|QUOTE (Brace @ Jul 9 2008, 20:17)|
Well i would love that, but unfortunately i don't think we'll ever see that because it would have to
deal with political issues, which they wouldn't have the balls to do
Jump to content
Posted 09 July 2008 - 11:11 PM
|QUOTE (Brace @ Jul 9 2008, 20:17)|
Posted 10 July 2008 - 05:24 PM
|QUOTE (ALabamaGamer @ Jul 9 2008, 18:54)|
I completely agree with OG Bobby Johnson (lol). I couldn't have said it better myself.
Get over VC and SA. Its in the past. Move the hell on. Yes, they were good and great and wonderful but you all are limiting the possibilities. Why in the world would you want to replay the same two games, the same two maps when there could be something bigger and better?!
Posted 11 July 2008 - 02:27 AM
Posted 11 July 2008 - 05:31 AM
|QUOTE (Shadownet @ Jul 9 2008, 01:31)|
|It can be set in Vice City, but this time I recommend a modern one, probably in year 2009 and 2010...|
Posted 11 July 2008 - 05:45 AM
|QUOTE (KevinR1990 @ Jul 9 2008, 04:30)|
|-Chicago: ...and its setting in the Roaring Twenties...|
Posted 11 July 2008 - 05:47 AM
|QUOTE (tmac9wr @ Jul 11 2008, 05:31)|
You have to understand that you can't have Vice City set in modern times. It has to be the 80s. Miami was on fire during the 80s, it was the peak of crime, money and corruption. The people who are saying "hey lets have a modern Vice City!" are probably fans of Bad Boyz II or something, becuase they think it'd be cool to be involved with the stupid ecstacy trade. The simple answer is, Miami in the 80s was the.place.to.be. The style and nostalgia of the 1980s is so befitting of the GTA series that it would be a shame if they didn't take another crack at it. The thought of being able to have shootouts in neon-clad clubs in Vice City is awesome.
The past GTA focused on "rags to less-rags", but the move to Vice City as a coke dealer would allow people to fulfill their fantasies of being a drug kingpin and purchasing all the absurdly excessive items that goes along with that status. Hell, R* could even make dozens and dozens of new purchasable items available for download after the release. I feel like many of the developers at R* grew up in the 80s, and the absurd culture of the 80s will be too much to pass up for our guys at R*....I would be perfectly happy waiting another 2-3 years for a new GTA game if it meant we were returning to 1980s Vice City.
Posted 11 July 2008 - 05:58 AM
Posted 11 July 2008 - 06:07 AM
|QUOTE (006 @ Jul 11 2008, 05:58)|
| GTA III doesn't take place in 2008, it takes place in 2001. There has been a lot of progress in these seven years. Enough to make the two games different. Plus, the city has been changed alot.|
What you're asking for is ANOTHER Vice city game to take place in the 80's, and i assume in the same three years GTA: VC took place in. Not enough progress to spawn another game with those settings.
So, what you're asking for is just a port of Vice city with better graphics and changed buildings, instead of an entirely different game, basically.
Posted 11 July 2008 - 11:30 PM
|QUOTE (The BigSlick @ Jul 10 2008, 17:24)|
ok then.. think about it this way, if Rockstar never called GTA 4's Liberty City, Liberty City, would you lot still complain? Its totaly diffrent..
Posted 12 July 2008 - 01:11 AM Edited by Mark Pagliaro, 12 July 2008 - 01:29 AM.
Posted 12 July 2008 - 01:41 AM
|QUOTE (YouMeSupreme @ Jul 8 2008, 01:48)|
| I want this|
With Miami, Orlando, New Orleans, Houston, Havana and Port-au-Prince as the main cities. Doubt it is gonna happen though. What concerns me most about the next GTA is if R* are finally going to give us enough ways to spend cash...imagine playing on this map and being able to buy yachts, any apartment, all kinds of vehicles, your own air/seaport or business or f*** it why not Disneyland?
Posted 12 July 2008 - 02:22 AM Edited by krashdown, 12 July 2008 - 02:25 AM.
Posted 12 July 2008 - 02:30 AM
Posted 12 July 2008 - 06:47 PM
Posted 25 September 2013 - 01:21 PM
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users