Quantcast

Jump to content

» «
Photo

Signature Check

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
9 replies to this topic
grope_4_that_date
  • grope_4_that_date

    Future Moderator

  • Members
  • Joined: 26 Feb 2008

#1

Posted 07 February 2013 - 11:29 PM

Is this okay?

user posted image

Andreas
  • Andreas

    GTAV Forum Leader

  • Leone Family Mafia
  • Joined: 27 May 2012
  • Austria

#2

Posted 08 February 2013 - 12:12 AM

The image has a resolution of 500x150 which is within the signature size rules. It may appear as too big in some browsers but nevertheless it's within the rules so you can use it as signature.

grope_4_that_date
  • grope_4_that_date

    Future Moderator

  • Members
  • Joined: 26 Feb 2008

#3

Posted 08 February 2013 - 12:17 AM

QUOTE (Carl CJ Johnsons Brother Brian @ Thursday, Feb 7 2013, 20:12)
The image has a resolution of 500x150 which is within the signature size rules. It may appear as too big in some browsers but nevertheless it's within the rules so you can use it as signature.

Yeah I didn't mean the size. I saved them as JPEG. I meant the context.

Ryan
  • Ryan

    Ginga Ninja

  • Moderator
  • Joined: 10 Apr 2006
  • Canada

#4

Posted 08 February 2013 - 12:19 AM

Yeah, it's fine.

Shoumic
  • Shoumic

    16 5 5™

  • Members
  • Joined: 09 Jul 2012
  • Bangladesh

#5

Posted 08 February 2013 - 07:01 AM Edited by shoumic, 08 February 2013 - 08:11 AM.

Taken From the Signiture Size rules topic.

QUOTE (DigitalD)
•ADDENDUM (8th Jan 2005): Sexual imagery is banned in signatures and avatars. Women or men in signatures is no problem, including bikinis, hotpants, the usual glamour modelling outfits, and all the other stuff we see in the everyday media. However sexually suggestive images, even if they don't technically contain nudity, are not considered appropriate for this forum.


Read this post. It contains more information about signiture rules and policies.

EDIT: As we can see from the part I have made bold in the rules, it's fine.

Girish
  • Girish

  • Moderator
  • Joined: 20 Apr 2006
  • India

#6

Posted 08 February 2013 - 07:30 AM

It's fine.

Xcommunicated
  • Xcommunicated

    Say hi to your mom for me.

  • Moderator
  • Joined: 25 Sep 2002
  • United-States

#7

Posted 08 February 2013 - 07:30 AM

QUOTE (shoumic @ Friday, Feb 8 2013, 02:01)
Taken From the Signiture Size rules topic.

QUOTE (DigitalD)
•ADDENDUM (8th Jan 2005): Sexual imagery is banned in signatures and avatars. Women or men in signatures is no problem, including bikinis, hotpants, the usual glamour modelling outfits, and all the other stuff we see in the everyday media. However sexually suggestive images, even if they don't technically contain nudity, are not considered appropriate for this forum.


Read this post. It contains more information about signiture rules and policies.

Well there is certainly nothing sexually suggestive going on like five on ones, five on twos, camel toes being squeezed between fingers, anal/vaginal orifices being manipulated under/through clothing, etc. It's fine.

Shoumic
  • Shoumic

    16 5 5™

  • Members
  • Joined: 09 Jul 2012
  • Bangladesh

#8

Posted 08 February 2013 - 08:05 AM Edited by shoumic, 08 February 2013 - 08:09 AM.

I never said it wasn't okay, all I did was show him the part of the rules which said it was fine.

grope_4_that_date
  • grope_4_that_date

    Future Moderator

  • Members
  • Joined: 26 Feb 2008

#9

Posted 11 February 2013 - 02:15 AM

Would this signature be okay? If yes, is it funny or does it make me look crude?

user posted image

Girish
  • Girish

  • Moderator
  • Joined: 20 Apr 2006
  • India

#10

Posted 11 February 2013 - 06:26 AM

Again, that's fine. I think the signature rules are pretty clear on what you shouldn't be using as a signature. You don't always have to check with us; use your best judgement.

If your sig breaks any rules, we'll be kind enough to remove it and inform you of the same.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users