Quantcast

Jump to content

» «
Photo

The Multiple TOWNS Argument

3,780 replies to this topic
Dope_0110
  • Dope_0110

    Gangsta

  • Members
  • Joined: 02 May 2013

#2131

Posted 04 August 2013 - 08:43 AM

QUOTE (josephene123 @ Sunday, Aug 4 2013, 08:38)
Why don't you guys realise he's a very good troll lol.gif

I agree, I saw trough it a while back and just decided to watch from the side as it develops.

gwaha
  • gwaha

    Homie

  • Members
  • Joined: 12 Jul 2013

#2132

Posted 04 August 2013 - 11:54 AM Edited by gwaha, 04 August 2013 - 11:57 AM.

You couldn't more wrong if you tried, Zm.

Seriously, the airstrip is NW of the satellite dishes which shows us your "second city" can only be LOS SANTOS and absolutely nothing else.

Just look at the darn map. Of course you will still not agree. Trust me when everyone tells you you are wrong, you are more than positively wrong. Your screenshots with the directions on them point in the complete opposite direction than they should.

Not to mention you completely screwed up with the directions in the screenshots of Michael. How can your south be west in the first screenshot and yet south in the second?

Or how about your Vinewood screenshot? Again the directions are completely wrong. North is not remotely to the right side. You do understand that the Alamo Sea is north of Los Santos, right? And you do understand that the Vinewood sign is north of Los Santos as well, right? So then north can't possibly be on the right side in that screenshot.

You are either a kid who wants Anaheim way too badly or you just a troll wasting our time. Sorry but it had to be said because your directions are so utterly wrong it is getting sad. You want Anaheim way, way too badly with ZERO evidence it even exists in the first place. And no, don't provide your so-called proof again because you haven't proven anything in this thread and you likely never will be able to as long as you keep obsessing about Anaheim.

Nun0567
  • Nun0567

    Thug

  • Members
  • Joined: 28 Aug 2012

#2133

Posted 04 August 2013 - 12:17 PM

QUOTE (urbanfire @ Sunday, Aug 4 2013, 07:03)
Here's my 2 cents on the topic of multiple cities argument:

Pay and Spray had been officially confirmed to NOT appear in the game, replaced by Los Santos Customs. It wouldn't make sense to have LS customs in Las Venturas or San Fierro, which destroys any hopes of having a second city in this game.

Expect towns though, as they can still fall within LS county.

This. At this point a second city is unrealistic

Zulu412
  • Zulu412

    Chiver

  • Members
  • Joined: 05 Mar 2013

#2134

Posted 04 August 2013 - 05:14 PM

@zuckisslow:
here's your version of proof back at ya.
clearly Paleto is NW of LS & some mountains & nothing to the esat.
oooohh i can use paint, derp
user posted image

_Kindled_
  • _Kindled_

    ‘Be Yourself’ is about the worst advice you can give to people.

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 09 Jul 2013
  • United-States

#2135

Posted 04 August 2013 - 05:42 PM

QUOTE (Zulu412 @ Sunday, Aug 4 2013, 17:14)
@zuckisslow:
here's your version of proof back at ya.
clearly Paleto is NW of LS & some mountains & nothing to the esat.
oooohh i can use paint, derp
user posted image

That's pretty ban-worthy. sigh.gif


I<3GTAV
  • I<3GTAV

    I LOVE GARY PAYTON NO ONE UNDERSTANDS

  • Members
  • Joined: 13 Nov 2012
  • United-States

#2136

Posted 04 August 2013 - 05:49 PM

I can't wait until this game releases, and see what those rock formations actually were. A rock formation, and not a suburb of LS even though there are large patches of desert in between.

josephene123
  • josephene123

    No

  • Members
  • Joined: 17 May 2013

#2137

Posted 04 August 2013 - 05:52 PM

Kindled I think you should stop siding with that guy, he's trolling whilst you're actually trying to find atleast half-legitimate stuff

Dope_0110
  • Dope_0110

    Gangsta

  • Members
  • Joined: 02 May 2013

#2138

Posted 04 August 2013 - 05:57 PM

QUOTE (Zulu412 @ Sunday, Aug 4 2013, 17:14)
@zuckisslow:
here's your version of proof back at ya.
clearly Paleto is NW of LS & some mountains & nothing to the esat.
oooohh i can use paint, derp
user posted image

Come on Zulu, you can do better. How could you completely leave out Analheim from this map?

All evidence points that Analheim should be sitting right on top of LS there and you just disregarded it.

Mr.Paper
  • Mr.Paper

    f*ck you Lucifer.

  • Members
  • Joined: 23 Jul 2008

#2139

Posted 04 August 2013 - 06:13 PM

I hope to GOD that they put las venturas and san fiero in this. its not san andreas without them.

freakydude20
  • freakydude20

    Trick

  • Members
  • Joined: 31 May 2013

#2140

Posted 04 August 2013 - 06:21 PM

QUOTE (Mr.Paper @ Sunday, Aug 4 2013, 18:13)
I hope to GOD that they put las venturas and san fiero in this. its not san andreas without them.

Get ready to be disappointed then... wink.gif

zuckmeslow
  • zuckmeslow

    Writer/Director

  • Members
  • Joined: 15 May 2013
  • None

#2141

Posted 04 August 2013 - 06:35 PM

I likr how people think im trolling but im legitly squeezing out as many things i can from trailers or screenshots just so i can prove my theory. Alright i look back and it might be lost santos. BUT WHICH DIRECTION WAS TREVOR FACING AWAY FROM IN THE PLANE PIC

ChatterBoxFM
  • ChatterBoxFM

    ★★★★★★

  • Members
  • Joined: 26 May 2013

#2142

Posted 04 August 2013 - 06:38 PM

Going back to San Andreas without going to San Andreas would be disappointing and a waste. If it is just Los Santos, I think they should have done just Vice City instead. They've also done LA a lot lately with MC:LA and LA Noire. Seems over done if it's only LS.

_Kindled_
  • _Kindled_

    ‘Be Yourself’ is about the worst advice you can give to people.

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 09 Jul 2013
  • United-States

#2143

Posted 04 August 2013 - 06:39 PM Edited by _Kindled_, 04 August 2013 - 06:44 PM.

QUOTE (Mr.Paper @ Sunday, Aug 4 2013, 18:13)
I hope to GOD that they put las venturas and san fiero in this. its not san andreas without them.

Well, no matter the lack of evidence. I'd kind of love to see them. I pray to God that they're hiding more areas of the map. blush.gif



ChatterBoxFM
QUOTE
Going back to San Andreas without going to San Andreas would be disappointing and a waste. If it is just Los Santos, I think they should have done just Vice City instead. They've also done LA a lot lately with MC:LA and LA Noire. Seems over done if it's only LS.


It would be a waste. Having San Andreas on the liscence plates and not thinking about the cities that used to be in them. cryani.gif
user posted image

@Zuckmeslow: I kind of agree. Doing bank robberies in the same place over and over again would be boring and repetitive.

zuckmeslow
  • zuckmeslow

    Writer/Director

  • Members
  • Joined: 15 May 2013
  • None

#2144

Posted 04 August 2013 - 06:43 PM

And i dont know about you guys. But three robbers would make for a better story in las venturas. Imagine an oceans eleven style campaign. Doing crazy stuff in the casinos. And i could see someone like trevor living in the city limits of las venturas. Los santos is the niko bellic story, go to hollywood to become famouse. End up in trouble.




Man you guys that are against another city are killin my hype for glory hole. I really hope we can go inside of stores in this one because at this point. Its just red dead redemption towns and a liberty city in one large map.

ChatterBoxFM
  • ChatterBoxFM

    ★★★★★★

  • Members
  • Joined: 26 May 2013

#2145

Posted 04 August 2013 - 06:44 PM

@Kindled Please either resize or delete that picture.

Edit: Thank you.

gwaha
  • gwaha

    Homie

  • Members
  • Joined: 12 Jul 2013

#2146

Posted 04 August 2013 - 06:46 PM Edited by gwaha, 04 August 2013 - 06:56 PM.

QUOTE (_Kindled_ @ Sunday, Aug 4 2013, 20:39)
Well, no matter the lack of evidence. I'd kind of love to see them. I pray to God that they're hiding more areas of the map. blush.gif

He is not going to help you out. GTA 5 is what it is, namely Los Santos and its surrounding country side.

Right now Fido's map is pretty much 3.5 times (without the underwater content) RDR already which is the map size mentioned by Rockstar so there is not much they can hide other than a town in the east.

Edit:

This game is NOT about just bank robberies. It is called heists for a reason. We have already seen evidence of robbing a jewelry store, evidence of a heist taking place in the harbor, etc. The heists also aren't all in the same city either, ie the heist which takes place in Paleto Bay. I also don't see the difference between having heists in three cities as opposed to heists in one big city the size of all three cities. There is no need to have more than one city when one city is already much bigger than any of the cities in SA ever were so they can already distinguish the heists from one another by just having it take place in distinct areas of the same city.

Also, Los Santos is still in San Andreas, hence the license plates. The game wouldn't be more San Andreas if they would add the exact same cities as before with bigger cities (which is just not feasible for an amount of reasons). It just seems that some individuals want the developers to make an HD version of GTA SA whereas Rockstar isn't interested in that because it would mean that they can't do any of the cities justice.

I<3GTAV
  • I<3GTAV

    I LOVE GARY PAYTON NO ONE UNDERSTANDS

  • Members
  • Joined: 13 Nov 2012
  • United-States

#2147

Posted 04 August 2013 - 06:50 PM

QUOTE (zuckmeslow @ Sunday, Aug 4 2013, 13:43)
I really hope we can go inside of stores in this one because at this point. Its just red dead redemption towns and a liberty city in one large map.

And that's a bad thing? A huge, diverse sunsoaked metropolis full of ghettos, beaches, and skyscrapers, surrounded by deserts, mountains, forests, rapids, and a wide variety of towns, all in the biggest map Rockstar has yet created?

And about the whole "San Andreas is a waste without the other cities", this was never supposed to be the whole state. It's a part of it.

ChatterBoxFM
  • ChatterBoxFM

    ★★★★★★

  • Members
  • Joined: 26 May 2013

#2148

Posted 04 August 2013 - 06:52 PM Edited by ChatterBoxFM, 04 August 2013 - 06:56 PM.

^ I know, that's why it would be disappointing icon14.gif


To go to only a part of San Andreas seems like a waste to me. They should have just stayed in order and did Vice City then.

_Kindled_
  • _Kindled_

    ‘Be Yourself’ is about the worst advice you can give to people.

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 09 Jul 2013
  • United-States

#2149

Posted 04 August 2013 - 06:57 PM

QUOTE (gwaha @ Sunday, Aug 4 2013, 18:46)
QUOTE (_Kindled_ @ Sunday, Aug 4 2013, 20:39)
Well, no matter the lack of evidence. I'd kind of love to see them. I pray to God that they're hiding more areas of the map. blush.gif

He is not going to help you out. GTA 5 is what it is, namely Los Santos and its surrounding country side.

Right now Fido's map is pretty much 3.5 times (without the underwater content) RDR already which is the map size mentioned by Rockstar so there is not much they can hide other than a town in the east.

The fan-mad maps aren't even the full maps. The maps are God-awfully small. If that's the best the best Rockstar could do... suicidal.gif

GTAKiwi's map gives a good perspective, but I highly doubt that's what were dealing with.
user posted image

@natethegreatforlife: If you've seen "The Ghettos of Los Santos" topic, they've actually explained that the ghetto is pretty small.(That's one sigh.gif )

zuckmeslow
  • zuckmeslow

    Writer/Director

  • Members
  • Joined: 15 May 2013
  • None

#2150

Posted 04 August 2013 - 06:58 PM

QUOTE (natethegreatforlife @ Sunday, Aug 4 2013, 18:50)
QUOTE (zuckmeslow @ Sunday, Aug 4 2013, 13:43)
I really hope we can go inside of stores in this one because at this point. Its just red dead redemption towns and a liberty city in one large map.

And that's a bad thing? A huge, diverse sunsoaked metropolis full of ghettos, beaches, and skyscrapers, surrounded by deserts, mountains, forests, rapids, and a wide variety of towns, all in the biggest map Rockstar has yet created?

And about the whole "San Andreas is a waste without the other cities", this was never supposed to be the whole state. It's a part of it.

Im just hoping this game blows all of us away. It would suck after all these years of waiting and when the game comes out you see nothing but "official gta v dissapointment thread"

ChatterBoxFM
  • ChatterBoxFM

    ★★★★★★

  • Members
  • Joined: 26 May 2013

#2151

Posted 04 August 2013 - 07:01 PM

Leaving out other cities won't ruin the game for me, but it's obvious it would be a giant wasted opportunity.

_Kindled_
  • _Kindled_

    ‘Be Yourself’ is about the worst advice you can give to people.

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 09 Jul 2013
  • United-States

#2152

Posted 04 August 2013 - 07:08 PM

QUOTE (ChatterBoxFM @ Sunday, Aug 4 2013, 19:01)
Leaving out other cities won't ruin the game for me, but it's obvious it would be a giant wasted opportunity.

"The biggest , most dynamic and most diverse open world ever created"

Yeah... there is way more to the map than we've seen. confused.gif

zuckmeslow
  • zuckmeslow

    Writer/Director

  • Members
  • Joined: 15 May 2013
  • None

#2153

Posted 04 August 2013 - 07:08 PM

I still believe there is another city in the unknown areas of the map

I<3GTAV
  • I<3GTAV

    I LOVE GARY PAYTON NO ONE UNDERSTANDS

  • Members
  • Joined: 13 Nov 2012
  • United-States

#2154

Posted 04 August 2013 - 07:11 PM

QUOTE (zuckmeslow @ Sunday, Aug 4 2013, 14:08)
I still believe there is another city in the unknown areas of the map

Look, we're less than 2 months from release. They would have confirmed multiple cities by now, they are a business, they want their product to sound as great as possible. There aren't multiple cities.

_Kindled_
  • _Kindled_

    ‘Be Yourself’ is about the worst advice you can give to people.

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 09 Jul 2013
  • United-States

#2155

Posted 04 August 2013 - 07:13 PM

QUOTE (natethegreatforlife @ Sunday, Aug 4 2013, 19:11)
QUOTE (zuckmeslow @ Sunday, Aug 4 2013, 14:08)
I still believe there is another city in the unknown areas of the map

Look, we're less than 2 months from release. They would have confirmed multiple cities by now, they are a business, they want their product to sound as great as possible. There aren't multiple cities.

Because you've played the game right? Just wait till release, and then we'll see!

gwaha
  • gwaha

    Homie

  • Members
  • Joined: 12 Jul 2013

#2156

Posted 04 August 2013 - 07:14 PM Edited by gwaha, 04 August 2013 - 07:17 PM.

QUOTE (_Kindled_ @ Sunday, Aug 4 2013, 20:57)
The fan-mad maps aren't even the full maps. The maps are God-awfully small. If that's the best the best Rockstar could do...  suicidal.gif

GTAKiwi's map gives a good perspective, but I highly doubt that's what were dealing with.

You may think they are god-awfully small but they are currently close to the same size as mentioned by Rockstar. The map will be about 20 to 25 square miles. And this means the map is bigger than Skyrim.

GTAKiwi's map gives the right respective and it is pretty much the map as it will be. Unless Rockstar is removing mountains in photoshop from certain screenshots the map just can't be much wider nor bigger from north to south than it already is.

Some of you can keep on posting that there is more only because you want the map to be bigger but what is the point when all of the media and even Rockstar have proven the opposite? You won't always get what you want, such is life.

I<3GTAV
  • I<3GTAV

    I LOVE GARY PAYTON NO ONE UNDERSTANDS

  • Members
  • Joined: 13 Nov 2012
  • United-States

#2157

Posted 04 August 2013 - 07:14 PM

QUOTE (_Kindled_ @ Sunday, Aug 4 2013, 14:13)
QUOTE (natethegreatforlife @ Sunday, Aug 4 2013, 19:11)
QUOTE (zuckmeslow @ Sunday, Aug 4 2013, 14:08)
I still believe there is another city in the unknown areas of the map

Look, we're less than 2 months from release. They would have confirmed multiple cities by now, they are a business, they want their product to sound as great as possible. There aren't multiple cities.

Because you've played the game right? Just wait till release, and then we'll see!

It's just logic, but whatever, we'll see in 43 days.

gtaxpert
  • gtaxpert

    that's how I dooz it

  • Members
  • Joined: 07 Aug 2005
  • Netherlands

#2158

Posted 04 August 2013 - 07:15 PM

QUOTE (natethegreatforlife @ Sunday, Aug 4 2013, 19:11)
QUOTE (zuckmeslow @ Sunday, Aug 4 2013, 14:08)
I still believe there is another city in the unknown areas of the map

Look, we're less than 2 months from release. They would have confirmed multiple cities by now, they are a business, they want their product to sound as great as possible. There aren't multiple cities.

The people that still believe there will be multiple cities don't have the mental capacity to understand rational argument. Don't try to persuade them with it. It is a waste of time.

CallCenterZombie
  • CallCenterZombie

    Sour Tooth

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 11 Apr 2007

#2159

Posted 04 August 2013 - 07:15 PM

QUOTE (zuckmeslow @ Sunday, Aug 4 2013, 14:08)
I still believe there is another city in the unknown areas of the map

user posted image

_Kindled_
  • _Kindled_

    ‘Be Yourself’ is about the worst advice you can give to people.

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 09 Jul 2013
  • United-States

#2160

Posted 04 August 2013 - 07:18 PM

QUOTE (gwaha @ Sunday, Aug 4 2013, 19:14)
QUOTE (_Kindled_ @ Sunday, Aug 4 2013, 20:57)
The fan-mad maps aren't even the full maps. The maps are God-awfully small. If that's the best the best Rockstar could do...  suicidal.gif

GTAKiwi's map gives a good perspective, but I highly doubt that's what were dealing with.

You may think they are god-awfully small but they are currently close to the same size as mentioned by Rockstar. The map will be about 20 to 25 square miles. And this means the map is bigger than Skyrim.

GTAKiwi's map gives the right respective and it is pretty much the map as it will be. Unless Rockstar is removing mountains in photoshop from certain screenshots the map just can't be much wider nor bigger from north to south than it already is.

Rockstar said it was "eerily" close to the real map, how do you know that doesn't mean close to the right positioning of land and geography? dozingoff.gif




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users