Quantcast

Jump to content

» «
Photo

Is This The Worst Game of the GTA 3 Era?

151 replies to this topic

Poll: Is this the worst game in the GTA 3 Era? (3, VC, SA, A, LCS, VCS) (476 member(s) have cast votes)

Is this the worst game in the GTA 3 Era? (3, VC, SA, A, LCS, VCS)

  1. Yes (76 votes [17.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 17.67%

  2. No (354 votes [82.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 82.33%

Vote Guests cannot vote
Raj Brunner
  • Raj Brunner

    "There is no knowledge that is not power"

  • Victim of The Pit™
  • Joined: 01 Oct 2015
  • United-States

#121

Posted 07 October 2016 - 08:57 PM Edited by Chamberman20, 07 October 2016 - 08:59 PM.

No, it would have to be GTA advanced.


Ribsey
  • Ribsey

    What are you doing, giving birth?

  • Members
  • Joined: 20 Jan 2012
  • Wales

#122

Posted 08 October 2016 - 09:53 AM

Not at all. While LCS was a side-step in GTA's progression (returning to an altered Vice City engine) but the care was still there. The lighting in the game goes from doom 'n gloom to bright sunny days, even capturing the feel of a '90s era city (especially in certain areas at night). While I enjoyed it back in the day, GTA Advance doesn't feel as if much effort was put into it as a whole.


George Costanza
  • George Costanza

  • The Yardies
  • Joined: 04 Jan 2009
  • None
  • Best Conversion 2017 [Liberty City Stories: PC]
    [Rockstar Editor Awards 2017] Best Rockstar Editor Short
    Best Total Overhaul 2017 Contribution [GTA: Underground]
    l33t p05T3r 5t34l3r 2017
    Worst Sheep 2017
    Spam Commando 2017
    Best Conversion 2016 [GTA: Underground] [Contribution]

#123

Posted 10 October 2016 - 07:10 PM

Technically? No, it was first 3D portable gta after all. And VCS was lagging af on PSP.
Story wise? No
Voice acting? Yes, cuz recasting, cuz R* didn't give enough money to get right voice actors back.


universetwisters
  • universetwisters

    brb sitting in my 85 Skylark as it idles in the garage

  • Victim of The Pit™
  • Joined: 26 Feb 2011
  • United-States
  • Best Total Overhaul 2017 [GTA: Underground]
    Best Map 2017 Contribution [Liberty City Countryside]
    Best Conversion 2016 [GTA: Underground] [Contribution]
    Best Workshop 2014
    Most Improved 2014
    Funniest Member 2014
    April Fools Winner 2015

#124

Posted 12 October 2016 - 11:49 PM

Voice acting? Yes, cuz recasting, cuz R* didn't give enough money to get right voice actors back.


I don't think they wanted Michael Madsen back after he did the lines for the Driv3r protagonist. That goddamn race traitor.
  • Jeansowaty and Payne Killer like this

The Rockstar Gamer 108
  • The Rockstar Gamer 108

    Desperado - Legend

  • Members
  • Joined: 12 May 2016
  • United-States

#125

Posted 13 October 2016 - 04:07 AM

I've played GTA LCS PC Edition and completed all 7 missions. It's far better than GTA III, which is the WORST GTA EVER!

InkJaw
  • InkJaw

    Player Hater

  • Members
  • Joined: 15 Sep 2015
  • United-States

#126

Posted 13 October 2016 - 08:57 AM

I don't think Liberty City Stories is the worst in the 3D era, just has limited features compared to SA since it was on a handheld. Worst would have to be GTA Advance, for sure.


The Rockstar Gamer 108
  • The Rockstar Gamer 108

    Desperado - Legend

  • Members
  • Joined: 12 May 2016
  • United-States

#127

Posted 16 October 2016 - 06:47 AM

For me, it's GTA III. Buying it was just a waste of damn cash..

InkJaw
  • InkJaw

    Player Hater

  • Members
  • Joined: 15 Sep 2015
  • United-States

#128

Posted 17 October 2016 - 06:34 AM

For me, it's GTA III. Buying it was just a waste of damn cash..

Well I mean, it was the first 3D era GTA. You can expect a lot of features from future games not to be present there. Still though, what makes you think buying GTA 3 was a waste of cash?


Mr_Rager
  • Mr_Rager

    Last Breath

  • Members
  • Joined: 14 Jul 2015
  • None

#129

Posted 17 October 2016 - 05:14 PM

For me, it's GTA III. Buying it was just a waste of damn cash..

LCS was my first GTA, and I ended up going backwards and playing III after SA and VC. I never felt that the gap between the three was that far. III is simpler and has its own charm and feel to it that I love. I prefer LCS though. I understand why people would think that III was better in some ways...but LCS simply had more to do.

Snesgamer83
  • Snesgamer83

    Rat

  • Members
  • Joined: 05 Oct 2016
  • United-States

#130

Posted 29 October 2016 - 05:37 AM

LCS is basically III with a map and a better, more well-acted story. What's not to love?


SMACKED!
  • SMACKED!

  • Victim of The Pit™
  • Joined: 14 May 2016
  • None

#131

Posted 29 October 2016 - 09:51 PM

Despite the fact I changed my mind about this game a few days ago, LCS is right away from being the worst GTA from the 3d era, nothing can assimilate the bad old Advance. But I do believe that LCS was a downgrade in terms of features. A sh*tload of stuff put in San Andreas was removed and the game went back to the "III/VC style" than implementing a few more stuffs and go ahead like it did in 2008 when IV was released (IMO).


WorthlessYouth
  • WorthlessYouth

    Trick

  • Members
  • Joined: 29 Oct 2007
  • Australia

#132

Posted 16 November 2016 - 01:41 PM

No. That award goes to Vice City Stories. Hands down.

 

Liberty City Stories blew everybody away upon release. A fully 3D Grand Theft Auto experience on a handheld device was unfathomable at the time.

 

Of all the 3D-era entries into the series, Vice City Stories was the only one that brought nothing new to the table, and was simply more of the same.

  • universetwisters and Jack Lupino like this

Jimmy
  • Jimmy

  • Facade Corporation
  • Joined: 26 Oct 2016
  • India
  • Best Newsletter 2017 [GTAF Weekly]
    Best Poster in Movies / TV 2017
    Best Jimmy
    Contribution Award [GTAF Weekly]
    Helpfulness Award [WD&P Mega Topic]

#133

Posted 16 November 2016 - 04:40 PM

I don't think Liberty City Stories is the worst. The setting is good, the storyline is crisp and well connected to the previous games and is very less confusing. On top of that, you've a familiar city to explore with a great set of vehicles. And now, there's an Android/iOS port as well.

 

On the other hand, Vice City Stories is much worse. So many characters and poor attempting at connecting it to the events before Vice City. That's just my opinion though.

  • Tommy Dickfingers and Payne Killer like this

DragonpokeZ
  • DragonpokeZ

    Special Vehicle Hoarder

  • Members
  • Joined: 24 May 2015
  • Spain

#134

Posted 02 February 2017 - 03:54 PM

The worst one is VCS. Period

ClaudeIzABadAzz
  • ClaudeIzABadAzz

    GTA Enthusiast

  • Victim of The Pit™
  • Joined: 04 Dec 2016
  • None

#135

Posted 03 February 2017 - 11:04 AM

LCS is a pretty good game since it is still the worst, If you know what I mean  -_-


B Dawg
  • B Dawg

    These boots are 100% wolverine hide

  • Members
  • Joined: 15 Dec 2008
  • Bosnia-and-Herzegovina

#136

Posted 03 February 2017 - 06:16 PM

The worst one is VCS. Period

VCS? Seriously? For me, when not counting Advance, it would be 3, with VC right behind it.

  • Mr_Rager likes this

piko
  • piko

    100% or nothing

  • Members
  • Joined: 05 Oct 2011
  • Finland

#137

Posted 04 February 2017 - 03:20 AM Edited by piko, 04 February 2017 - 03:20 AM.

Not a fair comparison, but seeing as it's 'improved' version of GTA III, I don't see how it could be worse than that.


Jeansowaty
  • Jeansowaty

    My music's my favourite music ever.

  • Members
  • Joined: 31 Mar 2013
  • Poland

#138

Posted 04 February 2017 - 02:57 PM

I really find the game pretty good, but compared to other 3D Universe titles (Advance doesn't count as a GTA on its own to me), LCS came up really mediocre. The worst thing outta all was the dull story that brang nothing rather than force characters from former GTA's to re-appear. As one person said, LCS was the V of the 3D Universe.

  • MiranK likes this

MiranK
  • MiranK

    Mission designer and San Fierro lover

  • Members
  • Joined: 05 Feb 2017
  • Bosnia-and-Herzegovina

#139

Posted 12 February 2017 - 01:34 PM

QUOTE (RyujinXKaizer @ Saturday, May 19 2012, 10:29) The worst GTA III Era is GTA Advance. I second that.


Completely agreed

The worst one is VCS. Period

Why exactly?

Journey_95
  • Journey_95

    Gangsta

  • Members
  • Joined: 31 Jul 2012
  • None

#140

Posted 22 January 2018 - 05:33 AM

Advance is the worst, then GTA 3 and finally LCS. Guess I'm no fan of 3D Era's Liberty City..


Jack Lupino
  • Jack Lupino

    "So long-a-Bowser!"

  • Victim of The Pit™
  • Joined: 16 Dec 2017
  • None

#141

Posted 22 January 2018 - 07:23 AM Edited by Jack Lupino, A week ago.

No


Ohhh123r
  • Ohhh123r

    *Cornette Face*

  • Members
  • Joined: 15 Jun 2017
  • United-States

#142

Posted 23 January 2018 - 02:31 PM

No! It's not the worst GTA 3D era, It's GTA Advance, y,know why? GTA Liberty City Stories is better while GTA Advance sucks...


Irrational
  • Irrational

    Federação das Américas

  • Members
  • Joined: 25 Dec 2011
  • Brazil

#143

Posted 23 January 2018 - 02:56 PM

Wow, superb reasoning, that was truly eye-opening.

 

Thank you, my good sir/madame.


Crossbones
  • Crossbones

    See You in the Obituary.

  • Members
  • Joined: 12 Aug 2017
  • India

#144

Posted A week ago

The worst game in 3d era is Advance. LCS is a masterpiece. Great storyline, awesome characters, fun side missions are just some to be mentioned. Although, the antagonist was the worst of all, doesn't means the game is worst.

CoolMods
  • CoolMods

    I wonder how it would be like to use Adblock in real life

  • Victim of The Pit™
  • Joined: 26 Jun 2017
  • Romania

#145

Posted A week ago Edited by CoolMods, A week ago.

No GTA LCS is awesome. They missions are fun until the end. The end is not that exciting and it's very dull unlike GTA 3, GTA VC, SA and GTA VCS endings. The ending was basicaly nonsense. Why wouldn't the story end goodly, by resolving every bullsh*t? I think Vincenzo should be killed at the end.


Jack Lupino
  • Jack Lupino

    "So long-a-Bowser!"

  • Victim of The Pit™
  • Joined: 16 Dec 2017
  • None

#146

Posted A week ago

I was about to vote yes...but  since gta advance is considered a 3D era game(although its 2D) i voted no.

While gta LCS had disappointing ending and lacklustre storyline,it stilll had fun sidemissions.

While there was not a single good thing about Advance,hell even the graphics looked like crap compared to gta1 and gta2.

  • Hmmm nice bike likes this

iguaan
  • iguaan

    100% Completion Tryhard

  • Members
  • Joined: 24 Jul 2016
  • Estonia

#147

Posted 6 days ago Edited by iguaan, 6 days ago.

As everyone said countless times, Advance is most definetly the worst one. The story in this game wasn't great, although I do prefer some side missions from this game over some of the others from other 3D era titles.

 

If Advance wouldn't be counted as a 3D universe game, then based on story alone it would have to be one of the Stories games (ironic).


Hmmm nice bike
  • Hmmm nice bike

    No, my bike!

  • The Yardies
  • Joined: 28 Oct 2006
  • United-States

#148

Posted 6 days ago

I think calling it the "worst" of the III era is a little harsh. Especially given that it was Rockstar's first entry into making games on the PSP, and San Andreas was a tough act to follow. The story was definitely not the best compared to other III era titles, but overall, I still enjoyed LCS.


ViceBoy69
  • ViceBoy69

    Thug

  • Members
  • Joined: 28 Mar 2014
  • United-Kingdom

#149

Posted 2 days ago

To love GTA3 you had to be around when it launched im an older gamer so GTA3 was a revelation back in the day, it may look dated now but back then it looked amazing


AlexGRFan97
  • AlexGRFan97

    Builder of Robots, Conqueror of Arenas

  • Members
  • Joined: 22 Dec 2013

#150

Posted A day ago Edited by AlexGRFan97, A day ago.

A lot of you are looking at this completely wrong. Games like these shouldn't be graded by subjectivity. They should instead be graded on how different they were from their predecessors and how much content they added.

  1. III was similar to Driver 2 which released the year prior, but instead of fitting the map around the missions, the missions were fit around the map. It was jawdropping at the time and completely alien to GTA 2 players but hasn't aged well in the long run.
  2. Vice City took what III built and expanded upon it. We got more outfits, a better soundtrack, aircraft, motorcycles, the kickass 80s atmosphere and the ability to use tools as weapons. Tommy was a memorable protagonist with a great VA.
  3. San Andreas added an obscene amount of content with all the RPG-style elements, 200+ vehicles, 100+ story missions and one of the largest maps on the PS2. You could take photos with the camera in one breath and fly around on a jetpack the next.
  4. Liberty City Stories was an unexpected step down. We all expected the next GTA would be based off of San Andreas' engine. Some of us even thought we'd see Upstate Liberty. They had the potential to make something truly great and didn't.
  5. When it came to Vice City Stories we knew exactly what to expect, and it's clear R* had fun making it. They reintroduced a swimming protagonist, added Empire building, and bought all the tracks they couldn't afford during VC's development.

So altogether

SA>VC>VCS>III>LCS





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users