signature file size limit
Posted 16 May 2012 - 05:46 PM
its not the year 2002 any more, we all have faster internet to load the pages instantly.
and its a pain because if you save as png you have to polerize the image before saving it to get the actual KB's down to under 80.
anyone else have an opinion or think its a good or bad idea?
Posted 16 May 2012 - 06:00 PM
Posted 16 May 2012 - 06:03 PM
Like I said some weeks back, balancing the sig limits with the avatar limits could work just fine.
Posted 16 May 2012 - 06:04 PM
Get a page full of those and you may be rethinking that "load the pages instantly" comment.
Edit: Hey Narcis...
Posted 17 May 2012 - 03:21 AM
|QUOTE (Tank @ Wednesday, Sep 24 2003, 19:17)|
|Remember, a talented sig maker doesn't need a huge amount of space to impress. Even so, 150x500 pixels is a large amount of space. If you're still bitchin' about lack of space, then assume I'm bitchin' at your lack of sig-making skills. Like many things in life, the real talent isn't the size of your sig, it's how you use it.|
Posted 17 May 2012 - 04:10 AM Edited by nic_23, 17 May 2012 - 04:13 AM.
And promethius im not talking about image size im talking about memory size. If you save it so its transparent it doesnt just work because its over 80kb you have to make the quality lower. And 500x150 is big enough im not even talking about size.
Posted 17 May 2012 - 04:14 AM
Sorry, but there are going to be no further changes to the sig rules that we already have in place.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users