|QUOTE (fullmetal @ May 26 2009, 14:14)|
|QUOTE (Jesus'En'Hitler420 @ May 26 2009, 19:55)|
| Gawd, I wish it was 2002 and the first CoD was coming out, that'd be worth the hype. |
The hype was justified back then ... the hype with CoD2, CoD4 and the 'small hype' with World at War weren't justified.
And so goddamn true... I'm going to reinstall the good ol' CoD games again.
You know what? You've been going on and on and on about how sh*tty the CoD games have been since CoD2, and that anyone who disagrees with you is a 12 year old playing CoD4 on an Xbox 360, gizzing buckets about the UAV. Well, allow me to gizz buckets all over your ludicrous idea.
Remember playing Doom when it was still spanking new? Hey, I do!
Remember playing Duke Nukem 3D when it was still spanking new? Hey, I do! I was, like, 6 years old!
Remember all those hours you spent playing Quake 3: Arena? Hey, I do!
Remember how mind blowing the first Rainbow Six game was? Hey, I do!
Remember playing Half-Life the day it came out? Hey, I do!
Remember playing Goldeneye 007 for hours on end, unlocking all the cheats? Hey, I do!
Remember playing Conter-Strike for hours on end, too? Hey, I do!
Remember the first CoD, with that unheard of multiplayer pacing, and that insane Stalingrad mission? Hey, I do!
Remember your dick exploding when you finally got your hands on the Gravity Gun in Half-Life 2? Hey, I do!
Well, I could keep going on, but let me get down to how all this makes you an idiot.
So, all that's gotta say I'm a pretty experienced PC FPS player. I've got about a decade and a half of hardcore PC FPS experience under my belt, and I don't think I've yet to play any major PC FPS. Wanna know the best FPS I have ever played?
WHY, CALL OF DUTY 4.... ON THE XBOX 360! GHASP! Maybe I need to sh*t all over your reasons why CoD4 sucked, too.
Seems you like to bitch a lot about the UAV. Well, sir, the UAV is f*cking genius. It does three things brilliantly well: 1.) it rewards a player for getting a 3-kill-streak, something that should be rewarded with something other than a guy going "OMG U KILD 3 GUIZ" 2.) it increases the already intensely fast pace of the CoD multiplayer matches, which can only be a f*cking good thing because no FPS has ever been filled with enough action 3.) It can be used as a tactical device for extremely good teamwork in more tight, no-respawn gametypes. If someone gets a UAV and saves it, it can be what makes or breaks your victory come the final round in Search and Destroy.
BUT IT MUST JUST BE AN UNFAIR ADVANTAGE HANDED OUT TO ANYONE FOR ANY REASON!
You seem to like to bitch a lot about the weapons, too. Well, let me ask you this: is the standard issue rifle for a US Marine an M1 Garand? F*ck no, it's not. Let's say they made the game take place in your precious WW2, where your precious M1 Garand waits for you. I sure as f*ck wouldn't have played the game, and I seriously doubt you would have either, because WW2 is f*cking boring. Now, I mowed those 12 year olds down like they were sacks of bricks with f*cking pistols. I went on a 50 game win streak, sir, and you can look up my f*cking gamertag if you wanna see if you can try to call me out in a lie. I hate using this argument, but maybe you just sucked. But I don't think it was maybe you sucked. You sucked. Your argument where you're the only one who has any "good" shooter experience and everyone else is an idiot falls through, too. Don't insult my intelligence, and I won't insult yours.
As for another CoD game, honestly, keep them coming. I can't say I've played any of the Treyarch games in the series, and I seriously doubt I will, but they sell like hotcakes. If they sell like hotcakes, that means IW is going to get a greenlight to develop whatever f*cking CoD game they can think of, which only brings more brilliance, across the board, at 60 f*cking frames per second, with multiplayer that makes me wonder how the hell I ever got into any other game's multiplayer in the first place.