wont say anything. as complaints are heard more then compliments.

i truly hope the handling in V isn't too much different to IV... if its anything like SR3 then its comical and will ruin gaming. i'm assuming the super glue type game play trailer handling is due to car mods, player special skills or maybe guided route for the car/traffic, just for the trailer. because weaving in and out of traffic like that will never happen in IV... and at times i would like to skid out of control at high speed and wreck the car.

AEJY
  • AEJY

    Dimes

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 14 Jul 2013

#898

Posted 15 July 2013 - 09:06 AM

Gta 5 will be fine! You guys just think since the suspension isn't as loose as IV, that it's "Arcadey". IV isn't realistic, you're just used to it. Don't forget about the 2nd trailer, driving looks fine in that. Don't panic, we good.

boyfromeast1
  • boyfromeast1

    Trick

  • Members
  • Joined: 20 Jun 2012

#899

Posted 15 July 2013 - 09:20 AM

yup it turned to look like handling in saint row 3 ... gta iv had good driving physics , i dont really care if it was a bit of boaty but this is too much arcade in gta v , i mean normal people want some difficult's not like litle kids they need games like saint row where you do sh*t and all is easy , sorry rockstar's but you start runing full retard ...

GTAaLEX117
  • GTAaLEX117

    Cynical Optimist

  • Members
  • Joined: 03 Apr 2013

#900

Posted 15 July 2013 - 09:34 AM

QUOTE (boyfromeast1 @ Monday, Jul 15 2013, 09:20)
yup it turned to look like handling in saint row 3 ... gta iv had good driving physics , i dont really care if it was a bit of boaty but this is too much arcade in gta v , i mean normal people want some difficult's not like litle kids they need games like saint row where you do sh*t and all is easy , sorry rockstar's but you start runing full retard ...

It's not like SR whatsoever, you've only seen the player driving a couple of sports cars, which do NOT react the way they do in IV. Honestly I think people should wait until they get to see some regular, unmodified cars driving. Or better yet, until they play the game...




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users