|QUOTE (Flesh-n-Bone @ May 10 2008, 10:16)|
|QUOTE (Stefan. @ May 10 2008, 04:00)|
| @Flesh-Bone: You idiot, have you seen how good the gameplay is in IV? Ooh, your bitty little Minigun didn't make it into the game, does that make it all of a sudden a crap game? I bet that you haven't even played the gmae yet, so it's absolutely stupid and naive to assume that a game is all of a sudden crap because a Flamethrowe didn't make it in. You also have no idea what's in IV.|
Also, GC, don't criticise someone for making a double post when you yourself made a deliberate one in a topic around here a few days/weeks ago.
I'm no idiot, I played it in a friends house, I wasn't blown away at all as much as people rate it. But it's gameplay wont beat San Andreas'. SA rules all the way. Plus I'm sick of that east coast piece of sh*t "Liberty City".
And Keyboard + mouse > console
You must be from the west coast.
You just hate GTA IV because it's based on NYC and you like SA for the opposite.
My cents in. I like the better games as well. It can be very old but as long it's fun it gets my vote. Many people up GTAIV with it's looks and are more of a graphic whore.
I was never bothered by the graphics in GTA as long it gave me the fun freedom. In fact, I was never bothered by ANY kind of graphics in any game. I get really confused when people say GTAIV graphics are bad.
I can't complain about GTAIV if I had never played (I actually want it to play) it though.
I also agree with mixmaster.