Posted 08 January 2012 - 06:37 PM
Edited by WILLAL212, 08 January 2012 - 06:40 PM.
i have worked out a map of los santos based only on the trailer (not uploaded because of computer problems) and have come to the conclusion that only western LA was only detailed in the trailer. As some of us know, west LA is the "rich" side of town, with hollywood, beverly hills, and the beaches.
As we all should know rockstar games 1st traillers show of the beauty of the city, while the 2nd details the story and characters. the only thing new they would show (map wise) is east LA, the gang ridden ghettoes of compton, inglewood, and other poor areas. this causes me to believe that is where we begin the story.
i have tried on multiple occasions to map the area east of the mile high club and there simply is not enough info to do so.
however the 2nd trailer could INSTEAD focus on the surronding areas such as the mountains, forest, and (hopefully) deserts of lower SA.
although i would love to see mexico, i am also a firm beliver in only one city. as a huge fan of every gta, i am fan enough to admit that (using gta 4 and San andreas as examples) rockstar north is not good at designing muliple cities. Liberty city and it's burroghs were beautifuly designed, but alderney was just boring. San Fierro was just terrible, and was certaintly the weakest of the three cities in the otherwise breathtaking state of SA. Rockstar should focus on one great city instead 1 good one, 1 ok one, and an absolute wasteland. i know im not the only one who vaules quality over quantity.
any way i trust Rockstar north will pump out another masterpiece as they havent disapointed me yet.