Simply, if you don't think it's worth it posting one single evidence supporting your claims, then why post pages of rubbish which only contradicts my evidence
on no grounds, and proves nothing?
How can you laugh at me for taking this debate seriously, when claming in the very next sentence that religion is an important topic? Then claiming I am the one who is insulting, saying it is not worth it proving the "3,626,486,000" people who believe in God right, because I am the one insulting in your signature. Just look at your last post. You are contradicting yourself.
I also am not sure what time this is you state you will not reply to my post (third?), when you do the next time you come on the board. Not a very trustworthy religious man, are you Ibro? Don't answer that, even though something is telling me you will.
How do you know I would not have turned Christian if you gave me a good reason? You are free to quote one time you think I was lying about something to cause you to have such an opinion. Stating my facts
are crap, when you yourself don't give anything to confirm your beliefs, is equally blunt.
Quoting something I said in a completely enhanced way to make me look ridiculous because you don't know of a more appropriate way to prove me wrong, is beyond debate the most unsound way to discriminate against me, because I do not share common beliefs with you. At least when I do it I state facts and provide accurate quotes.
I am an atheist and one of priests who has done nothing wrong apart from lying to you about the truth I know of os for instance reverend Jesse Jackson, who even though I disagree with in moral and political views, has done nothing wrong in severity of abusing his powers to inflict harm upon people, i. e. molesting children as is what you mostly hear about such people on news lately, thus proving another one of your assumptions wrong again.
And the reason I prefer giving the whole world my opinion on internet (not just you), apart from talking to a priest behind closed doors is that such an act would not change anything in his opinion as that is what he gets paid for to do, is that I at least have a chance of showing many open minded people with common sense light providing pages of solid evidence proving religion wrong and endorsing science, of which you obviously you are not one.
About your signature, oh yes, and what majority thinks is always better isn't it? That is the kind of narrow mindness that started this religious craze in the first place thousands of years ago, and I am deeply saddened that such opinion still runs within some people. You call me insulting, then why did you choose to flame me in your signature claiming how you hate people like me, when I didn't mention anything that would insult you? Getting a little edgy, aren't we?
Just because you claim
you will not check this, does not give you the right to order me not to write anything contradicting your doltish claims, when you made fun of and insulted me a number of times in the same post.
| I hate people who are sickened with politicians who praise God and they think that they suck up and are religion endorsing, and these people think they're "smart", when about 3,626,486,000 people believe in God and only about 10,000 people don't. |
Well I am. And I am also appalled by religion endorsing media, which made such a circus of the popeís death, covering it like death of the emperor of the world. It has been five days now of consecutive mainstream coverage of his death and practically nothing else. All the suicide bombings in Iraq put to silence by this one unchanging fact, that one of the most rich, powerful and biased men in the world died. Did you know the late pope considered resigning from the throne in 2000? Do men sent from God to spread his word and glory resign?