Jump to content

» «

Will this laptop run SA?

5 replies to this topic
  • gtasaxo

    Arsenal FC!

  • Members
  • Joined: 01 May 2010


Posted 01 May 2010 - 02:24 PM


or this one?


lil weasel
  • lil weasel

    Shoot Looters, Hang Pirates!

  • GTA Series Staff
  • Joined: 25 Dec 2006
  • United-States
  • Contribution Award [San Andreas]


Posted 01 May 2010 - 02:32 PM

Minimum System Requirements
1GHz Intel Pentium III or AMD Athlon Processor
256MB of RAM
8x DVD-ROM Drive

3.6 GB of free Hard Disk space for a minimal install
64MB Video Card with DirectX 9 compatible drivers ("GeForce3" or better)
DirectX 9 compatible Stereo Sound Card
Keyboard & Mouse

Recommended System Requirements
Intel Pentium 4 or AMD Athlon XP processor (or better)
384(+) MB of RAM
16x DVD-ROM drive
4.7 GB of free Hard Disk space for a full install
128(+) MB Video Card with DirectX 9 compatible drivers ("GeForce4" or better)
DirectX 9 compatible Surround Sound Card
Game pad with twin axis analog controls (USB or Joystick Port)
Keyboard & Mouse

  • Ryan


  • Zaibatsu
  • Joined: 10 Apr 2006
  • Canada


Posted 01 May 2010 - 03:24 PM

Neither PC is overly great, however they should run San Andreas. Don't expect to run GTA IV on them though.

  • radioman

    Big Homie

  • Members
  • Joined: 19 Apr 2006


Posted 01 May 2010 - 06:34 PM Edited by radioman, 01 May 2010 - 06:37 PM.

The second one will run SA better, as the first one has an AMD Sempron processor, and from experiance, with an Sempron processor, you will only get around 10-15fps. That is the processor my old XP laptop has, and that is all it gets with SA and it only gets around 20fps max. with III and VC. If that is the results on XP, I doubt it will even run on Windows 7 with a Sempron processor.? you'll be a lot better off saving your money and getting a PC that has higher specs.-I mean for example, Wal-Mart.com has A LOT of low price laptops and desktops that have higher specs than what you posted.

But, neither PC is capable of running IV or the EFLC.

  • Lioshenka

    KGB agent

  • Members
  • Joined: 04 Jul 2006
  • Wales


Posted 01 May 2010 - 11:04 PM

I've got 5-year old Toshiba Satellite. Running SA on medium settings is not a problem. I am on XP, but suppose installing Kubuntu will make it even faster.

  • Krawk


  • Feroci
  • Joined: 23 Sep 2009
  • None


Posted 03 May 2010 - 12:04 AM

I have seen Quad core machines run SA like crap because they always seem to put a total crap video card (often times integrated chip)in them. If my fps is not = the refresh rate there's that dizzy/drunk feeling you always seem to get when panning the camera.

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users