Quantcast

Jump to content

» «
Photo

I would like a sig

28 replies to this topic
blindsk8er6d9
  • blindsk8er6d9

    Z

  • Members
  • Joined: 06 Nov 2002

#1

Posted 18 June 2005 - 01:57 AM

I want a sig that has to do with WWE divas. it can have either:

Trish Stratus
or
Stacy Kiebler
or
a combination of both.

It dosn't matter how big it is or what font, just something that looks good. I am not going to provide pictures. I like it to be a suprise to see what good stuff you guys can come up with. Thank you to anyone who tries.

Oh and I want my name in it. THANX!

TheRoper
  • TheRoper

    West Coast

  • $outh $ide Hoodz
  • Joined: 17 Feb 2005

#2

Posted 18 June 2005 - 03:46 PM

watch for an edit, possibly...

Krusty.
  • Krusty.

    La Famiglia Di Corleone

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 11 Jun 2004

#3

Posted 18 June 2005 - 09:27 PM Edited by Krusteee, 18 June 2005 - 09:32 PM.

I think its Stacy Kiebler...

user posted image

user posted image

If you dont like them just say and i will have a bash at making you another one...

Vanillainy
  • Vanillainy

    Fancy Clown.

  • Zaibatsu
  • Joined: 25 Feb 2005

#4

Posted 19 June 2005 - 04:29 PM

...... Ok then this is my first ever siggy creation for somebody im new to doing this so sorry if its sh*t!
Ill get better:user posted image
..........

blindsk8er6d9
  • blindsk8er6d9

    Z

  • Members
  • Joined: 06 Nov 2002

#5

Posted 21 June 2005 - 05:59 PM

I will wait a while to see if TheRoper has anything and then if not, I will take yours Krusteee. Thanks to both of you though!

DiVaio
  • DiVaio

    ...

  • Members
  • Joined: 20 May 2004

#6

Posted 21 June 2005 - 07:19 PM

Funkychunky, please don't become the next Luke2004...

Anyways, here's my attempt:

user posted image

user posted image

Vanillainy
  • Vanillainy

    Fancy Clown.

  • Zaibatsu
  • Joined: 25 Feb 2005

#7

Posted 21 June 2005 - 07:20 PM

.......Why?Are you saying mine are sh*t? ..........

yngve
  • yngve

    Jävla Hårdrock.

  • Members
  • Joined: 01 Dec 2004

#8

Posted 21 June 2005 - 07:47 PM

QUOTE (funkychunky @ Jun 21 2005, 21:20)
.......Why?Are you saying mine are sh*t? ..........





Well, a few friendly observations:

1. The quality of the image is horrible.
2. It's to big, big signature often = bad signature. (it's larger then the rules allow even, 152pxl in hieght.)
3. The border looks horrible.
4. The font dose'nt match at all.

Vanillainy
  • Vanillainy

    Fancy Clown.

  • Zaibatsu
  • Joined: 25 Feb 2005

#9

Posted 21 June 2005 - 08:03 PM

OH well its my first ever try so..Off topic:wot about mine?

DiVaio
  • DiVaio

    ...

  • Members
  • Joined: 20 May 2004

#10

Posted 21 June 2005 - 08:12 PM

Well it can't be judged to be honest, because it's just a picture with a name and a border. You're probably using gimp or something like that and I know Luke2004 used it as well and posted crappy attempts most of the time.
If you try to keep the quality of the pictures you use high and don't add an ugly border like you did on your attempt, sigs can still look good, no mather what program.
Just try practising a lot and you'll probably get better. Good luck with it.

ThaddeusMcKlown
  • ThaddeusMcKlown

    With the birds I'll share this lonely view...

  • Andolini Mafia Family
  • Joined: 05 Dec 2004

#11

Posted 21 June 2005 - 08:46 PM Edited by ThaddeusMcKlown, 21 June 2005 - 08:50 PM.

QUOTE (DiVaio @ Jun 21 2005, 16:12)
Well it can't be judged to be honest, because it's just a picture with a name and a border. You're probably using gimp or something like that and I know Luke2004 used it as well and posted crappy attempts most of the time.
If you try to keep the quality of the pictures you use high and don't add an ugly border like you did on your attempt, sigs can still look good, no mather what program.
Just try practising a lot and you'll probably get better. Good luck with it.

AHEM.... *Gets offended at GIMP comments*

luke's attempts sucekd, but it's not the GIMP's fault
-TM-

Sweets
  • Sweets

    Pяopagaиda Iиc.

  • Members
  • Joined: 18 Dec 2004
  • Unknown

#12

Posted 21 June 2005 - 08:56 PM

Yeah, it's the skill not the program.
I suck, and all my crap comes from gimp, but don't blame gimp for my lack of skill, blame me for being totally without talent. I've seen viddy make things with paint that were so good that my head almost exploded.

And I don't like anything posted yet. At least Krusteee's were clear, but they need borders.

DiVaio
  • DiVaio

    ...

  • Members
  • Joined: 20 May 2004

#13

Posted 21 June 2005 - 09:22 PM Edited by DiVaio, 21 June 2005 - 09:44 PM.

QUOTE (ThaddeusMcKlown @ Jun 21 2005, 20:46)
QUOTE (DiVaio @ Jun 21 2005, 16:12)
Well it can't be judged to be honest, because it's just a picture with a name and a border. You're probably using gimp or something like that and I know Luke2004 used it as well and posted crappy attempts most of the time.
If you try to keep the quality of the pictures you use high and don't add an ugly border like you did on your attempt, sigs can still look good, no mather what program.
Just try practising a lot and you'll probably get better. Good luck with it.

AHEM.... *Gets offended at GIMP comments*

luke's attempts sucekd, but it's not the GIMP's fault
-TM-

That's what I said, if you'd read more carefully before posting you'd probably have read this:

QUOTE
sigs can still look good, no mather what program.




Edit:

I found better quality pictures, I noticed some major jpeg spots in my last attempt.

user posted image

CODE
http://img76.echo.cx/img76/3374/bs39tz.gif


user posted image

CODE
http://img272.echo.cx/img272/5703/bs45dy.gif

ThaddeusMcKlown
  • ThaddeusMcKlown

    With the birds I'll share this lonely view...

  • Andolini Mafia Family
  • Joined: 05 Dec 2004

#14

Posted 21 June 2005 - 09:38 PM

QUOTE (DiVaio @ Jun 21 2005, 17:22)
QUOTE (ThaddeusMcKlown @ Jun 21 2005, 20:46)
QUOTE (DiVaio @ Jun 21 2005, 16:12)
Well it can't be judged to be honest, because it's just a picture with a name and a border. You're probably using gimp or something like that and I know Luke2004 used it as well and posted crappy attempts most of the time.
If you try to keep the quality of the pictures you use high and don't add an ugly border like you did on your attempt, sigs can still look good, no mather what program.
Just try practising a lot and you'll probably get better. Good luck with it.

AHEM.... *Gets offended at GIMP comments*

luke's attempts sucekd, but it's not the GIMP's fault
-TM-

That's what I said, if you'd read more carefully before posting you'd probably have read this:

QUOTE
sigs can still look good, no mather what program.



Oops, my bad blush.gif
-TM-

yngve
  • yngve

    Jävla Hårdrock.

  • Members
  • Joined: 01 Dec 2004

#15

Posted 21 June 2005 - 09:46 PM Edited by yngve, 21 June 2005 - 09:48 PM.

QUOTE (ThaddeusMcKlown @ Jun 21 2005, 23:38)
QUOTE (DiVaio @ Jun 21 2005, 17:22)
QUOTE (ThaddeusMcKlown @ Jun 21 2005, 20:46)
QUOTE (DiVaio @ Jun 21 2005, 16:12)
*TEXT*

AHEM.... *Gets offended at GIMP comments*

luke's attempts sucekd, but it's not the GIMP's fault
-TM-

[color=#31CE31]That's what I said, if you'd read more carefully before posting you'd probably have read this:

QUOTE
sigs can still look good, no mather what program.



Oops, my bad blush.gif
-TM-

Still, some programs require much more talent than others to get a decent result.





GIMP SUXXXX!!ONE!111 ph34r.gif sorry.

yngve
  • yngve

    Jävla Hårdrock.

  • Members
  • Joined: 01 Dec 2004

#16

Posted 21 June 2005 - 09:47 PM

Sorry for the double post. Ignore me!

blindsk8er6d9
  • blindsk8er6d9

    Z

  • Members
  • Joined: 06 Nov 2002

#17

Posted 22 June 2005 - 12:25 AM

Divaio I am really likeing that orange Trish one. but this topic is stillat the top, I will wait for more.

TheRoper
  • TheRoper

    West Coast

  • $outh $ide Hoodz
  • Joined: 17 Feb 2005

#18

Posted 22 June 2005 - 05:55 AM Edited by TheRoper, 22 June 2005 - 07:33 AM.

here's my stab at it:

user posted image
CODE
http://img60.echo.cx/img60/9985/blindsk8er6d98qk.gif

Chalkstar
  • Chalkstar

    QvsQ lab monkey

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 08 Nov 2004

#19

Posted 22 June 2005 - 06:24 AM

My attempt.

Sig:
user posted image

Ava: user posted image

yngve
  • yngve

    Jävla Hårdrock.

  • Members
  • Joined: 01 Dec 2004

#20

Posted 22 June 2005 - 07:21 AM Edited by yngve, 22 June 2005 - 07:25 AM.

user posted image
CODE
http://img193.echo.cx/img193/496/blindskaterava8pg.png


user posted image
CODE
[IMG]http://img193.echo.cx/img193/3549/blindskater6im.png[/IMG]


oki?

And, oh, Chalk, the avatar you made is too big, 64x64 pxls is the largest allowed.

blindsk8er6d9
  • blindsk8er6d9

    Z

  • Members
  • Joined: 06 Nov 2002

#21

Posted 22 June 2005 - 01:01 PM

Thanks to all that submited them, but I am taking chalkstars. Thankyou!

Mankind
  • Mankind

    Mark Chump

  • Members
  • Joined: 12 Jun 2005

#22

Posted 22 June 2005 - 02:43 PM

There's something wrong with Stacy's left foot. I think Chalkstar missed some of the are around Stacy's foot.

blindsk8er6d9
  • blindsk8er6d9

    Z

  • Members
  • Joined: 06 Nov 2002

#23

Posted 22 June 2005 - 03:15 PM

QUOTE (Mankind @ Jun 22 2005, 09:43)
There's something wrong with Stacy's left foot. I think Chalkstar missed some of the are around Stacy's foot.

Ohh sh*t. I didn't even notice that. I guess my eyes weren't looking at her feet.

Mankind
  • Mankind

    Mark Chump

  • Members
  • Joined: 12 Jun 2005

#24

Posted 23 June 2005 - 12:59 AM

QUOTE (blindsk8er6d9 @ Jun 22 2005, 15:15)
QUOTE (Mankind @ Jun 22 2005, 09:43)
There's something wrong with Stacy's left foot. I think Chalkstar missed some of the are around Stacy's foot.

Ohh sh*t. I didn't even notice that. I guess my eyes weren't looking at her feet.

Yeah, you need to get rid of that black area on her left heel.

Chalkstar
  • Chalkstar

    QvsQ lab monkey

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 08 Nov 2004

#25

Posted 23 June 2005 - 05:01 AM

QUOTE (Mankind @ Jun 23 2005, 10:59)
QUOTE (blindsk8er6d9 @ Jun 22 2005, 15:15)
QUOTE (Mankind @ Jun 22 2005, 09:43)
There's something wrong with Stacy's left foot. I think Chalkstar missed some of the are around Stacy's foot.

Ohh sh*t. I didn't even notice that. I guess my eyes weren't looking at her feet.

Yeah, you need to get rid of that black area on her left heel.

I'll fix that tonight. I saw it last night (after I posted) but didn't have time to edit and re-post. The edit will be posted soon.

TheRoper
  • TheRoper

    West Coast

  • $outh $ide Hoodz
  • Joined: 17 Feb 2005

#26

Posted 24 June 2005 - 05:24 AM Edited by TheRoper, 24 June 2005 - 03:43 PM.

QUOTE (Chalkstar2188 @ Jun 23 2005, 05:01)
QUOTE (Mankind @ Jun 23 2005, 10:59)
QUOTE (blindsk8er6d9 @ Jun 22 2005, 15:15)
QUOTE (Mankind @ Jun 22 2005, 09:43)
There's something wrong with Stacy's left foot. I think Chalkstar missed some of the are around Stacy's foot.

Ohh sh*t. I didn't even notice that. I guess my eyes weren't looking at her feet.

Yeah, you need to get rid of that black area on her left heel.

I'll fix that tonight. I saw it last night (after I posted) but didn't have time to edit and re-post. The edit will be posted soon.

also, her right leg disappears behind her left, just past the ankle... i do believe her calf on her right leg should be going down toward her arse...

Chalkstar
  • Chalkstar

    QvsQ lab monkey

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 08 Nov 2004

#27

Posted 24 June 2005 - 08:18 AM

Not sure how that leg disappeared.

user posted image

Whatever

blindsk8er6d9
  • blindsk8er6d9

    Z

  • Members
  • Joined: 06 Nov 2002

#28

Posted 24 June 2005 - 09:21 PM

Yup, thanks guys.

TheRoper
  • TheRoper

    West Coast

  • $outh $ide Hoodz
  • Joined: 17 Feb 2005

#29

Posted 25 June 2005 - 04:43 AM

i know you already chose chalkstar's, but i just realized that i forgot the "s" in your name in my first attempt blush.gif so, in an attempt to keep my dignity, i fixed it... i know you're not gonna use it, but whatever.

user posted image
CODE
http://img63.echo.cx/img63/5750/blindsk8er6d92et.gif




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users