DoubleOGJohnson, it's these particular type of answers that I find pathetic. First, you go off spouting that I don't make money of GTA V sales, which is really a pointless argument to make as you obviously already know the answer, which in turn makes this statement completely pointless. I wouldn't say I'm angry as such, but more so annoyed with the current state of creativity in gaming as of late.
Nice to know you respect prostitutes more than me, I respect women in general and I am against sexism. You say I'm waging war, you're a bit extreme aren't you? You sure just love repeating yourself don't you? I heard you the first time when you said it, you don't get money of GTA V's sales. That's not even relevant to the point I made anyway.
It's Activision by the way and yes! I would most definitely would like to call the demise of that company, as it's not about games with them, but marketing, business priorities, limited creativity, reliability on using the same ideas and ripping people off as well as single handily lying to consumers.
As for EA, I hope you're aware that for Rockstar to wage war as you extremely put it would be quite difficult, as I am sure you're aware that EA tried to buy Rockstar Games? In fact they were going to give Rockstar a lot of money for this, though luckily Rockstar declined their offer as they knew, if GTA ever gotten in the hands of EA, it would mean the sad end of them being allowed to be creative anymore. EA would have essentially milked the game on a yearly basis.
Now this is interesting, you claim that I only want Rockstar as the only developer when I have stated no such thing, so thanks for putting words into my mouth. I am on about getting rid of mediocre developers, not good developers like, Rocksteady, Santa Monica, Sucker Punch etc, as they are good, but Ubisoft, EA, Activison? These companies have told none stop lies as well sold original creators down the line and stole their artistic rights, they make some of the most mediocre pieces of interactive entertainment you could ever experience.
As for sivispacem, he stated that he has played through Far Cry 3, 4 times now, which is all well and good. He seems to like it and I won't argue on that, however in my opinion Far Cry 3 is extremely overrated, it's A.I was ridiculously stupid even on hard, it's story was nothing special, as we've seen the whole man get's trapped on forbidden island scenario many times before, the side quests were just bland and poorly thought out in general, especially the ones involving those radio towers.
Far Cry 2, had way more content than Far Cry 3, I mean that's not really what's supposed to happen? You'd expect there to be more content with each sequel? I used to like Ubisoft, I regard Rayman 2: The Great Escape for PS1 one of the best game's I've ever played, so don't say I haven't acknowledge their work. I also regard Assassin's Creed II as one of the best games I've ever played. You make it seem like I hate the company full stop, which is entirely not the case. I don't like them now, but I used to before they sold out and jumped the shark.
Edited by ROCKGTASTAR, 27 October 2013 - 11:14 AM.