Quantcast

Jump to content

» «
Photo

GTAAA SAS

22 replies to this topic
SamuelColdmark1994
  • SamuelColdmark1994

    Crackhead

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 26 Jul 2008

#1

Posted 30 August 2008 - 08:10 PM Edited by SamuelColdmark1994, 30 August 2008 - 08:16 PM.

Here is my idea of GTA: San Andreas Stories.
You play in the late 80s, pretty cool or? .
Ok, im not rasict but this time you play as a with guy because here is not "Grove-Babe-Streeta style broe" lol.
All the rich people lives in LS: Richman,Mulholland,Rodeo etc, and Some lives in Las Venturas. The guy who "trying" to run the town is Little Devil togheter with Big Devil (but they will be killed by you soon).
The guy who own "Fools Blasted Records" (whatever "They" call it ?) is Jimmy Silverman (From GTA:SA, you know!)
The ghetto is full of GanBangerz and all sort of people.
San Fierro - the city of rest, (In the game) hippies, and Drugs`n`sh*t. A pretty cool and old town westnorth of LS.
Bayside is based north of SF there goes Ferrys over to San Fierro and it will cost around 10$ ...Las Venuras is next. A city of much more difference, here you will find all Casinos,good motels and Porno, hopely. The guy who work on the four dragons casino is Brian (Another Brian) he takes all the peoples money, thats pretty nasty. Outside LV you will find a military base in the desert.

Character: You escaped fron the yell when you where in London, BUT now you`re freeman and all and now you taking revenge. and.....?

SamuelColdmark1994
  • SamuelColdmark1994

    Crackhead

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 26 Jul 2008

#2

Posted 30 August 2008 - 08:17 PM

Oh, im sorry i post this in wrong forum. fukking tired.

Gadzooks
  • Gadzooks

    bang

  • Members
  • Joined: 10 May 2007

#3

Posted 31 August 2008 - 05:15 PM

QUOTE (SamuelColdmark1994 @ Aug 30 2008, 20:10)
Ok, im not rasict but this time you play as a with guy because here is not "Grove-Babe-Streeta style broe" lol.

suicidal.gif

Flesh-n-Bone
  • Flesh-n-Bone

    OG

  • Members
  • Joined: 17 Feb 2008
  • Sweden

#4

Posted 31 August 2008 - 05:19 PM

SAS should be based on Los Santos again. Because the ghetto is the best a GTA should plan in making.

DC93
  • DC93

    Mako Eyes.

  • Members
  • Joined: 25 Aug 2008

#5

Posted 31 August 2008 - 05:31 PM

If it's gonna be gangbanger based then I'd say play as one of the Balla OG's in the same time line as San Andreas was. What was going on a little bit before CJ came to Los Santos and after the Grove lost their power

Plus this smacks of the story written in Writers Discussion by Unvirginiser sigh.gif

WillE
  • WillE

    Pot Head

  • Members
  • Joined: 26 Jun 2007

#6

Posted 01 September 2008 - 04:10 AM

If you weren't trying to be racist you wouldn't have said that.

Instead you should've said something such as "somone who isnt known in the area, such as Niko to Liberty City"

and next time don't say your not trying to be racist.

Atleast then you won't seem like a complete ass.

SamuelColdmark1994
  • SamuelColdmark1994

    Crackhead

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 26 Jul 2008

#7

Posted 01 September 2008 - 06:29 PM

QUOTE (Flesh-n-Bone @ Aug 31 2008, 17:19)
SAS should be based on Los Santos again. Because the ghetto is the best a GTA should plan in making.

NO way dude...i hate the - "Ghetto-Stories" so..

SamuelColdmark1994
  • SamuelColdmark1994

    Crackhead

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 26 Jul 2008

#8

Posted 01 September 2008 - 06:30 PM

QUOTE (WillE @ Sep 1 2008, 04:10)
If you weren't trying to be racist you wouldn't have said that.

Instead you should've said something such as "somone who isnt known in the area, such as Niko to Liberty City"

and next time don't say your not trying to be racist.

Atleast then you won't seem like a complete ass.

lol

Flesh-n-Bone
  • Flesh-n-Bone

    OG

  • Members
  • Joined: 17 Feb 2008
  • Sweden

#9

Posted 01 September 2008 - 07:46 PM

QUOTE (SamuelColdmark1994 @ Sep 1 2008, 20:29)
QUOTE (Flesh-n-Bone @ Aug 31 2008, 17:19)
SAS should be based on Los Santos again. Because the ghetto is the best a GTA should plan in making.

NO way dude...i hate the - "Ghetto-Stories" so..

The opposite, I hate the stories you like actually. In case why do you hate the "ghetto-stories"? Is it because it's based on black people or what?

And next time use the edit button when you have something to add and don't double post.

WelcomeToLibertyCity
  • WelcomeToLibertyCity

    City of Angels

  • Members
  • Joined: 26 Aug 2008

#10

Posted 02 September 2008 - 03:27 PM

i think the ghetto stories are kinda fun, alot of action and everything, so if R* does make another SA hopefully it'll be about a guy from grove or ballas icon14.gif

Bgile5
  • Bgile5

    CARPE DIEM

  • Members
  • Joined: 31 Mar 2007

#11

Posted 03 September 2008 - 12:04 AM

QUOTE (Flesh-n-Bone @ Sep 1 2008, 19:46)
QUOTE (SamuelColdmark1994 @ Sep 1 2008, 20:29)
QUOTE (Flesh-n-Bone @ Aug 31 2008, 17:19)
SAS should be based on Los Santos again. Because the ghetto is the best a GTA should plan in making.

NO way dude...i hate the - "Ghetto-Stories" so..

The opposite, I hate the stories you like actually. In case why do you hate the "ghetto-stories"? Is it because it's based on black people or what?

And next time use the edit button when you have something to add and don't double post.

are you implying that only black people are ghetto?

Mzeppelin
  • Mzeppelin

    The Don

  • Members
  • Joined: 16 Aug 2005

#12

Posted 03 September 2008 - 05:11 AM

QUOTE (SamuelColdmark1994 @ Aug 30 2008, 20:10)
Character: You escaped fron the yell when you where in London, BUT now you`re freeman and all and now you taking revenge. and.....?

No thanks. I don't want to play as an Englishman in GTA.

Flesh-n-Bone
  • Flesh-n-Bone

    OG

  • Members
  • Joined: 17 Feb 2008
  • Sweden

#13

Posted 03 September 2008 - 12:51 PM

QUOTE (Bgile5 @ Sep 3 2008, 02:04)
QUOTE (Flesh-n-Bone @ Sep 1 2008, 19:46)
QUOTE (SamuelColdmark1994 @ Sep 1 2008, 20:29)
QUOTE (Flesh-n-Bone @ Aug 31 2008, 17:19)
SAS should be based on Los Santos again. Because the ghetto is the best a GTA should plan in making.

NO way dude...i hate the - "Ghetto-Stories" so..

The opposite, I hate the stories you like actually. In case why do you hate the "ghetto-stories"? Is it because it's based on black people or what?

And next time use the edit button when you have something to add and don't double post.

are you implying that only black people are ghetto?

Nope I didn't say that, what SC1994 said was that he hates the ghetto stories, specifically the Grove Street one which is mainly black's.

SamuelColdmark1994
  • SamuelColdmark1994

    Crackhead

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 26 Jul 2008

#14

Posted 03 September 2008 - 01:29 PM

QUOTE (Flesh-n-Bone @ Sep 3 2008, 12:51)
QUOTE (Bgile5 @ Sep 3 2008, 02:04)
QUOTE (Flesh-n-Bone @ Sep 1 2008, 19:46)
QUOTE (SamuelColdmark1994 @ Sep 1 2008, 20:29)
QUOTE (Flesh-n-Bone @ Aug 31 2008, 17:19)
SAS should be based on Los Santos again. Because the ghetto is the best a GTA should plan in making.

NO way dude...i hate the - "Ghetto-Stories" so..

The opposite, I hate the stories you like actually. In case why do you hate the "ghetto-stories"? Is it because it's based on black people or what?

And next time use the edit button when you have something to add and don't double post.

are you implying that only black people are ghetto?

Nope I didn't say that, what SC1994 said was that he hates the ghetto stories, specifically the Grove Street one which is mainly black's.

Yep! jag är inte rasist ok! men de skulle ju bli trist om man bara sprang runt ghettot och att allting skulle vara "riktat" på just bara ghetto, vem har sagt att jag inte gillar svarta människor`? lol

Flesh-n-Bone
  • Flesh-n-Bone

    OG

  • Members
  • Joined: 17 Feb 2008
  • Sweden

#15

Posted 03 September 2008 - 01:35 PM

Nej det skulle ej. Jag bara sa det för ghetto är mest om svarta, spela där skulle bli det bästa jag har varit med om. San Andreas var inte alls riktat på ghetton, det fanns tre städer av nån anledning.


To everyone else: Nothing really interesting is said in this post so don't bother searching for a translator. sigh.gif

beavis
  • beavis

    Lone Wolf

  • $outh $ide Hoodz
  • Joined: 28 Apr 2002

#16

Posted 03 September 2008 - 04:42 PM

Your idea went down the sh*t hole when you said the names, "Little Devil" and "Big Devil". Great job on the originality.

I agree too, If there's gonna be a San Andreas Stories, your character should revolve around the ghetto. I love the grime and dirtyness of Grove Street, It gave you a sense of watching early 90's gangster films like "Blood In Blood Out" or "Boys in the Hood".

tmac9wr
  • tmac9wr

    Peon

  • Members
  • Joined: 04 Mar 2007

#17

Posted 03 September 2008 - 05:18 PM

I like the idea of a San Andreas-based game being more based on the glitz and glamor of Los Santos and Las Venturas. I didn't mind that Sweet wanted to stay true to his roots when he got out of prison, but I hated that he was against making money and thought the story was pretty weak other than that. When you think about it, what the hell did the Grove Street guys do in order to make cash? Basically all they did was say "go get that territory" or "go destroy that crack". There was no cash inflow! I thought it was weak that Sweet never did anything to make cash, but then when CJ made money he called him a sell-out.

I don't mind the Ghetto-style storyline, even though I like the others better, but I thought it was so frustrating that Sweet impeded progress throughout the game. "Grove Street's back!" back to what? You guys don't do anything other than control territory! They didn't sell drugs, they didn't sell guns, they didn't run protection rackets (as far as I can remember), all they did was run around and hate the Ballas. I agree with SC1994 with not liking the "ghetto-storyline" if it's going to have the same attitude as the previous game.

Being gangster isn't about being true to your hood, etc...it's about making the cash. You definitely don't stab people in the back like Ryder and Big Smoke, but you don't form a street gang in order to make the community better. Ghetto storylines aren't bad, R* just decided to make it so your gang didn't do bad stuff, which in turn made the story weak.

Flesh-n-Bone
  • Flesh-n-Bone

    OG

  • Members
  • Joined: 17 Feb 2008
  • Sweden

#18

Posted 03 September 2008 - 05:23 PM

At least I liked it more than money-making only storyline's. Such as GTA3, IV and LCS. You just work for everybody in a big city just to make some money, I'm rather out for a storyline with a target rather than kill this guy and drive over there bs. And SA's storyline was based on many things - business, gang, hood and even working for government, great variety.

Omnia sunt Communia
  • Omnia sunt Communia

    Tierra Y Libertad

  • Members
  • Joined: 12 Aug 2008
  • None

#19

Posted 03 September 2008 - 08:26 PM

I'd rather play as Guppy (Woozie's Right Hand Man) two years before the events of San Andreas, you'd be an illegal immigrant who has to complete jobs for The Triads in order to pay for your transport from Hong Kong.

Gadzooks
  • Gadzooks

    bang

  • Members
  • Joined: 10 May 2007

#20

Posted 04 September 2008 - 02:24 PM

QUOTE (beavis @ Sep 3 2008, 16:42)
Your idea went down the sh*t hole when you said the names, "Little Devil" and "Big Devil". Great job on the originality.

I agree too, If there's gonna be a San Andreas Stories, your character should revolve around the ghetto. I love the grime and dirtyness of Grove Street, It gave you a sense of watching early 90's gangster films like "Blood In Blood Out" or "Boys in the Hood".

..Those are actual characters from San Andreas you f*cking retard..

tmac9wr
  • tmac9wr

    Peon

  • Members
  • Joined: 04 Mar 2007

#21

Posted 04 September 2008 - 02:35 PM

QUOTE (Flesh-n-Bone @ Sep 3 2008, 17:23)
At least I liked it more than money-making only storyline's. Such as GTA3, IV and LCS. You just work for everybody in a big city just to make some money, I'm rather out for a storyline with a target rather than kill this guy and drive over there bs. And SA's storyline was based on many things - business, gang, hood and even working for government, great variety.

I'm not sure what you mean by "money-making only storylines"....every storyline revolves around making money. The only missions from SA that I can think of that didn't involve making money were when you were working for the Gov. in order to get Sweet out of jail, and when you were going to exact your revenge on Sweet, Ryder, and Tenpenny. I'm not sure why you included IV on your list of the blatant "Money-making storylines" since the whole story revolved around Niko getting revenge on the man who betrayed him. He works for the Mafia and Government in order to get to this person, just like CJ used the government to get Sweet.

I wasn't saying before that I didn't like the Ghetto-based storyline, I just didn't like San Andreas' ghetto-storyline. The rest of SA's storyline was great in my opinion.

Did anyone on this board enjoy the fact that Sweet didn't do anything but call you a sell-out for making money? Did any of you enjoy the fact that all Sweet ever wanted you to do was go mess with the Ballas and spray-paint "Grove St" in other sections of the city? The only time you ever did anything that made money was for Ryder or Smoke.

I guess what I'm saying is Sweet was one of the worst characters ever...he should have been more of a badass.

Sergi
  • Sergi

    Foot Soldier

  • Members
  • Joined: 24 Jul 2008

#22

Posted 04 September 2008 - 02:56 PM

QUOTE (tmac9wr @ Sep 4 2008, 14:35)
QUOTE (Flesh-n-Bone @ Sep 3 2008, 17:23)
At least I liked it more than money-making only storyline's.  Such as GTA3, IV and LCS. You just work for everybody in a big city just to make some money, I'm rather out for a storyline with a target rather than kill this guy and drive over there bs. And SA's storyline was based on many things - business, gang, hood and even working for government, great variety.

I'm not sure what you mean by "money-making only storylines"....every storyline revolves around making money. The only missions from SA that I can think of that didn't involve making money were when you were working for the Gov. in order to get Sweet out of jail, and when you were going to exact your revenge on Sweet, Ryder, and Tenpenny. I'm not sure why you included IV on your list of the blatant "Money-making storylines" since the whole story revolved around Niko getting revenge on the man who betrayed him. He works for the Mafia and Government in order to get to this person, just like CJ used the government to get Sweet.

I wasn't saying before that I didn't like the Ghetto-based storyline, I just didn't like San Andreas' ghetto-storyline. The rest of SA's storyline was great in my opinion.

Did anyone on this board enjoy the fact that Sweet didn't do anything but call you a sell-out for making money? Did any of you enjoy the fact that all Sweet ever wanted you to do was go mess with the Ballas and spray-paint "Grove St" in other sections of the city? The only time you ever did anything that made money was for Ryder or Smoke.

I guess what I'm saying is Sweet was one of the worst characters ever...he should have been more of a badass.

The "Hood" aspect of SA could have easily been done alot better but it was still a great part of the game. When SA was 1st unveiled the "Hood" storyline and gameplay aspect seemed alot better executed then it actually was.

And yes Sweet seemed like a bad ass in beta SA pictures and video but the final outcome of Sweet was a f*cking loser. I wish Ryder would have been CJ's brother instead of Sweet.

Flesh-n-Bone
  • Flesh-n-Bone

    OG

  • Members
  • Joined: 17 Feb 2008
  • Sweden

#23

Posted 06 September 2008 - 10:47 PM

QUOTE (Sergi @ Sep 4 2008, 16:56)
QUOTE (tmac9wr @ Sep 4 2008, 14:35)
QUOTE (Flesh-n-Bone @ Sep 3 2008, 17:23)
At least I liked it more than money-making only storyline's.  Such as GTA3, IV and LCS. You just work for everybody in a big city just to make some money, I'm rather out for a storyline with a target rather than kill this guy and drive over there bs. And SA's storyline was based on many things - business, gang, hood and even working for government, great variety.

I'm not sure what you mean by "money-making only storylines"....every storyline revolves around making money. The only missions from SA that I can think of that didn't involve making money were when you were working for the Gov. in order to get Sweet out of jail, and when you were going to exact your revenge on Sweet, Ryder, and Tenpenny. I'm not sure why you included IV on your list of the blatant "Money-making storylines" since the whole story revolved around Niko getting revenge on the man who betrayed him. He works for the Mafia and Government in order to get to this person, just like CJ used the government to get Sweet.

I wasn't saying before that I didn't like the Ghetto-based storyline, I just didn't like San Andreas' ghetto-storyline. The rest of SA's storyline was great in my opinion.

Did anyone on this board enjoy the fact that Sweet didn't do anything but call you a sell-out for making money? Did any of you enjoy the fact that all Sweet ever wanted you to do was go mess with the Ballas and spray-paint "Grove St" in other sections of the city? The only time you ever did anything that made money was for Ryder or Smoke.

I guess what I'm saying is Sweet was one of the worst characters ever...he should have been more of a badass.

The "Hood" aspect of SA could have easily been done alot better but it was still a great part of the game. When SA was 1st unveiled the "Hood" storyline and gameplay aspect seemed alot better executed then it actually was.

And yes Sweet seemed like a bad ass in beta SA pictures and video but the final outcome of Sweet was a f*cking loser. I wish Ryder would have been CJ's brother instead of Sweet.

Ryder was f*ckin' awesome, wish he didn't betray you.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users