Quantcast

Jump to content

» «
Photo

Can you rate this for me please?

18 replies to this topic
Luke2004
  • Luke2004

    You wanna leave? k. gtfo.

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 10 Nov 2004

#1

Posted 04 May 2005 - 06:40 PM Edited by Luke2004, 04 May 2005 - 07:38 PM.

I've recentely got GIMP and I was messing around and managed to get:
user posted image
the graphics design part is for me - something I do besides GTAForums, so ignore that.

Looking forward to reading those harsh comments. tounge.gif

EDIT:
Image 2:

user posted image

By the way:
I know it's plain and flashes a bit quick.

Technical Difficulty
  • Technical Difficulty

    Run for your life.

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 27 Nov 2004

#2

Posted 04 May 2005 - 06:51 PM

Not bad. Good mix of colors. Good position & such. If the font had a bit more to it, it would be better. But yes, not bad. 7/10

Sweets
  • Sweets

    Pяopagaиda Iиc.

  • Feroci Racing
  • Joined: 18 Dec 2004
  • Unknown

#3

Posted 04 May 2005 - 07:00 PM

I have gimp, and I suck with it, but you can make the frames blink slower by clicking dialogs, then layers, then select the layer you wish to change and right click, then select edit layer attributes. It normally defaults every layer to 100ms, so just change the number.

Luke2004
  • Luke2004

    You wanna leave? k. gtfo.

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 10 Nov 2004

#4

Posted 04 May 2005 - 07:05 PM

QUOTE (SWEETSAPRIK @ May 4 2005, 20:00)
I have gimp, and I suck with it, but you can make the frames blink slower by clicking dialogs, then layers, then select the layer you wish to change and right click, then select edit layer attributes. It normally defaults every layer to 100ms, so just change the number.

Thanks I didn't know that. I just changed it as I saved it, but it's the same way I guess?

@ Technical Difficulty.. Thanks, I thought that you guys wouldn't like it, but 7/10 isn't bad, for a 'newbie' at gimg, well I think anyway.

jelly
  • jelly

  • Moderator
  • Joined: 09 Sep 2002

#5

Posted 04 May 2005 - 07:16 PM

lens flares are evil.

it's okay other than that though

Sweets
  • Sweets

    Pяopagaиda Iиc.

  • Feroci Racing
  • Joined: 18 Dec 2004
  • Unknown

#6

Posted 04 May 2005 - 07:29 PM

QUOTE (Luke2004)
Thanks I didn't know that. I just changed it as I saved it, but it's the same way I guess?

I'm not sure what you mean.

user posted image

All of your layers are 100ms. You'll have to use that dialog, and change each frame individually the way I said in my last post, then save. It works for me when I try it.

Luke2004
  • Luke2004

    You wanna leave? k. gtfo.

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 10 Nov 2004

#7

Posted 04 May 2005 - 07:34 PM

QUOTE (SWEETSAPRIK @ May 4 2005, 20:29)
QUOTE (Luke2004)
Thanks I didn't know that. I just changed it as I saved it, but it's the same way I guess?

I'm not sure what you mean.

user posted image

All of your layers are 100ms. You'll have to use that dialog, and change each frame individually the way I said in my last post, then save. It works for me when I try it.

ok. I thought it worked when you saved it as a .gif and you chose the animation settings, but I'll use that way from now on, works better... Thanks. smile.gif

Sweets
  • Sweets

    Pяopagaиda Iиc.

  • Feroci Racing
  • Joined: 18 Dec 2004
  • Unknown

#8

Posted 04 May 2005 - 07:42 PM

No problem.

I'm not sure about in this version, but in the last version of gimp that I had, you could use that animation settings box when you're saving it as a gif, to change all of the frames at once, but only the first time.

For some reason, after the first time you saved it, it no longer worked. Then you had to do each one individually.

PCJ.
  • PCJ.

    Shaggy

  • Members
  • Joined: 14 Aug 2004

#9

Posted 04 May 2005 - 08:56 PM

See, you're doing better already, admittedly you would doeven better with Photoshop, but for GIMP, that is not half bad.

I remember when I first started, I used lense flares alot. Try not to do it.

It also looks slightly pixelated.

If it was Photoshoped, I'd have to say its not too good, but considering you're using a new program that limits most people's ability, its pretty good, keep practicing.

Luke2004
  • Luke2004

    You wanna leave? k. gtfo.

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 10 Nov 2004

#10

Posted 04 May 2005 - 09:01 PM

biggrin.gif Thanks, people are starting to like what I'm doing...


@pcj.. I can't afford photoshop at this moment in time, but I don't know what the future holds. smile.gif

PSXtreme
  • PSXtreme

  • Members
  • Joined: 15 Jan 2002

#11

Posted 05 May 2005 - 12:49 AM

That second sig is f*cking huge and not that great, its way to boring, and lens flares are evil like jallar said.

Toro.
  • Toro.

    Traded for dollar bills.

  • Members
  • Joined: 18 Sep 2004

#12

Posted 05 May 2005 - 07:43 AM

the second sig is lame. The first sig is lame too. The reason why has been stated before.

Why do so many people call themselves graphic designers? It doesnt bother me if they actually have some talent but people who have been doing gfx for 2 weeks start giving me titles such as head gfx0r of luke enterprises etc.

I dont know, it just gets on my tits.

Luke2004
  • Luke2004

    You wanna leave? k. gtfo.

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 10 Nov 2004

#13

Posted 05 May 2005 - 04:08 PM

QUOTE (Toro. @ May 5 2005, 08:43)
the second sig is lame. The first sig is lame too. The reason why has been stated before.

Why do so many people call themselves graphic designers? It doesnt bother me if they actually have some talent but people who have been doing gfx for 2 weeks start giving me titles such as head gfx0r of luke enterprises etc.

I dont know, it just gets on my tits.

I never said I was a graphics designer. sarcasm.gif I just try and help people out.

4ourteen
  • 4ourteen

    n00b

  • Members
  • Joined: 21 Mar 2004

#14

Posted 05 May 2005 - 07:01 PM

QUOTE (Luke2004 @ May 5 2005, 11:08)
QUOTE (Toro. @ May 5 2005, 08:43)
the second sig is lame. The first sig is lame too. The reason why has been stated before.

Why do so many people call themselves graphic designers? It doesnt bother me if they actually have some talent but people who have been doing gfx for 2 weeks start giving me titles such as head gfx0r of luke enterprises etc.

I dont know, it just gets on my tits.

I never said I was a graphics designer. sarcasm.gif I just try and help people out.

QUOTE (Luke)
the graphics design part is for me - something I do besides GTAForums, so ignore that

Shut the f*ck up.

Anyways, I'm going to take a guess and say that the first one is nothing but filters. I could be wrong seeing as I don't know what filters gimp has, but that's what it looks like. A 8 year old can apply a filter. That doesn't make him a "Graphic Designer." The animation wouldn't be that bad if it was slower and more smooth.

The second one is way too plain and boring. The only thing I like about it is the colors. Brown/tan is awesome.

Luke2004
  • Luke2004

    You wanna leave? k. gtfo.

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 10 Nov 2004

#15

Posted 05 May 2005 - 07:17 PM

The only thing I couldn't design are the lense flares.
Another thing I made:
user posted image
I know it's pretty plain, I can never thing of what to put on the images.

# ###########
  • # ###########

    ~*~*~QT PIE~*~*~

  • Members
  • Joined: 21 Dec 2004

#16

Posted 05 May 2005 - 09:04 PM

Luke, you seem to get better everyday. However, your images lack something. I can't place my finger on it.

{Matty}{Vice}
  • {Matty}{Vice}

    Z...at heart.

  • Members
  • Joined: 22 Sep 2003

#17

Posted 05 May 2005 - 09:06 PM

That most recent dosen't look like the text is in the centre even thought it is...wierd.

Luke2004
  • Luke2004

    You wanna leave? k. gtfo.

  • BUSTED!
  • Joined: 10 Nov 2004

#18

Posted 05 May 2005 - 09:28 PM

QUOTE ({Matty}{Vice} @ May 5 2005, 22:06)
That most recent dosen't look like the text is in the centre even thought it is...wierd.

Is that good?

Moto
  • Moto

    Frat.

  • Members
  • Joined: 21 Apr 2004

#19

Posted 05 May 2005 - 10:48 PM

QUOTE (# ########### @ May 5 2005, 16:04)
Luke, you seem to get better everyday. However, your images lack something. I can't place my finger on it.

Any aesthetic quality whatsoever?

You're welcome for the help, by the way.















Seriously, though. The whole thing looks like filter after filter after filter. I don't know what filters gimp has (or if it calls them filters), but you need to set them down and walk away slowly. Pick yourself up a trial version of Photoshop and a student version if you like it (they're much cheaper than retail and are the same program, if you want a link to a student reseller or two PM me).











0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users