see? the E3 demo graphics was way better than the sold product, the exact same 'scandal' is not impossible with any games including V; that's why I'm highly skeptical on using promotional screenshots, even videos to judge the quality of graphics in today games.
they are all very easily manipulable especially by big developers.
Wow, which probably means the same thing for The Division, and Watch Dogs.
They did the same thing with Ghost Recon Future Soldier. it wasn't just the graphics, but the mission shown at E3 wasn't even in the game.
That scared me a little.
LMAO. Ubisoft is Ubisoft. They are known for their bait and switch tactics and false advertising. C* is not known for doing such things, at least when it comes to visual representations of their games.. All of the initial footage and screens of their games are done on PC and the visual fidelity remains that way until it's released on PC to customers. Ubisoft on the other hand, showcase an amazing looking game and then have it looking significantly different and or downgraded by the time it's released.....Far Cry 3 is a prime example of this.