Quantcast

Jump to content

» «
Photo

GTA IV: Las Venturas

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
102 replies to this topic
GTARandom
  • GTARandom

    Unfortunate piece of meat

  • Feroci
  • Joined: 15 Jun 2009
  • Croatia

#31

Posted 05 October 2012 - 07:33 PM

Stratosphere Tower and a bunch of new SA stuff placed for later remodelling. Enjoy


user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image



AlfredNTheFettuc
  • AlfredNTheFettuc

    Hellbanned but not

  • Members
  • Joined: 14 May 2010
  • Poland

#32

Posted 05 October 2012 - 08:33 PM

Looks pretty fantastic! Any other modern LV buildings in the plans?
Also, if this is supposed to be like the supposed IV era version of Las Venturas, will you replace some SA stuff like brands with the IV equivalents?

GTARandom
  • GTARandom

    Unfortunate piece of meat

  • Feroci
  • Joined: 15 Jun 2009
  • Croatia

#33

Posted 05 October 2012 - 08:41 PM

QUOTE (AlfredNTheFettuc @ Friday, Oct 5 2012, 22:33)
Looks pretty fantastic! Any other modern LV buildings in the plans?
Also, if this is supposed to be like the supposed IV era version of Las Venturas, will you replace some SA stuff like brands with the IV equivalents?

Yep, you can expect that smile.gif

Kalvin
  • Kalvin

  • Zaibatsu
  • Joined: 06 Apr 2011
  • United-Kingdom

#34

Posted 05 October 2012 - 08:48 PM

Is the Rocket which the R&T thing on supposed to be a lil parody or whatever for a p*nis? tounge.gif

Mega
  • Mega

    And remember: respect is EVERYTHING!

  • Members
  • Joined: 01 Jan 2012
  • Brazil

#35

Posted 05 October 2012 - 08:52 PM

QUOTE (ManDog @ Friday, Oct 5 2012, 17:48)
Is the Rocket which the R&T thing on supposed to be a lil parody or whatever for a p*nis? tounge.gif

It's actually from a GTA IV Show, Republican Space Rangers

nkjellman
  • nkjellman

    Boss

  • Members
  • Joined: 28 Aug 2008
  • United-States

#36

Posted 05 October 2012 - 08:53 PM

So is this supposed to be like the IV era LV?

GTARandom
  • GTARandom

    Unfortunate piece of meat

  • Feroci
  • Joined: 15 Jun 2009
  • Croatia

#37

Posted 05 October 2012 - 08:54 PM

In a nutshell, yes.

nkjellman
  • nkjellman

    Boss

  • Members
  • Joined: 28 Aug 2008
  • United-States

#38

Posted 05 October 2012 - 09:02 PM

QUOTE (GTARandom @ Friday, Oct 5 2012, 20:54)
In a nutshell, yes.

Ok then. I'd recommend though using IV and EFLC cars so it stays in the IV era. You could even try modeling one of GTA V's cars.

But like I said with EFTW, if Rockstar shows us the IV era LV, you probably might drop this, but I'd change it to Las Vegas.

However, are the SA LV models place holders?

GTARandom
  • GTARandom

    Unfortunate piece of meat

  • Feroci
  • Joined: 15 Jun 2009
  • Croatia

#39

Posted 05 October 2012 - 09:04 PM

QUOTE (nkjellman @ Friday, Oct 5 2012, 23:02)
QUOTE (GTARandom @ Friday, Oct 5 2012, 20:54)
In a nutshell, yes.

Ok then. I'd recommend though using IV and EFLC cars so it stays in the IV era. You could even try modeling one of GTA V's cars.

But like I said with EFTW, if Rockstar shows us the IV era LV, you probably might drop this, but I'd change it to Las Vegas.

However, are the SA LV models place holders?

That was potentially one of the reasons i did this, LV wasn't promised and i start to think Rockstar will want to get the most detail out of Cali instead of spoofs of more rubbish areas as was in old SA, which will result in no Las Venturas in V. Same opinion i have for San Fierro.

- SA LV models will remain where they are, they will just be remodelled and when props get added , there will be more "atmosphere" to the whole Venturas Boulevard area.

Jestic
  • Jestic

    Chris

  • Feroci
  • Joined: 16 Oct 2005
  • Netherlands

#40

Posted 05 October 2012 - 09:11 PM

QUOTE (nkjellman @ Friday, Oct 5 2012, 23:02)
But like I said with EFTW, if Rockstar shows us the IV era LV, you probably might drop this, but I'd change it to Las Vegas.

Even IF R* will make a LV again, it won't be before the next gta, which is not sooner than 2016.

nkjellman
  • nkjellman

    Boss

  • Members
  • Joined: 28 Aug 2008
  • United-States

#41

Posted 05 October 2012 - 09:20 PM

Ever thought of the possibility that LV and SF could be separate maps as DLC's for GTA V?

Anyways, GTA Random, you should increase the draw distance so you can see mountains in the background like in the real LV.

Garju67
  • Garju67

    Soldier

  • Members
  • Joined: 10 Jul 2011

#42

Posted 05 October 2012 - 09:34 PM

QUOTE (Blaster_nl @ Friday, Oct 5 2012, 23:11)
QUOTE (nkjellman @ Friday, Oct 5 2012, 23:02)
But like I said with EFTW, if Rockstar shows us the IV era LV, you probably might drop this, but I'd change it to Las Vegas.

Even IF R* will make a LV again, it won't be before the next gta, which is not sooner than 2016.

Are you R*? You always say things like that that are unconfirmed.

Triple Penetration
  • Triple Penetration

    Box ♡ Out

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 03 Jul 2011

#43

Posted 06 October 2012 - 01:46 PM

QUOTE (Garju67 @ Friday, Oct 5 2012, 21:34)
QUOTE (Blaster_nl @ Friday, Oct 5 2012, 23:11)
QUOTE (nkjellman @ Friday, Oct 5 2012, 23:02)
But like I said with EFTW, if Rockstar shows us the IV era LV, you probably might drop this, but I'd change it to Las Vegas.

Even IF R* will make a LV again, it won't be before the next gta, which is not sooner than 2016.

Are you R*? You always say things like that that are unconfirmed.

Cause common sense. You're pretty laughable if you think a LV game from R* would be released immediately after GTA V comes out.

Garju67
  • Garju67

    Soldier

  • Members
  • Joined: 10 Jul 2011

#44

Posted 06 October 2012 - 03:34 PM

Why not? Maybe a DLC or something like that. It's common sense but can happen anyway.

vans123
  • vans123

    Thompson 1928

  • Members
  • Joined: 23 Jul 2008

#45

Posted 06 October 2012 - 03:46 PM

It isnt, you came from common sense to "dreams"
Take two is going throu a big financial hole, who knows if they even release V ever with all these money problems
Mostly blaster has reason and truth all together with his answer

Mainline421
  • Mainline421

  • Members
  • Joined: 01 Mar 2012

#46

Posted 06 October 2012 - 05:41 PM

QUOTE (Triple Penetration @ Saturday, Oct 6 2012, 13:46)
QUOTE (Garju67 @ Friday, Oct 5 2012, 21:34)
QUOTE (Blaster_nl @ Friday, Oct 5 2012, 23:11)
QUOTE (nkjellman @ Friday, Oct 5 2012, 23:02)
But like I said with EFTW, if Rockstar shows us the IV era LV, you probably might drop this, but I'd change it to Las Vegas.

Even IF R* will make a LV again, it won't be before the next gta, which is not sooner than 2016.

Are you R*? You always say things like that that are unconfirmed.

Cause common sense. You're pretty laughable if you think a LV game from R* would be released immediately after GTA V comes out.

Off topic: I know I probably sound stupid now but have you ever thought of the possibility of LV being GTAV for almost 12 months now I have believed GTA V will only have Los Santos as R* said but then I came across this thread http://www.forum.gta....699/#post-4774 which actually make some pretty good points and Dan Houser would not say it is only LS () and if you look at the second picture on the thread it does not look like LS it looks like just outside LV. How ever the trailer seems based a lot around rich people and poor people which fits with LS but not the rest personally I have no idea where GTA V is set but just i case.

Back on topic again i think the draw distance need increasing.

GTARandom
  • GTARandom

    Unfortunate piece of meat

  • Feroci
  • Joined: 15 Jun 2009
  • Croatia

#47

Posted 06 October 2012 - 06:34 PM

-Draw distance increased

-More placements added:


user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image




Kalvin
  • Kalvin

  • Zaibatsu
  • Joined: 06 Apr 2011
  • United-Kingdom

#48

Posted 06 October 2012 - 06:36 PM

Em Es En, now! tounge.gif

Jestic
  • Jestic

    Chris

  • Feroci
  • Joined: 16 Oct 2005
  • Netherlands

#49

Posted 06 October 2012 - 06:54 PM Edited by Blaster_nl, 06 October 2012 - 06:56 PM.

QUOTE (Garju67 @ Friday, Oct 5 2012, 23:34)
QUOTE (Blaster_nl @ Friday, Oct 5 2012, 23:11)
QUOTE (nkjellman @ Friday, Oct 5 2012, 23:02)
But like I said with EFTW, if Rockstar shows us the IV era LV, you probably might drop this, but I'd change it to Las Vegas.

Even IF R* will make a LV again, it won't be before the next gta, which is not sooner than 2016.

Are you R*? You always say things like that that are unconfirmed.

GTA SA to GTAIV: 3.5 years.
GTAIV to GTAV: 5(.5) years.
GTA6, sooner than 3 years? Makes no sense.

And complete cities as DLC is insane.

@Mainline421. The 3 major individual cities in SA were actually not that big. R* probably made a LS the size of LC, and then probably a huge country side, exceeding the 6000x6000 limit from SA and IV.

Death2Drugs
  • Death2Drugs

    Wanna milky?

  • Members
  • Joined: 20 Feb 2011
  • Mexico

#50

Posted 06 October 2012 - 07:06 PM

The beauty of the screenshots.

You guys need to do a parody of Gold and Silver Pawn Shop!

Garju67
  • Garju67

    Soldier

  • Members
  • Joined: 10 Jul 2011

#51

Posted 06 October 2012 - 07:17 PM

QUOTE (Blaster_nl @ Saturday, Oct 6 2012, 20:54)
QUOTE (Garju67 @ Friday, Oct 5 2012, 23:34)
QUOTE (Blaster_nl @ Friday, Oct 5 2012, 23:11)
QUOTE (nkjellman @ Friday, Oct 5 2012, 23:02)
But like I said with EFTW, if Rockstar shows us the IV era LV, you probably might drop this, but I'd change it to Las Vegas.

Even IF R* will make a LV again, it won't be before the next gta, which is not sooner than 2016.

Are you R*? You always say things like that that are unconfirmed.

GTA SA to GTAIV: 3.5 years.
GTAIV to GTAV: 5(.5) years.
GTA6, sooner than 3 years? Makes no sense.

And complete cities as DLC is insane.

@Mainline421. The 3 major individual cities in SA were actually not that big. R* probably made a LS the size of LC, and then probably a huge country side, exceeding the 6000x6000 limit from SA and IV.

GTA 3 to GTA VC : 1 year
GTA VC to GTA SA : 2 years
GTA LCS to GTA VCS : 1 year

Don't forget these ones please.

Kalvin
  • Kalvin

  • Zaibatsu
  • Joined: 06 Apr 2011
  • United-Kingdom

#52

Posted 06 October 2012 - 08:10 PM

Yes but they did a low-poly city. GTAIV and GTAV and the rest to live on are super duper high quality. It takes less time when it counts on less polys. The way more polys, the way more time.
They started GTAV in 2008/9 and they've only completed LS in our understanding -2012, that's 3/4 years, if they're gonna make Las Venturas (Which is mostly the same size, maybe larger) It will take depending on the size 8 if larger, 3/4 if smaller.

Death2Drugs
  • Death2Drugs

    Wanna milky?

  • Members
  • Joined: 20 Feb 2011
  • Mexico

#53

Posted 06 October 2012 - 09:13 PM

QUOTE (ManDog @ Saturday, Oct 6 2012, 20:10)
Yes but they did a low-poly city. GTAIV and GTAV and the rest to live on are super duper high quality. It takes less time when it counts on less polys. The way more polys, the way more time.
They started GTAV in 2008/9 and they've only completed LS in our understanding -2012, that's 3/4 years, if they're gonna make Las Venturas (Which is mostly the same size, maybe larger) It will take depending on the size 8 if larger, 3/4 if smaller.

Although we're going a little off-topic, Rockstar probably re-uses a lot of models when making cities, so that probably cuts time a little.

vans123
  • vans123

    Thompson 1928

  • Members
  • Joined: 23 Jul 2008

#54

Posted 07 October 2012 - 12:39 AM

III era stuff is a joke compared to the level of detail and effort current games of these years need
so please dont bring those here

Jestic
  • Jestic

    Chris

  • Feroci
  • Joined: 16 Oct 2005
  • Netherlands

#55

Posted 07 October 2012 - 12:54 AM

QUOTE (Garju67 @ Saturday, Oct 6 2012, 21:17)
QUOTE (Blaster_nl @ Saturday, Oct 6 2012, 20:54)
QUOTE (Garju67 @ Friday, Oct 5 2012, 23:34)
QUOTE (Blaster_nl @ Friday, Oct 5 2012, 23:11)
QUOTE (nkjellman @ Friday, Oct 5 2012, 23:02)
But like I said with EFTW, if Rockstar shows us the IV era LV, you probably might drop this, but I'd change it to Las Vegas.

Even IF R* will make a LV again, it won't be before the next gta, which is not sooner than 2016.

Are you R*? You always say things like that that are unconfirmed.

GTA SA to GTAIV: 3.5 years.
GTAIV to GTAV: 5(.5) years.
GTA6, sooner than 3 years? Makes no sense.

And complete cities as DLC is insane.

@Mainline421. The 3 major individual cities in SA were actually not that big. R* probably made a LS the size of LC, and then probably a huge country side, exceeding the 6000x6000 limit from SA and IV.

GTA 3 to GTA VC : 1 year
GTA VC to GTA SA : 2 years
GTA LCS to GTA VCS : 1 year

Don't forget these ones please.

If you think for a second you could even compare a III era to a IV\V GTA in terms of size\budget\man hours ....you need to stop modding.

Between the old consoles and the current gen consoles a new level of game design was 'introduced'. Games needed to look realistic. I could write a whole story, but it's late, just comapre III-era gta worlds to IV-era (also V) and make your own conclusions.

Death2Drugs
  • Death2Drugs

    Wanna milky?

  • Members
  • Joined: 20 Feb 2011
  • Mexico

#56

Posted 07 October 2012 - 01:20 AM

As a question: are you planning to retexture the map?

GTARandom
  • GTARandom

    Unfortunate piece of meat

  • Feroci
  • Joined: 15 Jun 2009
  • Croatia

#57

Posted 07 October 2012 - 10:14 AM

QUOTE (Death2Drugs @ Sunday, Oct 7 2012, 03:20)
As a question: are you planning to retexture the map?

When re-moelling begins... Why do you people don't use your brains... why would i waste time on this if it wouldn't be HD, give it a thinking through at least for a second

MrSmarter22
  • MrSmarter22

    BloodFighter lvl 100

  • Members
  • Joined: 25 Dec 2010
  • None

#58

Posted 07 October 2012 - 05:12 PM

So people.. Filip(GTARANDOM) told me on skype that he lost his inspiration because some guys which dont use their brain that often said that its low quality etc. Yeah its low quality atm because we first convert buildings from San Andreas add them into the map if all buildings are placed from San Andreas we remodel them and make better textures in high quality. So the screenshots that you saw are from the alpha version. But in the future we are going to remodel the buildings from San Andreas first and then place them.

Jestic
  • Jestic

    Chris

  • Feroci
  • Joined: 16 Oct 2005
  • Netherlands

#59

Posted 07 October 2012 - 05:34 PM

QUOTE (MrSmarter22 @ Sunday, Oct 7 2012, 19:12)
So people.. Filip(GTARANDOM) told me on skype that he lost his inspiration because some guys which dont use their brain that often said that its low quality etc. Yeah its low quality atm because we first convert buildings from San Andreas add them into the map if all buildings are placed from San Andreas we remodel them and make better textures in high quality. So the screenshots that you saw are from the alpha version. But in the future we are going to remodel the buildings from San Andreas first and then place them.

That much was clear already, but Filip needs to learn to take criticism about his work.

Terreur69
  • Terreur69

    C2C - Down The Road

  • Members
  • Joined: 27 Dec 2010
  • France

#60

Posted 07 October 2012 - 06:03 PM

awesome screen !




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users