Quantcast

Jump to content

» «
Photo

Have A Question? V2

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
22,856 replies to this topic
Supernutz40
  • Supernutz40

    GTAF Commissioner

  • $outh $ide Hoodz
  • Joined: 15 Oct 2004
  • None

#17311

Posted 14 January 2014 - 12:48 AM

Would you ever have sex with a midget?


My wife is only a hair above the height defined for being labeled a midget. So I guess my answer is "yes".

Not sure what that limit is, but my wife is 4'10.5". I always tease her about being a midget.

Eris
  • Eris

    hey bae

  • Members
  • Joined: 04 Mar 2013
  • None

#17312

Posted 14 January 2014 - 12:59 AM

Here's the picture of the girl that made me think of the question.

 

EEONVkHh.jpg

 

 

Here tits must be a third of her body weight or something. 


Tacymist
  • Tacymist

    What becomes of the broken hearted?

  • Andolini Mafia Family
  • Joined: 01 Jul 2013
  • United-States
  • Most GIFted Member

#17313

Posted 14 January 2014 - 01:25 AM

I never thought there'd be a time where I'd make this statement but.... I'd plough that midget.

  • Failure, geobst, Andreas and 2 others like this

Frank Brown
  • Frank Brown

    Big Homie

  • Leone Family Mafia
  • Joined: 01 Oct 2013
  • United-States

#17314

Posted 14 January 2014 - 01:42 AM

Looks like a girl I went to High School with. Minus two inches. 


lil weasel
  • lil weasel

    Shoot Looters, Hang Pirates!

  • Members
  • Joined: 25 Dec 2006
  • United-States
  • Contribution Award [San Andreas]

#17315

Posted 14 January 2014 - 01:54 AM

Little People of America (LPA) define dwarfism as a medical or genetic condition that usually results in an adult height of 4'10" or shorter, among both men and women, although in some cases a person with a dwarfing condition may be slightly taller than that. The average height of an adult with dwarfism is 4’0, but typical heights range from 2’8 to 4’8.

"Midget" refers to a person who is very short, but normally proportioned. The term midget is now rarely used and is considered offensive. But its usage was very common until the end of the twentieth century. It has given way to "Short person" or "little person".

The term midget is different from dwarf based on body proportions. A person with dwarfism has disproportionately short limbs. The term midget was used to describe persons of small size but with normal proportions when compared to average people.

Both are: Less than 147 cm (4' 10")

trip
  • trip

    ~

  • Andolini Mafia Family
  • Joined: 10 Oct 2007
  • United-States
  • Contribution Award [Gen Chat]

#17316

Posted 14 January 2014 - 02:01 AM

Both are: Less than 147 cm (4' 10")


My little lady has it beat by nearly an inch.

universetwisters
  • universetwisters

    Ich liebe dich, so wie du bist.

  • Members
  • Joined: 26 Feb 2011
  • United-States
  • Best Workshop 2014
    Most Improved 2014
    Funniest Member 2014

#17317

Posted 14 January 2014 - 02:32 AM

My brother's wife it pretty short, about 4'10" or a little over, maybe even around five feet.

 

I know my ex, Jessica, was pretty short too, maybe about 5'5". My second ex wasn't much taller, maybe 5'7"?

 

Even funnier how my Uncle Clark is 6'4" and I'm only 5'10".


Eris
  • Eris

    hey bae

  • Members
  • Joined: 04 Mar 2013
  • None

#17318

Posted 14 January 2014 - 02:40 AM

5'5'' is an average height for a women. 

  • Frank Brown likes this

Frank Brown
  • Frank Brown

    Big Homie

  • Leone Family Mafia
  • Joined: 01 Oct 2013
  • United-States

#17319

Posted 14 January 2014 - 02:41 AM

5'5'' is an average height for a women. 

 

This. What do you expect, UT, 6'4" women everywhere? 

  • universetwisters likes this

universetwisters
  • universetwisters

    Ich liebe dich, so wie du bist.

  • Members
  • Joined: 26 Feb 2011
  • United-States
  • Best Workshop 2014
    Most Improved 2014
    Funniest Member 2014

#17320

Posted 14 January 2014 - 03:01 AM

 

5'5'' is an average height for a women. 

 

This. What do you expect, UT, 6'4" women everywhere? 

 

Attack_of_the_50_foot_woman_1958.jpg

 

It just seems kinda weird though, seeing as when we dated, she was more near my height, but I was maybe 5'9" when I was in 10th grade. I'd be surprised if just one inch makes a difference, though.


Panz
  • Panz

  • The Connection
  • Joined: 18 Aug 2008
  • United-States
  • Best Returning Member 2013
    Best Member in a Group 2013
    Hottest Member 2014
    ET Porn Endorser

#17321

Posted 14 January 2014 - 03:01 AM

I'm 5'3", and I thought that I was short.

 

We have a little person at my college, and she's absolutely gorgeous. No one looks at her differently, and Im pretty sure she has a fairly tall, normal-sized boyfriend. If you love someone enough, why not? I don't see why it would be deterring if you love the person. For a random hookup? Well, that's up to each person. Usually with random hookups, you do it with someone who you're attracted to, so that really depends on if you're attracted to the little person...and then there's always the matter of how drunk you are, and let's be real, if you're drunk enough, you could end up sleeping with a cactus.


Frank Brown
  • Frank Brown

    Big Homie

  • Leone Family Mafia
  • Joined: 01 Oct 2013
  • United-States

#17322

Posted 14 January 2014 - 03:03 AM

 

It just seems kinda weird though, seeing as when we dated, she was more near my height, but I was maybe 5'9" when I was in 10th grade. I'd be surprised if just one inch makes a difference, though.

 

 

One inch makes all the difference. Don't let anyone fool you.

  • sivispacem, universetwisters, Andreas and 1 other like this

universetwisters
  • universetwisters

    Ich liebe dich, so wie du bist.

  • Members
  • Joined: 26 Feb 2011
  • United-States
  • Best Workshop 2014
    Most Improved 2014
    Funniest Member 2014

#17323

Posted 14 January 2014 - 03:14 AM

 

 

It just seems kinda weird though, seeing as when we dated, she was more near my height, but I was maybe 5'9" when I was in 10th grade. I'd be surprised if just one inch makes a difference, though.

 

 

One inch makes all the difference. Don't let anyone fool you.

 

That could be the case. I've been told I'm pretty tall and old looking for my age, considering my voice and molestache growing thicker by the day.

 

 

And for reference, this is a picture of me taken last summer when I was out in Colorado, doing some kind of bike tire toss thing. I'm the stud with the beanie and flippy floppies. I think those tires had about a 2-foot diameter

17528_10200187579559692_994373687_n.jpg?

 

I can post a pic of my ex if you wanna see how short she is


fireguy109
  • fireguy109

    It's a long way to the top

  • The Connection
  • Joined: 30 Aug 2010
  • United-States

#17324

Posted 14 January 2014 - 03:33 AM Edited by fireguy109, 14 January 2014 - 03:34 AM.

The internet is probably the best place to go for creative insults, so I might as well post this here. What's a nice, polite, PC way to say someone is a total f*cking asshole? Referring to a historical figure here, btw.


universetwisters
  • universetwisters

    Ich liebe dich, so wie du bist.

  • Members
  • Joined: 26 Feb 2011
  • United-States
  • Best Workshop 2014
    Most Improved 2014
    Funniest Member 2014

#17325

Posted 14 January 2014 - 03:37 AM

The internet is probably the best place to go for creative insults, so I might as well post this here. What's a nice, polite, PC way to say someone is a total f*cking asshole? Referring to a historical figure here, btw.

"Depriving a village of their idiot"

 

"Depriving a king's council of a fool"

 

"A train that stopped short of the station"


gtamann123
  • gtamann123

    Bang Bang, Skeet Skeet

  • Members
  • Joined: 10 Jun 2008
  • United-States

#17326

Posted 14 January 2014 - 01:25 PM

Would you ever have sex with a midget?


Of course. If I liked her and she liked me why wouldn't we bang? And im talking about a midget. A dwarf would be a little sketchy but maybe.

Dr. John
  • Dr. John

    Women and Wine

  • Members
  • Joined: 31 Dec 2011
  • India

#17327

Posted 14 January 2014 - 02:18 PM

I was just watching a few old videos of MettalicBill (Slamman) where he was just showing the day when GTA V trailer was released. Here:

 

Apparently, I just noticed that there was a private forum to talk about Slamman. I was laughing REALLY hard and fell off my chair. Is that forum still existing? Lol, I would love if it could become public. :D


Finn 7 five 11
  • Finn 7 five 11

    Well I'm sorry, Princess.

  • Members
  • Joined: 31 Jan 2010
  • None

#17328

Posted 14 January 2014 - 02:28 PM

"I'm sweating like a Jew in a bank"

What does this mean? I mean, I realize the person is quite sweaty, but why would a Jew be sweatin' so hard in a bank?


theadmiral
  • theadmiral

    Founder And Opening Batsman: Vinewood Cricket Club

  • The Precinct
  • Joined: 26 Sep 2013
  • Trinidad-and-Tobago

#17329

Posted 14 January 2014 - 02:45 PM

"I'm sweating like a Jew in a bank"

What does this mean? I mean, I realize the person is quite sweaty, but why would a Jew be sweatin' so hard in a bank?

It is probably some sort of infantile anti-semitic comment that has no root in reality. I wouldn't think too hard about it.


RoadRunner71
  • RoadRunner71

    Left to rust

  • Members
  • Joined: 11 Mar 2012
  • None

#17330

Posted 14 January 2014 - 02:55 PM Edited by RoadRunner71, 14 January 2014 - 02:55 PM.

"I'm sweating like a Jew in a bank"

What does this mean? I mean, I realize the person is quite sweaty, but why would a Jew be sweatin' so hard in a bank?

Jews stereotypically are considered stingy.


Finn 7 five 11
  • Finn 7 five 11

    Well I'm sorry, Princess.

  • Members
  • Joined: 31 Jan 2010
  • None

#17331

Posted 14 January 2014 - 02:59 PM

 

"I'm sweating like a Jew in a bank"

What does this mean? I mean, I realize the person is quite sweaty, but why would a Jew be sweatin' so hard in a bank?

Jews stereotypically are considered stingy.

 

Haha, that's actually a good one. You're right admiral.


Vercetti42
  • Vercetti42

    I have moved to a new account.

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 13 May 2013
  • India
  • Best Contributor [Gaming] 2012

#17332

Posted 14 January 2014 - 05:49 PM Edited by AceKingston, 14 January 2014 - 05:50 PM.

Quick question to science/environmental experts. *Ace looks at Panz* :p

 

Anyways I've been reading that Yellowstone is 40,000 years overdue for it's eruption. If it does erupt it's effects would probably push humanity to the edge of extinction. So my question is will it erupt in our lifetime i.e. in the next 100 years or so?

 

Thanks in advance.


Gray Wolf
  • Gray Wolf

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 20 Sep 2012
  • None

#17333

Posted 14 January 2014 - 06:21 PM

I've got another science question for ya.

So the Sun is basically a giant fireball, right? and we know fire requires oxygen, fuel and something to ignite it (It's already on fire so we'll remove the ignition for now)

What keeps it burning?

Tacymist
  • Tacymist

    What becomes of the broken hearted?

  • Andolini Mafia Family
  • Joined: 01 Jul 2013
  • United-States
  • Most GIFted Member

#17334

Posted 14 January 2014 - 06:30 PM

Hydrogen and other gases.


lil weasel
  • lil weasel

    Shoot Looters, Hang Pirates!

  • Members
  • Joined: 25 Dec 2006
  • United-States
  • Contribution Award [San Andreas]

#17335

Posted 14 January 2014 - 06:33 PM

I've got another science question for ya.

So the Sun is basically a giant fireball, right? and we know fire requires oxygen, fuel and something to ignite it (It's already on fire so we'll remove the ignition for now)
What keeps it burning?

the way I heard is (simplified):

The way the Sun "burns" fuel is completely different from the way a fire on Earth burns (the term "burning" is a bit misleading when used to talk about stars). The Sun gets its energy by smashing small light elements together to make heavier elements; most of a star's life is spent smashing hydrogen atoms together to make helium. The burning that a star does, then, is a nuclear reaction, and not a chemical one like the fires on Earth (when a candle burns, the atoms themselves remain unchanged: just the molecules are affected).

  • Gray Wolf likes this

Panz
  • Panz

  • The Connection
  • Joined: 18 Aug 2008
  • United-States
  • Best Returning Member 2013
    Best Member in a Group 2013
    Hottest Member 2014
    ET Porn Endorser

#17336

Posted 14 January 2014 - 06:40 PM

Quick question to science/environmental experts. *Ace looks at Panz* :p

 

Anyways I've been reading that Yellowstone is 40,000 years overdue for it's eruption. If it does erupt it's effects would probably push humanity to the edge of extinction. So my question is will it erupt in our lifetime i.e. in the next 100 years or so?

 

Thanks in advance.

I don't really know much about Yellowstone and its volcano, but I do know that the site's geologic activity really hasn't changed over the years, so I don't know how its eruption would necessarily be "overdue". There's no predicting when a volcano might erupt, but with more recent technology, I believe scientists can at least detect changes in activity for up to months ahead of time, maybe even more.

 

And I doubt it would push humanity to extinction. The lava wouldn't go too far, and the only real danger would be the ejected particles into the air. That would probably cause a great deal of pollution and contamination to ecosystems and water supplies and agriculture, but I don't see how this could destroy humanity. It might affect a large portion of the U.S., but that's it.

 

We'll probably need the population cut soon, anyway.  :sigh:


Vercetti42
  • Vercetti42

    I have moved to a new account.

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 13 May 2013
  • India
  • Best Contributor [Gaming] 2012

#17337

Posted 14 January 2014 - 06:43 PM Edited by AceKingston, 14 January 2014 - 06:43 PM.

Thanks Panz, I was just asking because I was reading quite a lot of articles over the fact that it could push humanity to the edge of extinction or maybe it's just rumors?

 

The last time it happened was around 640,000 years ago so the chances do seem really slim. Like you said I can't see it affecting any other continent other than North America, maybe pollution but I just wanted to check anyways.  :)


Crokey
  • Crokey

    Builders Like Erections

  • Zaibatsu
  • Joined: 05 Aug 2003
  • Belize
  • Best Poster [Sports] 2014
    Worst Tits 2014
    Last ever poster in a public area on the old forum

#17338

Posted 14 January 2014 - 06:59 PM

Thanks Panz, I was just asking because I was reading quite a lot of articles over the fact that it could push humanity to the edge of extinction or maybe it's just rumors?

 

The last time it happened was around 640,000 years ago so the chances do seem really slim. Like you said I can't see it affecting any other continent other than North America, maybe pollution but I just wanted to check anyways.  :)

An eruption from Yellowstone and the subsequent ash cloud would directly affect nearly all of the continental United States, Southern Canada and Northern Mexico, the longer term affects of ash and volcanic chemicals such as sulphuric acid would have long term effects on the rest of the planet once the prevailing winds, jet streams and water circulation have distributed the output.  There are plenty of prediction maps on Google images and most depict the direct effects covering the Pacific seaboard, the Rockies and as far East as Eastern Texas longitude, but the fallout would cover most of the Eastern Seaboard and would pollute the Atlantic before the jet stream carries it over to Europe.

 

There was a great BBC Documentary (maybe on YouTube somewhere or on the BBC iPlayer) about it a couple of years back, which went into it in a whole lot more detail, but the upshot was that America would be f*cked, South America would be f*cked, Europe would be partly f*cked, Africa is already f*cked, Asia after rubbing their hands would eventually get f*cked, Antarctica would be a greyer shade of f*cked and the Aussie would just puff out their chests and tell the rest of the world to "man up you bloody bunch of Sheila's"

  • Tacymist likes this

K^2
  • K^2

    Vidi Vici Veni

  • Moderator
  • Joined: 14 Apr 2004
  • United-States
  • Most Knowledgeable [Web Development/Programming] 2013
    Most Knowledgeable [GTA Series] 2011
    Best Debater 2010

#17339

Posted 14 January 2014 - 07:02 PM

Weather will be affected world-wide, which is very likely to be detrimental on crops. So hunger in 3rd world countries is pretty much guaranteed. In US, things would be really bad. Much of it destroyed, rest rendered virtually uninhabitable by the fallout.

 

Best guess anyone has is eruption in the next 10,000 years, with a huge uncertainty on that.


Vercetti42
  • Vercetti42

    I have moved to a new account.

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 13 May 2013
  • India
  • Best Contributor [Gaming] 2012

#17340

Posted 14 January 2014 - 07:04 PM

Thanks Crokey and K^2 but what exactly makes the guess that it would erupt in the next 10,000 years unlikely?





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users