Quantcast

Jump to content

» «
Photo

Chrysler 300C vs 300M

34 replies to this topic
Tacymist
  • Tacymist

    Onward towards the fright

  • Andolini Mafia Family
  • Joined: 01 Jul 2013
  • United-States

#31

Posted 05 July 2013 - 12:03 AM

The 300M just has a really boring look to it, there really isn't anything about the design that stands out to me. The 300C has a stronger appearance overall, that's what I like.

epoxi
  • epoxi

    Your Mother

  • Andolini Mafia Family
  • Joined: 05 Sep 2003
  • None

#32

Posted 05 July 2013 - 10:39 AM

QUOTE (Pavlov @ Monday, Jul 1 2013, 14:53)
Then...


Brucie Kibbutz at 0:30.

evh5150vanhalen
  • evh5150vanhalen

    The gypsy modeler

  • Members
  • Joined: 02 Dec 2005
  • Canada

#33

Posted 05 July 2013 - 11:37 AM

300C all the way.....Although I may be a little biased since my father owns one lol.
user posted image
user posted image

Our lord Steve Jobs
  • Our lord Steve Jobs

  • Members
  • Joined: 01 Jun 2012

#34

Posted 23 August 2013 - 07:58 PM

The 300M is just an luxury Intrepid (you know like a Kuruma) and is FWD.
300C (also Lancia Thema in Europe) are RWD/AWD and the new ones look decent. They still sort of look like tanks. They also come with, besides gas V6 engines, gas V8s and a Diesel V6 in the Lancia.

GoldenBlade
  • GoldenBlade

    Hustlin'

  • Members
  • Joined: 08 Dec 2012

#35

Posted 29 August 2013 - 02:35 AM

The 300C has a unique body style, and I like it. The 300M isn't 'horrible'. but it's too dull. It really doesn't stick out like the 300C does.




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users