Do we really need threads like these still? Same threads are in VC section.
It's simple, when they created VC they obviously didn't know they will at one point in the future milk the franchise with two off spin games that are the Stories games, that's why original Vic doesn't look like Vic we got to play later. He was made as a random character that was never supposed to have any bigger role. The original Vic looks too bad to be a character, so they changed his design for VCS where he's the lead character and is supposed to look cool and not like a hobo.
But it is him who dies, and that's it, confirmed by Rockstar who make the story, and by the story itself. There are two brothers who deal drugs out of three (and Pete is not one of them), one brother treated Lance as a kid (and Pete is not the one) so you take a guess now which one is it that dies after eliminating Pete and obviously Lance from the equation.
It ain`t even worth to bother. There were some good coments in this topic about why it was Vic who died and all the explanation why it wasn`t Pete. I wrote alot on this myself too, but it seems that some people wont even read, they just go for their own "right", so every word that you write in the topics like this is a waste of time.
No matter how many times you show them good reasons from A to Z why it WAS Vic who died and no Pete, they will still go with this Pete nonsense. We explained to them like a hundred times already why Vic in VC looks diferent than in VCS or how come he is still in drug bussines and why he has hispanic dialect etc, but yet they will still coming up with this stupid conclusions; "it was pete because vic had a different looks and accent" Lol
I give up on this one.